Have no idea how he got lost in the shuffle. I'll edit that.Aaron Jones?
Justin Herbert should be considerably higher. By end of season I think he'll be top 5, despite all the Charger offensive penalties.
He just missed the list. I don't think Dallas will be this run heavy all year. I think Cooper being banged up, and Gallup being out has increased Pollard's workload these past couple games. I think once they are healthy, Dallas is more pass heavy, and that is also reflected in my ranking of Prescott.Pollard is missing
I think he's a great sell high right now. I just don't think this is sustainable at all. He's all they have, he's going to be facing consistent double teams soon, and his QB situation is awful.I wanna give guys props for throwing rankings out like this cuz it's bold, but Brandin Cooks at 29 my man?
Truthfully, I thought he'd be lower like 5th or so, but when I ran the numbers, he was 3rd.Why so high on Jefferson?
You don't think 7 is high enough for Moore?DJ Moore and ARob need bumping up.
7-12 is basically a tier for me, so I don't think top-5 is farfetched. It just comes down to trusting Wilson and Rodgers more, and while I don't really trust Hurts, he has top-5 upside every week due to his rushing. I also believe Herbert will be asked to do less than those guys, due to having a better defense.First of all thanks for taking the time to post all this.
Justin Herbert should be considerably higher. By end of season I think he'll be top 5, despite all the Charger offensive penalties.
DJ Moore and ARob need bumping up.
I'd be a bit concerned about Woods because Jefferson is playing the same number of snaps and his targets are not far off from Woods. Kupp is clearly the preferred option, but Woods and Jefferson may cannibalize each other a bit.It looks like you think Robert Woods starts getting breakfast? He's on my bench until then.
Thanks for the optimism, I was getting real low on him.
I’d like you to go deeper, like where would you put the rookie QBs? I think Lawrence and Lance could (emphasis) be ahead of Jones and darnoldQB:
1. Josh Allen
2. Kyler Murray
3. Lamar Jackson
4. Patrick Mahomes
5. Dak Prescott
6. Tom Brady
7. Russell Wilson
8. Jalen Hurts
9. Aaron Rodgers
10. Justin Herbert
11. Matthew Stafford
12. Derek Carr
13. Ryan Tannehill
14. Daniel Jones
15. Sam Darnold
You are forgetting about the inevitable 3 INT games that are coming when he kills momentum with all 3 INT's in the endzone on terrible decisions. It's coming once you get lulled into thinking he is over that.Thanks for posting this travdogg.
I think Kirk Cousins should be ranked higher than Sam Darnold at least.
I can see the argument for Chase being higher. My case against that, is that I think Cincinnati is going to be a run first team as long as Mixon holds up, as to protect Burrow, and I believe Tee Higgins is a slightly better player at this point. I also don't think Chase's TD rate is sustainable at all.Arob, I'd like to agree but not so sure.
Cooks and Chase have to move up. D.Johnson, just not high on him.
Woods is probably my favorite buy low right now, alongside Amari Cooper and Kyle Pitts.It looks like you think Robert Woods starts getting breakfast? He's on my bench until then.
Thanks for the optimism, I was getting real low on him.
I split the difference and am using .5PPR. To address these 1 by 1:Great stuff. Comments/questions are:
1) Mixon seems a little low. Since you have Swift at 8, guessing this is a PPR list. I would swap Mixon and Swift.
2) if this is PPR list, then Chubb is too high. Splitting time with Hunt and doesn't catch enough passes
3) where are your DEN RBs? one of them should be in the top 30, likely Javonte.
4) Miles Sanders at 17? I can't see how that can be.
5) I guess 5000+ yds and 40+ TDs is only QB6, since Brady is going to go for 5000+ and 40+ TDs
6) You must think Mike Williams will fall back to earth a little, but 16 isn't bad, I would have him a few spots higher.
7) Deebo too high. SF loves to run the ball and I don't think Aiyuk is dead, and Kittle will still get his.
8 - Gronk at 14? with Gesicki and Tonyan and Everett ahead of him? This is the biggest head scratcher of them all. TB is going to have a 5000+/40+ TD pie. Gronk has caught at least 4 passes in every game and if he stays healthy (big if) then Gronk will likely score 8+ TDs ROS. Has to be in your top 10.
My next 10 would be:I’d like you to go deeper, like where would you put the rookie QBs? I think Lawrence and Lance could (emphasis) be ahead of Jones and darnold
He's right on the cusp of both RB/WR lists. I just want to see more to trust it. Part of me thinks when Ridley/Pitts start to get going, its coming out of Patterson's workload more than anything else. But he could very well be a guy I'm letting previous history color my bias too much.Cordelle Patterson, RB/WR seems to be climbing the ranks somewhere. Perhaps put your best Flex out there?
I think Darnold's rushing production gives him a slightly higher ceiling. I also think Cousins TD rate is unsustainable, as is the Vikings only having 1 rush TD through 3 games.Thanks for posting this travdogg.
I think Kirk Cousins should be ranked higher than Sam Darnold at least.
Cordelle Patterson, RB/WR seems to be climbing the ranks somewhere. Perhaps put your best Flex out there?
I have felt the same way with previous history and bias regarding Cordelle Patterson. I added him because his numbers seem adequate to Flex or as a bye week fill in and now he's showing up on FBG's rankings this week and moving forward as a legitimate starter in many places since he has the RB/WR tag. More versatility is another key. He could get plugged in as a WR 3 or Flex or even has a RB 2. Feeling more confident each week.He's right on the cusp of both RB/WR lists. I just want to see more to trust it. Part of me thinks when Ridley/Pitts start to get going, its coming out of Patterson's workload more than anything else. But he could very well be a guy I'm letting previous history color my bias too much.
