Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
{counts...triple negative...thinks he means you can’t prove a negative)
Pretty sure Georgia has a statue about allowing poll watchers while votes are being counted. I think anyone watching that can see how shady it was.
So my first question (and no, I haven't read to the end of the thread so I apologize in advance if this is asked after this comment) is has it been validated by ANYONE not on OAN staff that they were "hidden ballot suitcases" and/or if they were "scanned" as in being counted (assuming here, THAT'S the problem with messing with them, but not entirely sure)? Anyone at all come back with the same conclusion?
OAN and real issues dont belong in the same sentence. They are the definition of fake news. If they are covering it...best to ignore completely.
It sounds like what happened is that the number of poll watchers was proportional to the number of election workers.
I agree with all this and, well, this has always been the way Trump works with his constant "many people say..." and "she's a nasty person" statements. Like I think someone else said here - Trump and his team don't want their accusations to hit the courts because an actual ruling would diminish their message.
Interesting rabbit trail but not directly related to Voter Fraud.
It would make things easier if all of you would actually look at the evidence. Don’t read cnn. Don’t read oann. Don’t watch the news.
Why would anyone read a “reasonable breakdown” of this issue? Just watch the tape for yourself. Judging evidence based on how your bubble evaluates it is lazy thinking because: spoiler alert: Democrats think it’s nothing and republicans think it’s treason.
I agree. It's almost as lazy as saying "You can't comment on this subject unless you watch this entire video, otherwise your opinions are worthless."
They have 4 people on video a real hearing they would bring those people in to hear what was going on. Instead they want to speculate on it.
How does that help me intelligently comment? The woman talking straight up lied from the very start. The Republican observers had the same access to observe as the Democratic observers. And there were zero complaints the day of, only after.
I watched the video. It's a stretch to call this "evidence." It looks like people counting votes. They pulled some suitcases out from under a table that had a tablecloth on it. Even the woman presenting the video, whose apparent belief is that something nefarious was going on, said she watched the video at 1 am the night before and had only gone through it quickly before presenting it today. The very fact that I'm able to watch this video is because it was recorded on CCTV, which, you'd have to assume, the poll workers knew about. It's not like this is some hidden camera video. So, the theory is that poll workers rushed observers out of the room, then proceeded to steal the Georgia presidential election by pulling out secret suitcases that were masterfully hidden by a tablecloth, then fed these Biden-favorable ballots through the scanners, then managed to get these supposed fake ballots to pass muster during the statewide recount and audit overseen by state-level Republican officials, all while being recorded by four CCTV cameras? That's the contention here?
That's the beauty of this conspiracy. They get 100s of people involved in multiple states to commit felonies and do it on video.
Also of note: the video @shader asked us to watch was produced by NTD TV, which is a Chinese media outlet associated with the Falun Gong cult.
I’m glad you watched it. I didn’t say it was proof of anything nefarious. But since you’ve watched it, you can intelligently comment on it. Unlike 99% of the internet who haven’t watched it yet have a clueless opinion on it.
I have no idea who NTD tV is, but they have the full video of this portion of the hearing which is certainly more information on this matter than you had before you watched it, which I’m sure you didn’t.
I watched it. I have no idea what they were doing. If I was wanting to prove it was fraud I would bring them in and ask them, under oath.For the record, if you watch the video and feel that the woman who was narrating cannot be trusted, than you are now more informed than you previously were. “Form your own opinion” shouldn’t be a controversial thing to say
Why yes, I do happen to think that a media outlet associated with a Chinese cult would be more likely frame events in a fashion that pushes their agenda.
I've watched it as well, and this seems like a pretty fair take. This CCTV video is pretty flimsy - it's like any CCTV video, it's easy to read into it whatever you'd like, when you can't clearly see what's happening. I don't see anything here that really changes my opinion at all. You could make a similar conspiracy claim on any CCTV ballot-counting operation.
Also, I was going to comment on this, but I see you've beaten me to it.
There is a reason the mainstream media is not covering these hearings. The reason is not because they're part of the deep state or because they want Trump to fail. The reason they're not covering these hearings is because the hearings are full of conspiracy theory nonsense.
It was a very thorough analysis and it seems reasonable...
I would hope the MSM would cover hearings that were actually hearings. Repersentives from both side asking questions to witness testifying under oath.
Watched the entire thing. Kept waiting to find out what was so worthwhile. Total waste of time.For the record, if you watch the video and feel that the woman who was narrating cannot be trusted, than you are now more informed than you previously were. “Form your own opinion” shouldn’t be a controversial thing to say
No one said they are a reputable source. No one says that the Epoch Times is a reputable source.Steve Tasker said:
Kemp just said it was a hearing that the legislature had today, and based on what they showed today he said there needs to be a signature audit. But hey believe what you want
When they put people under oath and witness are cross examined by the opposition then I'll call it a hearing. Until then it's just a show.
I did attack the content, perhaps you missed my comment above. No offense to you, because I like you personally, but the content is conspiracy theory riddled bull####. There is a reason it is not being covered by mainstream media. That reason is because it is conspiracy theory riddled bull####.
Mystery solved. Disgraced Republican lawmaker planted no-party candidate in key Senate race, sources say
Crying wolf seems to be profitable.
It’s now reported that just shy of $500 million has been raised since the middle end of October.
Trump cried fraud when he didn't win an Emmy.
Need more evidence that to even think of pressing charges and I’m not sure what the law really says about this but it’s ratf-ing garbage, an abuse of the system and a giant middle finger to all the voters of the district and people of the State.
They aren't hearings. They are the new "rally". They are partisan propaganda filled with misinformation and lies. That is not a hearing. The legal team of the President is just like Alex Jones though...I think that has been shown to be pretty clear. That they are not airing them is actually a positive for any network that chooses not to.
No, it doesn't. That's the same claim Mike Kelly (who, I'm ashamed to say is my Congressman) has tried to make and it's nonsense. The PA Constitution guarantees that certain people can vote by absentee ballot. It does NOT state that ONLY those people can vote by absentee ballot. The legislature cannot stop the enumerated people from using absentee ballots, but that doesn't mean it can't allow others to do so. It also includes a provision that "All elections by the citizens shall be by ballot or by such other method as may be prescribed by law: Provided, That secrecy in voting be preserved." That allows the method of voting to be prescribed by law, which is what Act 77 did. It's also why the PA Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that absentee ballots had to be enclosed in the provided "Secrecy Envelopes" and that "naked ballots" without them could not be counted--the only limit on the legislature in prescribing how voting is to be conducted is that secrecy must be preserved.Anarchy99 said:
