It will be. Thankfully the press will be much less agressive with Jen as we have seen already. That is OK with me.She's been good so far in the limited time I've seen her. I expect softball questions in the beginning but we'll see how she handles tougher times. I would have no problem with 4 years of boring.
I would just add that if she's lying, that should go after her like the nut before herIt will be. Thankfully the press will be much less agressive with Jen as we have seen already. That is OK with me.
Don't worry, she's a Democrat. They'll get softballs the entire 4 years.It will be. Thankfully the press will be much less agressive with Jen as we have seen already. That is OK with me.
Really? I want the press to hold our politician's feet to the fire and ask the tough questions. I dont want any cheerleaders, I dont care who is in office.It will be. Thankfully the press will be much less agressive with Jen as we have seen already. That is OK with me.
If she starts spouting lies and alternative facts then they should definitely go after her.Don't worry, she's a Democrat. They'll get softballs the entire 4 years.
Well, we knew it would be softer from day 1. That is what people want.Don't worry, she's a Democrat. They'll get softballs the entire 4 years.
If she starts lying will know she's a republican.Don't worry, she's a Democrat. They'll get softballs the entire 4 years.
Do you agree people get softer treatment when they aren’t confrontational?Well, we knew it would be softer from day 1. That is what people want.
Oh I don`t know. Just know I like the media being less hostile and agressive. Before you could see the hate in their eyes and feel it. Now it is easier to watch.sho nuff said:Do you agree people get softer treatment when they aren’t confrontational?
Probably so...as I am less hostile to people who are less hostile to me. Seems a reaction to how they are being treated by the administration.Oh I don`t know. Just know I like the media being less hostile and agressive. Before you could see the hate in their eyes and feel it. Now it is easier to watch.
Do you like being lied to all the time? How about the POTUS restricting you from doing your job?Oh I don`t know. Just know I like the media being less hostile and agressive. Before you could see the hate in their eyes and feel it. Now it is easier to watch.
Wait, she has hair?Where to start
It is amazing hearing her stand and take questions.
She's... competent. That shouldn't be the bar but here we are.
She takes questions and doesn't fight with the media but she is not pushover either. Loved this https://i.redd.it/qzg90dhy9yc61.jpg
That look is amazing.
And if she doesn't know she just... says so... and comes back to it?
And that hair. As the kids today say it is fire. I had no idea the cause of smart red headed women needed advancing but she has done more for it in three days than anyone I can remember.
Share your favorite Jen Psaki moments here.
Careful talking about a "back end" in this Jen thread. Our man @2Squirrels1Nut will take that the wrong way and get excited.Short interview with her on the back end of the latest Pod Save America podcast.
"White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki talks to Tommy about being back in the briefing room and the first week of the Biden Administration."
Sounds like they had worked together some in the Obama White House.
No, but I heard "She got The Fire Down Below" by Bob Seger today and thought of Jen.
Psaki shows another failure here. You don't say you don't have an answer. It's not a position of strength. That's even worse that pure 100 percent deflection. Saying transparency is not relevant within a question about actual transparency is horrible optics.
There are teenagers in high school debate teams that understand you can't say you don't have an answer. You say you'll follow up. Of course, Psaki can't follow up since she allowed a reporter to frame the narrative on her and corner her. Same guy over and over again. She should have leveraged him a long time ago to neutralize him by means of his publication/employer/brand.
People don't like liars, but they despise weakness even more.
Seriously. What the hell fredLook what you did, Fred.
Interestingly, a quick Google of "Trump 2014" yields 711 million in responses. The second item is a CNN video labelled "Trump in 2014: If I run, I'll provide taxes." I didn't watch the video to see if he touched his nose (per GG above).some of this stuff is from 5-8 years ago? what’s next, we’re going to get videos of trump hosting his game show? i think that’s what he was doing back then. video - trump grills tommy lee on not being aggressive enough selling pb&j sandwiches from his food truck. oooolol
Yeah, people that weren't flawless several years ago really bother me. And: Does all this count as the type of 'unity' that the Rs are now calling for?
Cowboysfan8 said:I disagree with her politics but find her quite attractive
Is that allowed?
some of this stuff is from 5-8 years ago? what’s next, we’re going to get videos of trump hosting his game show? i think that’s what he was doing back then. video - trump grills tommy lee on not being aggressive enough selling pb&j sandwiches from his food truck. oooolol
Interestingly, a quick Google of "Trump 2014" yields 711 million in responses. The second item is a CNN video labelled "Trump in 2014: If I run, I'll provide taxes." I didn't watch the video to see if he touched his nose (per GG above).
And he is showing the same critical analysis of her and her qualifications for the position that he did towards Kayleigh McEnany, oh, wait...I'm starting to think GordonGekko doesn't really appreciate Jen Psaki.
Say what now?How pleasant she is aesthetically doesn't change the reality that she lacks the temperament and fundamentals to be White House Press Secretary.
Seems her temperament has been fine. And a pleasant change from what we have seen in the past 2 press secretaries (one which some are praising on a run for governor in Arkansas)Say what now?
I said to myself, "self - even though you have him on ignore, you should check out one of those GG posts. I mean, there are so many of them. There has to be something valuable in there right?VIDEO: State Dept.'s Psaki can't explain her beef with Ukraine •May 13, 2014
The US State Dept's Jen Psaki was quick to undermine moves for autonomy in East Ukraine but failed to follow up on her key 'carousel voting' claim . It turns out she didn't actually know what she was talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bg9X0eNFds
/me sighsRT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government.
Is she? In what ways? Because of things she did in 2014?She's sub par.
Trying to change the subject means you agree.
Yes. And I'm being generous.Is she?She's sub par.
Trying to change the subject means you agree.
Is there some WAR or RPM rankings we can take a look at?She's sub par.
Trying to change the subject means you agree.
I admire the effort. I have a small measure of confidence you'll eventually say something funny.Is there some WAR or RPM rankings we can take a look at?
How so? I mean...if you are going to make an assertion...can you explain how she is sub par...and what is par to you?Yes. And I'm being generous.