Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Attempting to change the results of an election, even if the attempt fails is a miserable and dishonorable action for a president. I’m not sure what the correct consequence is but it should not just be shrugged off as “no big deal since it didn’t so work”.
But when you said it about democrats it made zero sense. We have open examples of Republicans doing this now.You can stop with this over dramatic hyperbole. The last 4 years we said the same about the Democrats.
I don't know what you want to happen in the next 17 days. My guess is nothing will happen and people will just shrug it off as the last ravings of a desperate man and just be happy it's over with.
If we have time for more special investigations on election tampering, surely this should be a part of it.
By "election tampering" are you talking about the investigations into voter fraud? If not, then any further investigations into election tampering will be seen as nothing more than retribution and revenge.
Ted Cruz is calling for a 10 day investigation into voter fraud. If we can do that, we can include the Presidents attempts to influence Georgia’ SOS into finding more votes as part of the investigation considering it’s the biggest lead we have for finding people attempting to circumvent the will of the county and our election integrity.
This is not conducive to good conversation. You can be part of the solution or you can twist or purposefully misinterpret people's words to get more "likes" on this board to add to your total (are you winning yet?).
I think this is fair. Part of healing and moving forward includes taking a different approach. I’m as guilty of this as anyone.
But also fair to post what mile high did...because we have time and time again seen those excuses used for Trump.
Is it really fair? Or is it like when I’m in a heated discussion with my wife and she brings up something from 5 months ago?
I don’t think mile high was in a heated discussion...and seeing how someone had already made a post claiming similar to he didn’t mean it that way...yeah, I think its fair.
Misinterpret his words? Seriously?
I just reject the analogy. This isn’t bringing up something you did one time. Its bringing up things that have happened over and over to excuse bad behavior.
Ok. My wife brings up things from months and months ago also. Rather than just addressing the situation at hand.
Sure...the situation at hand is Trump did what he did.
Hi - as his post was a stand alone post indicating the various excuses that will surely come out from this - I’m reading that as you were talking about Trumps comments - but apologies if you are referring to others comments.
He was responding to my post even though he didn't quote it. It was a snarky reply based on what I wrote.
I meant it rhetorically— that “C’mon ... I was just spouting off!” wouldn’t be an exculpatory defense if Trump had to defend the contents of the conversation with Raffensperger in court.
Amazing? Ever watch the MSM whenever there is a bad story about a Democrat? It's the same as you post just replace OAN and Newsmax with MSNBC, CNN, ABC (take your pick).
I'm somewhat surprised that the Fox story included this quote from Sen. **** Durbin:
I was thinking the same thing. I was going to speculate possibilities but deleted them.
Why are you surprised? The news content (particular “print”) of Fox is usually accurate. It’s all the editorial content - especially the talking heads on TV - are generally spouting right wing talking points.
My wife is, well was, Catholic. Not sure if it's still a thing but had to go on a retreat and attend marriage classes beforehand. It was pretty silly for the most part. Particularly when they could have just said FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DON'T GET MARRIED. However one valuable thing they presented was Rules For Fighting. Number one was don't bring up the past.
I’m with you. I have no idea what “the left” has done the last 4 years that’s remotely as egregious as Trump’s behavior wrt the election, and those who support him.MAC_32 said:
A failed attempt is still an attempt. There's no logical way around it. That said, I'd be writing up articles now if I were in charge. They won't do it, but that's what I'd do.
Again...he thinks that Congressional investigation into Russian interference and impeachment for breaking the law is the same thing as what the GOP is doing right now.
Also we can’t call it a failed attempt yet, it’s still on going. This call just happened yesterday. Who knows who else he has and will continue to call and lean on.
Considering he needs to flip 3 states to win, it's a good bet similar calls were made to PA, AZ, WI, and MI.
This isn't true. OANN is simply fictional stuff.
You're not going to convince anyone that already has that stance that it is laughably wrong.
