What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Healing And Moving Forward - Thoughts? (2 Viewers)

There are a lot of Americans who disagree with this statement.  How should we handle it?
Censure. Doesn't tie up resources, doesn't further divide, sets tone for bi-partisan agenda, enables rapid approval of Biden appts, etc.

The notion that impeachment will somehow deter future transgressions is an illusion. Johnson didn't prevent Nixon, Nixon didn't deter Clinton, Clinton didn't deter Trump
Good points, thank you.

I dont know how you can argue that Clinton didn't deter future presidents from lying to Congress.  Has any other president lied to Congress since Clinton?

Outside of the discussion, I think censure is reasonable.  There are others who disagree.

 
Good points, thank you.

I dont know how you can argue that Clinton didn't deter future presidents from lying to Congress.  Has any other president lied to Congress since Clinton?

Outside of the discussion, I think censure is reasonable.  There are others who disagree.
Yes. People will disagree because they won't get 100% of what they want. That's the nature of compromise, healing and moving forward.

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JAA
stlrams said:
The thread title is healing and moving forward.  Trump is out of office shortly so what happens the next 4 years is more important then the past but apparently you can’t move on.  
Not without accountability and contrition. You can’t baselessly attack the foundation of democracy for 2 months, summon your flock to DC on the basis of the great lie, whip them into a frenzy and send them marching in the Capitol resulting in death and destruction and then say “let’s just all move on”.  

Actions have consequences.  If Trump came out and admitted the great lie, I’d be more open to the argument that, for the good of the country, people should seek to unite and look forward.  But he’s leaving office without the repairing the giant hole he ripped through American democracy.  So, truth and Justice before unity. 

 
Outside of the discussion, I think censure is reasonable.  There are others who disagree.
I mean, I can see this for sure. Impeachment/disqualification is certainly the better way to avoid a future candidate who will reject a democratic vote and incite insurgency. JMHO.

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JAA
Twitter banned Trump knowing full well their stock would plummet from their most famous account. Not even half a day later, apple and Google ban Parler (the company that stood to benefit directly from Trump being banned) from their app store, Amazon removes their server access without notice (when their contract requires 30 days) and their bank cancels their credit. Yea. Complete coincidence. Nothing to see here folks.
TWTR is down 12% over the last 5 days and down 15% YTD.  Not a fun ride if you're long,but plummet?  That's a stretch.  Some might even view the correction as a buying opportunity. 

 
1 hour ago, JAA said:
There are a lot of Americans who disagree with this statement.  How should we handle it?
Censure. Doesn't tie up resources, doesn't further divide, sets tone for bi-partisan agenda, enables rapid approval of Biden appts, etc.

The notion that impeachment will somehow deter future transgressions is an illusion. Johnson didn't prevent Nixon, Nixon didn't deter Clinton, Clinton didn't deter Trump
Expand  
Good points, thank you.

I dont know how you can argue that Clinton didn't deter future presidents from lying to Congress.  Has any other president lied to Congress since Clinton?

Outside of the discussion, I think censure is reasonable.  There are others who disagree.
Re: Censure

I'm not it helps much with the divide. Isn't McCarthy, and a few others, getting heat because he said Trump was responsible and favored censure?

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JAA
Comparing the actions of mega corporations to Nazis who committed genocide is a weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee bit of a stretch.
He didn't even directly compare them. He intimated that the corporations were worse by alleging their actions would "make the Nazis blush" because, you know, outright genocide and the promotion of a master race is apparently peanuts versus deciding whether to offer an internet platform to certain customers. 

 
Re: Censure

I'm not it helps much with the divide. Isn't McCarthy, and a few others, getting heat because he said Trump was responsible and favored censure?
Nothing is going to close the divide between hardcore Trumpists and moderate GOP, nor between the extreme left and right. What a censure would do, however, is help move the center of gravity more towards the center so neither party is controlled as much by their partisan factions.

If I'm Biden, that's what I want to begin advancing a moderate agenda. Not another polarizing impeachment cage match.

A year from now Americans won't care an ounce whether Trump was convicted of impeachment or censured. However, they will care a great deal about whether COVID is defeated, the size of their stimulus checks, ratifying the Paris CC accord, WPA-style infrastructure projects, etc.

Censure provides a tailwind towards those things; impeachment a headwind.

