What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

2020 Presidential Election Polling Thread (1 Viewer)

CBS/YouGov (B): Trump +10 in South Carolina
Fo the life of me, I can't figure out why Graham is locked into a tight race.

Obviously Trump should be able to drag Graham across the finish line here - but weird that he doesn't mirror Trump's lead.

 
Fo the life of me, I can't figure out why Graham is locked into a tight race.

Obviously Trump should be able to drag Graham across the finish line here - but weird that he doesn't mirror Trump's lead.
I think he suffers some from the hard core Trumpers not believing in him

 
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn · 23m

Biden leads Trump in Nebraska's Second District, 48 to 41, according to new NYT/Siena poll

Nebraska and Maine award Electoral College votes according to congressional district - this is one of those districts that comes into play in a 269-269 scenario.

 
Not polling specific, but:

Medium Buying @MediumBuying

The Trump campaign is again canceling TV ad schedules that had been booked in Iowa (9/29-10/5 flight)

I don't know if this is simply a cash crunch that has been reported on, or a re-direction of funds to bigger states.  Either way, it feels a little like the Clinton campaign ignoring states they thought they were going to win comfortably.

And with Ernst in a tight Senate battle also - this is an odd move.

 
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn · 23m

Biden leads Trump in Nebraska's Second District, 48 to 41, according to new NYT/Siena poll
Quick note from Wasserman:

Between this and private surveys, I don’t really view #NE02’s lone Electoral vote as competitive. It’s Biden’s.

ETA - this was a district Trump carried 47-45 in 2016.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It would be pretty damning of the EC system if Trump lost the popular vote by 10+ points, but won the EC.

I don't know how one could talk about "the will of the people" or any sort of mandate stemming from such a discrepancy between the two. 

Furthermore, if this referendum is partially about filling SCOTUS seats, then a 10+ point popular vote loss likely means that the majority of the population doesn't want Trump selecting SCOTUS nominees. 

 
It would be pretty damning of the EC system if Trump lost the popular vote by 10+ points, but won the EC.

I don't know how one could talk about "the will of the people" or any sort of mandate stemming from such a discrepancy between the two. 

Furthermore, if this referendum is partially about filling SCOTUS seats, then a 10+ point popular vote loss likely means that the majority of the population doesn't want Trump selecting SCOTUS nominees. 
I think this could lead to troubling consequences.

You would move very quickly from rural states being concerned about not getting a voice in national politics, to very populous states/cities who will feel their concerns are being ignored.

Normally It is a minority group that feels disenfranchised, but if that happens to a majority of Americans - on top of the minority views winning the SC - I am not sure how that plays out.

 
I think this could lead to troubling consequences.

You would move very quickly from rural states being concerned about not getting a voice in national politics, to very populous states/cities who will feel their concerns are being ignored.

Normally It is a minority group that feels disenfranchised, but if that happens to a majority of Americans - on top of the minority views winning the SC - I am not sure how that plays out.
Not to mention the Senate.

 
Not polling specific, but:

Medium Buying @MediumBuying

The Trump campaign is again canceling TV ad schedules that had been booked in Iowa (9/29-10/5 flight)

I don't know if this is simply a cash crunch that has been reported on, or a re-direction of funds to bigger states.  Either way, it feels a little like the Clinton campaign ignoring states they thought they were going to win comfortably.

And with Ernst in a tight Senate battle also - this is an odd move.
Medium Buying @MediumBuying

SOURCES: The Biden campaign is expected to move forward with huge TV ad outlay in OHIO Current start date for statewide TV ad spending in OH is 10/6; could start sooner

7:59 AM · Sep 28, 2020

Medium Buying @MediumBuying

The Trump campaign is also canceling TV ad schedules that had been booked in Ohio for 9/29-10/5

10:46 AM · Sep 28, 2020

 
Yeah, this is a campaign that looks to be floundering at the moment.
I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised.  If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues.  Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway. 

 
I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised.  If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues.  Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway. 
Right - but as I mentioned before - if you go hard after rural north-east Ohio - it bleeds into Western Pennsylvania - that's an area Trump has to win, and win big.

Maybe they are taking the reverse track - spending heavy in Western PA, and letting that bleed over into Ohio.

 
Biden +5 in the latest Monmouth national poll. We now have three recent A+ national polls, showing Biden +10, Biden +8, and Biden +5. Averages out to Biden +7.7, which is pretty much identical to the national lead he's held for months. 

 
If Biden flips Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania - Trump has to flip a Clinton state to win.

I don't see where that flip would come from.  Given the likelihood that Neb02 will also flip to Biden - Trump needs to hold Arizona, and flip Minnesota to force a 269-269 tie.