I haven't heard 6-8 weeks minimum. I heard 4-6 weeks, which puts him at week 6 or so. This is also a YMMV pick. I think he's a better fit for Teddy than Sutton is and if healthy reassumes #1 WR duties soon after he returns. In Leagues that don't have IR spots, I think he's a great stash right now, especially for people who have either a 3-0 or 2-1 record, and are mostly healthy.Hey @travdogg appreciate you posting this & engaging with the board to defend some of these.
I’m curious how Jeudy gets to WR28 when he is out 6-8 weeks (minimum)?
Talent wise, I 100% agree. I have major questions about his QB situation, he has a decent floor, but has only really been used heavily against the Giants, and now Curtis Samuel will be coming back.ATB said:Terry McLaurin wayyyyyy too low. Below Diontae and Hollywood? Realistically, he should be top-15 at the very least.
I agree - for one, DAL is playing better defense, and for another, Dak isn't running. At all. And I don't see him getting the RuTDs he had last year either - I see Dallas leaning on the RBs in short yardage, goal to go situations. He'll still get some of those short PaTD, but his ceiling was definitely bolstered by the vulture TDs on QB rollouts, and I'm not expecting much of that this year. I have him around 8.Johnny Utah #9 said:1) I think you have Herbert too low. And as a Dak owner, I would love if he finished this high but I just don't see it this year.
I was just reading about how Cousins is close to setting a record for passes since he threw an interception set in 2001.Gally said:You are forgetting about the inevitable 3 INT games that are coming when he kills momentum with all 3 INT's in the endzone on terrible decisions. It's coming once you get lulled into thinking he is over that.
In Hurts case, he's currently QB4 in points. I do agree he's not a great NFL QB, but his situation is great in my opinion. He's got a very bankable rushing floor, and should have multiple weeks with garbage time. At the same time, he has a good amount of job security. I can't imagine benching him for Flacco under any circumstances, Minshew maybe, but he has to win the #2 job first. Its ugly, and there is some risk, but I think Hurts is being underrated. He's going to have a lot of weeks where he'll have 10+ points without throwing a single pass.I agree - for one, DAL is playing better defense, and for another, Dak isn't running. At all. And I don't see him getting the RuTDs he had last year either - I see Dallas leaning on the RBs in short yardage, goal to go situations. He'll still get some of those short PaTD, but his ceiling was definitely bolstered by the vulture TDs on QB rollouts, and I'm not expecting much of that this year. I have him around 8.
Speaking of 8, I also don't see Hurts being a top 10 QB this year. He looked truly horrible this week, he still doesn't have enough weapons, and he doesn't seem to make check-downs even if they did. He looks at his 1st read & takes off running if it's not open. Also, the OL took another big hit against DAL.
IMO Hurts may not crack top 12 when all's said & done.
IMO, Samuel's return opens up things for McLaurin. Until now, he's been the only dog on the field and good defenses could cue on him (like the Bills did). I think from here on out, he should be relatively back-to-form and shouldn't have down weeks as long as he has a decent WR2 to keep corners honest.Talent wise, I 100% agree. I have major questions about his QB situation, he has a decent floor, but has only really been used heavily against the Giants, and now Curtis Samuel will be coming back.
I want to have him higher, but I need to see some ceiling. Atlanta is a nice matchup this week. If it doesn't happen now, I think he's a low-end WR2.
I hope you are right, I'm a huge McLaurin fan. But the fact he's basically been uninvolved until garbage time in 2 of 3 weeks has my a little skittish on him.IMO, Samuel's return opens up things for McLaurin. Until now, he's been the only dog on the field and good defenses could cue on him (like the Bills did). I think from here on out, he should be relatively back-to-form and shouldn't have down weeks as long as he has a decent WR2 to keep corners honest.
Travdogg gave his reasoning for Gronk at 14. I don't agree with it, but he is envisioning a different scenario for Gronk. It's a ROS projection and not what's happened the last 3 weeks.OP you're criminally low on Gronk, Mike Williams. Gronk is a top 5 TE going forward, Mike Williams is a top 5 WR going forward.
K. Pitts at TE 5?! that's just comical. guy has about 4 catches on the season, he's a top 5 TE? he's on pace for about 28 recs on the year. Gronk's on pace for about 80-90 recs. he didn't fluke his way up. ranking him at TE 14 is just bad.
Kyle Pitts has 4+ catches in 2 of his 3 games this season. He's on pace for 60 catches, and has probably a 99% chance of being more involved as the season goes on.K. Pitts at TE 5?! that's just comical. guy has about 4 catches on the season, he's a top 5 TE? he's on pace for about 28 recs on the year.
Yes, but you’re talking ROS, and Hurts warts are starting to show. Dallas exposed him significantly, and Dallas isn’t a great defense.In Hurts case, he's currently QB4 in points. I do agree he's not a great NFL QB, but his situation is great in my opinion. He's got a very bankable rushing floor, and should have multiple weeks with garbage time. At the same time, he has a good amount of job security. I can't imagine benching him for Flacco under any circumstances, Minshew maybe, but he has to win the #2 job first. Its ugly, and there is some risk, but I think Hurts is being underrated. He's going to have a lot of weeks where he'll have 10+ points without throwing a single pass.
travdogg said:5. Honestly yes. 5,000 yards and 40 TD's is about QB6 these days. Brady had 4600-40 last year and was QB8, and that was in a year where Lamar Jackson wasn't himself, and Dak Prescott was injured.