What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Does it concern you that most law enforcement are pro-Trump? (1 Viewer)

Values of Honor

Footballguy
Most of the police officers that I know are open and unabashed Trump voters to the core, they are hardened Trumpists. 

Does it concern you that most police are pro-Trump?

Why?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not necessarily bothered by it, but I am somewhat surprised, since law enforcement officers tend to be more likely to be killed when Republicans hold the White House.

 
A new alias from October or even September concerns me more, but to be completely honest the political affiliation of law enforcement doesn't concern me at all. Most of the people I have known growing up in law enforcement have leaned conservative, but I would say the same thing about military folks before this year. They are some of the best people I know but we have historically disagreed about an awful lot.... until recently.

Considering this has been a slow year in fantasy football it's amazing how many new accounts have been created in the past few weeks to month and a half. 

 
Authorities love an authoritarian?  I'm shocked

He straight came out and endorsed police brutality during the 2016 campaign.  Also backed the NYPDs shoddy work in the Central Park 5 case.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doesn't concern me and our authorities support the community because it's their job.  If they let politics get in the middle of it, that's on them and they probably shouldn't be in the position anyway.  If you're one of the "I am helping X political party", you aren't fit to be in the position IMO.

 
It concerns me when police are using Nazi propaganda in their training.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2020/10/30/report-kentucky-police-presentation-quoted-hitler-to-encourage-regular-employment-of-violence/?sh=7e6f5abf73ed
 

It concerns me when police say it is “Out of their jurisdiction” to help a Biden bus when it is being intimidated by Trump supporters, and the President praises a clearly dangerous situation.

https://www.statesman.com/news/20201031/trump-train-swarms-biden-bus-on-1-35-and-trump-is-delighted
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/01/opinions/trump-dangerous-praise-texas-obeidallah/index.html

It concerns me that police kill a disproportionate amount of black people.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1123070/police-shootings-rate-ethnicity-us/

It doesn’t concern me that they vote overwhelmingly for Trump because they have worked so hard to set that expectation and at this point, I wouldn’t expect anything different.  
 

And until the “good police” make their disdain and intolerance known and help make this behavior stop, then I will lump them in with the bad as accessories to the fact.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why not?   Democrats are pro-union, and let's be honest......cops are heavily protected by their unions right now.
For one, police union leaders have been very vocal about their disappointment in the way Democrats are essentially throwing them under the bus  during the BLM and Antifa protests and rioting. Union support isn't a given for Dems. I know this topic start was a fishing trip, but the very question certainly implies that Dems take union votes for granted. People can only be only be taken for granted for so long before they start to think critically about who they've been giving their allegiance to. I'd have to question what someone has been missing if they haven't either noticed eroding union support of Dems or haven't at least thought about its possibility.

 
For one, police union leaders have been very vocal about their disappointment in the way Democrats are essentially throwing them under the bus  during the BLM and Antifa protests and rioting. Union support isn't a given for Dems. I know this topic start was a fishing trip, but the very question certainly implies that Dems take union votes for granted. People can only be only be taken for granted for so long before they start to think critically about who they've been giving their allegiance to. I'd have to question what someone has been missing if they haven't either noticed eroding union support of Dems or haven't at least thought about its possibility.
Hey, at least we can turn a fishing expedition into a real discussion!  ;)

My entire extended family is full of union members, across lots of industries.  Frankly it's a subculture I'm fascinated by and don't completely understand.   It baffles me why anybody would want to be controlled by a group of people (union leaders) who they won't ever meet and can't possibly hope to influence.   Completely agree that Dems will continue to lose union support - but also think it's insane to think that either party actually cares about blue collar, union member voters.

 
Hey, at least we can turn a fishing expedition into a real discussion!  ;)

My entire extended family is full of union members, across lots of industries.  Frankly it's a subculture I'm fascinated by and don't completely understand.   It baffles me why anybody would want to be controlled by a group of people (union leaders) who they won't ever meet and can't possibly hope to influence.   Completely agree that Dems will continue to lose union support - but also think it's insane to think that either party actually cares about blue collar, union member voters.
Yes it certainly is insane. There's very little evidence that any of these politicians give a crap about anybody but themselves and enriching their families.

 
Honestly, reforming the police system, reducing corruption, removing the blanket of protection qualified immunity gives unions and police from clear wrong-doing, much better education and training, reducing the militarization of the police, and holding them more accountable at every level is way more important to me then how they are voting right now.

 
As long as they do their jobs correctly, they could be anything legal they want to be, off the clock. The second their performance drops, or otherwise interferes with how they do the job, then they, and by extension us, now have a problem.

