What is? An expert's statement on the data?
Expert opinions in the form of conclusions. He can provide a sworn affidavit that includes facts, and can show how those facts support a conclusion, but only to the extent that it assists the trier of fact. In this case he states conclusions without connecting the dots to facts, which makes it in admissible.
Many of the suits filed based on a version of this conspiracy have been supported by similar affidavits. In nearly every case, the judges considering these motions have pointed to a lack of admissible evidence. This is more of the same.