beef
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
***Official Kamala Harris Impeachment Thread*** (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter beef
- Start date
The proverbial coin flips, and we see they’re on either side. That’s assuming they actually regain the majority.
ETA: I imagine they’ll have some type of drummed up charges that are actually false at any rate, since they and the truth are evidently estranged as of late.
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet
Footballguy
Everything Lindsay Graham is saying and doing these days is going to backfire on him.
Graham, like Hawley and Cruz, has looked at the polling of Republicans and decided to continue to hitch his wagon firmly to Donald Trump. This is the wrong side, despite the current polls. The Republican base is slow to change opinion, and right now they resent the hell out of liberals lecturing them that they were wrong about Trump; hence the continued firm support. But they’re also not stupid. Give it 6 months, a year, two years...Trump’s hold over them is going to diminish, then disappear altogether.
BladeRunner
Footballguy
I don't know....seems like a legit thing to do. I mean, if the Democrats are so concerned about fairness and equality then supporting this is a no-brainer!
BladeRunner
Footballguy
But impeachment is the only way to have the legitimate discussion about it and hold her ACCOUNTABLE!!!!
It's all about accountability, that's all we want. It's not about revenge or payback. Seriously, it's not. Just accountability.
Sea Duck
Footballguy
Again, this rhetoric tends to backfire. It's the same mentality that leads Trump supporters to think that they can storm the Capitol as long as they claim that it's a "peaceful protest".
BladeRunner
Footballguy
It's also the same rhetoric that causes neighborhoods to be burned to the ground and business looted. As long as they claim it's about "RACISM!" it's okay.
Man, that was easy.
Last edited by a moderator:
Joe Mammy
Footballguy
Lindsey has more flips than Waffle House.
A woman of color. Her only offense. She bailed someone out? Is that an impeachable offense?
And notice in your link that she should be impeached IF the GOP takes back the house. IF IF IF!
This needs to be filed in the round bin. Next. Geez, you guys are really reaching.
A woman of color. Her only offense. She bailed someone out? Is that an impeachable offense?
And notice in your link that she should be impeached IF the GOP takes back the house. IF IF IF!
This needs to be filed in the round bin. Next. Geez, you guys are really reaching.
squistion
Footballguy
Accountable for what exactly? The offending tweet Graham is talking about was in June of 2020 and she wasn't VP then. Trump was impeached twice for things he did while in office, not before.
rockaction
Footballguy
I can't believe Republican leadership is actually saying stuff like this. How deep is the crazy in the electorate? I don't watch Fox, Newsmax, or OAN. Is this standard stuff?
Apple Jack
Footballguy
Roy L Fewks
Footballguy
We know Lindsey isn't serious. It's just something fun to say to get the libs all wound up, like threatening to put Nancy P on the witness stand.
BladeRunner
Footballguy
rockaction
Footballguy
thriftyrocker
Footballguy
Kamala Harris's "offense" is tweeting a link to the Minnesota Freedom Fund which helps put up bail for anyone who can't post bail so they are not kept in jail for the sole reason of not having enough money.
BladeRunner
Footballguy
She was bailing out those where rioting, arson, looting, assaults and murders.. Seems impeachment-worthy to me.
sho nuff
Footballguy
squistion
Footballguy
timschochet
Footballguy
She was at the courthouse herself bailing out arsonists and murderers? News to me.
BladeRunner
Footballguy
Joe Mammy
Footballguy
Ohhhhhh, bbbbbbbbrrrrrrrrruuuuuuuuuuuuttttttttttttthhhhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Reach, reach some more and then reach further. Nope, nothing.
NorvilleBarnes
Footballguy
One thing about the left, they sure can turn on a dime.
Not sure if this thread was supposed to be satire or not, but this is actually my prediction. I believe (and I hope I'm wrong) Kamala will be President much sooner than people expect.
Not sure if this thread was supposed to be satire or not, but this is actually my prediction. I believe (and I hope I'm wrong) Kamala will be President much sooner than people expect.
