zamboni
Footballguy
Sorry if this should be in another forum - here is where it's at in the offseason.
My league (deep keeper) is contemplating moving to SF in which we are eliminating the kicker and replacing it with another flex spot.
So 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 DEF and 2 flexes (but only one of these two flexes can be a QB).
In discussing the switch, a few league members are concerned that teams may hoard QBs with only 32 starting options out there, thus holding QB needy teams at ransom. I don't share these concerns, but it is what it is. Some have mentioned a max of 3 QBs.
Question for those who use SF: do you have any restrictions on how many QBs can be owned by a roster? And if you don't have any restrictions, do you find any issues in competitive balance?
My league (deep keeper) is contemplating moving to SF in which we are eliminating the kicker and replacing it with another flex spot.
So 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 DEF and 2 flexes (but only one of these two flexes can be a QB).
In discussing the switch, a few league members are concerned that teams may hoard QBs with only 32 starting options out there, thus holding QB needy teams at ransom. I don't share these concerns, but it is what it is. Some have mentioned a max of 3 QBs.
Question for those who use SF: do you have any restrictions on how many QBs can be owned by a roster? And if you don't have any restrictions, do you find any issues in competitive balance?