PennStater77
Footballguy
He is right, nobody cares about Jan 6th LOLSuch BS. I feel sad for you.
He is right, nobody cares about Jan 6th LOLSuch BS. I feel sad for you.
That's a very inappropriate response given that people lost their lives on this date participating in something that shouldn't have happened. I don't mind your trolling or obvious fishing attempts, but let's be less callous than this, please.He is right, nobody cares about Jan 6th LOL
Why? Dems got control of House and Senate and their main concern while in control, go after Trump..LOLThat's a very inappropriate response given that people lost their lives on this date participating in something that shouldn't have happened. I don't mind your trolling or obvious fishing attempts, but let's be less callous than this, please.
That isn’t the main concern.Why? Dems got control of House and Senate and their main concern while in control, go after Trump..LOL
Like I said, why aren't they getting things done, Jan 6th was so in the past. Get to work on stuff that you promised or help people. Trump is in their heads and I love it.
The only person killed was shot be an over zealous police officer who shot an unarmed women who threatened no one.That's a very inappropriate response given that people lost their lives on this date participating in something that shouldn't have happened. I don't mind your trolling or obvious fishing attempts, but let's be less callous than this, please.
I would rather they take action against the people that caused 1/6.Democrats and their need to grossly overplay this. Nobody cares about this. Hunting down 60-year old nurses who have never committed a crime in their lives in a quest to fulfilled their lust for blood. Oh boy, the world is a safer place now we have blood thirsty partisan hacks in charge.
Of course it is the main concern.That isn’t the main concern.
To think its all they are doing is laughable.
You mean the complete lack of security.I would rather they take action against the people that caused 1/6.
Maybe she shouldn’t have worn that dress.You mean the complete lack of security.
Can you prove she was no threat? She was committing a crime and with her military training, she could be considered a threat.The only person killed was shot be an over zealous police officer who shot an unarmed women who threatened no one.
I thought the right was all about personal responsibilityYou mean the complete lack of security.
Democrats and their need to grossly overplay this. Nobody cares about this. Hunting down 60-year old nurses who have never committed a crime in their lives in a quest to fulfilled their lust for blood. Oh boy, the world is a safer place now we have blood thirsty partisan hacks in charge.
But there was a dude who had ZIP TIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....OMG!!!!!!!!!!! The horrors!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We need to ban Assault Zip Ties! At least have a waiting period for purchasing zip ties. Maybe a national registration for zip ties?
Hypothetically anyone walking down the street could be a threat. You can't shoot people out of fear, there needs to be some immanent threat. Nothing she did even remotely raises to the level of deadly force. It was chaotic fear which killed her which turned out to be irrationale.Can you prove she was no threat? She was committing a crime and with her military training, she could be considered a threat.
Because the Dems won't give two cents in their 'investigation' into the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. They already believe it was completely justified and Ashli will be nothing but a footnote. We are going to learn nothing except how much democrats hate Trump and white supremist/white nationalists.On June 16, you wrote -
"Who shot ashli babbitt?
Why is there no transparency into this? White lives don't matter? "
-
Now the Dems want to have a bi-partisan investigation into the events of that day. But now you seems completely uninterested in that. Why?
A member of a hoard trying to be the first to climb through a barricade is threatening no one? Really? That's the new spin?The only person killed was shot be an over zealous police officer who shot an unarmed women who threatened no one.
How do you know that?Because the Dems won't give two cents in their 'investigation' into the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. They already believe it was completely justified and Ashli will be nothing but a footnote. We are going to learn nothing except how much democrats hate Trump and white supremist/white nationalists.
same guy that thinks Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent after shooting three people is fake upset about this.A member of a hoard trying to be the first to climb through a barricade is threatening no one? Really? That's the new spin?
It’s really weird that you consistently take issue with people not liking white supremacists.Because the Dems won't give two cents in their 'investigation' into the shooting of Ashli Babbitt. They already believe it was completely justified and Ashli will be nothing but a footnote. We are going to learn nothing except how much democrats hate Trump and white supremist/white nationalists.
In house democrats eyes all if not most Republicans are white nationalists. Cerainly all Trump supporters are as countless bans in this forum can attest to. The only thing the report will do is characterize Ashli Babbitt as a far-rightwing extremist kook and will place all the blame for her death at the hands of Trump. I know this because this is the Democratic playbook. It never changes.How do you know that?
The House set up a select committee to investigate. The committee - "will have subpoena power to find out what led to the attack, as well as to examine the preparedness and response of Capitol Police and other law-enforcement agencies. Also within the panel’s scope will be government intelligence collection, analysis and the sharing of that information ahead of Jan. 6."
Seems to me examining the preparedness and response of Capitol Police necessarily includes what happened to Ashli Babbitt and exactly what you have been requesting. Indeed, Liz Cheney, who will be on the committee - said Congress is “obligated to conduct a full investigation of the most serious attack on our Capitol since 1814,” saying the nation, as well as law-enforcement officers who defended the Capitol, deserved answers.
So again - how do you know we will learn nothing?
Also - who doesn't hate white supremacists/white nationalists?
In house democrats eyes all if not most Republicans are white nationalists. Cerainly all Trump supporters are as countless bans in this forum can attest to. The only thing the report will do is characterize Ashli Babbitt as a far-rightwing extremist kook and will place all the blame for her death at the hands of Trump. I know this because this is the Democratic playbook. It never changes.
No hyperbole hereIn house democrats eyes all if not most Republicans are white nationalists. Cerainly all Trump supporters are as countless bans in this forum can attest to. The only thing the report will do is characterize Ashli Babbitt as a far-rightwing extremist kook and will place all the blame for her death at the hands of Trump. I know this because this is the Democratic playbook. It never changes.
Seriously?https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9779229/Capitol-rioter-told-cop-wanted-lynch-Nancy-Pelosi-quotes-Bible-court.html
Trump just recently at CPAC praised his supporters who stormed the US Capitol on January 6 as 'peaceful', 'patriots' and 'great people'.
It's been obvious for a very long time the right only wants to rule over others. Those subjects should do what they are told and not worry about what the rulers themselves are doing.I thought the right was all about personal responsibility
Just flat out bogus opining about House Democrats. Then complains that the media spreads mistruths about racial issues.No hyperbole here
No kidding, they would push through a supreme court judge in less time than that.So he has 9 days to choose. Sounds like plenty of time
No, she was not threatening. If Ashli was a black BLM protestor, the media would be absolutely outraged and calling for the cops head.A member of a hoard trying to be the first to climb through a barricade is threatening no one? Really? That's the new spin?
If instead of abandoning the police station in Minneapolis, they stayed behind and as protestors broke in and attempted to burn down the building, nobody would be outraged if the police shot someoneNo, she was not threatening. If Ashli was a black BLM protestor, the media would be absolutely outraged and calling for the cops head.
Really. You think BLM protestors would have gotten that far before the shooting started?No, she was not threatening. If Ashli was a black BLM protestor, the media would be absolutely outraged and calling for the cops head.
No, I am being accurate. This is how childish and partisan house Democrats behave. They are as predictable as the news media reporting a story on race. It will be one hundred percent one-sided non-sense that won't solve anything. Perhaps they will establish a bit more coordination between the multiple security forces, but they should do that anyways.Oh ok. So you are just being partisan.
Got it.
maybe he was there and now a little nervous about getting in troubleOn June 16, you wrote -
"Who shot ashli babbitt?
Why is there no transparency into this? White lives don't matter? "
-
Now the Dems want to have a bi-partisan investigation into the events of that day. But now you seems completely uninterested in that. Why?
Never mind.No, she was not threatening. If Ashli was a black BLM protestor, the media would be absolutely outraged and calling for the cops head.
Oh - so you've convicted him already? His trial hasn't even started yet.same guy that thinks Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent after shooting three people is fake upset about this.
Kyle Rittenhouse who defended himself after being attacked by peacefulBLM protesters?same guy that thinks Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent after shooting three people is fake upset about this.
Of course.If some guy climbed the fence in front of the White House and started sprinting toward the front door while President Trump was inside, would anyone have an issue with Secret Service taking him down with a firearm? I know I wouldn’t.
Of course.
This idea the rioter shooting wasn’t a horrible but justified action by a cop or secret service is just continued gaslighting / white washing efforts.
It’s an amazing testament to the officers that day that more of these people weren’t shot or that this didn’t spiral into something much worse.
There is a recently released video showing the rioters acknowledging the gun, the officer warning them to back up, then Babbit starts to jump through the door in the direction of the cop and is shot.In fairness, I don't think we know the facts of how Babbitt was killed, right? Hence the need for an investigation.
You can watch the video of her getting shot.In fairness, I don't think we know the facts of how Babbitt was killed, right? Hence the need for an investigation.
What would you think if rioters had broken in the windows of the WH, dragged cops out, beat them, groups of them running around various parts of the building when DJT was in there?Kyle Rittenhouse who defended himself after being attacked by peacefulBLM protesters?
Unarmed? Absolutely would have an issue with that.If some guy climbed the fence in front of the White House and started sprinting toward the front door while President Trump was inside, would anyone have an issue with Secret Service taking him down with a firearm? I know I wouldn’t.
Kyle Rittenhouse shooting those three guys was far more justified than the Babbitt shooting. Rittenhouse was in eminent danger where he would have been killed or severely harmed. Do you have any clue what went down that night. Apparently not.same guy that thinks Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent after shooting three people is fake upset about this.
If they would of had even 10% of that on January 6th, nothing would have went down.As a reminder, here was the advanced security for a peaceful BLM protest where marchers were simply walking down the street.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/210106172554-03-blm-george-floyd-protests-file-exlarge-169.jpg
So when he said "nobody cares about Jan. 6th" he was wrong. And callous. A woman is dead and her family grieves. Be better please.The only person killed was shot be an over zealous police officer who shot an unarmed women who threatened no one.
That is neither a direct quote nor the context. Nobody cares was referring to the Congressional Investigation which everyone knows is just a partisan witch hunt. So you be better.So when he said "nobody cares about Jan. 6th" he was wrong. And callous. A woman is dead and her family grieves. Be better please.