Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
There have been studies done that find an average of several different projections tend to be more accurate than just one petsons projections.
Yeah Bob is great. I also have liked MTs work over the years. DD is missed though. He would be my home base if he were still doing it.
Agreed on the averages, I just like making sure the slider leans Bob’s way in the league dominator.
Yeah I agree some guys are better with WR or QB than other positions for example.Agreed on the averages, I just like making sure the slider leans Bob’s way in the league dominator.
i also like looking at the differences between the projectors from a positional level and find sometimes I may prefer other rankers specific to a position as opposed to overall.
I am sure they all have certain positions they are more successful in accurately projecting.
Wisdom does come from experience.Good point on Wood and the Eagles. Same goes for Cecil and the Broncos but, and I love ya Cecil!, but I don’t look to him on RB’s anymore.
Have always meant to look more closely into BH. Is he solid across the board or does he specialize?
I find him solid across the board and feel like any comment I'd have on his positional accuracy/specialization would be anecdotal at best. I am glad to hear that about Fitzmaurice as I am only now becoming familiar so appreciate the tip. I like Waldman for QB's especially, ever since he had me onto Russell Wilson back in the day, but appreciate his perspective all around. I've always appreciated my footballguys subscription and still do.
I get that literally any outcome is possible due to injuries and players who surprise. I’m sure Waldman wouldn’t actually suggest you draft Evans over all but 2 WRs and he’s basically just saying don’t take Adams at his ADP. However, those rankings are nuts if you are looking to use rankings to draft from and are trying to hit the most likely outcomes.
Agreed. I imagine you could almost use last years stats and rearrange the names to your liking. Even then I would just bucket players by points and choose who I like.
Yeah I am more just looking at do I think the player is good, do I like the offense they are in, how much opportunity do I think they get and tiering by that’s
Im sure your not the only person.
I wonder why he feels this way? It seems like Zeke should be primed for a great season considering the OL/TEs are healthy and assuming Dak is good to go.
This just doesn’t make sense unless you’re predicting he misses significant time. If not he’s saying every starting TE and seven backup TEs will all finish ahead of Fant.
Yeah I am shocked at how low Waldman is on Fant. Part of it seems to be that he is high on Albert O but that ranking just seems oddly out there. I mean 39? I get that Sutton is back but I can’t see him falling off to that extent.
Perhaps he thinks Zeke "got paid" and decided to go through the motions. He certainly wouldn't be the first player to do that.
Likely because Elliott wasn't very good last year, his YPC has decreased 3 years in a row and he was largely outplayed by Pollard, who could steal carries again this year (capping Elliott at 250 carries as opposed to the 300 he used to get), possibly at a higher rate. There's a strong counter argument to be made for Elliott, as you outline (healthy offensive line, Dak is back, and he's looking great in camp). It's really a question of whether you see last year as indicative of a slow slide downhill (as Henry probably does) or if you want to write off last year and think he'll get back on track.papacapps said:
I cant speak for Matt. If you guys want to know why he is so down on Fant you should ask him.
