What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Bipartisan infrastructure deal now looks likely to happen? (1 Viewer)

 to cover up the fact that you have 71 socialists in your party.  I would say that's pretty extreme.
Would you feel better if they were independent? They just didn't show up they were elected. Maybe there is a growing movement in this country. What would you do if there was? If in the next few years there are 125 socialist members of Congress and create a third party.

 
Would you feel better if they were independent? They just didn't show up they were elected. Maybe there is a growing movement in this country. What would you do if there was? If in the next few years there are 125 socialist members of Congress and create a third party.
It's a free world?  Maybe it's time to find another non-socialist country to live in?

 
Would you feel better if they were independent? They just didn't show up they were elected. Maybe there is a growing movement in this country. What would you do if there was? If in the next few years there are 125 socialist members of Congress and create a third party.
Yeah, I know. That's the point.

It's not the GOP who has moved to the extremes, it's the Democratic party and the people that vote for them.

If there is a growing movement of socialism in this country then we're all screwed. We've got the entirety of the 20th century to look at the ravages of socialism.  If people haven't learned from that then they'll never learn And I guess we just keep increasing the body counts under the banner of socialism.

 
It's a free world?  Maybe it's time to find another non-socialist country to live in?
Or maybe the socialists go move to the country of their choice?  I would even be on board if our government would even foot the bill for their one-way trip.

People who actually have lived under socialism cannot believe that we have people in this country that support it.

The left has glorified it so much that we have a bunch of people in this country who actually thinks it's a valid choice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, I know. That's the point.

It's not the GOP who has moved to the extremes, it's the Democratic party and the people that vote for them.

If there is a growing movement of socialism in this country then we're all screwed. We've got the entirety of the 20th century to look at the ravages of socialism.  If people haven't learned from that then they'll never learn And I guess we just keep increasing the body counts under the banner of socialism.
No...it really is the GOP that has moved to the extremes.  FromQ in Congress to Trump in the oval

The dems are so extreme that they twice  rejected Bernie as the nominee.

 
?  Not sure what you’re laughing at here.  Sho’s 100% correct* with the part you bolded.  

*I think this is the first time I’ve ever typed those words in my life….
Just the usual hoping for a reaction from those who have told him point blank they wont ever respond to him.

We know there are Q followers who were elected.  That is established fact. 

 
?  Not sure what you’re laughing at here.  Sho’s 100% correct* with the part you bolded.  

*I think this is the first time I’ve ever typed those words in my life….
Q people is a cute made up name by the libs.  Hell, AOC would easily be the equivalent on the left.   His post was laughable, as usual

 
While I completely agree with your thought process here, I am compelled to point out that those here using the "Father Trump" phrase are purely doing it to troll. I don't believe for a moment that there is any other reason.
 I would agree that most are using it to clearly troll, but not all, imo. I was mostly speaking to a larger group, though, that uses it off this site. The point was more that insurrection is kind of hard to top in the extremist category.

 
Actually there is comparison. Your side set the stage with the BLM / Antifa insurrection riots.  They literally tried to burn down federal buildings.  Your side wholy supported all of that. I mean even more extreme than a socialist is a Marxist which BLM / Antifa is made up of.  So not only do you have socialists you have marxists on top of that.

So, yeah, you probably should be talking about insurrections. 

And besides, that was nothing but a smoke screen by you to cover up the fact that you have 71 socialists in your party.  I would say that's pretty extreme.
This simply isn’t true. 

 
Or maybe the socialists go move to the country of their choice?  I would even be on board if our government would even foot the bill for their one-way trip.

People who actually have lived under socialism cannot believe that we have people in this country that support it.

The left has glorified it so much that we have a bunch of people in this country who actually thinks it's a valid choice.
You’re so all over the place on this issue you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. If you did, you would know the differences between democratic socialism and pure socialism, and between socialists and communists. And you still can’t name a single policy proposed by Biden that is socialist (because there isn’t one.)

You seem like a smart guy and I believe you’re honestly opposed to the Democratic socialists in Congress because you think they will lead us to a Communist dictatorship. It would probably surprise you to learn that it was Democratic socialists who fought Communism and liberated Eastern Europe from it. But you’re not going to learn the truth about this by listening to right wing talk show hosts. You need to delve into a few history books. 

 
Or maybe the socialists go move to the country of their choice?  I would even be on board if our government would even foot the bill for their one-way trip.

People who actually have lived under socialism cannot believe that we have people in this country that support it.

The left has glorified it so much that we have a bunch of people in this country who actually thinks it's a valid choice.
And yet you're the one complaining about it so the ball is in your court to move away from what you don't like here.

The Republicans don't like Delta, don't like Coke, don't like baseball, didn't like wearing masks in the middle of a pandemic despite science and common sense stating it was the best solution for slowing the virus down (instead we get mask-less rallies and suggestions to drink disinfectants, and POTUS caught lying on the Woodward tapes).

Don't like upgrading our out dated infrastructure, but love dictators (ex. Putin) around the world, don't love Democracy (hence the insurrection on the Capitol) and recounting ballots 6 months after a free election that was confirmed as the most secure in history by the Trumps head CIA and stated by his top DOJ official.  

And that's all the tip of the iceberg. 

Trump said it himself, if I lose to sleepy Joe I'll have to move to another country and yet he's still here and so are you. But then again he's a pathological liar, narcissist, Terrorist-In-Chief who couldn't transfer over power peacefully, and who was surrounded by a corrupt and crooked administration.  

And oh yeah...I'm still WAITING for his replacement healthcare plan to Obamacare he had 4 years to come up with!  ;)  

 
How about thoughts and points, do those matter?  I was clear what I object to.  You can define that any way you wish.
Of course they matter.  So we're back to asking for examples of socialist policies that a good number seem to be terrified of.

By the way, when you say "big government" does that include instances of overreach where government is telling people what they can/can't do with their businesses?  Just trying to understand the line.  And then a follow up would be, who is it that you primarily vote for out of the parties and why?  Two things these parties have in common is their love affair with spending and their love affair with expanding government.  Do you typically vote third party?

 
Federal regulations of business and industry were scaled back during the Trump administration. I’d say that government control was meaningfully reduced in that regard. 
Typically, we have "less" regulation on business and "more" on individuals with the GOP in charge. Look at whats going on right now. A ton of new regulation around voting. In the tax bill most everything for individuals was temporary while for corporations got permanent provisions. In our state we have a ton of new regulation telling business what they can/cant do in terms of the pandemic (the exception). We have new regulation telling us whats allowed in terms of protest etc. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’m not jumping on you personally. There’s already a 20 page thread devoted to this nonsense and IMO, that’s about 19 pages too long. Why is so much of our political discussion devoted to this cultural stuff that affects less than 1% of the population? 
You’ve been posting endlessly for years about people that are here illegally.

What percent of the population are they?

 
OK, lets flip it.  Lets say Trump is in office and there are 71 Nazis - but none of his policies are Nazi-inspired.  How is that playing?
If you think the flip of socialist is a Nazi then I can see how we will never see eye to eye. Wouldn't the flip of a socialist be a libertarian?

 
You’re so all over the place on this issue you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. If you did, you would know the differences between democratic socialism and pure socialism, and between socialists and communists. And you still can’t name a single policy proposed by Biden that is socialist (because there isn’t one.)

You seem like a smart guy and I believe you’re honestly opposed to the Democratic socialists in Congress because you think they will lead us to a Communist dictatorship. It would probably surprise you to learn that it was Democratic socialists who fought Communism and liberated Eastern Europe from it. But you’re not going to learn the truth about this by listening to right wing talk show hosts. You need to delve into a few history books. 
Oof!  Yes, it was the Socialists who saved us from Communism.  :doh:

Yes, the right is moving to the extremes but I'm going to completely ignore the fact that my party has 71 socialists in it. Heck! They SAVED America and Europe!

The MSM strikes again!!!

 
If you think the flip of socialist is a Nazi then I can see how we will never see eye to eye. Wouldn't the flip of a socialist be a libertarian?
No, it wouldn't.  Socialism/Marxism/Communism are all in the same boat.  So, yes, the flip of a Socialist IS a fascist.  In fact, they all also have elements of fascism to boot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And yet you're the one complaining about it so the ball is in your court to move away from what you don't like here.

The Republicans don't like Delta, don't like Coke, don't like baseball, didn't like wearing masks in the middle of a pandemic despite science and common sense stating it was the best solution for slowing the virus down (instead we get mask-less rallies and suggestions to drink disinfectants, and POTUS caught lying on the Woodward tapes).

Don't like upgrading our out dated infrastructure, but love dictators (ex. Putin) around the world, don't love Democracy (hence the insurrection on the Capitol) and recounting ballots 6 months after a free election that was confirmed as the most secure in history by the Trumps head CIA and stated by his top DOJ official.  

And that's all the tip of the iceberg. 

Trump said it himself, if I lose to sleepy Joe I'll have to move to another country and yet he's still here and so are you. But then again he's a pathological liar, narcissist, Terrorist-In-Chief who couldn't transfer over power peacefully, and who was surrounded by a corrupt and crooked administration.  

And oh yeah...I'm still WAITING for his replacement healthcare plan to Obamacare he had 4 years to come up with!  ;)  
Actually, it's in your court to move.  :shrug:

We were here first - the people who don't succumb to far left ideologies.

What you posted couldn't be further from the truth.  Love dictators?  Really?  Is this coming from a guy whose party boasts 71 socialists/Marxists, supports the entire woke movement and BLM/Antifa Marxist movement?  The party who wants centralized and big government control?  The party who lionizes socialist regimes throughout the world?

I think you need to go back to the drawing board.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, it wouldn't.  Socialism/Marxism/Communism are all in the same boat.  So, yes, the flip of a Socialist IS a fascist.  In fact, they all also have elements of fascism to boot.
And there it is...lump socialism and the supposed 71 in the Democratic party in with communism.   Now throw in fascism as well.

That is what the ultimate goal of painting everything on the left socialist is...to then paint it as communist.  Its the boogeyman the right is trying to paint the left as.

 
No, it wouldn't.  Socialism/Marxism/Communism are all in the same boat.  So, yes, the flip of a Socialist IS a fascist.  In fact, they all also have elements of fascism to boot.
Not even close.  Where are you coming up with this stuff?  Communism and Fascism are not Democratic.

https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/socialism-vs-communism/#:~:text=The main difference is that,an incremental reduction in inequality.

The main difference is that socialism is compatible with democracy and liberty, whereas Communism involves creating an 'equal society' through an authoritarian state, which denies basic liberties. 

 
Oof!  Yes, it was the Socialists who saved us from Communism.  :doh:
Oof, this is correct. Look up the names Alexander Dubcek and Lech Walesa, the Solidarity Union in Poland. Read about the Berlin Airlift on 1948, the Hungarian Uprising of 1956, Prague Spring in 1968, amd the final collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989. You will discover that in all of these instances, the Democratic socialists (also called “Social Democrats”) were our allies and the key figures in the fight for freedom from the oppression of communism. Yes they saved us, and we saved them; it was a mutual effort. 
 

The history of the Cold War is quite important. You’re getting a skewed version of it and you’re all mixed up. But a few books will set it right. You could start with Lenin’s Tomb by David Remnik- it won the Pulitzer Prize. 

 
Oof, this is correct. Look up the names Alexander Dubcek and Lech Walesa, the Solidarity Union in Poland. Read about the Berlin Airlift on 1948, the Hungarian Uprising of 1956, Prague Spring in 1968, amd the final collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989. You will discover that in all of these instances, the Democratic socialists (also called “Social Democrats”) were our allies and the key figures in the fight for freedom from the oppression of communism. Yes they saved us, and we saved them; it was a mutual effort. 
 

The history of the Cold War is quite important. You’re getting a skewed version of it and you’re all mixed up. But a few books will set it right. You could start with Lenin’s Tomb by David Remnik- it won the Pulitzer Prize. 
But...but...but... Ronald Reagan

 
Yep, I just talked with a friend of mine who is not currently working.  He is a handyman and has been out of work for over a year.  I asked him if he has had any luck on the job search and he said he hasn't really been looking and doesn't plan to until September when the unemployment benefits may stop.  He gets $245 a week normally but it is now $525 a week with the extra $300.  There is no incentive for him to go find a job since he was only making around $35k a year before.
Exactly what my BIL does.  In normal times he works odd jobs for his brother who owns a construction type business.  Right now, he's making more than the work he was getting so he's getting paid to stay home.

 
Agree, not much you can do since they were voted in.  71 is enough to start affecting policy.
So @BladeRunnerI just don’t understand your line of thinking here. Here you love a comment that says 71 people in congress are affecting the direction a party is headed.  Yet in another thread you’re saying Trump has no power over a party when almost everyone in that party supports Trump. These two things just don’t lineup at all.  How can one thing be influencing a party when the other (which has far more support within the party) doesn’t?  

 
But...but...but... Ronald Reagan
Ronald Reagan worked with socialists in Eastern Europe in order to defeat the Soviet Union, men like Lech Walesa, and gave them great credit. Yet another reason that Reagan was an outstanding leader who bears no resemblance to the current conservative movement that, as @BladeRunner is demonstrating, has no knowledge of history. 

 
Similar to the 71...repeat it enough so it becomes reality.  Repeat and get communism in people's minds enough that they equate any socialistic idea as communism.
This was played out big time during the Bush era.  They just kept repeating Saddam Hussein, Iraq,  and 9/11.  

 
So @BladeRunnerI just don’t understand your line of thinking here. Here you love a comment that says 71 people in congress are affecting the direction a party is headed.  Yet in another thread you’re saying Trump has no power over a party when almost everyone in that party supports Trump. These two things just don’t lineup at all.  How can one thing be influencing a party when the other (which has far more support within the party) doesn’t?  
I agree with you, Trump has major power over the party today.

 
Ronald Reagan worked with socialists in Eastern Europe in order to defeat the Soviet Union, men like Lech Walesa, and gave them great credit. Yet another reason that Reagan was an outstanding leader who bears no resemblance to the current conservative movement that, as @BladeRunner is demonstrating, has no knowledge of history. 
:no:

At the risk of you telling me I have no knowledge of history (extreme condescension at its finest) , I'll disagree with this.

