Wrigley
Footballguy
Only because of injury....suuuuuuuuuuuureA cream and a lozenge? OK
Only because of injury....suuuuuuuuuuuureA cream and a lozenge? OK
Anti-Semite.Only because of injury....suuuuuuuuuuuureA cream and a lozenge? OK
So sick.41-83 with 14 home runs and 39 RBIs when putting first pitch in play. /Miggy
beautiful day today too. If i was a met fan id find a way to get to the ballparkHarvey and Max isn't a bad pitching matchup today. All-Star Game, part II.
I'd keep those two and then probably any of those three WRs.Not gonna venture into the Shark Pool or Asst Coach place. Getting back into fantasy football this year. Keeper league is adding a couple teams, which means I get a pick of 3 keepers from players not kept or abandoned by previous teams or whatever. PPR league. Any suggestions on these guys? I barely even watch football so I am at a loss here.
Kaepernick ($20)
Dez ($35)
Demaryius ($31)
Amendola ($20)
Richardson ($43)
Spiller ($20)
Bush ($20)
Ivory ($20)
Ridley ($20)
Graham ($34)
Yup, and I'd keep Demariyus in the three WR choices.I'd keep those two and then probably any of those three WRs.Not gonna venture into the Shark Pool or Asst Coach place. Getting back into fantasy football this year. Keeper league is adding a couple teams, which means I get a pick of 3 keepers from players not kept or abandoned by previous teams or whatever. PPR league. Any suggestions on these guys? I barely even watch football so I am at a loss here.
Kaepernick ($20)
Dez ($35)
Demaryius ($31)
Amendola ($20)
Richardson ($43)
Spiller ($20)
Bush ($20)
Ivory ($20)
Ridley ($20)
Graham ($34)
19 HRs 85 RBI 429/545/1.423 with RISP /Miggy41-83 with 14 home runs and 39 RBIs when putting first pitch in play. /Miggy
What did the Mets do wrong?The Mets didn't learn anything from the Isringhausen/Pulsipher/Wilson debacle.
What did the Mets do wrong?The Mets didn't learn anything from the Isringhausen/Pulsipher/Wilson debacle.
Id rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
Come on. Sample sizes matter, as do opponents and home park (especially when you're dealing in small sample sizes).This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
The difference is, Fernandez's #s since June are a bigger sample size than his numbers from the rest of his career.Come on. Sample sizes matter, as do opponents and home park (especially when you're dealing in small sample sizes).This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
Dan Haren has a 2.71 ERA and a 0.87 WHIP for the second half of the season. Is he a second round pick for you in 2014? Based on his numbers since June he would be.
Drafting SP that early is always a risk/reward proposition. Fernandez has as much upside as anyone but comes with risks of sophomore slump, poor offensive support and innings limit,Come on. Sample sizes matter, as do opponents and home park (especially when you're dealing in small sample sizes).This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
Dan Haren has a 2.71 ERA and a 0.87 WHIP for the second half of the season. Is he a second round pick for you in 2014? Based on his numbers since June he would be.
I'm no lip reader but I enlarged the gif a bit and it looked like Tulo said "Did you catch that???"
That's what I got. Awesome .gif. Sometimes you just have to acknowledge somebody did something awesome and robbed you.I'm no lip reader but I enlarged the gif a bit and it looked like Tulo said "Did you catch that???"
Think that's right?
He also has an unsustainable .249 BABIP on the year, which will almost certainly change next year. And he's also faced incredibly weak lineups- he hasn't made a single start against the Braves all year and the other three teams in his division are 22nd, 24th and 27th in runs scored. The other teams he's faced more than once include the Twins (21st) and the Pirates (25th) (others are the Reds, Rockies, Dodgers and Cardinals). He'll avoid the Tigers even though his division is playing the AL Central in interleague, and he faced the Rays back in May when they sucked (although they still hit him). All of that also will almost certainly change next year.The difference is, Fernandez's #s since June are a bigger sample size than his numbers from the rest of his career.Come on. Sample sizes matter, as do opponents and home park (especially when you're dealing in small sample sizes).This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
Dan Haren has a 2.71 ERA and a 0.87 WHIP for the second half of the season. Is he a second round pick for you in 2014? Based on his numbers since June he would be.
