So you're going to disregard the opinion and article from a major liberal media outlet.Well, besides the fact that I almost never agree with Jim Cramer, you really didn’t answer my question. What is the difference between the old NAFTA deal and the new one?
Third times the charm I hope:So you're going to disregard the opinion and article from a major liberal media outlet.
I'll keep posting articles that basically state that Trump's china policy will be mimicked by Biden, and is a complete reversal of Obamas EIGHT YEARS of doing absolutely nothing.
I'll save you timeThird times the charm I hope:
How is the new NAFTA deal significantly different from the old one? Please explain.
Few things..No, I don't believe Biden will mimic Trump’s policies with China...that would again leave us in a worse position than we already were. Also, to claim Obama did absolutely nothing in regards to China is flat out false. What do you think the purpose of TPP was?So you're going to disregard the opinion and article from a major liberal media outlet.
I'll keep posting articles that basically state that Trump's china policy will be mimicked by Biden, and is a complete reversal of Obamas EIGHT YEARS of doing absolutely nothing.
You mean less of it?
Oh, it's not just the liberals....us conservative/moderate types also understand tariffs are merely a tax on us. They will get us nothing and if Biden continues them as the sole means in his approach he'll be as foolish as Trump."Why isn't Biden dropping Tariffs?" - Washington Post
So many liberals in this thread and in this forum parroting from liberal media source how bad the Tariffs were.
Here is an article from your beloved Washington Post.
Yeah did you read the article? I suspect you only read the headline."Why isn't Biden dropping Tariffs?" - Washington Post
So many liberals in this thread and in this forum parroting from liberal media source how bad the Tariffs were.
Here is an article from your beloved Washington Post.
Sigh, of course I read the article.Yeah did you read the article? I suspect you only read the headline.
If you had read even the first paragraph of the article, you would have seen this line:
There are NO defensible reasons for keeping Trump’s tariffs in place.
Please read the rest of the article as the writer explains why. And thank you for posting it.
Because he hasn’t been inaugurated yet?"Why isn't Biden dropping Tariffs?" - Washington Post
So many liberals in this thread and in this forum parroting from liberal media source how bad the Tariffs were for the last year....where are you now?
Here is an article from your beloved Washington Post.
Then I’m surprised you would offer it as evidence that Trump’s tariffs are a good thing since it says exactly the opposite.Sigh, of course I read the article.
Yes. It’s an awful decision by Biden. He’s trying to placate people who don’t understand the harm these tariffs are doing. Biden knows better; he’s behaving like a lousy politician. Terrible.
Who said they are ok with Biden of he does the same as Trump? Biden is not in office...he cannot enact policies.For the record, I absolutely believe Trump was on the right side of China policy as opposed to do-nothing Obama.
I just wanted to see the liberals in this forum try to explain their discontent with Trump on China and then all of a sudden okay with Biden continuing those policies.
I find that interesting.
I'll get to it. I have other fish to fry...currently stewing over nimrod Newsom.You have yet to explain yourself why these tariffs are a positive. You have yet to explain why the new NAFTA deal was a positive.
Well, first you have to find someone doing this right?For the record, I absolutely believe Trump was on the right side of China policy as opposed to do-nothing Obama. So this is a shockingly good decision by Biden...if he just repeats Trump policy I'll be tickled pink.
I just wanted to see the liberals in this forum try to explain their discontent with Trump on China and then all of a sudden okay with Biden continuing those policies.
I find that interesting.
A major difference will be that Biden will work with European allies and Japan to confront China. Farmers in the USA were crushed by the tariffs, and China is falling short on its phase one "agreement" to buy. Peter Navarro has been wrong so many times, there's bound to be a better policy.For the record, I absolutely believe Trump was on the right side of China policy as opposed to do-nothing Obama. So this is a shockingly good decision by Biden...if he just repeats Trump policy I'll be tickled pink.
I just wanted to see the liberals in this forum try to explain their discontent with Trump on China and then all of a sudden okay with Biden continuing those policies.
I find that interesting.
I'm not OK with it.For the record, I absolutely believe Trump was on the right side of China policy as opposed to do-nothing Obama. So this is a shockingly good decision by Biden...if he just repeats Trump policy I'll be tickled pink.
I just wanted to see the liberals in this forum try to explain their discontent with Trump on China and then all of a sudden okay with Biden continuing those policies.
I find that interesting.
This makes a lot more sense to me.The Z Machine said:I'm not OK with it.
Depends. Are you a believer in more taxes and less free trade? Or an enemy of capitalism.... however you want to phrase it.This makes a lot more sense to me.