 
Nothing is going to close the divide between hardcore Trumpists and moderate GOP, nor between the extreme left and right. What a censure would do, however, is help move the center of gravity more towards the center so neither party is controlled as much by their partisan factions.

If I'm Biden, that's what I want to begin advancing a moderate agenda. Not another polarizing impeachment cage match.

A year from now Americans won't care an ounce whether Trump was convicted of impeachment or censured. However, they will care a great deal about whether COVID is defeated, the size of their stimulus checks, ratifying the Paris CC accord, WPA-style infrastructure projects, etc.

Censure provides a tailwind towards those things; impeachment a headwind.
I'd push back here, personally. If Trump gets impeached and convicted, he cannot hold office again. As far as I'm aware, censure doesn't accomplish that. I feel that our next four years will be very different depending on whether or not Trump can seek election in 2024.

 
Oh, those are zany constitutionalists who believe there's a provision in the Uniform Commericial Code requiring some sort of actual contractual assent between the particular governmental entities in the country and inidividual persons. An extension of that argument is that the contract can be unilaterally revoked/terminated by the individual.  Hence the "we don't consent to be governed comment." 

This line of thinking actually pre-dates Trumps. In my old public defender days I was assigned to represent a number of these individuals. Usually, it's an individual who has gotten his or her licensed revoked by DUI and keeps driving and getting popped for driving on a suspended license and then wants to argue he or she doesn't consent to be bound by state or US law and therefore his or her freedom of locomotion cannot be restricted. There is, obviously, no basis in law or fact here. But, it's a relatively common bad argument. 

I forget the nexus, but tied into the above is also some silliness about whether the US flag has gold trim and something about the Flag Act from the first half of the century. 

I will say my all-time favorite zany legal theory, just due to its sheer complexity yet utter absurdity, is the "Federal Postal Court": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkLNShrp90A

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, those are zany constitutionalists who believe there's a provision in the Uniform Commericial Code requiring some sort of actual contractual assent between the particular governmental entities in the country and inidividual persons. An extension of that argument is that the contract can be unilaterally revoked/terminated by the individual.  Hence the "we don't consent to be governed comment." 

This line of thinking actually pre-dates Trumps. In my old public defender days I was assigned to represent a number of these individuals. Usually, it's an individual who has gotten his or her licensed revoked by DUI and keeps driving and getting popped for driving on a suspended license and then wants to argue he or she doesn't consent to be bound by state or US law and therefore his or her freedom of locomotion cannot be restricted. There is, obviously, no basis in law or fact here. But, it's a relatively common bad argument. 

I forget the nexus, but tied into the above is also some silliness about whether the US flag has gold trim and something about the Flag Act from the first half of the century. 

I will say my all-time favorite zany legal theory, just due to its sheer complexity yet utter absurdity, is the "Federal Postal Court": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkLNShrp90A
These two youtube comments brilliantly sum up the federal postal court: 

John Michaelson2 years ago

Congratulations, you created the legalese equivalent of someone farting in a spacesuit. No one in any position of authority recognizes your mumbo-jumbo, therefore it is by definition void of any purpose.

Blaine Sandoval10 months ago

I’m of two minds about this: on one hand, he seems completely bonkers. On the other, there is a mad sort of logic to what he is saying.

 
I'd push back here, personally. If Trump gets impeached and convicted, he cannot hold office again. As far as I'm aware, censure doesn't accomplish that. I feel that our next four years will be very different depending on whether or not Trump can seek election in 2024.
That's cool. IMHO this fear is greatly exaggerated. Nixon was never formally prevented from running again...and yet he was clearly toast once impeached. Ditto for Trump.

Why spend precious first 100-day political capital on an expensive insurance policy that will never be used...when it can instead be leveraged to actually get things done and move the country forward? Makes no sense to me.

 
Trump still has an approximately 39% approval rating. He's not clearly toast. For comparison's sake Nixon was at 24% when he resigned.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's cool. IMHO this fear is greatly exaggerated. Nixon was never formally prevented from running again...and yet he was clearly toast once impeached. Ditto for Trump.

Why spend precious first 100-day political capital on an expensive insurance policy that will never be used...when it can instead be leveraged to actually get things done and move the country forward? Makes no sense to me.
Nixon resigned during his second term as President. He could not run for President again. 

 
That's cool. IMHO this fear is greatly exaggerated. Nixon was never formally prevented from running again...and yet he was clearly toast once impeached. Ditto for Trump.

