I think the seeding would be a reasonable tie break at this point.I have no idea what to do in case of a tie. Use our voting/seeding as a tie break?
I think the seeding would be a reasonable tie break at this point.I have no idea what to do in case of a tie. Use our voting/seeding as a tie break?
I also deduced points for players out of position, but you are correct that I did not map out exactly all the possibilities of how the teams would play. I kind of assumed these were all really great teams and could find ways to work together. The more talented players who had more achievements were more likely to be impactful and were more significant players for their eras. I didn't have an algorithm to determine cohesiveness but I wanted to do something that wasn't just me being arbitrary because some of these teams are really close and difficult to sort out. I don't think my voting in the decades was ever far from the group consensus.Then team construction had zero value to you and it was just whoever had the most individual accolades.
Sounds about right. Would be a pretty fun series to watch.24 votes in, Frosty and Instinctive tied at 12 a piece.
I kind of went the opposite of you and didn't really factor in individual accolades per se. Obviously accolades are a measure of how good a player is but I really focused on the team build and how they would matchup in a pick up game against the other teams to rank them. In the end i was never very far off either with usually a flip flop of spots with my max difference probably being 6 spots once or twice.I also deduced points for players out of position, but you are correct that I did not map out exactly all the possibilities of how the teams would play. I kind of assumed these were all really great teams and could find ways to work together. The more talented players who had more achievements were more likely to be impactful and were more significant players for their eras. I didn't have an algorithm to determine cohesiveness but I wanted to do something that wasn't just me being arbitrary because some of these teams are really close and difficult to sort out. I don't think my voting in the decades was ever far from the group consensus.
Yeah I figured everyone would take a different approach. However, I don't see then how this tourney would be any different to the voting we just did if in both cases people were going by who wins a 5 on 5 game.I kind of went the opposite of you and didn't really factor in individual accolades per se. Obviously accolades are a measure of how good a player is but I really focused on the team build and how they would matchup in a pick up game against the other teams to rank them. In the end i was never very far off either with usually a flip flop of spots with my max difference probably being 6 spots once or twice.
Definitely a fun exercise regardless of how you go about doing it.
The difference is it is against just one at a time instead of all 16 teams at once. You might have better matchups for your road and the team that is a bad matchup gets eliminated early on so you don't face them.Yeah I figured everyone would take a different approach. However, I don't see then how this tourney would be any different to the voting we just did if in both cases people were going by who wins a 5 on 5 game.
Well yeah we saw Jayrod's team of bricklayers win a decade on this principle.Then team construction had zero value to you and it was just whoever had the most individual accolades.
It would be amazing. I think these are two of the best teams and voted as such in BIS, where my team was ridiculously underranked (which must be due to the accolades = votes voters outweighing the building a team concept voters).Sounds about right. Would be a pretty fun series to watch.
I went with who could flat out ball and did not take into consideration relative to peers.I kind of went the opposite of you and didn't really factor in individual accolades per se. Obviously accolades are a measure of how good a player is but I really focused on the team build and how they would matchup in a pick up game against the other teams to rank them. In the end i was never very far off either with usually a flip flop of spots with my max difference probably being 6 spots once or twice.
Definitely a fun exercise regardless of how you go about doing it.
I ranked you 12th. Your team would smash Tim's Wilt and his merry bank of stiffs.Steph Curry + Paul George + three other 2021 All-Star players = worst team in Best in Show
Imagine if Jayrod understood the spotlighting rules from the get-go.Frosty and Instinctive now tied at 14
Ilov80s making a late surge, now only down 12-13 to Jayrod
I'm with you fellers.Should I keep the voting open until the morning (like 8am pacific) or still shut it down in about an hour tonight?
I won’t be setting up the next round until the morning anyway.
Bosh paired with either of your bigs would definitely be better.I made such a huge mistake taking Kevin Love over Chris Bosh. The second Bosh went I was kicking myself. I knew I needed shooting out of the bigs because I was targetting Rondo, and once my brain locked onto Love I couldn't think of anyone else.
Yes I know Scoobus. Thank you.Bosh paired with either of your bigs would definitely be better.
I'd shut it down now and just go with seeding for any tie-breakers.Should I keep the voting open until the morning (like 8am pacific) or still shut it down in about an hour tonight?
I won’t be setting up the next round until the morning anyway.
But even without still way better than that garbage Melo team, amirite?Yes I know Scoobus. Thank you.
I'm somehow down 1 vote now so obviously this should be kept open.Should I keep the voting open until the morning (like 8am pacific) or still shut it down in about an hour tonight?
I won’t be setting up the next round until the morning anyway.