Right now Biden is +9.4 in Minnesota per RCP.

And, Trump can't lose Florida, North Carolina or Ohio - all states that are close enough that he has to defend very rigorously.

 
I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised.  If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues.  Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway. 
Whether you look at consensus forecasts or individual states polling, it’s hard to see a path to 270 for Trump unless he sweeps these 6:

FL GA NC OH PA TX

If he loses any of those six, it’s likely he’s not getting to 270.   

Put another way, there are currently 10 different combinations of swing states that get Biden to 270. Trump has no more than 4 paths and almost all of them involve a clean sweep or close to it in most of the “in play“ states.

 
Whether you look at consensus forecasts or individual states polling, it’s hard to see a path to 270 for Trump unless he sweeps these 6:

FL GA NC OH PA TX

If he loses any of those six, it’s likely he’s not getting to 270.   

Put another way, there are currently 10 different combinations of swing states that get Biden to 270. Trump has no more than 4 paths and almost all of them involve a clean sweep or close to it in most of the “in play“ states.
That's why Tim was pretty spot on when it said it would come down to PA.  I think all of us could easily see Trump winning any or all of those other 5. 

 
Whether you look at consensus forecasts or individual states polling, it’s hard to see a path to 270 for Trump unless he sweeps these 6:

FL GA NC OH PA TX
I think the fact that Texas is even on this list is a strong indication of the state of the race.

 
That's why Tim was pretty spot on when it said it would come down to PA.  I think all of us could easily see Trump winning any or all of those other 5. 
Trump is closer to losing Texas than he is to winning Pennsylvania right now.

He needs to pull something out of his back pocket to get back in that race.  If Biden stands tall tomorrow night it could be lights out.

 
RCP Averages Battleground states:

Minnesota - Biden + 9.4
Wisconsin - Biden +6.3
Pennsylvania - Biden +5.3
Michigan - Biden +5.2

Arizona - Biden +3.4
Ohio - Biden +3.3
Florida - Biden +1.3
North Carolina - Biden +0.8
Georgia - Trump +1.3
Texas - Trump +3.6

WI, PA, MI -> Biden = 269

Trump has to sweep the rest (including Minnesota) to be re-elected in the House, and probably serve with Kamala Harris as VP.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump is closer to losing Texas than he is to winning Pennsylvania right now.

He needs to pull something out of his back pocket to get back in that race.  If Biden stands tall tomorrow night it could be lights out.
IDK man

:shrug:

Hillary was a 7:1 mortal lock - everyone was wrong

Less Third Party votes will help but turnout (& by extension, counting mail in ballots) will be everything

upthread (or maybe it was a different thread) @SaintsInDome2006 was saying it’s coming down to these states (listing 8 or so), so 500 countries. well, no...because 450 of those counties are rural or small towns who historically always vote R. The race will come down to 12-15 urban counties in a half dozen states, and how big they go for Biden. Historically, that is always always always a function of turnout. 

 
IDK man

:shrug:

Hillary was a 7:1 mortal lock - everyone was wrong

Less Third Party votes will help but turnout (& by extension, counting mail in ballots) will be everything

upthread (or maybe it was a different thread) @SaintsInDome2006 was saying it’s coming down to these states (listing 8 or so), so 500 countries. well, no...because 450 of those counties are rural or small towns who historically always vote R. The race will come down to 12-15 urban counties in a half dozen states, and how big they go for Biden. Historically, that is always always always a function of turnout. 
Thanks. Fwiw I was thinking of counties/parishes that might have substantial populations of persuadable voters who might be choosing between Trump and Biden in states which could go either way themselves.

I agree about your point overall - Milwaukee, Detroit, Charlotte, Atlanta, and Philly could save the country IMO. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
IDK man

:shrug:

Hillary was a 7:1 mortal lock - everyone was wrong
Clinton was +1.7 in the final RCP average for Pennsylvania.  Trump won by +0.7 - a swing of 2.4 in the polling.

Final Ohio - Trump +3.5
 

Michigan was Clinton +3.4, Trump won with +0.3

Really the only big miss of 2016 - Wisconsin was Clinton +6.5, and Trump won by +0.7

Trump was not facing these deficits in 2016.  And, to be fair, he is not facing these deficits this year in the week before the election.  Except - we see a lot of people already voting.

 
Nate Cohn@Nate_Cohn

Biden leads Trump in Pennsylvania, 49 to 40 percent among likely voters, in a new Times/Siena poll

Thats a big number.
Wow. That’s the best PA poll for Biden in some time, and from an A+ pollster no less. ABC/WaPo (another A+ firm) is releasing its own PA poll tonight — will be interesting to see how that one compares. 

