One thing we don’t know is how many LGBTQ parents are already on the committee. If none, which I really doubt given prevalence in SF, then that should be a consideration. Absolutely. However, I find no fault if they are merely trying to add ethnic diversity commensurate with the student population. It’s pretty clear that they need a few more Asian folks. The percentages above obviously fall short of 100%, so not sure what to make of that. I don’t know if they’re separating out Indian from Asian, but I’m led to believe that given that they did with Pacific Islander.
If we found out that half of the parents on the council were part of the LGBTQ community, would you change your perspective? Hypothetical, of course, since we don’t actually know.
ETA that if none of the parents were LGBTQ, then yeah - this is horrifically dumb. But not at all unsurprising given the district under discussion.