compared to a .231 BABIP for Kershaw. Also, last I checked he dominated the Rockies twice (#12), Dodgers twice (#15), Reds once (#13) & Cardinals (#3). He faces the Braves this week and I expect another monster game as usual. He also dominated the Indians to the tune of 14ks (#5 in runs scored)He also has an unsustainable .249 BABIP on the year, which will almost certainly change next year. And he's also faced incredibly weak lineups- he hasn't made a single start against the Braves all year and the other three teams in his division are 22nd, 24th and 27th in runs scored. The other teams he's faced more than once include the Twins (21st) and the Pirates (25th) (others are the Reds, Rockies, Dodgers and Cardinals). He'll avoid the Tigers even though his division is playing the AL Central in interleague, and he faced the Rays back in May when they sucked (although they still hit him). All of that also will almost certainly change next year.The difference is, Fernandez's #s since June are a bigger sample size than his numbers from the rest of his career.Come on. Sample sizes matter, as do opponents and home park (especially when you're dealing in small sample sizes).This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
Dan Haren has a 2.71 ERA and a 0.87 WHIP for the second half of the season. Is he a second round pick for you in 2014? Based on his numbers since June he would be.
Not saying he isn't great. He is great. I own him in my primary league, and love him to death. Just saying there are a LOT of reasons not to expect a repeat performance in 2014.
Also not sustainable. Kershaw also won't be as good next year as he's been this year.compared to a .231 BABIP for Kershaw. Also, last I checked he dominated the Rockies twice (#12), Dodgers twice (#15), Reds once (#13) & Cardinals (#3). He faces the Braves this week and I expect another monster game as usual. He also dominated the Indians to the tune of 14ks (#5 in runs scored)He also has an unsustainable .249 BABIP on the year, which will almost certainly change next year. And he's also faced incredibly weak lineups- he hasn't made a single start against the Braves all year and the other three teams in his division are 22nd, 24th and 27th in runs scored. The other teams he's faced more than once include the Twins (21st) and the Pirates (25th) (others are the Reds, Rockies, Dodgers and Cardinals). He'll avoid the Tigers even though his division is playing the AL Central in interleague, and he faced the Rays back in May when they sucked (although they still hit him). All of that also will almost certainly change next year.The difference is, Fernandez's #s since June are a bigger sample size than his numbers from the rest of his career.Come on. Sample sizes matter, as do opponents and home park (especially when you're dealing in small sample sizes).This is lunacy. Check his #s since June. Hes been better than Kershaw. Ill give you Price. Thats about it.I'd have a tough time putting him ahead of Greinke, Price, Scherzer, Strasburg, Wainwright, and maybe LeeId rank him behind only Kershaw, Darvish, & Felix next year
Dan Haren has a 2.71 ERA and a 0.87 WHIP for the second half of the season. Is he a second round pick for you in 2014? Based on his numbers since June he would be.
Not saying he isn't great. He is great. I own him in my primary league, and love him to death. Just saying there are a LOT of reasons not to expect a repeat performance in 2014.
Marlon Byrd was dealt to the Pirates this morning, Mets had a Marlon Byrd t-shirt giveaway tonight. That's how you take care of your fans.
Those numbers are downright Bondsian.19 HRs 85 RBI 429/545/1.423 with RISP /Miggy41-83 with 14 home runs and 39 RBIs when putting first pitch in play. /Miggy
Never seen a ball land in that location. Crazy.Trout hit a nuke tonight against Tampa. 450 feet, and it was off a good pitch.
I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
The gray box that says box score?I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
ETA: Can anyone find the link to the box score here? Took me a while.
I can see that with IE but when I looked earlier using Firefox, all I saw was a box that was empty except for the two team logos.The gray box that says box score?I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
ETA: Can anyone find the link to the box score here? Took me a while.
Same deal in Safari. Hilarious that their big, ugly redesign is optimized for Explorer.I can see that with IE but when I looked earlier using Firefox, all I saw was a box that was empty except for the two team logos.The gray box that says box score?I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
ETA: Can anyone find the link to the box score here? Took me a while.
I get a completely different looking page when I access it via Chrome. Hopefully Marissa Mayer isn't a Braves or Indians fan.Same deal in Safari. Hilarious that their big, ugly redesign is optimized for Explorer.I can see that with IE but when I looked earlier using Firefox, all I saw was a box that was empty except for the two team logos.The gray box that says box score?I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
ETA: Can anyone find the link to the box score here? Took me a while.
Holy #### is it horrible.I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
ETA: Can anyone find the link to the box score here? Took me a while.
Someone's noticed that if you change ".com" to ".ca" you get the old page view. Also, Yahoo! is being deluged with complaints, so maybe they'll switch back.Holy #### is it horrible.I spent 5 minutes looking for a box score link yesterday. Finally gave up and went to MLB.com.pantagrapher said:Anyone else think the new Yahoo! player pages look ####### awful?
ETA: Can anyone find the link to the box score here? Took me a while.
UnrealHeading to Fenway for the first time this Friday/Saturday
UMPED: