PinkydaPimp
Footballguy
Who you got?
Zeke comes to mind here.
Zeke comes to mind here.
Last edited by a moderator:
Zeke is at the top of the list for meWho you got?
Zeke comes to mind here.
Zeke isn’t a sell lol he went up against arguably the top rushing D in the leagueZeke and Sermon might be sells….
Would you pay mid to late 2nd round value for him?Zeke is at the top of the list for me
Personally, yes.Would you pay mid to late 2nd round value for him?
There are several first round RBs that crapped the bed yesterday.Who you got?
Zeke comes to mind here.
Abso-friggin-lutelyWould you pay mid to late 2nd round value for him?
ThisZeke isn’t a sell lol he went up against arguably the top rushing D in the league
I’d trade Zeke to get Mixon.Zeke owner here. There is ZERO chance you're getting him for a second. At minimum, it'd take a first and even then, I am not selling.
Game script will not have Dak throwing that much for the year. That Tampa line is all world.
I'm going down with the Zeke ship before I sell for a 2nd round pick.
No Zeke owner is giving him up after one week except for a steep price which then isn't buying low.Who you got?
Zeke comes to mind here.
I will give you Aiyuk…Now Aaron Rodgers. Someone could get him from me for like a WR3 right now.
I would probably take that.I will give you Aiyuk…
seriously, if I would give a WR2 fir ARod….
Aiyuk was hurt, not magically useless.I will give you Aiyuk…
seriously, if I would give a WR2 fir ARod….
I'll gladly buy shares in either of those offenses if the price is right.Zeke and Sermon might be sells….
I'll gladly buy shares in either of those offenses if the price is right.
Adam Levitan
@adamlevitan
Broncos RB usage:
* Melvin Gordon 33 snaps, 20 routes, 14 touches
* Javonte Williams 33 snaps, 15 routes, 15 touches
Agree on Zeke. I don't even try on elite guys because nobody is panicking on the first round pick after week 1. Sermon went in the 8th and was a healthy scratch. I think he is attainable .it's hard to imagine in anything but a guppy league that these guys are buy lows
I think a guy like Aiyuk/Sermon may be reasonable targets to get on the cheap.
I offered Amari Cooper and Deebo Samuel for Ridley last week. I was laughed at. Which is appropriate because I am very high on Ridley and wouldn’t have let him go for that.Funny how perceptions change immediately Weeks 1 & 2
Guy offered me Julio and Sermon for CEH
post draft, before the first G I might have done that - love having ascending young RBs for the stretch run
Today? Bruh plz
I offered Amari Cooper and Deebo Samuel for Ridley last week. I was laughed at. Which is appropriate because I am very high on Ridley and wouldn’t have let him go for that.
But week 1 hindsight is fun to look at.
Agree on Zeke. I don't even try on elite guys because nobody is panicking on the first round pick after week 1. Sermon went in the 8th and was a healthy scratch. I think he is attainable .
His ADP was 7.11 RB31, so, while there was hype, it wasn't like anyone was banking on him to carry their RB corp. I'm in the Bay Area so both my leagues were aware of the hype, but also wary of Shanahan's RB usage. He went 8.01 and 8.02 in those leaguesSermon is a majorly hyped rookie...again i think you would have trouble with a buy low offer after week 1.
but situation and league dependent. There are probably lots of people out there that probably didn't read all the articles about him being the top rookie
Don't tap the glassI don’t think twofers have worked since the mid 00s. You need to disguise it by throwing in 1 more to make it look like A + D for B + C bc even guppies [know] giving A for B + C is dumb, whoever gets the difference maker wins,
But sometimes that 3rd player makes 'em suspicious, like "well geez, if my 1 guys is worth all 3 of those guys, I'd better hold"I don’t think twofers have worked since the mid 00s. You need to disguise it by throwing in 1 more to make it look like A + D for B + C bc even guppies [know] giving A for B + C is dumb, whoever gets the difference maker wins,
But sometimes that 3rd player makes 'em suspicious, like "well geez, if my 1 guys is worth all 3 of those guys, I'd better hold"
So maybe go 3 for 2 by adding a back of the roster guy & asking for a back of the roster guy.
Ah - yeah, that makes sense.I think he meant adding another lessor player to their side of the deal so it's 2 for 2.
So instead of Cooper/Deebo for Ridley you do something like Cooper/Deebo for Ridley/Crowder.
Then the other person thinks of it like
Cooper < Ridley
Deebo > Crowder
And it makes more sense to them than if they weren't giving away a 2nd player.
went over your headBut sometimes that 3rd player makes 'em suspicious, like "well geez, if my 1 guys is worth all 3 of those guys, I'd better hold"
So maybe go 3 for 2 by adding a back of the roster guy & asking for a back of the roster guy.
Yes, I got it now. @FreeBaGeL shook my noodle loose, thanks.went over your head
you want the stud for your two starters. you even the trade up by asking for one of his bench guys, maybe a handcuff or an upside guy with no clear role atm.
psychologically the twofer feels like a trap. “I’m not falling for that one!” but sometimes when you make an even worse offer (2 for 2) they’ll go for it. counterintuitive but humans, game theory, et al.
This is me. A. Jones, Ridley, Woods, Pitts, Boyd, Sermon. Yikes...My entire team: Rodgers, A. Jones, Ridley, McLaurin, Pitts, Mostert
Oof-- yeah --I've been playing FF for like 30 years, and that was likely an all time low for points.This is me. A. Jones, Ridley, Woods, Pitts, Boyd, Sermon. Yikes...
Kenny Golladay-People might get thrown off by Shepard's big game, but Golladay looked really good, especially considering he missed almost all of camp and was questionable to even play at all earlier in the week. As he gets more acclimated with Jones(and the offense in general) WR2 production should follow.
Do we think there's upside here though after Ridley and Pitts get fed, plus Davis and Patterson out of the backfield?I'll throw in a vote for Russell Gage.
doesnt he have a bad hammy though?This right here. I was watching intently to Golladay because I have him and hadn't seen him play in about a year. I forgot how good he is on contested catches. He is a stud and Jones seemed to start to trust him more as the game went along. I think he will only get better (provided he can stay healthy).
Remains to be seen.Do we think there's upside here though after Ridley and Pitts get fed, plus Davis and Patterson out of the backfield?
Fair enough. I don't think there will be consistent targets/upside for him with the addition of Pitts and Davis (offsetting the departure of Julio), but you never know. And you can almost certainly get him for next to nothing.Remains to be seen.
He caught 74 balls last year and caught TDs in 3 of the final 5 games. Julio is gone, Pitts is a rookie TE, and the game plan didn't seem to go very well this week without him being involved.
He may turn out as a bust but I'm not going to let one zero push me off of him just yet(and that zero might let me acquire him for next to nothing).