Last edited by a moderator:
Once again....didn't even look at the link where, "Targeted at Black Americans" was in the headline...and it is obvious that you've never known many black smokers.Targeting them? I dont think that means what you think it means.
Big Tobacco targeted Black Americans, not Biden.Once again....didn't even look at the link where, "Targeted at Black Americans" was in the headline...and it is obvious that you've never known many black smokers.
Americans...or just black Americans?Big Tobacco targeted Black Americans, not Biden.
Once again....didn't even look at the link where, "Targeted at Black Americans" was in the headline...and it is obvious that you've never known many black smokers.Americans...or just black Americans?
They sell them overseas too, ya know
Soda tax type ideas anger me. If we lifted cane tariffs and quit handing out corn subsidies we wouldn’t have high fructose corn syrup in everything and wouldn’t be so fat as a nation.Always an interesting debate - where is the line on where government can curtail our freedoms? NY tried this with sugary drinks and it was a dud. Now we have the admin outright banning a product. While the government certainly has a place in deciding what can and can't be consumed (schedule 1 drugs being a prime example), I'm not sure if this kind of curtailment of free will is appropriate here. If we agree that adults over 18 have agency and the product is not on a legal proscribed list (ie. schedule 1, etc.) I don't see that we need big brother telling adults that they can't consume this.
Reminds me of stevia, which was essentially on the no-no list for forever because business interests didn't want to compete with it - under the guise of "health detriment to users". We see that was all BS once business decided it was a good thing to sell. Same deal for MJ and absinth; those two were pushed aside by alcohol interests. One of them is now recovering, but it has been quite the long road. Absinthe is still essentially proscribed.
(I also regard the whole "targeting of this population for this product" to be a specious argument. As long as we're talking adults, we trust said adults to have rights and freedoms. If they choose to listen to an ad and engage in unhealthy behavior that's a simple product of their free will and their personal responsibility for their own behavior.)
I agree completely. sidenote: just seems to be one side of the political spectrum that think they know what is best for you.Always an interesting debate - where is the line on where government can curtail our freedoms? NY tried this with sugary drinks and it was a dud. Now we have the admin outright banning a product. While the government certainly has a place in deciding what can and can't be consumed (schedule 1 drugs being a prime example), I'm not sure if this kind of curtailment of free will is appropriate here. If we agree that adults over 18 have agency and the product is not on a legal proscribed list (ie. schedule 1, etc.) I don't see that we need big brother telling adults that they can't consume this.
Reminds me of stevia, which was essentially on the no-no list for forever because business interests didn't want to compete with it - under the guise of "health detriment to users". We see that was all BS once business decided it was a good thing to sell. Same deal for MJ and absinth; those two were pushed aside by alcohol interests. One of them is now recovering, but it has been quite the long road. Absinthe is still essentially proscribed.
(I also regard the whole "targeting of this population for this product" to be a specious argument. As long as we're talking adults, we trust said adults to have rights and freedoms. If they choose to listen to an ad and engage in unhealthy behavior that's a simple product of their free will and their personal responsibility for their own behavior.)
That would also be targeting a product.So....what if Biden targeted 40 oz malt liquor?
Would you view it as targeting an individual group like targeting menthol cigarettes?
Yes. Menthol cigarettes were...that isnt Biden targeting them.Once again....didn't even look at the link where, "Targeted at Black Americans" was in the headline...and it is obvious that you've never known many black smokers.
They're going to be really happy about this!
So what if he does overstep boundaries. It will be forgotten quickly since the liberal NSM will give him a pass. This is the danger of the liberal MSM.Not liking this one bit. Biden has mostly been a pleasant surprise so far, but stuff like this, or his statements about the Chauvin trial before the verdict came in... SMH. Seems he's overstepping some boundaries here.
Uh huh. I mean just look at the free pass those liberal hacks at the NYT are giving Gov. Cuomo... barely covering the story.So what if he does overstep boundaries. It will be forgotten quickly since the liberal NSM will give him a pass. This is the danger of the liberal MSM.
What about gin and juice?So....what if Biden targeted 40 oz malt liquor?
Would you view it as targeting an individual group like targeting menthol cigarettes?
I’d like to see Slippery Slope guy weigh in on thisIs he going to target rye whiskey next? How about IPA's? It's basically the same thing.
I will burn #### down!!!Is he going to target rye whiskey next? How about IPA's? It's basically the same thing.
The majority of Black Americans who smoke use menthol cigarettes, according to the CDC, and a majority who started smoking began using menthol cigarettes. The product is more addictive than cigarettes without menthol, studies show, and has a cooling effect in the body.
The majority of Black Americans who smoke use menthol cigarettes, according to the CDC, and a majority who started smoking began using menthol cigarettes. The product is more addictive than cigarettes without menthol, studies show, and has a cooling effect in the body.
All quotes from the article posted by the OPResearchers have long known about the disparities in menthol cigarette use and its harmful effects on Black communities – and they’ve long regarded it as a pediatric issue: Among Black teenagers ages 12 to 17 who used tobacco, 71% smoked menthol, according to the CDC.
No...it is targeting a section of a product....That would also be targeting a product.
I'd be okay with thisIs he going to target rye whiskey next? How about IPA's? It's basically the same thing.
Agreed...overrated swill. And takes up too high a percentage of the taps at bars and shelves at stores.I'd be okay with this
Give me a good ale, stout, porter, or sour over an IPA any day.Agreed...overrated swill. And takes up too high a percentage of the taps at bars and shelves at storesI'd be okay with this
Exactly..throw in a good Kolsch or very hazy Heif in the heat and Im a happy camper. If we could cut in half the IPAs and 1/4 of the seltzers...we can take back over the beer aisle.Give me a good ale, stout, porter, or sour over an IPA any day.
The right doesn't think African Americans should have a right to vote? That seems pretty ignorant and flat wrong.Why is it so easy for the right to see the shallow smokescreen connecting menthols to the AA culture, but when it comes to voting rights, their deduction skills completely leave them?
This citizens petition in 2013 is where this originated: LINKNo...it is targeting a section of a product....
Biden isn't targeting tobacco...just the menthol section of it...the section which blacks favor over the other sections of that product.
You would defend him attacking 40oz malt liquor over the entire alcohol industry?
He has a racist history...why even attempt to defend him?
oh....church doctrine requires it....I know.
I seriously doubt that Biden can even boogie underwater and not get wet.
This was based on minors using these products. That we don't want and folks of all political stripes agree that minors need limits and protections (from themselves, sometimes).Trump's FDA banned flavored vapes.
That petition I linked (fixed the link) says they want menthol added to the ban from 2009 of flavored smokes. Says that this flavor targets young people.This was based on minors using these products. That we don't want and folks of all political stripes agree that minors need limits and protections (from themselves, sometimes).
Menthols have to do with the choices of adults. That is a very different discussion.
If Biden wants to do this with any consistency he should push for a law that makes tobacco a schedule 1/schedule 2 drug and be done with it. What's good for one is good for all.
Why would that earn a vacation or be reported?I’m fairly certain if Biden was on this board and connected black people and menthol cigarettes he would get reported dozens of times and probably a vacation.
Its pretty clear that the only way we fix systemic racism is by being as racist as humanly possible.I’m fairly certain if Biden was on this board and connected black people and menthol cigarettes he would get reported dozens of times and probably a vacation.
It's good to see your approach to beer is the same as your polotics. Rather than give people freedom you want to force your beliefs on others.Exactly..throw in a good Kolsch or very hazy Heif in the heat and Im a happy camper. If we could cut in half the IPAs and 1/4 of the seltzers...we can take back over the beer aisle.
Next...get rid of the wannabe bourbon experts driving up the prices and making the good stuff scarce....and my drinking world will be great again.
Totally what i was saying...forcing things on others.It's good to see your approach to beer is the same as your polotics. Rather than give people freedom you want to force your beliefs on others.
Personally I think all hefeweizen is :X but in my country youre free to enjoy what you like.
Poster says he wants to ban IPAs, you agreed.Totally what i was saying...forcing things on others.
I celebrate the entire beer catalog.Non-IPA people...you just have to give in. They are easy to make and have high ABV. I too was an anti-IPAist but gave up the struggle.
I suggest a Hazy's as a gateway.
Hazy Hefeweizen is the Zima of beers. Do you take fruit with yours?Exactly..throw in a good Kolsch or very hazy Heif in the heat and Im a happy camper. If we could cut in half the IPAs and 1/4 of the seltzers...we can take back over the beer aisle.
Next...get rid of the wannabe bourbon experts driving up the prices and making the good stuff scarce....and my drinking world will be great again.
ROTFLMAOOnce again....didn't even look at the link where, "Targeted at Black Americans" was in the headline...and it is obvious that you've never known many black smokers.
They're going to be really happy about this!
IPAs are the Kale of beer. Overrated hipster crap that got hyped into being popular. I dont think most IPA drinkers even like it.Hazy Hefeweizen is the Zima of beers. Do you take fruit with yours?
That petition I linked (fixed the link) says they want menthol added to the ban from 2009 of flavored smokes. Says that this flavor targets young people.
From the article linked in the OPYoung people and African Americans are more likely to smoke menthol cigarettes, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 54% of smokers ages 12-17 use menthol, and 7 in 10 African American smokers in that age group smoke menthol cigarettes. Non-Hispanic Black adults smoke the most menthol cigarettes, the CDC says.
It’s weird it wasn’t banned when these other flavors were back in 09. I leave it to tobacco enthusiast FBGs as to why.From the article linked in the OP
Goodness knows I like some stuff that should probably be banned (Necco Wafers, I'm looking at you. )Biden isn't targeting tobacco...just the menthol section of it...the section which blacks favor over the other sections of that product.
You would defend him attacking 40oz malt liquor over the entire alcohol industry?