djmich
Footballguy
I half agree. Its terribly inefficient unless you curate what you read. You need to find the few dozen needles in the haystack. Its actually not that hard because generally people you value will like or re-tweet people they like so you can get exposure fast.I think the problem is that much of the time the reaction on Twitter isn’t just people disagreeing or criticizing, but mobs get whipped up and people start actually threatening violence on someone, their friends, and family.
But I’m not in disagreement with you in that it’s a terrible medium to communicate opinions on anything political or social and anyone doing so should do so realizing the potential huge negatives from doing so.
To me effective use of twitter consists of finding a few people who write things that I generally want to read in a way I want to read them (meaning written with purpose and not just to spew bile). These generally consist of people who are not writing crap because frankly they have an online presence, are known, so suffer reputational harm if they write crap.
If you read the comments to those tweets...you are going to read a lot of crap and its a waste of time. This is the rabbit hole of hate. If you click any of the stuff that twitter tries to get you to click you are going to read a lot of crap.
Edited to add: I also do not post. This helps with the effectiveness (I don't waste time writing) and also ensures I don't accidently get myself or my family cancelled lol. There is not much downside to this because as Grove mentions I think it works better as a forum to disseminate opinions/ideas/information than a debate.
Last edited by a moderator: