Also the "ball is out of bounds if it's touched by a player who has any part of their body out of bounds" rule.I absolutely hate that rule.
It's like he got KC fired up yet he was en route to the end zone...if he had just caught it and went down instead of trying to be the hero, Cleveland would have had it 1st and goal and powerful combo at RB to play with.Do you really need to spin the ball because you did what you get paid to do? And then follow it up with that.
This vodka isn’t going to drink itselfWell, no reason to keep watching now.
Belichick prohibits Pats players from doing it, because stuff like that happens too often.I'm surprised that doesn't happen more with all the reaching with the ball.
Disagree but it's frustrating...KC lead with helmet and I'm not sure what result that would have made but it wasn't called and it impacted the playWell, no reason to keep watching now.
Of course, that’s what they do with literally every fumble that goes out of bounds.For those saying they hate the rule - what would you prefer they do, offense keeps the ball at the spot of the fumble? I’d be cool with that.
I didn’t say stop drinking - don’t be ridiculous.This vodka isn’t going to drink itself
That would be far worse... You get a "free" fumble?For those saying they hate the rule - what would you prefer they do, offense keeps the ball at the spot of the fumble? I’d be cool with that.
Yes. Giving the ball to the defense when they didn't recover it doesn't make much sense.For those saying they hate the rule - what would you prefer they do, offense keeps the ball at the spot of the fumble? I’d be cool with that.
Seems like one of those plays that might change a rule next yearIf the ball went out at the 1, Cleveland would have the ball at the 1. How does this rule exist?!????????
Exactly this. Just like everywhere else on the field.For those saying they hate the rule - what would you prefer they do, offense keeps the ball at the spot of the fumble? I’d be cool with that.
Interesting. That guy might make it in this coaching business.Belichick prohibits Pats players from doing it, because stuff like that happens too often.
I’d love to be wrong but feels like this one is over.Disagree but it's frustrating...KC lead with helmet and I'm not sure what result that would have made but it wasn't called and it impacted the play
I dunno, man. Think back to all those games when the Cleveland Browns battled back after suffering adversity.I’d love to be wrong but feels like this one is over.
But you're basically telling a guy to fight against instinct. Goal line is there and the objective is to score.It's like fighting for an extra half yard when you're nowhere near a first down or TD. You increase the likelihood of injury or turnover - it's not worth it.
Groundhog day on AMC. Gladiator on BBC.Any good movies coming on the next few minutes?
Nobody does Hindsight like AndyIt's like fighting for an extra half yard when you're nowhere near a first down or TD. You increase the likelihood of injury or turnover - it's not worth it.