DA RAIDERS
Footballguy
as crazy as it sounds, i'll pass on rodgers. way too many other holes to fill. and the trade would only create more holes.
Rodgers for a 3rd rounder? Yes. As much as I back Carr.... Rodgers is an all time great and has many years left.
My bad.... I think I read that wrong.... I think it was the third overall they wanted and some more.Rodgers for a 3rd rounder? Yes. As much as I back Carr.... Rodgers is an all time great and has many years left.
Kind of funny how these unquestionably great QB's like Russell and Rodgers have LV on their short list of places they want to land.... you know, with Gruden and Mayock at the helm which if you listen to some Raider fans are horrible, no nothing and no one wants to play for them..... kind of odd, because, it seems, that some Raider fans just may be overly biased in their poo poo views.
I thought it was for the 3rd overall pick, not a 3rd rounder.Rodgers for a 3rd rounder? Yes. As much as I back Carr.... Rodgers is an all time great and has many years left.
Ah - you caught it just as I was postingMy bad.... I think I read that wrong.... I think it was the third overall they wanted and some more.
That is different. 17 plus a slew of other value. I will stick with Carr.
But my other point stands.
Yea.... I think I read it wrong..... I was like "wow, why in the hell did the Niners not jump on that?!" now it makes sense.I thought it was for the 3rd overall pick, not a 3rd rounder.
?
I don’t think it’s realistic regardless. If the Niners want him, that 1.03 is a trade chip the Raiders can’t realistically compete with.as crazy as it sounds, i'll pass on rodgers. way too many other holes to fill. and the trade would only create more holes.
Sounds like things are heating up with Denver.I don’t think it’s realistic regardless. If the Niners want him, that 1.03 is a trade chip the Raiders can’t realistically compete with.
That division would be brutal for the Raiders.While I may not have thought it was best idea for Raiders, I didn't want him in division:
Cecil Lammey
@CecilLammey
19m.
@markschlereth
on @1043TheFan
NOW says #Broncos are not taking a QB in the #NFLDraft because they are close to trading for Aaron Rodgers per his sources. "As close to a done deal as it can be."
That would SUCKWhile I may not have thought it was best idea for Raiders, I didn't want him in division:
Cecil Lammey
@CecilLammey
19m.
@markschlereth
on @1043TheFan
NOW says #Broncos are not taking a QB in the #NFLDraft because they are close to trading for Aaron Rodgers per his sources. "As close to a done deal as it can be."
Long term it would be good but short term it would suck. Rodgers on the Donkeys makes them a lwadinge SB competitor for sure. Having two of those in our division will hurt.So far so good!! Parsons may be available
and i hope the stupid ### donkeys did mortgage their future, and traded everything for Rodgers.
Bears just didI knew all the Rodgers talk was a bunch of bull ####.
For the raiders needs, this draft is unfolding nicely. Really hope someone trades up for a qb. Let’s go hoodie!
My daughter interrupted me when I was typing and as I was trying to finish they announced. lolExcept Cowboys.... going to be D..... I think taking Parsons is...... yup, they did
I knew it. Cowboys NEEDED D pretty much everywhere. One thing that the Cowboys do pretty often is take BPA regardless of need but in this case they needed him and prob the best defensive player period.F. F. F. There goes Parsons.
Yep. Parsons is likely ROY on D.I knew it. Cowboys NEEDED D pretty much everywhere. One thing that the Cowboys do pretty often is take BPA regardless of need but in this case they needed him and prob the best defensive player period.
Vera-Tucker. Must have thought Raiders were targeting him.Jets might snipe an OL here.
A gift to them. Geez. Sometimes the Pats just luck into the perfect spots.F’ing hoodie gets Mac jones, if he wants him.
Thanks for the update.Hey Chad. I’m not happy. Gruden reached again and left a lot of potential D players on the table. Gruden cannot draft.