 
It concerns me more that most gun-nuts are pro-Trump.
Another myth, IMO.  I'm guessing most guys shooting up the inner cities aren't your Trump voters
gun-nuts is a not very nice term, certainly intended at a minimum as a pejorative. 

however, I'm curious if you read gun-nuit and immediately thought of urban gun owners. because I would venture that's not how most folks would frame it.

let's make the broad presumption @Lehigh98 had NRA members in mind when he wrote that. at least, that's where my mind went. am I offbase?

NRA members are a very different  demographic than gun owners in the aggregate.

1 out of every 3 Americans own a gun. of that subset, 1 in 5 belong to the NRA.

that cohort - 1 out of 15 Americans - has a slightly skewed worldview compared to average Americans. 

 
gun-nuts is a not very nice term, certainly intended at a minimum as a pejorative. 

however, I'm curious if you read gun-nuit and immediately thought of urban gun owners. because I would venture that's not how most folks would frame it.

let's make the broad presumption @Lehigh98 had NRA members in mind when he wrote that. at least, that's where my mind went. am I offbase?

NRA members are a very different  demographic than gun owners in the aggregate.

1 out of every 3 Americans own a gun. of that subset, 1 in 5 belong to the NRA.

that cohort - 1 out of 15 Americans - has a slightly skewed worldview compared to average Americans. 
When I read gun-nut, I think of people that like to own and shoot guns.  That could be anything from inner city gangs, hunters, NRA members, or just straight up hoodlums.  

Why would it scare him, or you, if that particular group is a Trump supporter?  I mean shouldn't it scare you that street hoodlums murdering people more than NRA members that vote Republican?

Everyone has a slightly skewed worldview compared to average americans.  What, exactly, is an average American?

 
gun-nuts is a not very nice term, certainly intended at a minimum as a pejorative. 

however, I'm curious if you read gun-nuit and immediately thought of urban gun owners. because I would venture that's not how most folks would frame it.

let's make the broad presumption @Lehigh98 had NRA members in mind when he wrote that. at least, that's where my mind went. am I offbase?

NRA members are a very different  demographic than gun owners in the aggregate.

1 out of every 3 Americans own a gun. of that subset, 1 in 5 belong to the NRA.

that cohort - 1 out of 15 Americans - has a slightly skewed worldview compared to average Americans. 
You know... gun nuts.

First 3 results for a google search of "gun nuts"...

https://www.fieldandstream.com/blogs/gun-nut/

https://www.gunnuts.net

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY_roSElk65SCnJe0ZMIqaA

FYI, I used to be a member of the NRA back when I was doing some range shooting comps.  Not anymore though.

 
What concerns me are these militia groups that think they're standing up for America when they force their way into the Michigan capital or plot to kidnap the governor.  Tensions are amping up even further.  If Trump loses and they think they have to do something about it, I'm concerned.

 
Lehigh98 said:
FYI, I used to be a member of the NRA back when I was doing some range shooting comps.  Not anymore though.
when did they really start to attract money and become a thing?

I took a hunter safety course when I was 7...and hunted until I was 20 (1969-82)

up until then I had literally never heard of them

everything was the local conservation club, state DNR, private hunting groups

when I got out of the service in 1989 they had become ubiquitous

still have never met anyone that belongs to the NRA and whitetail deer season is practically a state holiday back home 

 
still have never met anyone that belongs to the NRA and whitetail deer season is practically a state holiday back home 
I've known plenty and at least in my experience they have always been great people. Between NRA members, and hunters in general, they have probably done more to preserve nature than all the environmentalists I've known combined. And I used to live in Humboldt County so I have met plenty of those folks too.

FWIW, when I think of gun nuts I think of people that own more than three guns. MOST PEOPLE probably don't have a reason to own more than three, at that point they just like guns. And @Lehigh98 is probably right in that they do lean more towards trump imo. I haven't met many inner city gun owners but the few I know have never owned more than one gun. Not a lot of need for different types of hunting rifles in the inner city from what I have seen.

 
I've known plenty and at least in my experience they have always been great people. Between NRA members, and hunters in general, they have probably done more to preserve nature than all the environmentalists I've known combined. And I used to live in Humboldt County so I have met plenty of those folks too.
my entire family hunts. probaby 80% of the adults in my hometown church (90-95% of the men) are hunters.

I don't know a single one that is an NRA member. west Michigan, DeVos country, last voted Democratic in 1864 (not a typo)

 
Generally speaking I trust most police officers and I don’t trust most politicians, especially the guy running things right now.  Trump hasn’t earned their trust because right now he’s putting them in harms way with his divisive rhetoric.  If Trump truly cared about police officers he would be trying to diffuse things and not make them worse.