Is your stance that we should have more Obama-era policy with China?
Yes. We should use multilateral trade pressure not unilateral. The tariffs hurt American farmers and consumers far more than it hurt China. Besides, even the hurt it did cause China, the people that run that country don't care. They knew they could outlast and outwit Trump.This makes a lot more sense to me.
Is your stance that we should have more Obama-era policy with China?
Unless marriages count.Successfully postponing the alien invasion.
How would you characterize Obama's China policy effectiveness?I think Trumps intent with China was good. I think his execution was poor.
not to mention the "socialism" these policies create which I find pretty funny given the fear mongering around the word.Yes. We should use multilateral trade pressure not unilateral. The tariffs hurt American farmers and consumers far more than it hurt China. Besides, even the hurt it did cause China, the people that run that country don't care. They knew they could outlast and outwit Trump.
What does Obama's China's policy effectiveness have to do with Trumps?How would you characterize Obama's China policy effectiveness?t with China was good. I think his execution was poor.
How would you forecast Biden's?
It highlights that sometimes doing "nothing" is better than doing "something" for the sake of doing??What does Obama's China's policy effectiveness have to do with Trumps?
They involve capital moving from the consumer to government (i.e. a tax).The Commish said:Did we ever get an explanation of how these tariffs are "capitalistic"?
toucheThey involve capital moving from the consumer to government (i.e. a tax).
In this case the Chinese currency debased itself by the approximate amount of the tarriffs, so the consumer didn't see a rise in the cost of goods. So it really wasn't a tax, the consumer didn't pay it - the Chinese did through their currency.They involve capital moving from the consumer to government (i.e. a tax).
It did? What was the Yuan worth in dollars in January of 2016? What is it worth today?In this case the Chinese currency debased itself by the approximate amount of the tarriffs, so the consumer didn't see a rise in the cost of goods. So it really wasn't a tax, the consumer didn't pay it - the Chinese did through their currency.
This, of course didn't solve the issue of demand destruction done in retaliation (to US farmers, etc.). Nor did we make much headway into further protections of our IP. Clinton gave that away and we haven't really been able to get it back. I do appreciate DJT trying.
You do realize that there are other variables in time space that have had an effect since 2016, yes? The U.S. has been actively debasing its currency during this COVID issue and the dollar has dropped dramatically this year. This talks about China adjusting its currency in 2018.It did? What was the Yuan worth in dollars in January of 2016? What is it worth today?
One of the bright spots....glad they decided to continue the pursuit of this during this admin.....when they implemented the absurd tariffs on canadas solar panels i wondered if theyd do something with this too, cause "obama bad" seemed to their measuring stick with these things.The establishment of the Energy Resource Governance Initiative (ERGI) could prove to be a huge, huge deal as we accelerate the transition to clean energy. It is a multi-country consortium established in 2019 by the State Dept. designed to reduce dependence on China for metals and other supply chain components for EV's, solar/wind, batteries, etc.
This is obviously ironic given the rest of Trump's environmental agenda...but is expected to be expanded further during the Biden Administration.
The Trump administration’s top energy diplomat said on Friday he expects an initiative aimed at securing supply chains for metals critical for the clean energy transformation will continue with President-elect Joe Biden’s administration.
Increasing demand for renewable energy, electric vehicles, and battery storage technologies will create unprecedented demand for energy resource minerals. Energy Resource Governance Initiative (ERGI) is a U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Energy Resources (ENR)-led effort designed to promote sound mining sector governance and resilient energy mineral supply chains. Through this initiative, ENR will engage countries to advance governance principles, share best practices, and encourage a level playing field. ERGI will also promote resilient and secure energy resource mineral supply chains.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-minerals-renewables/top-u-s-energy-diplomat-expects-minerals-initiative-to-continue-under-biden-idUSKBN28S334?il=0
https://www.state.gov/energy-resource-governance-initiative/
Lots of people are hurting in real time because Trump is bitter about losing the election. He deserves no credit for this.I give Trump credit for not supporting this garbage budget with crappy COVID support.
Pull COVID out of that garbage budget, pass it separate for $2k and proper unemployment benefits.
Please stop enabling the fear mongering of lazy politicians. The bill needs fixing yesterday. It should have been done weeks ago. Fix it now. As a matter of ideaology I refuse to reward bad behavior.Lots of people are hurting in real time because a Trump is bitter about losing the election. He deserves no credit for this.I give Trump credit for not supporting this garbage budget with crappy COVID support.
Pull COVID out of that garbage budget, pass it separate for $2k and proper unemployment benefits.