Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Hard to say when I don't know what the rest of your roster looks like. Just on the surface I would take Dak and Kupp is I had the RB depth to surrender Mixon
Hard to say when I don't know what the rest of your roster looks like. Just on the surface I would take Dak and Kupp is I had the RB depth to surrender Mixon
This all depends on the RB depth of the guy giving up Mixon. Dak has questions and Tannehill isn't a bad starter so the increase to Dak from Tanny isn't necessarily that great.
This trade isn't going to happen. The Mixon owner found the offer to be extremely lopsided and was insulted by it (he initiated trade talks for Dak after missing on him in the draft. He was offering bench depth. Dak/Kupp for Mixon was my counter). I can certainly understand him not wanting to give up Mixon for Dak and Kupp but I was a bit taken aback by his reaction. Mixon is his 3rd back (small league). I was just looking for some feedback as to the reasonableness of the offer. Thanks again, guys
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.