Williamson is definitely still a pink county, but that is the TX-31st. The 31st has been trending toward the middle for a while. That's the one MJ Hegar only lost by 3 points in 2018 (it was 22 points in '16). Cruz won it by 2.Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
New: Fort Bend, Collin and Comal counties in TX just became the 4th, 5th and 6th counties in the U.S., to my knowledge, to surpass their 2016 *total* votes counted (as with Hays, Denton and Williamson, TX, population growth since '16 is a big factor here).
1:14 PM · Oct 27, 2020
Hays, Denton, Williamson, and Collin all swung hard towards Beto in '18. Some of the most educated counties in the state.
Texas seems like a weird state to be leading the way in early voting. The only thing that makes sense is that there’s a huge minority turnout which clearly benefits Biden. I still think Texas only goes blue in a total landslide but it’s certain an interesting development.Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
New: Fort Bend, Collin and Comal counties in TX just became the 4th, 5th and 6th counties in the U.S., to my knowledge, to surpass their 2016 *total* votes counted (as with Hays, Denton and Williamson, TX, population growth since '16 is a big factor here).
1:14 PM · Oct 27, 2020
Hays, Denton, Williamson, and Collin all swung hard towards Beto in '18. Some of the most educated counties in the state.
Reading the comments it seems to have something to do with someone named Mollie Hemingway and/or the notion that some of these latest Republican leaning polls are bs concocted to skew the 538 algorithms (and to skew narratives about the polls).Is Nate Silver getting a bit stressed out perhaps? I know it puts him on tilt when people still claim he was "wrong" in 2016, but I don't think I've ever seen him use profanity in a tweet before. He's usually got this "I'm above-it-all, just a numbers guy" attitude.
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1321148011179892744
Which was in response to this tweet by Silver:Of interest ... Nate Silver is telling Democrats to not accept election results if Trump wins.
If the polls aren't tightening since the debate—and with 62 million people having voted—we're sort of getting to the point where the only way Trump can win is with a major polling error, bigger than in 2016 (or if the election is stolen somehow).
They are going to surpass their total vote from 2016 before we get to day of voting. It is crazy and I am not sure if anyone knows what it means.Texas seems like a weird state to be leading the way in early voting. The only thing that makes sense is that there’s a huge minority turnout which clearly benefits Biden. I still think Texas only goes blue in a total landslide but it’s certain an interesting development.
I wonder if this is related.Reading the comments it seems to have something to do with someone named Mollie Hemingway and/or the notion that some of these latest Republican leaning polls are bs concocted to skew the 538 algorithms (and to skew narratives about the polls).
Wasn't Hillary's drop in October 2016 due, in large part, to polls sponsored by conservative groups?I wonder if this is related.
(((Harry Enten))) @ForecasterEnten
22h
Some polling sponsored by groups that are conservative (or are Rasmussen) have this race tightening... But I really don't see it in any other piece of data that's out there.
Wait....so PA had something on their site that stated something that wasn't actually law? That's kinda lame...Mystery Achiever said:Can't speak for Wisconsin, but PA changed advertising and web site info to November 6 when it was upheld.
No. IIRC, they used the 11/3 receipt deadline while the case was being litigated and changed to 11/6 when they prevailed on the extension.Wait....so PA had something on their site that stated something that wasn't actually law? That's kinda lame...
The PA change was upheld by the US Supreme Court on October 20th. At that point, the state began to advertise the change.Wait....so PA had something on their site that stated something that wasn't actually law? That's kinda lame...
Really? I thought she was toast.Gr00vus said:Checking the AZ senate race polls, several current ones have McSally ahead of Kelly now, other more recent ones show a much slimmer margin for Kelly compared to polls from a couple of weeks ago. I mention this here because it may indicate movement in the state in the Presidential race as well. AZ may be staying Republican this year.
538 still has it 78% Kelly. Of the two recent polls with McSally in the lead, one is marked as partisan, the other is Susquehanna, which seems to be coming under fire a bit with suspicions of cooking the books. Maybe that's all there is to it and there isn't actually a move towards McSally.Really? I thought she was toast.
Also, she's a known loser, and Kelly is a freakin astronaut married to a Congresswoman who was shot in the head while in office.538 still has it 78% Kelly. Of the two recent polls with McSally in the lead, one is marked as partisan, the other is Susquehanna, which seems to be coming under fire a bit with suspicions of cooking the books. Maybe that's all there is to it and there isn't actually a move towards McSally.