Stretching 'socialism' to fit your intended, absolutely correct assertions is disingenuous at best.

A country rarely goes from the Soviet brand of socialism to complete capitalism immediately.

My definition of socialism is much more finite than yours.

 
Oof, this is correct. Look up the names Alexander Dubcek and Lech Walesa, the Solidarity Union in Poland. Read about the Berlin Airlift on 1948, the Hungarian Uprising of 1956, Prague Spring in 1968, amd the final collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989. You will discover that in all of these instances, the Democratic socialists (also called “Social Democrats”) were our allies and the key figures in the fight for freedom from the oppression of communism. Yes they saved us, and we saved them; it was a mutual effort. 
 

The history of the Cold War is quite important. You’re getting a skewed version of it and you’re all mixed up. But a few books will set it right. You could start with Lenin’s Tomb by David Remnik- it won the Pulitzer Prize. 
The only skewed version is the one you're regurgitating.  :doh:

Socialism saved America (it didn't) so now we must embrace Socialism.  Is that what you're telling me?  :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:no:

At the risk of you telling me I have no knowledge of history (extreme condescension at its finest) , I'll disagree with this.

Stretching 'socialism' to fit your intended, absolutely correct assertions is disingenuous at best.

A country rarely goes from the Soviet brand of socialism to complete capitalism immediately.

My definition of socialism is much more finite than yours.
Your argument has nothing to do with what I wrote. The folks who fought Soviet Communism in Eastern Europe were mostly Social Democrats, ideological kin to the Democratic Socialists of Bernie Sanders. That is absolutely a fact. 

 
Your argument has nothing to do with what I wrote. The folks who fought Soviet Communism in Eastern Europe were mostly Social Democrats, ideological kin to the Democratic Socialists of Bernie Sanders. That is absolutely a fact. 
Like I said, my definition of socialism is more finite.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only skewed version is the one you're regurgitating.  :doh:

Socialism saved America (it didn't) so now we must embrace Socialism.  Is that what you're telling me?  :lol:
Socialism hasn’t saved America or anywhere. Socialism is a bad set of ideas. But you’re combining progressivism with socialism with Communism and it’s not accurate: 

1. Communism is a totalitarian form of government, it is horrific, it’s implementation has always been and always will be a disaster. It should always be opposed by freedom loving people, full stop. 
 

2. Socialism is a group of bad ideas. It rarely works. The larger form it takes the more it fails. However the people who back it are generally idealistic, rarely evil, and almost always oppose authoritarianism and totalitarianism. In certain circumstances freedom loving people can and should support socialist regimes. 
 

3. Progressivism is simply for more government involvement within a capitalistic system. Depending on the scale this can be positive or negative but unless they are directly in favor of abolishing the free market, they are not socialists no matter what they call themselves. 

 
Like I said, my definition of socialism is more finite.
I doubt it’s more finite than mine, Would you agree with me that Bernie, AOC and the rest who call themselves Democratic Socialists are not really socialists, since they don’t have any desire to abolish capitalism? 

 
You ever heard of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?  Yeah, those ones.  The ones that are aligned with the DSA.  Started by none other than Bernie Sanders!
As mentioned.  There are only 5 DSA members in Congress.  I'm not sure where the 71 comes from?  Maybe in all government (regional level included)?  But saying 71 sounds a lot more scarier I guess.  Lets not let facts get in the way.

 
As mentioned.  There are only 5 DSA members in Congress.  I'm not sure where the 71 comes from?  Maybe in all government (regional level included)?  But saying 71 sounds a lot more scarier I guess.  Lets not let facts get in the way.
71 members of the CPC.  Actually, I think it's 75.  5 Members of the DSA is 5 that weren't there in 2016, btw.

The CPC is closely aligned with DSA and Socialists in general.  It was started by Bernie Sanders - the avowed Socialist who has proclaimed the glories of Venezuela and Cuba.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@identikit based on what you wrote I think you simply misunderstood my point. @BladeRunnerwas conflating Bernie Sanders’ Democratic Socialism with actual socialism, and then with Communism. The three are not the same. My definition of socialism is just as finite as yours. The Social Democrats of Eastern Europe who fought Communism were not actually socialists, and Bernie is not actually a socialist either. They leaned left, like Bernie does, but within the free market system. 

 
71 members of the CPC.  Actually, I think it's 75. 

The CPC is closely aligned with DSA and socialists in general.  It was started by Bernie Sanders - the avowed Socialist who has proclaimed the glories of Venezuela and Cuba.
You had better be specific here: what proposals is the CPC in favor or that are essential to socialism? 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top