Fo the life of me, I can't figure out why Graham is locked into a tight race.CBS/YouGov (B): Trump +10 in South Carolina
Obviously Trump should be able to drag Graham across the finish line here - but weird that he doesn't mirror Trump's lead.
Fo the life of me, I can't figure out why Graham is locked into a tight race.CBS/YouGov (B): Trump +10 in South Carolina
I think he suffers some from the hard core Trumpers not believing in himFo the life of me, I can't figure out why Graham is locked into a tight race.
Obviously Trump should be able to drag Graham across the finish line here - but weird that he doesn't mirror Trump's lead.
Quick note from Wasserman:Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn · 23m
Biden leads Trump in Nebraska's Second District, 48 to 41, according to new NYT/Siena poll
I think this could lead to troubling consequences.It would be pretty damning of the EC system if Trump lost the popular vote by 10+ points, but won the EC.
I don't know how one could talk about "the will of the people" or any sort of mandate stemming from such a discrepancy between the two.
Furthermore, if this referendum is partially about filling SCOTUS seats, then a 10+ point popular vote loss likely means that the majority of the population doesn't want Trump selecting SCOTUS nominees.
Not to mention the Senate.I think this could lead to troubling consequences.
You would move very quickly from rural states being concerned about not getting a voice in national politics, to very populous states/cities who will feel their concerns are being ignored.
Normally It is a minority group that feels disenfranchised, but if that happens to a majority of Americans - on top of the minority views winning the SC - I am not sure how that plays out.
Medium Buying @MediumBuyingNot polling specific, but:
Medium Buying @MediumBuying
The Trump campaign is again canceling TV ad schedules that had been booked in Iowa (9/29-10/5 flight)
I don't know if this is simply a cash crunch that has been reported on, or a re-direction of funds to bigger states. Either way, it feels a little like the Clinton campaign ignoring states they thought they were going to win comfortably.
And with Ernst in a tight Senate battle also - this is an odd move.
I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised. If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues. Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway.Yeah, this is a campaign that looks to be floundering at the moment.
Right - but as I mentioned before - if you go hard after rural north-east Ohio - it bleeds into Western Pennsylvania - that's an area Trump has to win, and win big.I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised. If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues. Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway.
Whether you look at consensus forecasts or individual states polling, it’s hard to see a path to 270 for Trump unless he sweeps these 6:I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised. If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues. Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway.
That's why Tim was pretty spot on when it said it would come down to PA. I think all of us could easily see Trump winning any or all of those other 5.Whether you look at consensus forecasts or individual states polling, it’s hard to see a path to 270 for Trump unless he sweeps these 6:
FL GA NC OH PA TX
If he loses any of those six, it’s likely he’s not getting to 270.
Put another way, there are currently 10 different combinations of swing states that get Biden to 270. Trump has no more than 4 paths and almost all of them involve a clean sweep or close to it in most of the “in play“ states.
I think the fact that Texas is even on this list is a strong indication of the state of the race.Whether you look at consensus forecasts or individual states polling, it’s hard to see a path to 270 for Trump unless he sweeps these 6:
FL GA NC OH PA TX
Trump is closer to losing Texas than he is to winning Pennsylvania right now.That's why Tim was pretty spot on when it said it would come down to PA. I think all of us could easily see Trump winning any or all of those other 5.
IDK manTrump is closer to losing Texas than he is to winning Pennsylvania right now.
He needs to pull something out of his back pocket to get back in that race. If Biden stands tall tomorrow night it could be lights out.
Thanks. Fwiw I was thinking of counties/parishes that might have substantial populations of persuadable voters who might be choosing between Trump and Biden in states which could go either way themselves.IDK man
Hillary was a 7:1 mortal lock - everyone was wrong
Less Third Party votes will help but turnout (& by extension, counting mail in ballots) will be everything
upthread (or maybe it was a different thread) @SaintsInDome2006 was saying it’s coming down to these states (listing 8 or so), so 500 countries. well, no...because 450 of those counties are rural or small towns who historically always vote R. The race will come down to 12-15 urban counties in a half dozen states, and how big they go for Biden. Historically, that is always always always a function of turnout.
