squistion
Footballguy
Thank you.Let me save everybody an annoying string of posts.
They said he was responsible for the deaths, not the exact phrase of a murderer of 300k.
Thank you.Let me save everybody an annoying string of posts.
They said he was responsible for the deaths, not the exact phrase of a murderer of 300k.
Really??Let me save everybody an annoying string of posts.
They said he was responsible for the deaths, not the exact phrase of a murderer of 300k.
I would post a link to a youtube video of biden saying that trump was responsible for all of the deaths at that time(which was over 200k then), and 1000 a day ongoing, but I dont want to get some retort about youtube not making the ever changing source list. It is easy to find so anybody actually interested can find it.
Kingprawn is using some hyperbole because ultimately it isnt much of a stretch to say that accusing somebody of being responsible for a death is not really different than calling them a murderer. It is different, but it is in the ballpark.
Saying responsible vs murder is a huge distinction is my point. I think a bigger difference than you are inferring here.Let me save everybody an annoying string of posts.
They said he was responsible for the deaths, not the exact phrase of a murderer of 300k.
I would post a link to a youtube video of biden saying that trump was responsible for all of the deaths at that time(which was over 200k then), and 1000 a day ongoing, but I dont want to get some retort about youtube not making the ever changing source list. It is easy to find so anybody actually interested can find it.
Kingprawn is using some hyperbole because ultimately it isnt much of a stretch to say that accusing somebody of being responsible for a death is not really different than calling them a murderer. It is different, but it is in the ballpark.
Opeds vs democrats claiming murder. Again very different.Really??
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.salon.com/2020/10/01/lets-tell-the-truth-about-the-pandemic-donald-trump-is-guilty-of-mass-murder/&ved=2ahUKEwiWtIKf5vjuAhWBGM0KHeLuDikQFjABegQIBxAC&usg=AOvVaw21TMRqqJYFVgSwzUQjx6f1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/04/how-donald-trump-almost-killed-my-husband/amp&ved=2ahUKEwiWtIKf5vjuAhWBGM0KHeLuDikQFjAHegQIBhAC&usg=AOvVaw06Hv7ZQR4jwuEkJHPR1Xe-&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://static.theintercept.com/amp/is-donald-trump-criminally-responsible-for-coronavirus-deaths.html&ved=2ahUKEwiWtIKf5vjuAhWBGM0KHeLuDikQFjAJegQIBRAC&usg=AOvVaw3PqR4Ca1MMCnIcdfJi_QQI&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nydailynews.com/snyde/ny-michael-moore-president-trump-murder-coronavirus-covid-deaths-20200914-3sptq3qnjvgifchhaioatec274-story.html%3FoutputType%3Damp&ved=2ahUKEwjUjv2W5_juAhWpB50JHZUAAZMQFjAAegQIARAC&usg=AOvVaw3jb1xG1eebWMO9ty2tFMwI&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-testing-advert-us-election-coronavirus-mass-murder-a9583916.html%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwjUjv2W5_juAhWpB50JHZUAAZMQFjABegQICBAC&usg=AOvVaw1RiKfcAI4o-o3kr1nOuULP&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/trump-coronavirus-covid/tnamp/&ved=2ahUKEwjUjv2W5_juAhWpB50JHZUAAZMQFjACegQIDBAC&usg=AOvVaw3_juvabqx7wVLvmx84S39M&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/bette-midler-donald-trump-murderer-handling-coronavirus-pandemic.amp&ved=2ahUKEwjUjv2W5_juAhWpB50JHZUAAZMQFjADegQICxAC&usg=AOvVaw32WNuFMqFuNK7Xpi8KKKXk&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.the-sun.com/news/1462792/cher-calls-trump-mass-murderer-punishment-death-twitter/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjUjv2W5_juAhWpB50JHZUAAZMQFjAEegQICRAC&usg=AOvVaw0SOhFDn2eltvyHkdbX5vvI&ampcf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/01/20/pelosi-says-trump-could-be-accessory-to-murder-for-capitol-attack-deaths/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjUjv2W5_juAhWpB50JHZUAAZMQFjAGegQIBRAC&usg=AOvVaw2PiMa7Iwoag8X-g-i2JvUC&ampcf=1
And it goes on and on. Even Pelosi said he could be an accessory to murder.
