You including the "job" of the VP is unfortunately a give away on your agenda.
And unfortunately poisons your intended conversation/thread.
I've long maintained my stance that Joe will not finish his full term. His replacement should be in the conversation as well.You including the "job" of the VP is unfortunately a give away on your agenda.
And unfortunately poisons your intended conversation/thread.
I'd argue that the possibility of Harris succeeding Biden is irrelevant to her current performance as VP. Could it happen? Sure.Max Power said:I've long maintained my stance that Joe will not finish his full term. His replacement should be in the conversation as well.
She's in charge of the border crisis right? She was the last person Joe talked to about his Afghanistan decision. There are pretty massive issues her name is tied to.I'd argue that the possibility of Harris succeeding Biden is irrelevant to her current performance as VP. Could it happen? Sure.
But what is Harris's current job? What was Mike Pence's job? Prior to that, Biden, Cheney, Gore... What did any of them actually do as VP? It's really hard to judge a VP's performance given that they don't really have any specific responsibilities or authority.
I'd argue that the possibility of Harris succeeding Biden is irrelevant to her current performance as VP. Could it happen? Sure.
But what is Harris's current job? What was Mike Pence's job? Prior to that, Biden, Cheney, Gore... What did any of them actually do as VP? It's really hard to judge a VP's performance given that they don't really have any specific responsibilities or authority.
These are things I've read, but I'm really unclear on what her actual level of responsibility and authority for either of those things are/were. Yes, we've all seen the headlines "Harris in charge of border!", but what does that actually mean? I don't personally know.She's in charge of the border crisis right? She was the last person Joe talked to about his Afghanistan decision. There are pretty massive issues her name is tied to.
Ditto Pence. Sure, we all saw the headlines, but what was his actual, true level of responsibility and authority? If he had decided to implement mask mandates nationwide, would Trump have done so?Pence was in charge of the Covid task force IIRC. Kamala is in charge of the border situation.
You can tell Biden has had a rough couple of months by all the people who want to steer the thread into a discussion about the theoretical nature of evaluating the role of the vice president in the 21st century.
I'm not sure if this was partially directed at me, but my comment was more to the "Due to the structure of the poll, I can't vote on the Biden portion without being forced to vote on the Harris portion" angle (i.e. "This field is required"). You can put me down for No on Biden (relative to "what I had hoped") and abstain on Harris.You can tell Biden has had a rough couple of months by all the people who want to steer the thread into a discussion about the theoretical nature of evaluating the role of the vice president in the 21st century.
Max Power said:I've long maintained my stance that Joe will not finish his full term. His replacement should be in the conversation as well.
Don't elect a guy with dementia and we aren't having this conversation. Own his horrible VP as well. Plenty of better options, but he went with diversity over qualifications.Only this angle isn't new either. See through thin as any other time I've heard it.
But what is Harris's current job?
The is basically me with the exception of sitting out the next election. I’d vote 3rd party again.Easy no on Biden. I had set what I thought was a very low bar for this administration -- just respect ordinary norms, and stay off Twitter. He's succeeded on the stay-off-Twitter part, but failed miserably at the respect-ordinary-norms part. I'd still support Biden over Trump, but I'd sit out an election between Biden and DeSantis or Haley or somebody like that. And I'm not sure whether I would really support Biden over Trump at this point. I'm not seeing much improvement in government, except that it's less shouty on Twitter.
I also voted no on Harris, but that's only because I have an extremely low opinion of her as a person. She seems to performing her job of having a pulse quite admirably.
She's in charge of nervous laughs.But what is Harris's current job?
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/us-elections-government/ny-yang-third-party-book-release-20210910-lcuf7suaqvh6xiyzpbiytjmmcu-story.htmlThe is basically me with the exception of sitting out the next election. I’d vote 3rd party again.
Why would anyone respond when you never address any response except the ones from Trump supporters that agree with your posts?GordonGekko said:( I'm pretty sure your agenda got revealed when you ignored all of what was presented above to split hairs. Feel free to respond and before you do, ask yourself in what direction that Gekko Brand will orbitally bombard you next)
But what is Harris's current job? What was Mike Pence's job? Prior to that, Biden, Cheney, Gore... What did any of them actually do as VP? It's really hard to judge a VP's performance given that they don't really have any specific responsibilities or authority.
.....
In any case, Max, I didn't vote in the "7 months in" poll and I'm not voting in this one, specifically because I have no opinion at all on the job Harris is doing. My suggestion for future ones would be to at least include an "I don't know" option for Harris so that someone like me could put a vote in for the Biden portion?
