***OFFICIAL CYDY/Leronlimab Thread***

[This_Guy 102]

  We were really gumming up the Stock thread so..........

On 10/17/2019 at 10:20 AM, chet said:

Boom or bust with this one:  CYDY.  Biotech drug maker awaiting FDA approval for new HIV drug among other things.  Here's an article from Seeking Alpha that came out last month.

FYI:  Stocks that trade @ ~$0.34 are more likely to go to $0 than $1.  I think this will be an exception.

 

 

  

On 7/21/2020 at 3:21 PM, chet said:

I am trying to understand today's PR and calculate some p-values based on the numbers.  Placebo had 28 participants and 11 SAEs for a success rate of 17/28.  Drug had 56 participants and 8 SAEs for a success rate of 48/56.

Here are the inputs and result from a two proportion hypothesis test.  It returns a p-value of ~0.0078 which is very significant.  However, this doesn't tell the entire tale because some patients had more than one SAE so the total number of placebo patients who had an SAE was 6/28 and total drug patients with an SAE was 5/56.  

I don't know how to adjust for the above--anyone have a suggestion.  Anyone have a suggestion?

 

[Jayrok 3,669]

Is there any traction to this ticker?  Does the company have a strong CEO and good fundamentals?  Will need to look a bit more into this, sounds promising.  Thanks for the tip. 

[This_Guy 102]

1 minute ago, Jayrok said:

Is there any traction to this ticker?  Does the company have a strong CEO and good fundamentals?  Will need to look a bit more into this, sounds promising.  Thanks for the tip. 

Opinions on the CEO are........mixed.

[JerseyToughGuys 3,149]

-

[drunken slob 596]

 

[Capella 30,561]

💰 

[Bob Sacamano 9,786]

Pump

[adonis 9,879]

Ironically, soon we may be able to buy it at the October 2019 price first mentioned by Chet.

[JerseyToughGuys 3,149]

just doubled the number of threads I follow here nowadays.

[BassNBrew 11,189]

1 minute ago, Bob Sacamano said:

Pump

Dump

[Chaz McNulty 1,036]

Where would the stock be right now if Nadar had said last week:

" we will have the safety data out next week, and hope to have the efficacy data out the following week".

[arrow1 937]

:boatloads:

[Aaron Rudnicki 9,025]

black dot

[unckeyherb 1,509]

gulp

[Jayrok 3,669]

1 minute ago, Chaz McNulty said:

Where would the stock be right now if Nadar had said last week:

" we will have the safety data out next week, and hope to have the efficacy data out the following week".

Probably 6.70 to 7.  

[matuski 4,968]

3 minutes ago, Chaz McNulty said:

Where would the stock be right now if Nadar had said last week:

" we will have the safety data out next week, and hope to have the efficacy data out the following week".

Seriously.

 

[adonis 9,879]

Are we poor yet?

[Al Czervik 331]

Maybe we get some help from Dr Yo being on Dr Drew at 6pm? 

[Capella 30,561]

So say all the results are promising and all with the efficacy and the serious trials but they still move to stage 3 and continue the serious. What are the predictions for the stock price? A stage 3 for M/M means another 3-4 months and a chance to be passed up by some other drug - I might want to cash in at that point. Thoughts?

[Capella 30,561]

1 minute ago, Al Czervik said:

Maybe we get some help from Dr Yo being on Dr Drew at 6pm? 

Is this the rantes not panties guy? Gonna guess no. 

[FreeBaGeL 9,210]

I told the wife we were going to be lambo shopping tonight and she is not disappointed.  Just put in an order.

Edited July 21, 2020 by FreeBaGeL

[Nick Vermeil 3,408]

 

[adonis 9,879]

1 minute ago, Capella said:

2 minutes ago, Al Czervik said:

Maybe we get some help from Dr Yo being on Dr Drew at 6pm? 

Is this the rantes not panties guy? Gonna guess no.

He uses that hashtag on twitter, so maybe.  He's also a BP follower.

Has no other news he can present, just a remix of what BP's said, what the data shows, and what he hopes to see.

[fantasycurse42 8,316]

So everyone is scared again

You guys talk mad ####.

[eaganwildcats 906]

[Capella 30,561]

1 minute ago, fantasycurse42 said:

So everyone is scared again

You guys talk mad ####.

Nobody is scared, just baffled at the incompetence 

Edited July 21, 2020 by Capella
Edit: well you’re scared

[matuski 4,968]

Did they mention uplisting recently?

[Bluto Blutarsky 894]

                                          .

[fantasycurse42 8,316]

2 minutes ago, Capella said:

Nobody is scared, just baffled at the incompetence 

To understand this right; my constant frustration with NP is fear, but everyone else is just confusion? Understood. 

ETA: He does really suck

Edited July 21, 2020 by fantasycurse42

[Don't Noonan 5,722]

Did we do it?

[matuski 4,968]

Also, please dont kill the stock thread.

CYDY wasn't the only winner there.   

[⚡DEADHEAD⚡ 766]

$5k on some budgeto fake-### BS video instead of $5k on a technical proofreader. Boggles the mind.

[ChiefD 19,276]

sigh

[Random 383]

Are we rich yet?

[fantasycurse42 8,316]

Just now, ⚡DEADHEAD⚡ said:

$5k on some budgeto fake-### BS video instead of $5k on a technical proofreader. Boggles the mind.

What really frustrates me is he could just create a video and post it on Twitter... 

Like we're all sitting around and watching SuperStonk Proactive NY Investor in the background. 

[fantasycurse42 8,316]

Is there going to be Q & A at this stockholder meeting tomorrow?

[Golf Guy 69 498]

11 minutes ago, Al Czervik said:

Maybe we get some help from Dr Yo being on Dr Drew at 6pm? 

Only if the "cool beens" rally.

[⚡DEADHEAD⚡ 766]

Scott Kelly is the Chairman of the Board. Does he not see what we see?

[adonis 9,879]

Stepping back, not much has changed.  They've done a poor job managing expectations, but I've been in this due to the science from the beginning.  I'm sticking around until the science has a chance to shine.

Today's data, while not done as well as it should have been done, still showed good scientific merit.  The results are there.  Results from previous studies are there.  There's nothing different really between today and yesterday's BP talk that affects the potential for the drug.

Perhaps we have a case of hyper-focus on the missed expectations, and we're allowing that to overshadow the drug itself, which time and time again when it speaks, it's powerful.  The other folks doing the speaking on behalf of leronlimab either do it many favors (like BP) or can cause some short term stock harm like NP.

But the science is unchanged, the trials are ongoing, and results are coming.  None of that is any different today than it was weeks ago.  Just our expectations weren't met, and like kids at christmas who didn't get what they wanted, we have all of the feels.

[Caesar 1,372]

4 minutes ago, adonis said:

Stepping back, not much has changed.  They've done a poor job managing expectations, but I've been in this due to the science from the beginning.  I'm sticking around until the science has a chance to shine.

Today's data, while not done as well as it should have been done, still showed good scientific merit.  The results are there.  Results from previous studies are there.  There's nothing different really between today and yesterday's BP talk that affects the potential for the drug.

Perhaps we have a case of hyper-focus on the missed expectations, and we're allowing that to overshadow the drug itself, which time and time again when it speaks, it's powerful.  The other folks doing the speaking on behalf of leronlimab either do it many favors (like BP) or can cause some short term stock harm like NP.

But the science is unchanged, the trials are ongoing, and results are coming.  None of that is any different today than it was weeks ago.  Just our expectations weren't met, and like kids at christmas who didn't get what they wanted, we have all of the feels.

I still believe that Red Rider BB gun is hiding behind the leg lamp.

[jamny 6,503]

🚤

[Polish Hammer 619]

:reluctant sehorn:

[SFBayDuck 7,243]

19 minutes ago, Al Czervik said:

Maybe we get some help from Dr Yo being on Dr Drew at 6pm? 

I think we're going to need Dr. Bunsen Honeydew and Dr. Teeth to chime in to really push us over the top.

[Guinis72 138]

[chet 4,627]

Quote

 

I am trying to understand today's PR and calculate some p-values based on the numbers.  Placebo had 28 participants and 11 SAEs for a success rate of 17/28.  Drug had 56 participants and 8 SAEs for a success rate of 48/56.

Here are the inputs and result from a two proportion hypothesis test.  It returns a p-value of ~0.0078 which is very significant.  However, this doesn't tell the entire tale because some patients had more than one SAE so the total number of placebo patients who had an SAE was 6/28 and total drug patients with an SAE was 5/56.  

I don't know how to adjust for the above--anyone have a suggestion.  Anyone have a suggestion?

 

Come on--there are some bright people here.  Let's figure this out.  

In the placebo group, you have 28 patients who produced a total of 11 SAEs.

In the drug arm, you have 56 patients who produced a total of 8 SAEs.

To be clear, you DON'T want SAEs.  So what is the probability that the drug influenced a better outcome?

Edited July 21, 2020 by chet
corrected a mistake

[fantasycurse42 8,316]

4 minutes ago, chet said:

Come on--there are some bright people here.  Let's figure this out.  

In the placebo group, you have 28 patients who produced a total of 11 SAEs.

In the drug arm, you have 56 patients who produced a total of 6 SAEs.

To be clear, you DON'T want SAEs.  So what is the probability that the drug influenced a better outcome?

Aren’t there 8 total SAEs in 5 patients in the control?

ETA: I agree with you, there has to be some statistical significance here. 

Edited July 21, 2020 by fantasycurse42

[Bluto Blutarsky 894]

17 minutes ago, chet said:

Come on--there are some bright people here.  Let's figure this out.  

In the placebo group, you have 28 patients who produced a total of 11 SAEs.

In the drug arm, you have 56 patients who produced a total of 8 SAEs.

To be clear, you DON'T want SAEs.  So what is the probability that the drug influenced a better outcome?

@caustic is the math guru iirc 

Edited July 21, 2020 by Bluto Blutarsky

[chet 4,627]

4 minutes ago, fantasycurse42 said:

Aren’t there 8 total SAEs in 5 patients in the control?

ETA: I agree with you, there has to be some statistical significance here. 

Yes.  Error fixed.  Thx

[[icon] 9,835]

In for all the dollars

[BassNBrew 11,189]

@This_Guy Could we please get a cytodyn  reference in the title and maybe a description about it curing Covid?