 
I'm kind of surprised that everybody is just blowing this question off or treating it as a fishing trip.  Trump openly campaigns on white nationalism and authoritarianism.  It seems obvious and self-evident to me that it is bad if LEOs disproportionately support that ideology.  

 
I'm kind of surprised that everybody is just blowing this question off or treating it as a fishing trip.  Trump openly campaigns on white nationalism and authoritarianism.  It seems obvious and self-evident to me that it is bad if LEOs disproportionately support that ideology.  
Support and tolerate are two different things.  They shouldn’t tolerate him doing it and definitely shouldn’t support him (mainly because he’s incompetent and putting them in harms ways).  But I do think a majority tolerate the rhetoric and that is concerning.  Even more distributing are the ones who support it and are in the positions they are in.

 
I've known plenty and at least in my experience they have always been great people. Between NRA members, and hunters in general, they have probably done more to preserve nature than all the environmentalists I've known combined. And I used to live in Humboldt County so I have met plenty of those folks too.
 
How do those guys outdo environmentalists? 

Most hunters I know respect nature, but beyond controlling out-of-whack animal populations resulting from a lack of apex predators, they aren’t exactly carbon neutral.

 
I'm kind of surprised that everybody is just blowing this question off or treating it as a fishing trip.  Trump openly campaigns on white nationalism and authoritarianism.  It seems obvious and self-evident to me that it is bad if LEOs disproportionately support that ideology.  
100%

 
I'm kind of surprised that everybody is just blowing this question off or treating it as a fishing trip.  Trump openly campaigns on white nationalism and authoritarianism.  It seems obvious and self-evident to me that it is bad if LEOs disproportionately support that ideology.  
It has more to do with support than anything else.

Detroit Police chief James Craig who is black, and the DPD that is around 75% black back Trump.  Craig was disgusted by Bidens lack of condemnation when riots were burning in many major cities.  Came right out and said "This will not happen in Detroit"   and it did not.  Of all places I really though Detroit was a prime riot spot but Craig was all over it from the start.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm kind of surprised that everybody is just blowing this question off or treating it as a fishing trip.  Trump openly campaigns on white nationalism and authoritarianism.  It seems obvious and self-evident to me that it is bad if LEOs disproportionately support that ideology.  
:lmao:

He's a terrible President and a dolt, but this is complete fear mongering.

 
Not concerned but also don't know how they could be expected to support Democrats right now.
:goodposting:

It would concern me if the overwhelming majority of law enforcement didn’t support President Trump after what we’ve seen out of the Democrat Party this past year. 

 
I'm kind of surprised that everybody is just blowing this question off or treating it as a fishing trip.  Trump openly campaigns on white nationalism and authoritarianism.  It seems obvious and self-evident to me that it is bad if LEOs disproportionately support that ideology.  
sure and the other side can make false assertions like that too...Biden openly campaigns on rioting, lawlessness and socialism. It seems obvious and self-evident that it is bad if LEOs proportionately support that ideology... See how silly that sounds?

 
It bothers me.  It bothers me that the Democrats cant gain some respect from first responders.  Something is wrong if first responders felt left behind by the Democratic party.

 
Hey, at least we can turn a fishing expedition into a real discussion!  ;)

My entire extended family is full of union members, across lots of industries.  Frankly it's a subculture I'm fascinated by and don't completely understand.   It baffles me why anybody would want to be controlled by a group of people (union leaders) who they won't ever meet and can't possibly hope to influence.   Completely agree that Dems will continue to lose union support - but also think it's insane to think that either party actually cares about blue collar, union member voters.
Sounds like the democrats like their unions the same way way they like their government. 

Seems like the democrats are starting to favor immigrants over the union folks. 

 
It bothers me that some police don't believe in the oath they took.  It used to apply to ALL Americans.  

 
Most of the cops I know are conservative Republicans.  They fear the Democrats and are quick to parrot Trump talking points decrying defunding the police as an all or nothing proposition and black lives matter as a group of militant terrorists.  Most are white, and while they are not outwardly racist, they have no sympathy for minorities in any context.  My experience is that they have absolutely no interest in discussing law enforcement reform, either generally or specifically, and want to retain the status quo because it is what they know.  Events like George Floyd are scrutinized individually ("I wouldn't do that"), and they refuse to recognize broader, systemic patterns.  They get very defensive very quickly, and feel very underappreciated.  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top