How dare you call them creatures!!!1. There is no such creature as an “illegal”.
2. Please provide evidence that undocumented immigrants are allowed to vote in the city of San Francisco.
How dare you call them creatures!!!1. There is no such creature as an “illegal”.
2. Please provide evidence that undocumented immigrants are allowed to vote in the city of San Francisco.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/san-francisco-allows-undocumented-immigrants-vote-school-elections-n8932211. There is no such creature as an “illegal”.
2. Please provide evidence that undocumented immigrants are allowed to vote in the city of San Francisco.
You need a sponsor. Almost always. There is no line:That’s completely false. Anyone, anywhere in the world can apply for a US Visa. You know this.
In school board elections. And doesn’t that make sense to you?
Almost none of them will ever vote. This is yet another falsehood.I'm using the terms "Hispanic Christians" and "future voters" for the folks crossing the southern border.
Evidence provided.In school board elections. And doesn’t that make sense to you?
They will if we give them a path to citizenship. They will also pay more in taxes once they can be hired legally. Win Win.Almost none of them will ever vote. This is yet another falsehood.
Nothing about illegal immigration makes sense to me. I don’t know what makes you and other Liberals think you can choose which laws to follow. Civilization is built in rule of law. When that breaks down it leads to a very bad place.In school board elections. And doesn’t that make sense to you?
I am in favor of a path to citizenship. But I want it to be a long path.They will if we give them a path to citizenship. They will also pay more in taxes once they can be hired legally. Win Win.
What are you talking about? Liberals have been pushing amnesty for years. And they won’t stop. I’m going to start calling you Baghdad Bob. You’ve crossed the line into pure propaganda.Almost none of them will ever vote. This is yet another falsehood.
Amnesty and citizenship are far removed from each other.What are you talking about? Liberals have been pushing amnesty for years. And they won’t stop. I’m going to start calling you Baghdad Bob. You’ve crossed the line into pure propaganda.
According to the article you linked, nearly one third of all school children in San Francisco have parents who are undocumented.Nothing about illegal immigration makes sense to me. I don’t know what makes you and other Liberals think you can choose which laws to follow. Civilization is built in rule of law. When that breaks down it leads to a very bad place.
You just said that illegal aliens will never vote. And then a post later you said that you support a pathway to citizenship. It’s just one lie after another coming from your mouth. Who do you think you’re fooling here?Amnesty and citizenship are far removed from each other.
If they are citizens, doesn't that mean they are not "illegal aliens"?You just said that illegal aliens will never vote. And then a post later you said that you support a pathway to citizenship. It’s just one lie after another coming from your mouth. Who do you think you’re fooling here?
And how big a leap is it to say that they should also have representation at the state and federal level? It’s called a slippery slope. You know it well. Let them all in and eventually we’ll have to start treating them like citizens.According to the article you linked, nearly one third of all school children in San Francisco have parents who are undocumented.
Perhaps you don’t like this. Perhaps you would like to see these parents deported, and the children with them (although no doubt many of those same children were born here.). But that’s not the reality of the situation as it stands. Those children’s parents ought to have some representation in deciding the school board members.
I wrote that almost none of them will ever vote. I’m confident this is the case. How have I lied?You just said that illegal aliens will never vote. And then a post later you said that you support a pathway to citizenship. It’s just one lie after another coming from your mouth. Who do you think you’re fooling here?
I don’t believe in slippery slopes.And how big a leap is it to say that they should also have representation at the state and federal level? It’s called a slippery slope. You know it well. Let them all in and eventually we’ll have to start treating them like citizens.
WAT?It doesn’t take a math genius to figure out that an open door policy, coupled with free access to the best schools and the best healthcare in the world, equals a complete disaster for the country. You’ll see. It will be too late by then, but you’ll see.
Try skiing in icy conditions.I don’t believe in slippery slopes.
There have been studies showing that illegals do vote - today. It’s not that hard, and it’s getting easier and easier as Democrats loosen up the voting laws.If and when undocumented immigrants are given a path to citizenship, it will be a long time before they are actually given citizenship, even under the most liberal of current proposals.
Once they are given citizenship, if we can follow voting trends for those in similar economic strata to the vast majority of undocumented immigrants, we can safely predict that only a small minority will choose to actually vote. Of those that do, some will vote Republican.
Therefore this whole meme about how Democrats are pushing this issue to provide them with a bunch of new voters is total BS.
I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you saying that the flood of illegals coming in are highly educated? That’s a joke.WAT?
"IF we have highly educated, healthy people living here, the end is NIGH!"
Now you’re raising a completely separate issue. We were discussing undocumented immigration. Now you’re discussing ALL immigration. I’m perfectly happy to have this new discussion with you (and indeed it’s always been my contention that many conservatives who complain about “illegal immigration” would really like to do away with almost ALL immigration) but you’ll have to decide which one you wish to discuss.It doesn’t take a math genius to figure out that an open door policy, coupled with free access to the best schools and the best healthcare in the world, equals a complete disaster for the country. You’ll see. It will be too late by then, but you’ll see.
You just said they were coming here for great schools and healthcare.I have no idea what you are talking about. Are you saying that the flood of illegals coming in are highly educated? That’s a joke.
What studies do you have that show that undocumented people vote today? And please try to avoid quoting a hate group like FAIR- I mean legitimate studies?There have been studies showing that illegals do vote - today. It’s not that hard, and it’s getting easier and easier as Democrats loosen up the voting laws.
I would like to see those studies - and see how someone determined undocumented people were voting.There have been studies showing that illegals do vote - today. It’s not that hard, and it’s getting easier and easier as Democrats loosen up the voting laws.
He’s all over the place. The only consistent thing is that he doesn’t seem to want them here.You just said they were coming here for great schools and healthcare.
I don’t know one single Republican who wants to do away with all immigration. That’s a left-wing bogeyman. We allow roughly 650k legal immigrants into the country each year. I have no issue at all with that. It’s necessary and it benefits the country. It’s the illegal immigration that I have a problem with.Now you’re raising a completely separate issue. We were discussing undocumented immigration. Now you’re discussing ALL immigration. I’m perfectly happy to have this new discussion with you (and indeed it’s always been my contention that many conservatives who complain about “illegal immigration” would really like to do away with almost ALL immigration) but you’ll have to decide which one you wish to discuss.
Well that’s the problem isn’t it? You liberals view anyone who has conservative views on immigration as Nazis. Yet they are the only ones willing to conduct research on the subject. It’s a perfect little way for you to avoid dealing with realities you don’t like.What studies do you have that show that undocumented people vote today? And please try to avoid quoting a hate group like FAIR- I mean legitimate studies?
Nope. I want immigration, but I want it to be legal and thoughtful. You Liberals want illegal immigration without any thoughtful consideration. That’s just fact. You’re the party of anarchy. Just own it. I’d actually respect it more.He’s all over the place. The only consistent thing is that he doesn’t seem to want them here.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/college-park-decides-to-allow-noncitizens-to-vote-in-local-elections/2017/09/13/2b7adb4a-987b-11e7-87fc-c3f7ee4035c9_story.htmlWhat studies do you have that show that undocumented people vote today? And please try to avoid quoting a hate group like FAIR- I mean legitimate studies?
There's no documentation of these people at all? That seems demeaning to refer to them this way1. There is no such creature as an “illegal”.
2. Please provide evidence that undocumented immigrants are allowed to vote in the city of San Francisco.
It appears the gap in perspective here has to do with the low value you please on citizenship/residence in the United States.Someone who comes here illegally has committed a crime (albeit a minor one.) That doesn’t make them an illegal person.
In a city that house a huge housing shortage...According to the article you linked, nearly one third of all school children in San Francisco have parents who are undocumented.
Perhaps you don’t like this. Perhaps you would like to see these parents deported, and the children with them (although no doubt many of those same children were born here.). But that’s not the reality of the situation as it stands. Those children’s parents ought to have some representation in deciding the school board members.
No one is saying the person's is illegal. They immigrated here. They did so illegally.Someone who comes here illegally has committed a crime (albeit a minor one.) That doesn’t make them an illegal person.
Wtf does calling them an illegal person even mean?No one is saying the person's is illegal. They immigrated here. They did so illegally.
We're not calling them an illegal person. We're calling them an illegal immigrant. Because when they immigrated--they did so illegally.
If I called them an illegal person--your argument would make sense. But I'm not, so...continue on Tim.
Depends, are they going to turn around and dump the couch illegally on someone else's property?I’m still confused about something: about twice a year I drive up to a Home Depot, approach some day laborers and say “I’ve got a shopping center a mile from here. Somebody dumped an old couch in the alley. I want you to follow me in your truck and remove the couch.” Guy says “$100.” I say OK; or I might say “that’s too much; I’ll give you $75.”
What exactly is immoral or unethical about this transaction? Some people here seem to think it makes me a bad person, or a hypocrite, or both. I’m not seeing that; what am I’m missing?
You missed: it's fun to pretend like you don't understand common figures of speech like "get in line" or "cut in line" to deflect from not having an actual argument on the issue.Did I miss anything?
I think a lot of people say if you disagree with part of my premise, you hate the entire subject. So Tim thinks if you don't approve of illegal immigrants coming here--ya know--illegally--then you're a xenophobe who hates people from other countries.So it looks like it's pretty much been decided:
Did I miss anything?
- "illegal immigrant" is a proper and apt name for foreigners who come here illegally.
- No one is against LEGAL immigration except Democrats.
- The people who have to apply and wait to get in (and pay) - and yet are skipped in favor of "illegal immigrants" - are the actual immigrants that are being unfairly treated.
I can guarantee you that every other country in the world enforces THEIR borders. But the USA shouldn't for some reason.I think a lot of people say if you disagree with part of my premise, you hate the entire subject. So Tim thinks if you don't approve of illegal immigrants coming here--ya know--illegally--then you're a xenophobe who hates people from other countries.
It's possible to just think we should enforce our borders and only allow legal immigration.
What you mean is this.Sometimes, in fact quite often, political correctness, or “cancel culture”, can be a very good thing. I would like to cancel the term “illegal immigrants”. Here is my argument:
This.What you mean is this.
"If I can control the language then I will win the argument"
It's the very foundation and why political correctness and cancel culture exist. It has nothing to do with empathy for the people claiming to be protected. It's all about the win,
But it has to be more than just a legal/illegal distinction, right? Because otherwise, we could just decide to have open borders and then all immigration would be legal.I think a lot of people say if you disagree with part of my premise, you hate the entire subject. So Tim thinks if you don't approve of illegal immigrants coming here--ya know--illegally--then you're a xenophobe who hates people from other countries.
It's possible to just think we should enforce our borders and only allow legal immigration.
http://ww2.odu.edu/~jrichman/NonCitizenVote.pdfI would like to see those studies - and see how someone determined undocumented people were voting.
Thats actually an interesting paper.