Sorry, I’m calling it. 16-15 Frosty.I'm somehow down 1 vote now so obviously this should be kept open.
BoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooSorry, I’m calling it. 16-15 Frosty.
Dame takes great offense at this.Instinctive said:Well yeah we saw Jayrod's team of bricklayers win a decade on this principle.
All of the favorites won so I guess the committee did something right with the seedings so farYo Mama said:***FIRST ROUND FINAL RESULTS***
Scoobus over Doug 28-0
Jayrod over Ilov80s 16-12
Gally over EYLive 23-5
Wikkid over Jake 16-12
Modogg over Tim 26-5
Mister CIA over Yo Me 20-11
Higgins over Kev 25-6
Frosty over Instinctive 16-15
I’ll set up the second round polls in the morning
Looks like Tim was busy with his alias accounts because surely no rational person could possibly think Tim has a better team. Modogg's team still wins by 20 in the non-3 pt / non-shot clock era.1. Modogg (1990s) vs Timschochet (1960s)
Modogg (1990s) - John Stockton, Michael Jordan, Dan Majerle, Larry Johnson, Derrick Coleman
26
Timschochet (1960s) - Walt Hazzard, Frank Selvy, Jim Pollard, Vern Mikkelson, Wilt Chamberlain
5
No reseeding of bracketsAll of the favorites won so I guess the committee did something right with the seedings so far
ETA: Are the brackets reseeded every round (Highest seed vs lower remaining seed, etc) or is it a set bracket like NCAA Tourney?
It’s funny, I almost put in a comment about how Jayrod was going to complain about his matchup, and you didn’t disappoint.This is stupid
I also can't believe Frosty's team made it through mine but that's what we get going to the masses of Frosty alt accounts.This is stupid
He's about to get boat raced now, though...no volume of aliases could save him in this one.I also can't believe Frosty's team made it through mine but that's what we get going to the masses of Frosty alt accounts.
Poll Don’t Lie!He's about to get boat raced now, though...no volume of aliases could save him in this one.
This is stupid
I am in a nail biter against Magic. He is really the only thing keeping him in a matchup against my squad and I still don't think it would be close. It's a bad matchup for wikkid's squad but it's coming down to the wire.I also can't believe Frosty's team made it through mine but that's what we get going to the masses of Frosty alt accounts.
It's all good. I knew this would happen when I chose to take Russell over Lebron. I am not a huge fan of the modern NBA so it wouldn't have been fun for me to build a draft and team around Lebron even though it would have set me up to maybe win the draft. The bias against the older teams was obviously going to happen. Only 2 teams from the first 40 years of the NBA are left in the bracket. One of them got there by beating a 60s team.Sorry @Ilov80s. You got doubly screwed by being a #9 seed and then getting stuck with what should have been a top 5 seed in the first round. Your team deserved better. I blame the committee.
Isn’t that the whole point of this draft?This just gives me something to complain about.
Lebron would handle Russell like child's play. Russell "dominated" by being taller that most of his peers. How does 15.1 ppg, 56 FT%, and 44% FG stack up against 27 ppg, 75%, and 50%It's all good. I knew this would happen when I chose to take Russell over Lebron. I am not a huge fan of the modern NBA so it wouldn't have been fun for me to build a draft and team around Lebron even though it would have set me up to maybe win the draft. The bias against the older teams was obviously going to happen. Only 2 teams from the first 40 years of the NBA are left in the bracket. One of them got there by beating a 60s team.
This just gives me something to complain about.
I have not completely decided on my Pantheon team as I am still debating Schayes vs Issel for my final bench spot. I will get it confirmed today.Please make sure your Pantheon teams are correct on the Google sheet. I’ll kick off that ranking process Friday morning.
Q - What would you call it if you transported Lebron at his peak back into high school and imagine him only scoring 15 points per game?There are a lot of pro-LeBron arguments to be made there...but that just isn't a very compelling one. When you could do that same thing using Brook Lopez's stats vs Bill Russell, the argument you're using may require a little more nuance.
Voters gonna vote ILove80's. Don't sweat it.
Signed,
GM that had his well-constructed Larry Bird and 18 all NBA Defensive awards team voted #11 overall by someone...in the 1980's. It happens.
Good luck Scoobus, Gally, Modogg, and Higgins in the voting.
Yeah sure. But transport Bill Russell into being born in the 90s where he's allowed to use all the facilities, he actually lifts weights and does cardio, people cant punch him on the court, etc etcQ - What would you call it if you transported Lebron at his peak back into high school and imagine him only scoring 15 points per game?
A - A typical day in Bill Russell's life.