Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
  • 0

1.04 RB or TE


Question

I have Mahomes a qb Core rbs are A.Gibson,Ronald Jones ,Fornette and Chase Edmonds. Wes are Lamb, Higgens, Theilenand Dionte Johnson with Kelce at TE in a pot dynasty. Contemplating taking Pitts at 4 or rb. Trevor Lawrence will go off board quick. I also have #12 overall pick.

Edited by VolBoy
Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Make a combined draft board ranking all players across positions.  Take the highest guy on your list regardless of position.  

 

Put in the work to really evaluate the players you think are best regardless of position.  Don't take a lesser player because you think you need that position more.  The point of the draft is to hit on your picks.  If your combined board is done right you have the best chance of hitting on the pick.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yea. That is what I'm looking at. Kelce has been great to depend on. TE are so hit or miss. Could Pitts be the next great one. Kelce is 31, when does he slow down?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I personally would go for a RB unless maybe Harris, Etienne, and Williams were all taken, then maybe Chase, but still probably a RB (this is imagining a pre-NFL-draft fantasy draft). I wouldn't take TE until much later, unless this is some kind of TE premium situation. I know people are saying that Pitts is not just the best TE of the class, but a generational talent, but I'm not taking the bait, at least not top 10 picks. In my league no TE's are even mandatory. If you have to have 1 TE that would be a little different.

Edited by eighsse
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 4/7/2021 at 9:26 PM, VolBoy said:

Yea. That is what I'm looking at. Kelce has been great to depend on. TE are so hit or miss. Could Pitts be the next great one. Kelce is 31, when does he slow down?

I think you can pretty much bank on Kelce putting up numbers. Doesn't miss games and clearly hasn't lost a step at this point. Pitts is definitely intriguing but that would be bonkers if he could match that production as a rookie. Plus he'll probably be on a mediocre to bad team that doesn't throw the ball around as much as the Chiefs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...