This sort of threat by the President - ultimately against the needs of the people of Pennsylvania - won't help. (Taken from CNN):Suburban Philly women went for Trump in 2016. They will be his undoing in 2020.
I appreciate how you've gone from "Total landslide!" to (paraphrasing) "Trump will lose the vote but he'll be bailed out by the Supreme Court", all in the span of just 16 days.Don’t matter. Trump will be appointed after the SCOTUS throws out main in voting. Lol.
No. IIRC, they used the 11/3 receipt deadline while the case was being litigated and changed to 11/6 when they prevailed on the extension.
But neither of these were a change of the law, right? Just that the SC agreed?The PA change was upheld by the US Supreme Court on October 20th. At that point, the state began to advertise the change.
The WI change was never advertised by the state as far as I know, because the original judge delayed the effective date to allow for SCOTUS to review it.
Fort Bend (southwest Houston suburbs) also went Hillary in 2016.Dave Wasserman @Redistrict
New: Fort Bend, Collin and Comal counties in TX just became the 4th, 5th and 6th counties in the U.S., to my knowledge, to surpass their 2016 *total* votes counted (as with Hays, Denton and Williamson, TX, population growth since '16 is a big factor here).
1:14 PM · Oct 27, 2020
Hays, Denton, Williamson, and Collin all swung hard towards Beto in '18. Some of the most educated counties in the state.
Susquehanna also had a poll from the end of August that had the race even. Every other poll at that time had Kelly up 10-15 points. To say it was outlier is an understatement.538 still has it 78% Kelly. Of the two recent polls with McSally in the lead, one is marked as partisan, the other is Susquehanna, which seems to be coming under fire a bit with suspicions of cooking the books. Maybe that's all there is to it and there isn't actually a move towards McSally.
C Rated polls.. LOLRABA Research (B/C)
IOWA
Biden 50%
Trump 46%
Glengariff Group (B/C):
MICHIGAN
Biden 49%
Trump 42%
Which is good for Trump cause anything after the 3rd is going to be eliminated..ABC's decision desk won't call any states until they have 99.5% certainty.
It's going to be a long night, and probably a few days thereafter.
This is so wrong that it has to be a willful misunderstanding of the law.Which is good for Trump cause anything after the 3rd is going to be eliminated..
Not according to the SCOTUSThis is so wrong that it has to be a willful misunderstanding of the law.
SCOTUS did not claim that anything not counted by the 3rd doesn’t count...thats the point being made.Not according to the SCOTUS
Patients.. ACB just got sworn in, they will..SCOTUS did not claim that anything not counted by the 3rd doesn’t count...thats the point being made.
You're misunderstanding what SCOTUS said.Not according to the SCOTUSThis is so wrong that it has to be a willful misunderstanding of the law.
Patients? Yes, there are many COVID patients in hospitals.Patients.. ACB just got sworn in, they will..
That would be bad for Trump, then. Biden will have a huge lead from all the early voting. If SCOTUS tells states to stop counting on 11/4, then Trump is toast.Patients.. ACB just got sworn in, they will..SCOTUS did not claim that anything not counted by the 3rd doesn’t count...thats the point being made.
Sorry I meant the 4th, but anyways, mail in voting ballots are going to be deemed unconstitutional due to all the errors by the SCOTUS. 4 More YearsThat would be bad for Trump, then. Biden will have a huge lead from all the early voting. If SCOTUS tells states to stop counting on 11/4, then Trump is toast.
What are you basing this claim on?Sorry I meant the 4th, but anyways, mail in voting ballots are going to be deemed unconstitutional due to all the errors by the SCOTUS. 4 More Years
Nothing - just ignore and move on lolWhat are you basing this claim on?
I leave early Wednesday morning for a 5 day trek on the AT. I’m counting on you people to have this all sorted out by the time I get back.ABC's decision desk won't call any states until they have 99.5% certainty.
It's going to be a long night, and probably a few days thereafter.
This is the correct answerNothing - just ignore and move on lol
But you'll miss the apocalypse!I leave early Wednesday morning for a 5 day trek on the AT. I’m counting on you people to have this all sorted out by the time I get back.
If Biden clearly wins Florida or Texas there probably won’t be much to wait around on.ABC's decision desk won't call any states until they have 99.5% certainty.
It's going to be a long night, and probably a few days thereafter.
Enjoy!! Would love to join you some time.I leave early Wednesday morning for a 5 day trek on the AT. I’m counting on you people to have this all sorted out by the time I get back.
I'm sort of speechless.Don’t matter. Trump will be appointed after the SCOTUS throws out main in voting. Lol.