Also, unrelated to Harris, but relative to the question "Do you approve of...", it's important to consider what the bar is. Is it "Do I approve of X relative to what my ideal would be?" The answer is almost always going to be No, as no one is going to match what I would consider perfection. Is it "Do I approve of X relative to what I generally expect from that position?" Is it "Do I approve of X relative to what I expected from the alternative?" Something else? My answer would be different depending on the context.
Biden has been a mess but I’m pretty sure you watched 1/6 and know what that means to our democracy - I have zero concerns that Biden will try to do anything possible to stay in office if he loses. We already know some of the stuff the other guy will try - I’m not willing to see what else he and his enablers have cooked up if he gets back in the Oval Office. And quite frankly I’m surprised you don’t feel the same.Easy no on Biden. I had set what I thought was a very low bar for this administration -- just respect ordinary norms, and stay off Twitter. He's succeeded on the stay-off-Twitter part, but failed miserably at the respect-ordinary-norms part. I'd still support Biden over Trump, but I'd sit out an election between Biden and DeSantis or Haley or somebody like that. And I'm not sure whether I would really support Biden over Trump at this point. I'm not seeing much improvement in government, except that it's less shouty on Twitter.
I also voted no on Harris, but that's only because I have an extremely low opinion of her as a person. She seems to performing her job of having a pulse quite admirably.
.... and now a bit of overreach on vaccines to businesses....
Hey GG. How much of this really matters? According to you if Newsom survives the recall the world is going to starve. I’m just trying to figure out which thing I’m supposed to be more scared of. My children starving or being forcibly injected by big pharma in 5-10-15 years with some unknown drug for profits.DIRECT HEADLINE: Joe Biden: Covid vaccination in US will not be mandatory
Published December 5 2020
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55193939
*****
You call it "a bit of an overreach", I call it an open and egregious attack on the United States Constitution. You can't treat Congress like a speed bump in a mall parking lot. You can't just legislate from the Oval Office.
I recognize most of the lawyers who regularly post openly here on the FBG forums and wave their law degrees around like battering rams lean left. And I recognize most of them don't deal with Constitutional law in their day to day practices. Most here probably haven't covered any of this since moot court or in some outlines for a class how many untold years ago.
That being said, Biden is trying to package a vaccine mandate he can practically make ( direct federal employees) along with more of his unconstitutional madness. Did anyone forget the CDC just up and deciding what landlords can and can't do with their own property? Biden is going to push some outdated OSHA regulation claiming exigencies that won't pass legal muster in any actual free and fair court in America. Which lends the question, to push this, what is going to be free and fair about our legal system anymore?
Will the endless gaggle of leftist lawyers here say nothing about this?
THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT BIDEN AND NOT JUST ABOUT TRUMP AND NOT JUST ABOUT THE PANDEMIC, THIS IS ABOUT THE WORLD YOUR CHILDREN WILL INHERIT.
If this somehow survives, where will the legal slippery slope go down the road for your children? Your grandchildren? Everyone you've ever loved in this life? What happens in 5-10-15 years from now when Big Pharma uses it's political puppets to decide your children need to be held down and injected with whatever will help their profit margin the most.
Here's a crazy idea. Maybe more people would trust the government more when it says the vaccine is there to help them if Biden would stop getting caught lying about everything. Maybe there wouldn't be a need to set the Constitution on fire if Biden just stopped lying to the American people.
The Constitution was not designed by the Founder to be treated like a suggestion box at a local Olive Garden by Biden's handlers and Susan Rice.
The real pandemic seems to be how some of you, not all, but far too many, will rationalize the surrender of your own freedom because social media outrage told you doing so would finally validate your political tribalism.
I’ve always thought this as well. I think he retires in another year.Max Power said:I've long maintained my stance that Joe will not finish his full term. His replacement should be in the conversation as well.
I agree with this completely. My views were transparent during the election……once again, we had two historically bad choices for President. (How did we manage to do that twice in 4 years? Oh yeah, Democratic primary voters are idiots)Don't elect a guy with dementia and we aren't having this conversation. Own his horrible VP as well. Plenty of better options, but he went with diversity over qualifications.
Wasn’t she put in charge of fixing the border crisis? How’d she do there?But what is Harris's current job?
As noted earlier, while I've seen the headlines, I don't really know what her actual responsibility or authority is. Much like Pence with the COVID task force; I don't know what his level of authority was there. I assume he would not have been allowed to implement federal mask mandates, but would have had to get Trump's blessing. Ditto Harris here. What can she do here on her own? What can't she do?Wasn’t she put in charge of fixing the border crisis? How’d she do there?
She accomplished nothing, so I would say very poorly?Wasn’t she put in charge of fixing the border crisis? How’d she do there?
Is its though? I vote its not.Not even 30 days later, but worth the poll...
I don’t follow politics closely or know the history behind the VP spot but it just seems weird to me that that 2nd in command of just about anything would be viewed in this way.As noted earlier, while I've seen the headlines, I don't really know what her actual responsibility or authority is. Much like Pence with the COVID task force; I don't know what his level of authority was there. I assume he would not have been allowed to implement federal mask mandates, but would have had to get Trump's blessing. Ditto Harris here. What can she do here on her own? What can't she do?
@IvanKaramazov put it pretty well earlier. Her job function, beyond breaking ties in the Senate, is "be alive". She seems alive, best I can tell, so...
I don’t follow politics closely or know the history behind the VP spot but it just seems weird to me that that 2nd in command of just about anything would be viewed in this way.
Based on how I meant it, yes. But even if I went with line of succession it doesn’t really change my point. I don’t understand the idea that they are almost figureheads.VP really isn't "2nd in Command" of anything though, is she?
She is 2nd in the Line of Succession - but that is very different than being "2nd in Command"
You need to know all the details of her responsibilities / authority? It’s a high level leadership position. Such a strange take.As noted earlier, while I've seen the headlines, I don't really know what her actual responsibility or authority is. Much like Pence with the COVID task force; I don't know what his level of authority was there. I assume he would not have been allowed to implement federal mask mandates, but would have had to get Trump's blessing. Ditto Harris here. What can she do here on her own? What can't she do?
@IvanKaramazov put it pretty well earlier. Her job function, beyond breaking ties in the Senate, is "be alive". She seems alive, best I can tell, so...
I remember Pence visiting ground zero, the nursing home in WA, making a bunch of promises and keeping them.As noted earlier, while I've seen the headlines, I don't really know what her actual responsibility or authority is. Much like Pence with the COVID task force; I don't know what his level of authority was there. I assume he would not have been allowed to implement federal mask mandates, but would have had to get Trump's blessing. Ditto Harris here. What can she do here on her own? What can't she do?
@IvanKaramazov put it pretty well earlier. Her job function, beyond breaking ties in the Senate, is "be alive". She seems alive, best I can tell, so...
It’s a high level leadership position. Such a strange take.
I remember Pence visiting ground zero, the nursing home in WA, making a bunch of promises and keeping them.
Doing too good of a job? You'd have to ask him.Why did Trump dump Pence from the Covid press-conferences?
Biden is doing better than I expected. I didn't vote for him and swore I never would but I'd consider it if he ran in '24 given that he is actually attempting to get us out of Afghanistan.
Will still never vote for Kamala although I'm not sure what her job description is other than breake the occasional tie in the senate.
I agree. He still has a lot to do to really turn me, but as an anti-interventionalist, he has exceeded my expectations.Biden will not run again at 82 years old. I am just hoping he is able to finish his term.
You don’t know what authority she’s been granted? Let me help you out. Pretty clear charge on a hugely important crisis. But I get it. You and the other Liberals in here can’t bring yourself to fairly evaluate anything that is critical of Democrats. So I’ll do it for you- she has done a terrible job on the border.Has the VP ever been a "high level leadership position"? Maybe Cheney calling the shots for Bush.
The VP has no defined role - other than presiding over the Senate and casting a vote in the even of a tie. Each president opts to use their VP in different way - which is why I always laugh when people talk about the "most qualified" VP candidate. The qualifications for each VP are different, and really down to what the sitting president wants. Typically though, the president does not want a VP who overshadows the President.
Now - do I think Harris has made the most of her position - in terms of setting herself up for the Dem nomination in 2024? No, I do not. But, I don't know what authority she has been granted by Biden, and what she has done with that. So, I can't say whether she is doing what Biden wants, or not.
So I’ll do it for you- she has done a terrible job on the border.
Pence stood in front of a microphone almost daily and took questions about the task force he was in charge ofAs noted earlier, while I've seen the headlines, I don't really know what her actual responsibility or authority is. Much like Pence with the COVID task force; I don't know what his level of authority was there. I assume he would not have been allowed to implement federal mask mandates, but would have had to get Trump's blessing. Ditto Harris here. What can she do here on her own? What can't she do