Why spend precious first 100-day political capital on an expensive insurance policy that will never be used...when it can instead be leveraged to actually get things done and move the country forward? Makes no sense to me.
The last 5ish years have been one incident after another that's been thought of as "surely, this will be Trump's political downfall" -- I'm past assuming that'll ever happen. Frankly I'm not even sure being legally barred from office would be enough to stop Trump from trying again in 2024.

 
The last 5ish years have been one incident after another that's been thought of as "surely, this will be Trump's political downfall" -- I'm past assuming that'll ever happen. Frankly I'm not even sure being legally barred from office would be enough to stop Trump from trying again in 2024.
2024 will be a referendum on the Biden/Harris administration's four-year performance.

Pretty sad that Democrats have such low expectations of their governing abilities that they are already shaking in their boots over the prospect of facing a publicly disgraced Donald Trump. Even with a head start of full control of Congress. Crazy how far he's in their heads.

 
If you do not accept the fact that Joe Biden was fairly elected President, you’re not going to be part of the healing and moving forward, IMO. 

 
2024 will be a referendum on the Biden/Harris administration's four-year performance.

Pretty sad that Democrats have such low expectations of their governing abilities that they are already shaking in their boots over the prospect of facing a publicly disgraced Donald Trump. Even with a head start of full control of Congress. Crazy how far he's in their heads.
So long as Biden stays healthy and wants to run again, he should win quite easily in 2024. 

 
2024 will be a referendum on the Biden/Harris administration's four-year performance.

Pretty sad that Democrats have such low expectations of their governing abilities that they are already shaking in their boots over the prospect of facing a publicly disgraced Donald Trump. Even with a head start of full control of Congress. Crazy how far he's in their heads.
I'm more concerned about Trump further driving the discourse towards violent conflict and lies than anything else. But, given the tone of your comments I think I'm just going to move on and ignore you like the others. Have a good season, guy.

 
timschochet said:
See this is why I don’t accept slippery slope arguments. Because what you described would never happen with me. I don’t move my goalposts. 
I can't stand slippery slopes. While nobody denies they exist to some extent, it's an intellectually lazy way to justify an otherwise unreasonable, inflexible stance. Working for compromise will go a lot farther than refusing to negotiate based on fears of a worst case scenario.

 
So long as Biden stays healthy and wants to run again, he should win quite easily in 2024. 
Both in here and in the media it seems that preventing Trump from seeking/gaining office again is the primary reason for pursuing impeachment vs. censure. Is that not your observation? I'm saying Trump's political future is non-existent, and even more so if Biden does his job.

 
Both in here and in the media it seems that preventing Trump from seeking/gaining office again is the primary reason for pursuing impeachment vs. censure. Is that not your observation? I'm saying Trump's political future is non-existent, and even more so if Biden does his job.
Yes I think it’s a good goal. Although I agree with you that Trump can’t win again the amount of damage he can do as a candidate should not be underrated. More than that it’s a fitting punishment for him as not being able to run again will seriously weaken his fundraising ability. 

 
If you do not accept the fact that Joe Biden was fairly elected President, you’re not going to be part of the healing and moving forward, IMO. 
That’s not necessarily true. I’m sure there are quite a few people who believe there was significant fraud who can also live peacefully with others. 

 
Since it seems I'm the representative for my reasonable Trump supporting friends  :lmao:  they would say the exact same but flipped with "I'm not even sure why people are going for impeachment unless they just hate letting Trump supporters get a tiny "win" of leaving office without impeachment."

I know that's not a popular take here and I don't know that I agree with it and I have no interest or time to debate it. But that's what they tell me. 

I do personally think impeachment is increasing the divide and distracting from serious challenges that need to be taken on with Covid and the economy.  

I'll bow out now. 
I'm bad at analogies (but great mixed metaphors are always a possibiility), but what I'm hearing from your reasonable Trump supporters feels like "heads I win, tails you lose,"  and my gut reaction is a resounding "NO."  Let's take our medicine and reckon with recent history, because sure as #### things will only get worse otherwise. 

Think about it for a second, everytime you suspend an account, you're holding your readership to a higher standard that youknowwho. I know you know that, but I don't think all your friends do.

There's room for diplomacy, but not that much.