My God, you think you'd like bite a shoe or something for ten minutes before you spoke again after that beat down. It's almost like asking for sources is...in bad faith or something...That was easy.
Bad faith...like talking a post about democrats and covid and bringing opeds (not prominent democrats) and pelosi and the Capitol attack?My God, you think you'd like bite a shoe or something for ten minutes before you spoke again after that beat down. It's almost like asking for sources is...in bad faith or something...
Except in this case this began with me arguing that Cuomo shouldn’t be called a murderer, and then I was asked by @KingPrawnif I complained when Trump was called a murderer. I did. And I never argued that Trump wasn’t called a murderer, so @crackattack wasted everyone’s time by posting all those examples. Of course Trump was called a murderer. And it was wrong. So you guys have created this hypocrisy in your own minds.My God, you think you'd like bite a shoe or something for ten minutes before you spoke again after that beat down. It's almost like asking for sources is...in bad faith or something...
Oh, I didn't follow that part of your argument. sho and squis were more than willing to assert that, it seems. I don't know. It's hard to keep track sometimes.Except in this case this began with me arguing that Cuomo shouldn’t be called a murderer, and then I was asked by @KingPrawnif I complained when Trump was called a murderer. I did. And I never argued that Trump wasn’t called a murderer, so @crackattack wasted everyone’s time by posting all those examples. Of course Trump was called a murderer. And it was wrong. So you guys have created this hypocrisy in your own minds.
I will continue to assert that prominent democrats did not claim Trump murdered hundreds of thousands of people. Not did crack’s links show that any did.Oh, I didn't follow that part of your argument. sho and squis were more than willing to assert that, it seems. I don't know. It's hard to keep track sometimes.
None that I ever saw.I will continue to assert that prominent democrats did not claim Trump murdered hundreds of thousands of people. Not did crack’s links show that any did.
Also that if someone said that about he or Cuomo would be wrong.
You would think...My God, you think you'd like bite a shoe or something for ten minutes before you spoke again after that beat down. It's almost like asking for sources is...in bad faith or something...
I've heard on this very website that silence is compliance. Those "celebrities" donate to democrats. Those democrats accept their money along with the opinions they spew. So until democrats start returning money from celebrities who spew this nonsense, or condem those comments, I will assume they agree with such opinions. Seems fair.You would think...
That wasn't the point.I guess the millions of people these "celebrities" and opinion people reach via Twitter and news outlets ar inconsequential. But Rush as an opinion guy/newsish person isn't. Crazy times. The influence "celebrities" have and opinion people matters. Good stuff. It only matters from politicians
Twitter is used constantly as a "source" from nobody's, celebrities, and opinion people. Again. Crazy times.
Because my post was already gone...you responded to the post that was talking to me...about the points I was making. Your links only solidified my point (yet others called it a beat down).I never responded to you Sho. I don't respond to you. I didn't quote you. I owe you nothing. I was posting my thoughts and opinions on the subject. I don't even read your full replies. So it'd be fine with me if you just skipped over my posts, don't quote me etc. Have a great weekend!
I've heard on this very website that silence is compliance. Those "celebrities" donate to democrats. Those democrats accept their money along with the opinions they spew. So until democrats start returning money from celebrities who spew this nonsense, or condem those comments, I will assume they agree with such opinions. Seems fair.
So democrats should check the social media sites of every celebrity and see if there are any political opinions they disagree with - and if there are, then they should return any donations, otherwise it must be assumed they agree with such opinions? Okie Dokie.I've heard on this very website that silence is compliance. Those "celebrities" donate to democrats. Those democrats accept their money along with the opinions they spew. So until democrats start returning money from celebrities who spew this nonsense, or condem those comments, I will assume they agree with such opinions. Seems fair.
