Well, here i am on a beautiful Saturday having to respond to a post by a conspiracy theorist about a conspiracy theorist.
I am replying to the first link cause it's such nonsense that I am not wasting time on the others.
First the title: Ballot Printing Companies Better Lawyer Up – 2020 Ballots Were Modified in Multiple Republican Areas Forcing
Adjudication and
Potential Fraudulent Vote Switching
Out of the gates, they point to "Adjudication" has nothing to do with fraud. Then state "potential fraud" - which
@PennStater77 reads as definite fraud to the volume of overturning an election.
They repeat the idea claiming more republican ballots required review and potentially switched from Trump to Biden - but they are still not stating definite fraud - just Pennstater77 is doing do.
from the article "This allowed unknown individuals to record all the ballots for Biden." - they should have just said "the boogeyman".
article: "These “error’ed ballots” were forced out of the counting system and into the adjudication – manual review – by an individual who decides which candidates the ballots report as voting for. " - again no claim of actual fraud
Then they talk about some allegations from a MI lawyer named Deperno - but fail to state the judge denied his claims.
and they end the article - "What are the odds that this all happened randomly? We all know the answer to that." just more conspiracy accusations.
So they don't state any fraud occurred, that nay votes were changed - and logically can't state then that the election will be overturned.
So when asked for a legit source regarding over turning the election, you provide this garbage? There's nothing in the article stating fraud occurred. Just a decently written article with the intention to lead on the gullible.