The General
Footballguy
parasaurolophus
Footballguy
So what you are saying is that not actually doing something means you arent guilty of it?
sho nuff
Footballguy
This does not se the left turning...but the right that defended Trump
not once...but twice in deserving impeachment...for trying with someone who doesn’t seem to have committed an impeachable offense...and the offense even discussed was before she was VP
parasaurolophus
Footballguy
joffer
Footballguy
Mile High
Footballguy
Now you are reading things that aren’t there.
you need to give up on trying to be clever - it’s not working for you
parasaurolophus
Footballguy
beef
Footballguy
NorvilleBarnes
Footballguy
parasaurolophus
Footballguy
I guess i dont understand what you were saying then. It sure sounded like you didnt support impeaching people for reading into things they said or actions that others did based on her words. Just because she posted a link that said "donate to the minnesota freedom fund" doesnt mean she should be held responsible if people actually did it and of course she cant be held responsible if the bad re-offenders got bailed out too, even though that could have been considered a completely obvious and forseeable outcome.
I thought that was an obviously bipartisan point since we just watched that unfold.
Summer Wheat
Footballguy
The more I hear about "impeachment" on any side is that the key is having majority in Congress. On POTUS Radio said that is left leaning but overall pretty good on info said GOP kept control in 2018 and 2020 there never would have been any impeachments trials. Is that true?
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
Because she didn't...Trump did himself do what he was accused of. Save the "he was acquitted so he didn't actually do it".
sho nuff
Footballguy
There barely was an impeachment "trial" in 2020. Thanks to ol Mitch. This one at least there was some semblance of a trial (still no witnesses). But I think there were enough Rs ready for it that at least one of these would have still made it through the house.
I mean...we can talk about if its political...but IMO...the things Trump was impeached for...any POTUS would have been impeached or had articles brought for those actions. Nobody...nobody would have ever been impeached for what Kamala is being accused of here in this little game.
beer 30
Footballguy
Lindsay is my Senator. I can assure you he is going nowhere. Folks love him here for some reason. He isn't particularly involved locally, I don't see massive improvements in SC's infrastructure/industry/education so not sure what his claim to fame is other than he supports Trump
Ramblin Wreck
Footballguy
Now you’re the sherrif of responses? Because that excuse came straight out of you Clinton dudes. So spare us all your bull crap here
dawgtrails
Footballguy
There is nothing impeachable about donating to a fund that helps people who can't afford bail. Even if that money went to suspected arsonists or rioters or murderers.
Joe Mammy
Footballguy
squistion
Footballguy
Yes, an action that was not illegal and would not have been impeachable even if she were VP, which she wasn't at the time.
Sand
Footballguy
If I remember right all 50 blue Senators voted that concept constitutional.squistion said:
Not saying she should be impeached. Heck, let's impeach Carter - incitement of stagflation. That would be much more entertaining and he certainly did more damage to the US than Kamala ever could.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Voted what constitutional?
Because if you are talking about Trump...he was POTUS when his actions occurred...even when he was impeached.
Sand
Footballguy
Convicted rapists and such were bailed out. The director of the fund said "“I often don’t even look at a charge when I bail someone out,” Lewin said. “I will see it after I pay the bill because it is not the point. The point is the system we are fighting.”"parasaurolophus said:
So, yeah, without even a shred of common sense or oversight these boneheads running the fund let truly dangerous people free. I can see the political point to bailing out protestors. Bailing out rapists and such? Awful. And Kamala, as a super high profile politician, should have vetted this place before tweeting. That was a dumb as any of DJT's tweets.
Sand
Footballguy
They voted that it didn't matter if DJT was in office.
Either way she could be impeached if political whims go that way. She was a Senator at the time, which is a federal office.
sho nuff
Footballguy
That it didn't matter he wasn't still in office and they could still proceed.
Not that he was not in office when the acts occurred. In this case, Harris was not VP when the acts being talked about even happened. Those are two totally different things.
And I hope we are in a place where the political whims are never for impeaching people for things like...supporting a fund that bailed people out. Even if some people did bad things...the system still gives them the option of bail...
Similar threads
![[icon]](/data/avatars/s/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