Silence is complianceSo democrats should check the social media sites of every celebrity and see if there are any political opinions they disagree with - and if there are, then they should return any donations, otherwise it must be assumed they agree with such opinions? Okie Dokie.
No it isn't A lack of response is not a response.Silence is compliance
Twitter is an often used source here.I guess the millions of people these "celebrities" and opinion people reach via Twitter and news outlets ar inconsequential. But Rush as an opinion guy/newsish person isn't. Crazy times. The influence "celebrities" have and opinion people matters. Good stuff. It only matters from politicians
Twitter is used constantly as a "source" from nobody's, celebrities, and opinion people. Again. Crazy times.
Yes, he was being blamed and rightfully so for his administrations inept response to the pandemic, including disbanding the pandemic task force Obama had set up, his discouraging of mask usage and social distancing, plus his denial of the seriousness of the COVID crisis, predicting repeatedly it would go away and disappear (most recently that it wouldn't be talked about after election day)If anyone comes here and says Trump wasn't DIRECTLY blamed for the covid deaths on this country is just being flat out dishonest. Period
Did anyone say that? Because that is certainly not the point I made, and don't recall others making it.If anyone comes here and says Trump wasn't DIRECTLY blamed for the covid deaths on this country is just being flat out dishonest. Period
He wasn't blamed for "excess" deaths. He was blamed for ALL deaths. Unless you believe that all the deaths could have been prevented had Trump acted more responsibly.Did anyone say that? Because that is certainly not the point I made, and don't recall others making it.
He was blamed for excess deaths because of his actions and inactions. And I believe it is fair to put that on him. Just as it is fair to do so with Cuomo (and other governors who took poor measures).
I don’t believe there were any large groups on here or out there blaming hom for all deaths. Including any prominent people. Again, spare me pissed off celebrities.He wasn't blamed for "excess" deaths. He was blamed for ALL deaths. Unless you believe that all the deaths could have been prevented had Trump acted more responsibly.
Semantics. I wont play that game with you. Youre right. I cannot find anything to show he went out and literally murdered every American that died of covid. You got me there.Yes, he was being blamed and rightfully so for his administrations inept response to the pandemic, including disbanding the pandemic task force Obama had set up, his discouraging of mask usage and social distancing, plus his denial of the seriousness of the COVID crisis, predicting repeatedly it would go away and disappear (most recently that it wouldn't be talked about after election day)
That said, being blamed for the deaths is not the same as calling him a murderer, which major Democrats and party leaders did not do, as that implies intent.
No, I don't recall anyone saying that there would have been no COVID deaths in this country if not for Donald Trump.He wasn't blamed for "excess" deaths. He was blamed for ALL deaths. Unless you believe that all the deaths could have been prevented had Trump acted more responsibly.
What??? That can't be!
Nope. It'll be he didn't say "murdered". Yet implies it. Semantics.What??? That can't be!
Waiting for the defense of this one.
Is he one of those wacky celebrities?
Maybe he's just one guy. And not "everyone " as the cop will usually pull out.
Interesting
Sure...he said it that way (back in September...speaking fully about lockdowns and how things were done (lockdowns and masks being downplayed).
What??? That can't be!
Waiting for the defense of this one.
Is he one of those wacky celebrities?
Maybe he's just one guy. And not "everyone " as the cop will usually pull out.
Interesting
Already replied...he said it...and screwed up and was hit for it by pretty much every fact checker.Nope. It'll be he didn't say "murdered". Yet implies it. Semantics.
Lmfaosho nuff said:Id say yes...he said it. I doubt he meant all...but sure, you got one that said it and obviously the big one.