Clinton was +1.7 in the final RCP average for Pennsylvania. Trump won by +0.7 - a swing of 2.4 in the polling.
ExactlyI agree about your point overall - Milwaukee, Detroit, Charlotte, Atlanta, and Philly could save the country IMO.
Wow. That’s the best PA poll for Biden in some time, and from an A+ pollster no less. ABC/WaPo (another A+ firm) is releasing its own PA poll tonight — will be interesting to see how that one compares.Nate Cohn@Nate_Cohn
Biden leads Trump in Pennsylvania, 49 to 40 percent among likely voters, in a new Times/Siena poll
Thats a big number.
So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg. I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work.The race will come down to 12-15 urban counties in a half dozen states, and how big they go for Biden. Historically, that is always always always a function of turnout.
Not sure to be honest. I tried to Google “give rides to polling sites” and “volunteer to shuttle voters”, a half dozen local results showed up for me. But there’s zero chance NYS won’t go blue.So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg. I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work.
They're back now but they pulled ads for at least one week here earlier this month.I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised. If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues. Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway.
Here's my PA polling data not based in science. I drove around my Main Line township (wealthy suburbs of Philadelphia) today for a while. I counted yard signs about 7 to 1 for Biden. (22 to 3). There were another dozen or so houses with signs supporting BLM and there have been dozens of signs up on lawns since the initial Muslim ban years ago saying "Hate has no home here." I live in a very Jewish area and I had presumed that these signs were coming from the Jewish community or temples in the area.Nate Cohn@Nate_Cohn
Biden leads Trump in Pennsylvania, 49 to 40 percent among likely voters, in a new Times/Siena poll
Thats a big number.
I don't know man and I live here. My original plan in the beforetimes was to volunteer on all the college campuses in my area to register voters, but given the circumstances (global pandemic) I don't know if that is an option.So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg. I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work.
My brother lives in Merion Station. I know he's interested in helping out too.I don't know man and I live here. My original plan in the beforetimes was to volunteer on all the college campuses in my area to register voters, but given the circumstances (global pandemic) I don't know if that is an option.
I am starting to do some research on volunteering and I can PM you on what I find.
Also if Philly pulls this off for the sake of the nation, will everyone stop giving our city crap?
Phone bank or text bank. If there’s a Congressional candidate that can use help. Even state-level. Or go straight to the Biden camp. You can do it all virtually.So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg. I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work.
I think around here it is more about getting out the vote than changing minds. If people get to the polls in record numbers in Philly and the surrounding areas, I think Biden wins PA handily. In these crazy times, I'm just not sure how to do that. I also think it needs to be decisive and getting low risk people to vote in person is going to be key so the vote is decisive and there are not shenanigans with calling the election illegitimate (vote by mail fraud garbage). I am certain it will be safe given I haven't seen a single person around here without a mask on and taking the pandemic seriously in 6 months and I'm sure the poling places will have all necessary safety precautions in play.Phone bank or text bank. If there’s a Congressional candidate that can use help. Even state-level. Or go straight to the Biden camp. You can do it all virtually.
If you want to go there, lit drops are easy. Just going to targeted houses and dropping off candidate literature, or voting information.
Or go here and adopt Pennsylvania.
Ballot chasing is done by phone/text, too. You tell them their closest voting location, etc.I think around here it is more about getting out the vote than changing minds. If people get to the polls in record numbers in Philly and the surrounding areas, I think Biden wins PA handily. In these crazy times, I'm just not sure how to do that. I also think it needs to be decisive and getting low risk people to vote in person is going to be key so the vote is decisive and there are not shenanigans with calling the election illegitimate (vote by mail fraud garbage). I am certain it will be safe given I haven't seen a single person around here without a mask on and taking the pandemic seriously in 6 months and I'm sure the poling places will have all necessary safety precautions in play.
I really wanted to volunteer on college campuses in a get out the vote effort, but I'm pretty sure Villanova and others aren't allowing that, understandably.
I am nervous about Minnesota despite this poll. Trump campaign signs are everywhere in rural Mn and enthusiasm is at a fever r pitch with Trump boat parades on lakes all over the state. This is encouraging thoughRCP Averages Battleground states:
Minnesota - Biden + 9.4
Wisconsin - Biden +6.3
Pennsylvania - Biden +5.3
Michigan - Biden +5.2
Arizona - Biden +3.4
Ohio - Biden +3.3
Florida - Biden +1.3
North Carolina - Biden +0.8
Georgia - Trump +1.3
Texas - Trump +3.6
WI, PA, MI -> Biden = 269
Trump has to sweep the rest (including Minnesota) to be re-elected in the House, and probably serve with Kamala Harris as VP.
ABC/WaPo: Biden 54, Trump 45. Huge.Wow. That’s the best PA poll for Biden in some time, and from an A+ pollster no less. ABC/WaPo (another A+ firm) is releasing its own PA poll tonight — will be interesting to see how that one compares.
So with the recent Fox poll included, we have two +9s and a +7 in PA. All rated A- or better by FiveThirtyEight. Things are looking good for Biden without a doubt. Maybe I don’t need to worry about Florida as much.ABC/WaPo: Biden 54, Trump 45. Huge.
Dude, Florida gonna Florida. Don't count on that state.Juxtatarot said:Maybe I don’t need to worry about Florida as much.
For the first time since we started our poll tracker several weeks ago, Joe Biden leads by enough to withstand a repeat of the polling error in 2016.
If the polls were exactly as wrong as they were four years ago, Mr. Biden would hold the Clinton states and flip Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Nebraska’s Second District, giving him more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win.
The big shift: Pennsylvania. An ABC/Post poll overnight and a Times/Siena poll Monday showed Mr. Biden up by nine points in the state, giving him a far more comfortable lead there than Hillary Clinton held over the final stretch four years ago. It’s worth waiting on a few more high-quality polls to confirm that Mr. Biden has a big edge here (it’s hard to overstate the electoral consequences if he does).
Of course, the polls won’t be exactly as wrong as they were in 2016. They could understate support for Donald Trump by an even greater degree. But there are good reasons to believe that many causes of 2016’s poll misfire are less likely this time around:
-More pollsters now weight by education, which ensures that voters without a college degree make up an appropriate share of the sample. Many state polls had far too many college graduates four years ago, leading them to underestimate Mr. Trump.
-There are far fewer undecided voters, who ultimately broke toward Mr. Trump across the Upper Midwest. A similar late break among undecided voters this time would be less consequential.
-A more stable race. Our estimate of the polling error in 2016 is a little unfair to pollsters: We’re looking at the average error over the final three weeks of the race. That includes polls taken after the “Access Hollywood” tape and before the Comey letter. Those polls showed Mrs. Clinton with a commanding lead. The final polls were more accurate, if still biased toward Mrs. Clinton.
This time it’s probably less likely that the polls will swing greatly over the last few weeks of the race. After all, they’ve been far more stable over the last few months than they were at any point in 2016.
That doesn’t mean that we’re immune to another misfire. Indeed, most polling misses happen precisely because the causes can’t be anticipated. That’s why our tables on this page also include the polling miss from 2012, when surveys underestimated President Obama. But it also means there’s no reason the polls couldn’t be off by even more than they were four years ago.
This is VERY misleading. Pre-debate polls don't mean much. In 2016, Trump gained ground in several polls after the first debate.
But there are so few undecideds this year. And polarization is so high. Do you honestly think the debates are going to change many minds? I expect the Trump supporters to think Trump won and the Biden supporters to think Biden won.This is VERY misleading. Pre-debate polls don't mean much. In 2016, Trump gained ground in several polls after the first debate.
I hope it gets to this for Biden...Aaron Blake@AaronBlake
Democrats have carried the Philly suburbs by between 7 and 17 points in every race since 2004.
Trump's deficit there in two new polls:
NYT-Siena -- 24
WaPo-ABC -- 38
The polarization is NOT as high as people might think. Don't forget that some of Biden's support comes from former Trump voters. It won't take nearly as much to convince those people to switch back to Trump. If "Old Joe" makes a fool of himself tonight, Trump will EASILY close the gap.But there are so few undecideds this year. And polarization is so high. Do you honestly think the debates are going to change many minds? I expect the Trump supporters to think Trump won and the Biden supporters to think Biden won.This is VERY misleading. Pre-debate polls don't mean much. In 2016, Trump gained ground in several polls after the first debate.