 
Insein said:
No he's not. How can you look at the situation and be that disingenuous? They are charging him with leading an insurrection. There's is absolutely nothing in any of his words or actions that could be misconstrued as inciting violence in general let alone an insurrection. To believe that is just as ridiculous as the birthers for Obama, the 911 truthers, and every other radical fringe group that bought whole heartedly into their own delusions. 
So, without being privy to all the evidence, you've made up your mind it's impossible Trump promoted the insurrection. How will you react if he is convicted?

 
Both in here and in the media it seems that preventing Trump from seeking/gaining office again is the primary reason for pursuing impeachment vs. censure. Is that not your observation? I'm saying Trump's political future is non-existent, and even more so if Biden does his job.
Many of us never thought Trump had a chance being elected in the first place. While I'd like to think people have come to their senses, I'd prefer to remove any chance he has to be re-elected. That's not to say he and/or his family won't be involved in American politics whatsoever, but limiting their power is extremely important. 

 
I have so many thoughts on this. I'd actually like to share, but more then not. It'd get me suspended. Such a great world we live in!! Viva las Biden!!

 
Both in here and in the media it seems that preventing Trump from seeking/gaining office again is the primary reason for pursuing impeachment vs. censure. Is that not your observation? I'm saying Trump's political future is non-existent, and even more so if Biden does his job.
What do you base this on exactly?  He's adored by MILLIONS of people.  As long as he's an option he has a substantial political future.  Of course, it will be for the GOP to deal with internally.  He'd make HUGE noise in the 2024 primary if allowed.  Would he win?  Don't know, but he's woven into the fabric of the party until he dies.

 
Pretty sad that Democrats have such low expectations of their governing abilities that they are already shaking in their boots over the prospect of facing a publicly disgraced Donald Trump. Even with a head start of full control of Congress. Crazy how far he's in their heads.
I dont understand these statements.  Who is scared?  How are they projecting that fear?  I dont see it.

 
As a life-long DC area resident, I've been thinking about this recently. It stinks that more and more of the city is being blocked off. Obviously I understand the reasoning, but it still stinks.
Yes. It would be tragic and sad on many levels.

All born from one dudes refusal to admit he lost. 

 
IN recent months/years, a disturbing number of right wing and right leaning folks have come to view (and speak about) anyone leaning left or on the left as immoral socialists, ANTI-American. They now firmly believe the election was stolen and cannot be dissuaded from this position by any evidence. (Even when you successfully prove false one "proof" they add three more, most of which even if true wouldn't come remotely close to enough to change the results). Many wrap their position up in their faith, making any political disagreement an attack on their religion.

I agree with some previous posters, until this ends there isn't a path. Until these folks realize Democrats aren't enemies of America I have no idea how we can move on. (FWIW, I don't think they are enemies, but I do think they are intentionally misled)

 
There’s absolutely no way. This was 100 a consequence of having Don in the office.

Anyone disagree with this @GoBirds @BladeRunner?
I think it definitely has to do with Don in office. The reaction to him the last 4 years from day one has been extreme and behavior we have never seen directed at any POTUS. I doubt it would be to the same extent under the others. I’m sure we are about to see the favor returned unfortunately. 

 
IN recent months/years, a disturbing number of right wing and right leaning folks have come to view (and speak about) anyone leaning left or on the left as immoral socialists, ANTI-American. They now firmly believe the election was stolen and cannot be dissuaded from this position by any evidence. (Even when you successfully prove false one "proof" they add three more, most of which even if true wouldn't come remotely close to enough to change the results). Many wrap their position up in their faith, making any political disagreement an attack on their religion.

I agree with some previous posters, until this ends there isn't a path. Until these folks realize Democrats aren't enemies of America I have no idea how we can move on. (FWIW, I don't think they are enemies, but I do think they are intentionally misled)
Wait...wut?  have you been around for the last 20 years?  The last 4?  WTH?

You have got to be kidding me with your post.  The left has been non-stop demonizing conservatives since GWB.  And the right being "misled"?  OMG.

If you think only it's only the right that has to end this, then you're simply being unrealistic.  Tone-deaf posts like yours is what really gets me bent out of shape.   Unbelievable.  :doh:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait...wut?  have you been around for the last 20 years?  The last 4?  WTH?

You have got to be kidding me with your post.  The left has been non-stop demonizing conservatives since GWB.  And the right being "misled"?  OMG.

If you think only it's only the right that has to end this, then you're simply being unrealistic.  Tone-deaf posts like yours is what really gets me bent out of shape.   Unbelievable.  :doh:
so...was the election stolen?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top