 
The race will come down to 12-15 urban counties in a half dozen states, and how big they go for Biden. Historically, that is always always always a function of turnout. 
So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg.  I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work. 

 
So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg.  I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work. 
Not sure to be honest. I tried to Google “give rides to polling sites” and “volunteer to shuttle voters”, a half dozen local results showed up for me. But there’s zero chance NYS won’t go blue.

I tried a few different searches specific to the City of Brotherly Love and came up empty.

 
I mean their only best realistic path involves Florida, PA, and AZ, so I'm not too surprised.  If they cancel ad buys in any of those states, then they have real issues.  Even IA and OH is understandable since if they can't get PA, OH and IA are meaningless wins anyway. 
They're back now but they pulled ads for at least one week here earlier this month. 

 
Nate Cohn@Nate_Cohn

Biden leads Trump in Pennsylvania, 49 to 40 percent among likely voters, in a new Times/Siena poll

Thats a big number.
Here's my PA polling data not based in science. I drove around my Main Line township (wealthy suburbs of Philadelphia) today for a while. I counted yard signs about 7 to 1 for Biden. (22 to 3).  There were another dozen or so houses with signs supporting BLM and there have been dozens of signs up on lawns since the initial Muslim ban years ago saying "Hate has no home here." I live in a very Jewish area and I had presumed that these signs were coming from the Jewish community or temples in the area.

While this is unscientific and yard signs were a big joke in 2016 which I probably piled on about, I can say this is very rare. I've lived in this area for a while and have never seen political signs before. This is telling me that people in the burbs, in at least my area of PA, are very motivated to the point they are putting cardboard signs on the lawns of their multi-million dollar homes. 

Also this isn't a humble brag. My house is one of the most modest in a quarter mile radius. I'm just surrounded by rich folk. 😀

ETA: I should clarify that the "Hate has no home here" signs are in support of diversity and the Muslim community. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg.  I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work. 
I don't know man and I live here. My original plan in the beforetimes was to volunteer on all the college campuses in my area to register voters, but given the circumstances (global pandemic) I don't know if that is an option. 

I am starting to do some research on volunteering and I can PM you on what I find.

Also if Philly pulls this off for the sake of the nation, will everyone stop giving our city crap?  :bag:

 
I don't know man and I live here. My original plan in the beforetimes was to volunteer on all the college campuses in my area to register voters, but given the circumstances (global pandemic) I don't know if that is an option. 

I am starting to do some research on volunteering and I can PM you on what I find.

Also if Philly pulls this off for the sake of the nation, will everyone stop giving our city crap?  :bag:
My brother lives in Merion Station.  I know he's interested in helping out too.

 
So, what can those of us that are out of state do to help this turnout? I'm 2 hours from Philly and 1.5 to Harrisburg.  I'm willing to take the day before and the day of election to put my labor to work. 
Phone bank or text bank. If there’s a Congressional candidate that can use help. Even state-level. Or go straight to the Biden camp. You can do it all virtually.

 If you want to go there, lit drops are easy. Just going to targeted houses and dropping off candidate literature, or voting information.

Or go here and adopt Pennsylvania.

 
Phone bank or text bank. If there’s a Congressional candidate that can use help. Even state-level. Or go straight to the Biden camp. You can do it all virtually.

 If you want to go there, lit drops are easy. Just going to targeted houses and dropping off candidate literature, or voting information.

Or go here and adopt Pennsylvania.
I think around here it is more about getting out the vote than changing minds. If people get to the polls in record numbers in Philly and the surrounding areas, I think Biden wins PA handily. In these crazy times, I'm just not sure how to do that. I also think it needs to be decisive and getting low risk people to vote in person is going to be key so the vote is decisive and there are not shenanigans with calling the election illegitimate (vote by mail fraud garbage). I am certain it will be safe given I haven't seen a single person around here without a mask on and taking the pandemic seriously in 6 months and I'm sure the poling places will have all necessary safety precautions in play. 

I really wanted to volunteer on college campuses in a get out the vote effort, but I'm pretty sure Villanova and others aren't allowing that, understandably.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think around here it is more about getting out the vote than changing minds. If people get to the polls in record numbers in Philly and the surrounding areas, I think Biden wins PA handily. In these crazy times, I'm just not sure how to do that. I also think it needs to be decisive and getting low risk people to vote in person is going to be key so the vote is decisive and there are not shenanigans with calling the election illegitimate (vote by mail fraud garbage). I am certain it will be safe given I haven't seen a single person around here without a mask on and taking the pandemic seriously in 6 months and I'm sure the poling places will have all necessary safety precautions in play. 

I really wanted to volunteer on college campuses in a get out the vote effort, but I'm pretty sure Villanova and others aren't allowing that, understandably.
Ballot chasing is done by phone/text, too. You tell them their closest voting location, etc.

 
RCP Averages Battleground states:

Minnesota - Biden + 9.4
Wisconsin - Biden +6.3
Pennsylvania - Biden +5.3
Michigan - Biden +5.2

Arizona - Biden +3.4
Ohio - Biden +3.3
Florida - Biden +1.3
North Carolina - Biden +0.8
Georgia - Trump +1.3
Texas - Trump +3.6

WI, PA, MI -> Biden = 269

Trump has to sweep the rest (including Minnesota) to be re-elected in the House, and probably serve with Kamala Harris as VP.
I am nervous about Minnesota despite this poll. Trump campaign signs are everywhere in rural Mn and enthusiasm is at a fever r pitch with Trump boat parades on lakes all over the state. This is encouraging though

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/minnesota-sees-absolute-shattering-record-absentee-ballot-requests/story?id=73101334

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ABC/WaPo: Biden 54, Trump 45. Huge.
So with the recent  Fox poll included, we have two +9s and a +7 in PA.  All rated A- or better by FiveThirtyEight. Things are looking good for Biden without a doubt.  Maybe I don’t need to worry about Florida as much.

 
Biden's lead is now robust to a 2016-level polling error

For the first time since we started our poll tracker several weeks ago, Joe Biden leads by enough to withstand a repeat of the polling error in 2016.

If the polls were exactly as wrong as they were four years ago, Mr. Biden would hold the Clinton states and flip Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona and Nebraska’s Second District, giving him more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win.

The big shift: Pennsylvania. An ABC/Post poll overnight and a Times/Siena poll Monday showed Mr. Biden up by nine points in the state, giving him a far more comfortable lead there than Hillary Clinton held over the final stretch four years ago. It’s worth waiting on a few more high-quality polls to confirm that Mr. Biden has a big edge here (it’s hard to overstate the electoral consequences if he does).

Of course, the polls won’t be exactly as wrong as they were in 2016. They could understate support for Donald Trump by an even greater degree. But there are good reasons to believe that many causes of 2016’s poll misfire are less likely this time around:

-More pollsters now weight by education, which ensures that voters without a college degree make up an appropriate share of the sample. Many state polls had far too many college graduates four years ago, leading them to underestimate Mr. Trump.

-There are far fewer undecided voters, who ultimately broke toward Mr. Trump across the Upper Midwest. A similar late break among undecided voters this time would be less consequential.

-A more stable race. Our estimate of the polling error in 2016 is a little unfair to pollsters: We’re looking at the average error over the final three weeks of the race. That includes polls taken after the “Access Hollywood” tape and before the Comey letter. Those polls showed Mrs. Clinton with a commanding lead. The final polls were more accurate, if still biased toward Mrs. Clinton.

This time it’s probably less likely that the polls will swing greatly over the last few weeks of the race. After all, they’ve been far more stable over the last few months than they were at any point in 2016.

That doesn’t mean that we’re immune to another misfire. Indeed, most polling misses happen precisely because the causes can’t be anticipated. That’s why our tables on this page also include the polling miss from 2012, when surveys underestimated President Obama. But it also means there’s no reason the polls couldn’t be off by even more than they were four years ago.

 
Center part of PA has been just about all Trump but the past two weeks I've been seeing quite a bit more Biden signs popping up.  Makes me feel better.  Philly is going to have to be what wins it and all signs so far show that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aaron Blake@AaronBlake

Democrats have carried the Philly suburbs by between 7 and 17 points in every race since 2004.

Trump's deficit there in two new polls:

NYT-Siena -- 24

WaPo-ABC -- 38

 
This is VERY misleading. Pre-debate polls don't mean much. In 2016, Trump gained ground in several polls after the first debate.
But there are so few undecideds this year.  And polarization is so high. Do you honestly think the debates are going to change many minds? I expect the Trump supporters to think Trump won and the Biden supporters to think Biden won.

 
This is VERY misleading. Pre-debate polls don't mean much. In 2016, Trump gained ground in several polls after the first debate.
But there are so few undecideds this year.  And polarization is so high. Do you honestly think the debates are going to change many minds? I expect the Trump supporters to think Trump won and the Biden supporters to think Biden won.
The polarization is NOT as high as people might think. Don't forget that some of Biden's support comes from former Trump voters. It won't take nearly as much to convince those people to switch back to Trump. If "Old Joe" makes a fool of himself tonight, Trump will EASILY close the gap.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top