Yeah that is some bad faith spin of my overall post.Yeah, the leader of the Democratic Party said it, but that doesn't mean anything. Semantics. Nothing to see here. You see, the media fact checked it, so everything is kosher.
Thats funny? I admitted he said it. Can you admit he seemed to say otherwise elsewhere in that very townhall? Cid he ever say it again?Lmfao
But he didn't mean it so it's OKThats funny? I admitted he said it. Can you admit he seemed to say otherwise elsewhere in that very townhall? Cid he ever say it again?
That's literally word for word what you saidYeah that is some bad faith spin of my overall post.
Yeah, because if there's anything I do on the board, it's to act in bad faith so that less people take me seriously. Bull####. That's exactly the tone and thrust of your post, as jobarules points out.Yeah that is some bad faith spin of my overall post.
Where dod I say it was ok?But he didn't mean it so it's OK
If by literally word for word, you mean not at all what I said? SureThat's literally word for word what you said
You just did in order to mock my post. Sorry if you think that BS was in good faith...pretty clear it wasn’t. Since it wasn’t at all what I said.Yeah, because if there's anything I do on the board, it's to act in bad faith so that less people take me seriously. Bull####. That's exactly the tone and thrust of your post, as jobarules points out.
It was part sarcasm, and you should know context and tone. It's a synthesis of yours and squis's arguments constantly on this board. And that you tried to explain it away by saying "But...but look at the fact checkers. They got it right." is right in keeping with the tone and main thrust of your post. You absolutely did do that. That was your line of argument.You just did in order to mock my post. Sorry if you think that BS was in good faith...pretty clear it wasn’t. Since it wasn’t at all what I said.
As Joba pointed out?...he falsely stated i said it word for word.
So now we went from "show me a link" to "show me a link to someone other than a crying celebrity" to "sure he said it but he didn't repeat it"sho nuff said:Sure...he said it that way (back in September...speaking fully about lockdowns and how things were done (lockdowns and masks being downplayed).
Id say yes...he said it. I doubt he meant all...but sure, you got one that said it and obviously the big one.
He was hit for that...by fact checkers even from the Washington Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/17/joe-bidens-cnn-town-hall-an-occasional-whopper/
and politifact
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/18/joe-biden/joe-biden-wrongly-claims-trump-couldve-prevented-e/
among others.
And had previously asked how many it would have saved or how many less would have died (in that very townhall). So it seems a big flub, doubt he ever repeated such thing either...did he?
It wasnt to explain it away. It was to show it wasn’t some overall democratic party theme or that through the msm. Because the context of the discussion started when the claim was made that “President Trump was called a murderer of 300,000+ people throughout the presidential campaign by the Democrats. Was it just a game to them as well?” And expanded further about those who even said death when people like cher and bette midler were brought up.It was part sarcasm, and you should know context and tone. It's a synthesis of yours and squis's arguments constantly on this board. And that you tried to explain it away by saying "But...but look at the fact checkers. They got it right." is right in keeping with the tone and main thrust of your post. You absolutely did do that. That was your line of argument.
And I'm done with this for now. You guys are making claims that aren't true about Cuomo and Democrats blaming Trump for the deaths of a ton of people. They did do exactly that. You should be making this about whether they were right or not. Because Trump being responsible and Cuomo being guilty of a cover-up are not mutually exclusive here. But you're so Team Blue that you'll deny everything to save argument face, even if the implied premises are faulty. (You didn't even need to worry about what Dems and op-ed people were saying. Cuomo doesn't undercut those arguments against Trump at all. All Cuomo's situation shows is that Cuomo ####ed up. Nothing more, nothing less.)
We didn’t go from any of that to the next for anyone that followed what O actually said from the start nor what Im saying now.So now we went from "show me a link" to "show me a link to someone other than a crying celebrity" to "sure he said it but he didn't repeat it"
There's an old saying that I think applies here. If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
sho nuff said:Saying responsible vs murder is a huge distinction is my point. I think a bigger difference than you are inferring here.