What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

2020-21 NBA *Playoffs* Thread: Bucks are the champs and you can take that to the bank bromigos (12 Viewers)

Do the Lakers even have any pieces to trade?
They have zero tradeable first round picks inside the Stepien window.  They would have to ship Davis or LeBron to get  Simmons back.  Phi has a '21 and '23 firsts that are tradeable but would have to be unprotected or convertible to seconds.

eta- LA might be able to gut their roster to make salaries match but does either team say yes?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wasn’t the Lowery trade demand something outlandish?
twas - like Maxie & two firsts. but i've rarely seen an acquisition that fit a team better. Lowry would have provided what Rivers didn't, conjugating the win verb. i stopped watching this playoff season mostly because everybody's out there doing what they do best independent of what their teammates are doing or what ends up being most winworthy. Lowry on the floor would have kept Embiid from freeballing and Simmons from giving in to his demons and, as he did with the Raptors, kept the team from losing touch with the point of it all. aint no more a thing than putting it in the hole, boys - watch me sell out to get it done.

 
Do the Lakers even have any pieces to trade?
you'll hear a lot of this this offseason. if the Lakers trade everybody under contract without uninterrupted egos or eyebrows (namely Kuzma, Harrell & KCP, like msudaisy say) they can match a 35% contract, salarywise, so fans think other teams are obliged to send them their superstars since they can. up here in Celtics country, we call it Green logic

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Before any more basketball is played, we have the draft lottery!  :excited:  (Tomorrow night, 8:30 ET)

Potential drama:

There's a 47.9% chance that the atrocious Rockets lose their pick to the Thunder -- their pick is top-4 protected.

There's a 72.4% chance that the slightly-less-atrocious Wolves lose their pick to the Warriors -- that pick is top-3 protected.

There's a 79.8% chance that the Bulls lose their pick to the Magic (top-4 protected). 

I'm rooting for OKC to land the #1 pick and for the Wolves to keep their pick (so they can take Suggs). 

 
Before any more basketball is played, we have the draft lottery!  :excited:  (Tomorrow night, 8:30 ET)

Potential drama:

There's a 47.9% chance that the atrocious Rockets lose their pick to the Thunder -- their pick is top-4 protected.

There's a 72.4% chance that the slightly-less-atrocious Wolves lose their pick to the Warriors -- that pick is top-3 protected.

There's a 79.8% chance that the Bulls lose their pick to the Magic (top-4 protected). 

I'm rooting for OKC to land the #1 pick and for the Wolves to keep their pick (so they can take Suggs). 
Pulling for the Dubs...technically finshed 8th this year and will add a full season of Klay, a half season of Green, a partial season of Curry, a one-year-wiser-Wiseman, and two lottery picks

 
I’m not one for making excuses but there is no dissecting the Nets elimination - Kyrie out and Harden very limited.  They still almost won - I don’t see any reason to overreact, just bad luck.
hard to get too excited about beating the Nets when they were out three guys.  two of whom happen to be among the best 10 or so guys in the entire league.

 
hard to get too excited about beating the Nets when they were out three guys.  two of whom happen to be among the best 10 or so guys in the entire league.
i feel the same way im glad we won but jeez the injury gods sure did everything they could to help us out if the nets are healthy they win and that is one heck of a scary team take that to the bank brohans 

 
hard to get too excited about beating the Nets when they were out three guys.  two of whom happen to be among the best 10 or so guys in the entire league.
Sure but you now get to face a young Hawks team that is a big underdog and then get maybe a Kawhi-less Clippers or most likely the Suns.  I think the Bucks are looking good right now.  If I ranked the 4 left it would be Bucks, Suns, Clips, Hawks.  I don't say this as some kind of jinx thing - the only realistic shot the Hawks have is if Giannis has to miss games.  He should dominate as much or more than Embiid did against the Hawks and the surrounding players are better/playing better.

 
hard to get too excited about beating the Nets when they were out three guys.  two of whom happen to be among the best 10 or so guys in the entire league.
Disagree.  Bucks overcame not one, but TWO historic performances from KD.  No need to apologize to anyone for this series win.

 
Little Hillsboro Oregon hosts the Les Schwab invitational around Xmas - some of the best HS talent in the country facing off against Oregon's best HS teams in a great tournament in a small gym.  Love it.  

Few years back, I took my son who's a basketball nut and during one of the games, he said that Ben Simmons (in town to play Portland) posted on his Insta that he was heading out to watch the next game.  Kid was pretty stoked about this and spotted Ben and his entourage strutting into the gym on the opposite side.  Pretty star struck he told me "I'm going to go get his autograph" and I said "Yeah, you can try, but he's probably not signing stuff" but he wouldn't hear of it.  

After the game, we walked to the other side of the gym and waited by the exit.  About 20-30 kids his age were also there, no doubt Insta followers and hoping for an autograph.  Simmons finally emerged, looked straight ahead and ignored all the kids asking him for a fist bump, a signature or even a hello.  Just looked straight ahead with a 200 years stare and exited out with this boys.  

Karma is real, folks.  Don't be a richard to kids who are over the moon that you are sharing the small gym with them to watch hoops.  Could have said "hello" or just given a high five or two.  But to ice them out completely?  Go miss every free throw, chump.  

 
And the Philly fans think they can get Lillard for Simmons straight up
No philly fan said Lillard for Simmons straight up. We have said Simmons, Thybulle, another salary (Howard maybe) plus 3 firsts and maybe that gets it done. That's after a super max sign and trade for Dame. But probably not.

 
No philly fan said Lillard for Simmons straight up. We have said Simmons, Thybulle, another salary (Howard maybe) plus 3 firsts and maybe that gets it done. That's after a super max sign and trade for Dame. But probably not.
No Philly fan in this thread, but plenty in social media.

You don't have three firsts to trade. 

 
Disagree.  Bucks overcame not one, but TWO historic performances from KD.  No need to apologize to anyone for this series win.
one man teams just don't go far, though. and he nearly did win those games single-handedly.

a team with three of the 10 best players in the NBA is a different animal, entirely.

i'm happy the Bucks got through, but they got destructified by the Nets with a healthy Irving and Durant.. much less adding a healthy Harden in to the mix.

 
The funny thing is one team that could definitely use Simmons would be the Hawks - now I have no idea how that would work, I don't pay attention to contracts, cap space, etc.  Just from a game perspective they could use another playmaker, defender and some size.  Hawks have a ton of shooters but Trae is their only real playmaker.  Simmons could defend, rebound, create and never shoot.

Granted after watching him the last 7 games I'm not sure I want him on the Hawks as he seems to be a head case at the moment and I know from what y'all are saying he's due a lot of money.  I'm just thinking with all the skills he does have he could be a decent piece for the Hawks.  But I also have no clue what assets we would have to offer.

 
It's under the assumption that Dame wants out no matter what.
I think we might be reading a bit too much into Dame's level of discontent in Portland.  Let's see what Olshey can do this off-season to appease Dame.  I know it sucks to get bounced in the first round of the playoffs, but there's not a citizen in Oregon that thought this team was anywhere near Championship level.  And if Dame is disappointed with that, that's just an incredible lack of self awareness.  

 
If you go by the reactions on social media and the NBA talking heads. KCP and salary filler should be enough for Simmons. 
yeah it is nuts right now seeing ideas like Ben Simmons for 2 2nd round picks, etc. If i were the entire Sixers org. i would turn off all phones and computers and come back in 4 days when sanity begins to come back into the picture. 

 
The funny thing is one team that could definitely use Simmons would be the Hawks - now I have no idea how that would work, I don't pay attention to contracts, cap space, etc.  Just from a game perspective they could use another playmaker, defender and some size.  Hawks have a ton of shooters but Trae is their only real playmaker.  Simmons could defend, rebound, create and never shoot.

Granted after watching him the last 7 games I'm not sure I want him on the Hawks as he seems to be a head case at the moment and I know from what y'all are saying he's due a lot of money.  I'm just thinking with all the skills he does have he could be a decent piece for the Hawks.  But I also have no clue what assets we would have to offer.
Perhaps you missed the work of the Ginger Assassin last night.

 
If nothing else, he’s getting elite pay.


i guess the sixers did when they gave simmons a max contract take that to the bank brohans
Is he really though?  I'm in no way saying Ben is worth his contract (though I'm sure that is the one thing you guys will take from this post)... but look at all the guys in the league with max contracts.  This is a league of getting max deals, and not all of them are going to work out.  Right now Ben is looking like one of the many that might not be working out.  

I'd call 'elite" being a top 10 NBA player, and not one person in here ever called him that.  Don't even think the Sixers ever even thought he was that. 

 
And the Philly fans think they can get Lillard for Simmons straight up
Link?  Or are you making that up too.

No one said that, but nice try.


EDT:  I see now that you mean people on twitter, not in here.  I can't find anyone on twitter saying it, but I suppose if you look on twitter hard enough, you'll find a few people that will say almost anything (like the earth is flat).  It's not even close to the consensus from Philly fans that they can get Lillard for Simmons straight up, maybe 1% of them so not sure your statement has any merit. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Hawks this year are like Washington Huskies making the CFB playoff that one year - we are just happy to be here and hope we don't embarrass ourselves on national TV.
I really hate the Hawks, Collins, and Trae.  They're hatable dudes.

But you balance that out a bit.  Your modesty, and just being a happy fan cheering for your team is refreshing, especially in here.

 
it's different with Simmons. i'm told he shoots FTs twice as good w his other hand, which happens to be his natural hand, btw.

that's why, as an advocate for his exceptional talent for longer than anyone here and for the entertainment of those who reveled in my formal Borderline Personality Disorder analysis of Kyrie Irving a coupla yrs ago, i'm going back to the diagnostic manual to suggest that Simmons might be an autistic savant - yes, like Rain Man.

i remember as far back as his LSU days, when his coach kept yelling at him to start the offense high. without a hint of it being from ego, Ben didn't stop until he was running the Tiger offense from the spot on the floor where PJTucker shoots treys.

then, in his second year with the Sixers, i'd watch him on D and sensed that, oblivious to the actual play as it occurred, he was "practicing" his peripheral vision, seeing how far he could get from the action while still being able to respond to it at shot time. this resulted in the next year him being always halfway between what was happening and what could happen, which has what has made him one of the best defensive (and THE best @ zone) players in the game. 

it's literally ALL in his head. he's counting all the toothpicks but cant add 1 + 3. the terrible coaching of Brett Brown (and imperial nature of Embiid) "forced" him away from finding a two-man game with his fellow superstar when that was the natural thing; the call for him to expand out to shooting treys in his early years "forced" him to not only avoid them like the plague but actually get worse @ deuces; and the attention on his free throws has made him "want" to get worse&worse at it so that his self-concept can be just as far as possible from the public concept of him. combine that with the faraway look in his eyes and the more placidly he acts the worse it gets, and i'm pretty sure there's something dramatically Aspergerish at play making him such an assburger.
OK, i wanna take one more shot at exploring this further, especially since Simmons is all the talk today.

Let's say the problem with him is psychological, organically or adaptively so. I've gotta pay this guy $150 million over the next four years to further demoralize my talented squad. or, i'm a GM of another team who thinks a different utilization of Ben Simmons' talents might unlock the other half of his game.

Either way, i have no way of knowing that Simmons will ever attempt an important shot at a basket without bursting into tears. Do i have a right, according to the current CBA, to insist upon a psych eval and then, if his dysfunction can be shown to be developmental or psychological, require him to follow some form of prescribed course to health?

Anybody out there actually know the answer to this or want and know how to chase it down?

 
OK, i wanna take one more shot at exploring this further, especially since Simmons is all the talk today.

Let's say the problem with him is psychological, organically or adaptively so. I've gotta pay this guy $150 million over the next four years to further demoralize my talented squad. or, i'm a GM of another team who thinks a different utilization of Ben Simmons' talents might unlock the other half of his game.

Either way, i have no way of knowing that Simmons will ever attempt an important shot at a basket without bursting into tears. Do i have a right, according to the current CBA, to insist upon a psych eval and then, if his dysfunction can be shown to be developmental or psychological, require him to follow some form of prescribed course to health?

Anybody out there actually know the answer to this or want and know how to chase it down?
Psych evals are much trickier than physical ones and impossible to diagnose with 100% certainty.  Sure if he has something like schizophrenia, but that's not the case here.  He likely does have some sort of mental block/issue that is affecting his game to some degree.  Making fun of that or talking about 'tears' or being 'un-tough' is part of what is wrong with the world today.

Whatever is Bens issue (lack of effort, lack of ability, mental block), it doesn't seem like he will be able to overcome that here.  No one knows what's going on in his head, but there clearly is an issue there with his confidence.  People love to just blame him for lack of effort because that's the easiest reason for them to understand, and easiest way to appoint blame.

Not sure if the Sixers can force an eval or not, can they force a physical eval if a player is injured but refuses to let a doctor look at his knee?

 
truthfully if ben simmons is a lesson to the league that organizational intentional tanking doesnt pay off with a championship then im happy about him as a human take that to the bank brohans 
Tanking is such a loaded word.  So OKC has no right to do what they're doing either?  The way they went about building the team has already paid off, whether they win a title or not (it's now doubtful that they do win a title).  There would have been years of mediocrity without it... he put them in a position to win, but it didn't work.  In today's NBA (maybe this year is the year that changes... hopefully anyways), if you can't attract star Free Agents or hit on draft picks, you're never going to win a title.

Would love it if every year going forward is more wide open like this year, it's made the NBA a lot more fun.  But the Nets are set up to crush everyone next year.

 
Either way, i have no way of knowing that Simmons will ever attempt an important shot at a basket without bursting into tears. Do i have a right, according to the current CBA, to insist upon a psych eval and then, if his dysfunction can be shown to be developmental or psychological, require him to follow some form of prescribed course to health?

Anybody out there actually know the answer to this or want and know how to chase it down?
Unless this is explicitly allowed in the CBA (and I don't think it is), I'm going to guess no: http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q106

As any league executive will tell you, the CBA isn't a list of the things teams can't do; it's a list of the things teams can do. The league operates in a "disallow by default" mode -- actions are not allowed except where the CBA specifically permits them.

In other words, teams aren't allowed to put anything into a player's contract that wasn't negotiated between the league and players association and included in the CBA. For example, a team signing a known drug offender can't insist on a "one strike and you're out" policy or that the player attend mandatory drug counseling -- instead they must follow the negotiated drug program (see question number 109).

 
hard to get too excited about beating the Nets when they were out three guys.  two of whom happen to be among the best 10 or so guys in the entire league.
Disagree.  Bucks overcame not one, but TWO historic performances from KD.  No need to apologize to anyone for this series win.
Of course there's no need to apologize - they can only play the team in front of them.  That's different than acknowledging the healthy dose of luck that helped the Bucks get past the Nets.  But injuries are part of the game, especially in the playoffs.  There's no crying, no excuses and no apologizing this time of year.

 
Unless this is explicitly allowed in the CBA (and I don't think it is), I'm going to guess no: http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q106
thx for the link.

a scan gives me this:

Sometimes a player and team can disagree over whether the player is physically capable of playing, or whether his continuing to play would carry an elevated risk of serious injury or even death. Fitness to Play panels exist to bring a consensus of objective medical expertise to decisions about whether players in these situations can continue to play.

A Fitness to Play panel consists of three physicians, one appointed by the league, one by the players association, and with the third appointed by the first two physicians. The panel members must be board certified and fellowship-trained specialists in the applicable area of medicine, with at least 10 years of post-fellowship clinical experience. There are multiple Fitness to Play panels, established for different medical fields:

Cardiac illnesses and conditions

Blood clots, and other blood conditions and disorders

Other areas as issues arise

The league, player's team or players association can refer a player to a Fitness to Play panel if a physician advises the league, his team or the players association in writing that the player is unable or unfit to play as a result of an injury, illness or other health condition, or if his continuing to play carries an elevated risk of death. Once a player has been referred to a Fitness to Play panel, the player can no longer play or practice with his team until he is cleared by the panel.

The panel will review the player's medical information and examine him personally (unless a personal examination is determined to be unnecessary) and report to the league, team and players association whether the player is fit to play, guided by current medical knowledge, authoritative medical guidelines, and the best available objective evidence.

If the panel finds the player to be fit to play, he must sign an informed consent and assumption of risk, and then he is cleared to play. If the panel does not find the player fit to play and material circumstances later change, then the player can be re-referred to the panel after nine months, or after the first day of the next regular season, whichever is later.

The team is not forced to let the player play, even after he is cleared by the panel. However, if the team doesn't let the player play, and the player is not in the last season of his contract (excluding any option year) when cleared, then within 60 days the team must either trade the player, add an "Exhibit 7" to his contract1, or waive him. Under these circumstances a waiver can be either full or partial -- see question number 68 for more information on partial waiver claims.

If a Fitness to Play panel finds that a player is physically unfit to play, then the team also can request that the panel's decision be used to establish that the player has suffered a career-ending injury or illness in order to have his salary excluded from the team's team salary2 (see question number 61).
and this interesting li'l nugget from the fine & suspension portion:

Player not in good physical or mental condition, and unfit to play skilled basketball. Suspension until ready to play.
dunno if it's enough to compel an eval or treatment - certainly not for a trade partner craving some due diligence, tho - but it's a window

 
Not sure what team would trade for Simmons and give anything of significant value. It would have to be bad contract for bad contract. Only trade that might make sense on its face is Simmons for cj mccollum.
I'll take the Lehigh guy for Ben.   :D

 
@TimBontemps

New ESPN story: Doc Rivers said Monday that Ben Simmons is prepared to do the work to fix his shot this summer — and that the Sixers have the plan to do it. “I believe we know what the right work is, and the right type of work, and the right way to do it.”

 
Since 'The Process' began, the Atlanta Hawks were in the conference finals, rebuilt turning over the entire roster, and are in the conference finals again.
The Process would have worked if not for those snooping kids!

I mean, the trade up for Fultz was a disaster.  They overpaid for Tobias Harris (wasting the 1st rounder that they got for the terrible trade of Mikal Bridges for Zhaire Smith trade).  They chose Simmons/Brett Brown over Jimmy and Reddick.  The Horford signing never made sense.  And as much as I love Thybulle and Maxey as pieces of a championship roster, you include them to get Harden (or maybe even CP3).  Other than that though, great success.  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top