What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

[Dynasty] 2014 Draft Prospects (1 Viewer)

Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler believes Ohio State RB Carlos Hyde is the only running back he'd consider taking in the top-60 picks.
"There is only one running back I'd consider taking in the top-60 picks this year - Ohio State RB Carlos Hyde. Plenty of quality running backs in 3rd-5th rounds," Brugler tweeted. Hyde has a good chance to be the first RB off the board in this years draft. After an impressive Pro Day, some scouts believe he could even go in the first-round. Our own Josh Norris has compared Hyde to Zac Stacy and Frank Gore and also believes he'll be the first running back off the board.

Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
I like Hyde. But Im maintaining that Sankey and Mason will have better careers in the pros...

And if I had to take one in the draft, Id go Sankey above both
I have been putting in some more time lately trying to crack this RB class. Overall, I think it's a very pedestrian group. There are lots of 2nd-4th round guys, but nobody with the right stuff to warrant a 1st round pick. So if you're looking at this group trying to find that prospect, I don't think you'll have much luck. That guy isn't in the pool this year. Lots of these backs check off some of the boxes, but nobody has everything.

As far as Hyde goes, he is a fluid runner with a great frame, very good feet/hips, good hands, and good balance. The issue is that he's a one speed runner with no second gear at all. He is efficient and economical, but there's no burst. So my hunch is that he's just going to be a jack-of-all-trades grinder in the NFL whose lack of dynamic qualities prevents him from becoming an elite back on his own merits. He could still put up gaudy FF stats if fed carries and targets ala Arian Foster and LeVeon Bell, but he's not going to suddenly become Fred Taylor or Ahman Green and bust off big runs with his speed.
Seastrunk has a chance to be pretty good. Perhaps Hill can also if he can keep out of trouble.

 
So if people are suddenly shocked by that and it's causing them to radically adjust their rankings, I think it's an indictment of their specific ability to assess tape rather than the practice of assessing tape in general.
I get what you're saying and just wrote something up about the things you need film to see, but literally no one had Carey outside the top three or four guys going into the combine. And he might not get drafted in the first ten RBs despite an exceptionally weak year at the position.

But even if that's not right (and Carey gets drafted early) there are other examples. What use is "the tape" if the best guys out there can't separate a high-end starter prospect from a third day guy before the combine?

And what does it say that former pro scouts and former GMs are all over the place on all but the best and worst prospects after watching the same film? If it could be done reliably the professionals would be in agreement. But it can't be done consistently. The tape lies.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler believes Ohio State RB Carlos Hyde is the only running back he'd consider taking in the top-60 picks.
"There is only one running back I'd consider taking in the top-60 picks this year - Ohio State RB Carlos Hyde. Plenty of quality running backs in 3rd-5th rounds," Brugler tweeted. Hyde has a good chance to be the first RB off the board in this years draft. After an impressive Pro Day, some scouts believe he could even go in the first-round. Our own Josh Norris has compared Hyde to Zac Stacy and Frank Gore and also believes he'll be the first running back off the board.

Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
I like Hyde. But Im maintaining that Sankey and Mason will have better careers in the pros...

And if I had to take one in the draft, Id go Sankey above both
I have been putting in some more time lately trying to crack this RB class. Overall, I think it's a very pedestrian group. There are lots of 2nd-4th round guys, but nobody with the right stuff to warrant a 1st round pick. So if you're looking at this group trying to find that prospect, I don't think you'll have much luck. That guy isn't in the pool this year. Lots of these backs check off some of the boxes, but nobody has everything.

As far as Hyde goes, he is a fluid runner with a great frame, very good feet/hips, good hands, and good balance. The issue is that he's a one speed runner with no second gear at all. He is efficient and economical, but there's no burst. So my hunch is that he's just going to be a jack-of-all-trades grinder in the NFL whose lack of dynamic qualities prevents him from becoming an elite back on his own merits. He could still put up gaudy FF stats if fed carries and targets ala Arian Foster and LeVeon Bell, but he's not going to suddenly become Fred Taylor or Ahman Green and bust off big runs with his speed.
Seastrunk has a chance to be pretty good. Perhaps Hill can also if he can keep out of trouble.
I'm sure a couple of them will pan out. I think it's a decent group in terms of depth. It just lacks star wattage.

Seastrunk is one of the most interesting names out there. Great explosiveness. Not the biggest guy though and has a somewhat unconventional running style where he often loses momentum during cuts. It's really hard to put into words, but if you watch his games there is just something different about the way he cuts. Almost like his legs are too long for his body and it takes huge effort to redirect them. Other short backs like Bernard and Mason are more effortless in that regard, albeit not as athletically gifted otherwise. I think Lache has some real boom potential. I think there's a bust possibility as well though. It would be more reassuring if so many of the pundits weren't down on him. NFL.com, CFN, and Draft Scout aren't all that high on him.

I think Hill can be pretty good. He does everything reasonably well, but was exposed a little bit in the combine. He's not traditionally athletic. More of a soft body who gets by because of his bulk and initial quickness, though I think he plays faster than his 40 time. Playing for LSU definitely helped pad his numbers. At the same time, he has a nice power/quickness combo and is a good pass catcher too. The fact that he clearly and decisively beat out Spencer Ware and Michael Ford is also pretty impressive. Ware was drafted last year and both of those guys made NFL rosters as rookies.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if people are suddenly shocked by that and it's causing them to radically adjust their rankings, I think it's an indictment of their specific ability to assess tape rather than the practice of assessing tape in general.
I get what you're saying and just wrote something up about the things you need film to see, but literally no one had Carey outside the top three or four guys going into the combine. And he might not get drafted in the first ten RBs despite an exceptionally weak year at the position.

But even if that's not right (and Carey gets drafted early) there are other examples. What use is "the tape" if the best guys out there can't separate a high-end starter prospect from a third day guy before the combine?

And what does it say that former pro scouts and former GMs are all over the place on all but the best and worst prospects after watching the same film? If it could be done reliably the professionals would be in agreement. But it can't be done consistently. The tape lies.
For starters, one outlier doesn't mean a 'model', so to speak, is doomed for irrelevancy. Besides Carey, the other consensus top backs are still the consensus top backs, despite only Sankey and Mason being the only ones to put up decent numbers. And generally speaking I think that's the case each year. I think it's safe to say the correlation between the consensus top backs going into a combine being drafted higher is a lot stronger than the correlation between the top performers at the combine being drafted higher.

And secondly, I think a good argument can be made that the combine isn't immune from 'lying' itself. If you went solely by combine numbers, you'd think Andre Ellington is doomed to ineptitude after running a 4.61 at just 199lbs, but if you watched tape you'd have known that he's actually a fast player with elite burst/acceleration. Then you got someone like Joseph Addai who ran a 4.40 at the combine, and despite getting 1000+ carries in a Peyton Manning led offense you can count the amount of 25+ yard rushes he had on one hand, and he never broke a single 50+ yard rush.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if people are suddenly shocked by that and it's causing them to radically adjust their rankings, I think it's an indictment of their specific ability to assess tape rather than the practice of assessing tape in general.
I get what you're saying and just wrote something up about the things you need film to see, but literally no one had Carey outside the top three or four guys going into the combine. And he might not get drafted in the first ten RBs despite an exceptionally weak year at the position.

But even if that's not right (and Carey gets drafted early) there are other examples. What use is "the tape" if the best guys out there can't separate a high-end starter prospect from a third day guy before the combine?

And what does it say that former pro scouts and former GMs are all over the place on all but the best and worst prospects after watching the same film? If it could be done reliably the professionals would be in agreement. But it can't be done consistently. The tape lies.
I don't claim to be a pro scout, but I had Carey at RB6 in my pre-combine rankings and I think my assessment of him was pretty much on-point. I would be surprised if there weren't professional scouts who had a similar view of him. I think it's important to remember that the pundit sites aren't necessarily an accurate reflection of what teams are thinking behind closed doors. I don't take their rankings as gospel even though they're usually more or less in the ballpark of what happens in the actual draft. In other words, I don't know that Carey was ever really a unanimous top 3 guy. Only on the fantasy land of the Internet.

I think it's tough to talk about the scouting abilities of individuals when most of what we see on the Internet comes through semi-pro pundits and ex-scouts. I honestly don't know enough about the NFL's scouting departments to know if there are some superstar scouts out there who nail every evaluation. It wouldn't surprise me. We might not ever see their work, but that makes sense. If I had a guy like that on my payroll, I think I'd pay whatever it took to keep him around as opposed to letting him leave to write for Rotoworld.

My hunch is that it's a lot like any other competitive endeavor. There are probably lots of people with mediocre ability and a select few who do it really well. The ineptitude of the average wannabe scout isn't an indictment of the best professionals any more than my ineptitude as a three point shooter is an indictment of Reggie Miller. The fact that "not everyone is a good evaluator" doesn't extend to "nobody is a good evaluator." I don't think the tape lies. I think it's more accurate to say that "the tape is hard to assess." The tape itself isn't lying. People just aren't able to pull the right conclusions from watching it.

Personally, I believe in using the numbers AND the tape. I think that's what NFL teams do as well. In a perfect world, you'd be dealing with clean prospects like Tyler Eifert and Doug Martin for whom the numbers and the tape both tell the same story. When one side of the equation contradicts the other, that's where things get sticky. We know that not every player the scouts love pans out. We also know that not every player with a great workout profile pans out. I think the ability to understand the concrete numbers has value, but I also think the ability to look at the tape and get some idea of what you're seeing also has value. If it were just about the tangibles, nobody ever would've ever spent a high pick on LeSean McCoy, Anquan Boldin, Keenan Allen, Chad Johnson, or Frank Gore. You can thumb your nose at them all you want, but it's not like the people who watch the games are completely clueless all the time.

 
Mostly agree with that EBF -- and I know you put stock in the #s too, so you aren't really who I was aiming at.

But Johnson, McCoy, Boldin and Gore all register as decent prospects by the numbers (at least with the benefit of some historical data to use for comps).

I still don't buy Allen long-term, but I also don't have workout numbers for the guy so probably shouldn't have picked that hill to die on.

 
Rotoworld:

Arizona State RB Marion Grice is still recovering from a broken left fibula and is expected to hold a pro day workout on April 8.
Grice attempted to play through leg injuries in November and December, but we did not know the ailment was so serious. The running back did not work out at the NFL Combine. Grice's best trait might be his comfort as a receiver.

Source: NFL.com


NFL Network's Daniel Jeremiah compared Colorado WR Paul Richardson's play speed to Ted Ginn's.
"Richardson destroys pursuit angles when he gets in the open field. He has an extra gear." Jeremiah tweeted. The Colorado product can certainly get vertical downfield, which could earn him some Desean Jackson comparisons. We don't expect Richardson to be drafted in the top 50.

Source: Daniel Jeremiah on Twitter
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell projects as a sixth- or seventh-round draft pick, writes Gil Brandt of NFL.com.
Crowell strangely lost more than half an inch in measurement from the combine to Alabama State's pro day, going from 5-foot-11 to 5-foot-10 3/8. He decided to keep his 4.57 forty time from the Scouting Combine, but collected a 4.51 short shuttle and a 7.25 cone drill. The former five-star Georgia recruit is interesting because he's a boom-or-bust prospect that will come at a minimal cost. Were it not for off-the-field issues, Crowell might have been a second- or even a first-rounder in May. It should be noted that Crowell earned praise from those around him at the Alabama State program.

Source: NFL.com
Thanks for this Faust.

Those are pretty awful agility numbers even for a 224 pounder and would have been among the worst at the combine for RBs.
It was raining at his Pro Day.

 
So if people are suddenly shocked by that and it's causing them to radically adjust their rankings, I think it's an indictment of their specific ability to assess tape rather than the practice of assessing tape in general.
I get what you're saying and just wrote something up about the things you need film to see, but literally no one had Carey outside the top three or four guys going into the combine. And he might not get drafted in the first ten RBs despite an exceptionally weak year at the position.

But even if that's not right (and Carey gets drafted early) there are other examples. What use is "the tape" if the best guys out there can't separate a high-end starter prospect from a third day guy before the combine?

And what does it say that former pro scouts and former GMs are all over the place on all but the best and worst prospects after watching the same film? If it could be done reliably the professionals would be in agreement. But it can't be done consistently. The tape lies.
I was never a fan of Carey since a year ago. I had him ranked 9th before the Combine. Back in November, I had him ranked 15th.

The tape doesn't lie. It's the observer who lies to themself.

TJ Yeldon will be next year's Ka'Deem Carey.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is like saying that because some people are bad at assessing film, there is no value in film assessment. I think certain things can be hard to assess from watching games and highlights. I think height/weight can be trickier than you'd think when the players are wearing pads and uniforms. For example, I thought Lee might be more like 200+ pounds than 192. Blackmon is another guy who seemed to look and play bigger than he really was.

For the most part though, I'd say a lot of what happens at the combine is confirmation of what people already expected. I don't think anyone who knows what they're looking at should've been surprised to see a guy like Jarvis Landry run slow and show minimal explosiveness. That is what he looks like "on tape" as well. So if people are suddenly shocked by that and it's causing them to radically adjust their rankings, I think it's an indictment of their specific ability to assess tape rather than the practice of assessing tape in general. Sort of like how a pitcher throwing a terrible fastball that leads to a home run isn't an indictment on the art of pitching, but only that pitcher and that pitch.

I don't think one side is right in the tape vs. numbers debate. Jon Baldwin and Donald Brown look like Pro Bowlers on paper. They suck on the field. Other guys like LeSean McCoy and Chad Johnson sucked on paper. They're Pro Bowlers on the field. If scouts had no ability to do their jobs, you wouldn't have seen McCoy and his unspectacular height/weight/speed/explosiveness anywhere near the second round. Carey is actually a little bit like McCoy in that his best quality is his first step quickness (which isn't going to show up in combine drills), but he's nowhere near as good and I never liked him as much. Did anyone expect him to test well though? I didn't. I'm surprised he couldn't beat a 4.7, but he never struck me as a guy who was going to shine in that environment. I posted this on February 4th:

Carey isn't much of a height/weight/speed athlete, but he can make people miss in tight spaces. So if someone is hoping for a LeSean McCoy type of back to get into space, he would offer some potential for that kind of role.
I'm surprised by just how awful his workout was, but it's not like he was ever going to be Reggie Bush in the testing. That was never his game. I think he'll still slide because his 40 time was still really bad even in the context of a guy who isn't thought to be a tremendous athletic specimen, but I don't know that evaluators are going to be shocked that he wasn't awesome in the drills. He never looked like that kind of player.

The thing about the "eyeball test" is that it's completely subjective and some people are horrible at it. I had a guy on another forum tell me before the combine that Andre Williams was a terrible athlete and that he was going to test like Stepfan Taylor. Ridiculous if you'd watched them extensively and had any ability to assess what you were looking at, but many semi-pro Internet pundits don't really have a clue what they're doing (and in fairness I've been that guy in the past). Ultimately, bad scouts aren't any more of an indictment of "eyeball test" scouting than bad pitchers are an indictment of throwing a curveball. Some people do it well and some people don't.
It's not as simple or as complicated as you are making it in the above lengthy dissertation. Good scouts and judges of talent can get things wrong sometimes. It happens.What is up with the length of your posts... You ever hear the saying "less is more"?

As a sales person I had to learn a long time ago that just because you puke up everything you know (in your case what you think you know) - does not mean everyone is gonna buy what your selling.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler believes Ohio State RB Carlos Hyde is the only running back he'd consider taking in the top-60 picks.

"There is only one running back I'd consider taking in the top-60 picks this year - Ohio State RB Carlos Hyde. Plenty of quality running backs in 3rd-5th rounds," Brugler tweeted. Hyde has a good chance to be the first RB off the board in this years draft. After an impressive Pro Day, some scouts believe he could even go in the first-round. Our own Josh Norris has compared Hyde to Zac Stacy and Frank Gore and also believes he'll be the first running back off the board.

Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
I like Hyde. But Im maintaining that Sankey and Mason will have better careers in the pros...

And if I had to take one in the draft, Id go Sankey above both
I have been putting in some more time lately trying to crack this RB class. Overall, I think it's a very pedestrian group. There are lots of 2nd-4th round guys, but nobody with the right stuff to warrant a 1st round pick. So if you're looking at this group trying to find that prospect, I don't think you'll have much luck. That guy isn't in the pool this year. Lots of these backs check off some of the boxes, but nobody has everything.

As far as Hyde goes, he is a fluid runner with a great frame, very good feet/hips, good hands, and good balance. The issue is that he's a one speed runner with no second gear at all. He is efficient and economical, but there's no burst. So my hunch is that he's just going to be a jack-of-all-trades grinder in the NFL whose lack of dynamic qualities prevents him from becoming an elite back on his own merits. He could still put up gaudy FF stats if fed carries and targets ala Arian Foster and LeVeon Bell, but he's not going to suddenly become Fred Taylor or Ahman Green and bust off big runs with his speed.
Sankey is a stud and has checked off every box, and this RB class is way better than last years class!!

There may not be a first round back again? Times have changed....

Sankey

Mason

Hill

Hyde

Seastrunk

Carey

Crowell

Sims

Williams

Storm

West

Lot of talent there...

 
NFL free agency could push running backs out of draft's 1st round

By Bryan Fischer

College Football 24/7 writer

If you see an interview with a potential draft pick at running back over the next month or two, they just might steal a line from Rodney Dangerfield and say they don't get no respect.

That's certainly the case when you look over NFL Media analyst Daniel Jeremiah's latest mock draft, which doesn't include a running back in the first round. Bucky Brooks and Charles Davis' mock drafts don't have a running back going until the Browns' No. 26 pick.

With free agency beginning Tuesday, the situation could get worse for running back prospects before May rolls around. Combine a soft free-agent market with a lack of agreement on which running backs merit a first-round grade, and this year's draft could be a long one for running backs.

Around the League's list of the top 101 free agents in 2014 includes eight running backs, no small feat, considering how devalued the position has become in the age of splitting carries. The list of unrestricted free agents is long, meaning there is a healthy number of cheap, short-term options for a club looking to fill needs at the spot.

Teams might simply opt to pass on a running back in the early rounds of the draft, knowing there are free-agent options such as Darren Sproles, LeGarrette Blount or Maurice Jones-Drew. Backups who have either hit free agency, such as Rashad Jennings or Toby Gerhart, or have been cut, such as Michael Bush, could also present a good low-cost, low-risk alternative to spending a draft pick.

That could mean trouble for first-round hopefuls such as Ohio State's Carlos Hyde.

While NFL Media analyst Mike Mayock said he believes Hyde solidified his status as a late-first-round to mid-second-round pick with a strong pro-day workout -- especially by showing his skills as a pass-catcher -- Hyde still hasn't flashed his speed for scouts in the 40-yard dash after tweaking his hamstring at the NFL Scouting Combine.

Hyde isn't the only top RB prospect dealing with an increasing number of knocks. Auburn's Tre Mason, a top five prospect at tailback according to Brooks and Mayock, was a bit of an afterthought at Auburn's recent pro day and still has to deal with criticism about his pass-blocking skills, size and injury history. LSU's Jeremy Hill is considered a first-round talent carrying the baggage of a second- or third-day pick. Bishop Sankey led the Pac-12 in rushing last year -- and has risen to become Mayock's top tailback after the combine -- but still carries a third- to fourth-round projection for some before his pro day at Washington.

Also working against the group is the overall depth at wide receiver, defensive line, offensive tackle and cornerback in a loaded draft class. It's not hard to see a team, for example, becoming enamored with the size of a wide receiver such as Kelvin Benjamin late on the first day or perhaps go after a pass rusher such as Kony Ealy before addressing other needs.

If a run on quarterbacks happens late instead of early in the first-round, that could cause a domino effect that pushes running backs even further down. With so many quality players coming out of college this year, a pick based on value -- rather than on needs or talent -- could determine where a running back is selected.

Another factor to consider: Running backs projected to go in the middle rounds, such as Stanford's Tyler Gaffney, UCF's Storm Johnson or Alabama State's Isaiah Crowell, have the talent to potentially contribute early on, giving general managers even more options to find a fit this spring.

This year could really show how much teams value running backs in their system. It could reveal whether teams think they need a back to win right away or can find somebody they can develop.

"Most teams designate a position where they need to target it in free agency," former Pro Bowl running back LaDainian Tomlinson said on NFL Network's Total Access. "If you can't get a running back in the draft at a high position, you may want to target it through free agency. Remember, guys in free agency are always a short-term solution. When you're looking at guys in the draft, you're looking to build on those players."

There's talent to be had among the backs coming out of college this season, but the early rounds of the draft are unlikely to bear that out. If any running backs are planning to head to New York for the draft, they might want to book an extra night (or two) just in case.

Follow Bryan Fischer on Twitter @BryanDFischer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's been discussed before, but it's no easy task locating tape of Troy WR Eric Thomas. I cut up his game last year against Arkansas State:

http://youtu.be/BXyGiUWbVek

His effort as a blocker is truly pathetic, but he's an absolute beast with the ball in his hands. By the way, his hands measured 10 5/8" at the NFLPA game. My eyes may be tricking me, but I think he'll run in the 4.4s at his pro day. If he does, I'm not going to be shocked if he's a day 2 pick.
Whitney26, on 22 Jan 2014 - 8:03 PM, said:

EBF, on 22 Jan 2014 - 7:55 PM, said:

Whitney26, on 22 Jan 2014 - 7:45 PM, said:

The "Weigh-In" results from the NFLPA game were elusive, but I finally got a copy tonight. Here's a link for the NFLPA, Shrine and Senior Bowls for anyone interested:

https://docs.google....1YVcbr2gCt8/pub
Didn't hear much about Troy WR Eric Thomas during the practice week, but he looks like a quality day 3 sleeper to me.

6'0.375" 214 is a nice height/weight for him.
The hands (10 5/8) are ridiculous. I wish there was more tape available.
Troy pro day was today. Here are the numbers I found for Thomas:

Height - 6'0.5"

Weight - 216

40 - 4.53, 4.50

Vert - 37"

Broad - 10'3"

3 Cone - 6.96

Good numbers. He only did 2 reps on the bench though and the 10 yard splits on his 40s were sluggish at 1.63 and 1.65.

Quote

Thomas has heard many different guesses at where he will end up in April, but he thinks the good showing on Monday will help his chances.“I was hearing fifth to probably free agent, but I improved my numbers so I think I’ll move up a little. We’ll just go from there,” Thomas said.
 
Xue said:
Rotoworld:

Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell projects as a sixth- or seventh-round draft pick, writes Gil Brandt of NFL.com.
Crowell strangely lost more than half an inch in measurement from the combine to Alabama State's pro day, going from 5-foot-11 to 5-foot-10 3/8. He decided to keep his 4.57 forty time from the Scouting Combine, but collected a 4.51 short shuttle and a 7.25 cone drill. The former five-star Georgia recruit is interesting because he's a boom-or-bust prospect that will come at a minimal cost. Were it not for off-the-field issues, Crowell might have been a second- or even a first-rounder in May. It should be noted that Crowell earned praise from those around him at the Alabama State program.

Source: NFL.com
Thanks for this Faust.

Those are pretty awful agility numbers even for a 224 pounder and would have been among the worst at the combine for RBs.
It was raining at his Pro Day.
Didn't know that and poor conditions would explain it, but then saw this. I would have preferred the rainy day reasoning actually.

http://blogs.nfl.com/2014/03/07/isaiah-crowell-works-in-rainy-conditions/

Twelve teams were present Tuesday at Alabama State’s pro day, where Isaiah Crowell was the top name among 11 players who worked out. The players performed their jumps and shuttle runs indoors, but the rest of the workouts took place outdoors, where it was rainy and cold.

Crowell measured in at 5-10 3/8, which was quite a bit different from his 5-11 measurement at the combine. He was measured twice just to make sure it was correct. He stayed on his 40 time from the combine (4.57), but posted a 4.51 short shuttle and a 7.25 cone drill. I thought he had a good workout. He’s had some baggage from before his transfer from Georgia, but I think he’ll be a sixth- or seventh-round draft pick.

 
Watkins is even better than I thought:

In his throwing session, amid ghost defenders, Boyd completed 67 of 68 passes -- including 32 of 33 from eight yards or more and five successful bombs to Watkins, receiver Martavis Bryant and running back Roderick McDowell, among others.
Indeed, he can even make Taj Boyd look good!
IMHO Boyd is not a bad QB. I wouldn't have a problem grabbing him in the middle to late 3rd. He's in my top 5 in this draft I'm not an expert but I've watched well over two dozen games these few years and I like what I've seen in him.

:twocents:

Tex

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Rotoworld:

NFL Network's Daniel Jeremiah praised Penn State WR Allen Robinson for his yards after catch ability.
"Wish (Robinson) had more juice but I love the way he fights for every inch after the catch. Very physical," Jeremiah tweeted. According to Rotoworld contributor Greg Peshek, Robinson yards after the catch averaged out to 7.56, a very solid number. He also has nice vision and block anticipation as a ball carrier.

Source: Daniel Jeremiah on Twitter
 
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler believes Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell would be mocked int he first-round if he was clean off the field.
"I hope he doesn't waste his talent in the NFL," Brugler writes. We share that sentiment. Rotoworld's Josh Norris ranks Crowell as his No. 3 running back in the class and notes he could be this year's Christine Michael. Crowell is very decisive and displays a physical style to break contact. He was dismissed from Georgia following two felony weapons charges.

Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
 
I am having a real hard time evaluating this draft class. In reading the comments of many of the posters I see a lot of love being given to the WR depth and people holding their nose on the strength of the RBs. With RB's, is this class really any different than the 2013 prospects? Is Carlos Hyde really a lesser talent than Eddie Lacy? How big of a drop-off is Sankey from Bernard? I really can't see this big difference. No one appears to be a transcendent talent, that much we all agree on.

As for WR, it seems like it is about Watkins and Evans and then it's a toss-up. I've seen arguments for Marquise Lee and I've also seen him in the #12-15 ranking in the WR position. That pretty much summarizes that people have no friggin' clue how to evaluate this class. Is Brandin Cooks the next Tavon Austin? Is Tavon Austin really even the next Wes Welker slot elite? To get someone like Cooks is going to cost you a top 5-8 pick to find out. Sounds pretty risky.

Every year, or leading up to it, people on this site grade out a class and tell you if it's going to be special or not. Many were looking forward to this class; much more so than 2013. The more I look at it, the more I'm left with the feeling that it is pretty average for what we come to expect in the rookie draft. Just interested in different views since it's boiling down to 2 guys and everyone else's potluck opinion of talent.

 
Rotoworld:

Scouts Inc.'s Steve Muench believes Stanford senior RB Tyler Gaffney's pass protection needs some work.
"Stanford RB Tyler Gaffney has quick feet for size and always moving forward. Also catches ball well but pass pro needs work," Muench tweeted. Gaffney is a workhorse back who has the ability to wear down defenses with his running style, but lacks the ideal explosion. He could be a complimentary piece to a NFL backfield at the next level and could be a third day selection. Our own Josh Norris sees flashes of Jackie Battle in Gaffney.

Source: Steve Muench on Twitter
 
Rotoworld:

Texas A&M WR Mike Evans told NFL.com that he has visits scheduled with the Lions and the Eagles.
The Lions could be a legitimate option for Evans' talent despite showing heavy interest in receivers during free agency. The Eagles are an interesting option, since they just signed Riley Cooper and Jeremy Maclin (albeit a one year deal), but he offers different traits than any other pass catcher on that team. He should be locked in to a top 15 selection.

Source: NFL.com
Matt Waldman of the Rookie Scouting Portfolio believes Eastern Illinois QB Jimmy Garoppolo has "dramatic" pocket presence problems and would leave him off his draft board entirely if he were a decision-maker.
"Is it impossible for Garappolo to address his pocket presence? Of course not," Waldman wrote. "Have I ever seen it when the issues are this dramatic? Not in recent memory." Waldman believes Garoppolo "sees phantom pressure" and consistently lacks "a clear plan on the field when the initial play doesn't work." The link below provides plenty of damning evidence via film available on YouTube to support Waldman's assessments. Garoppolo has the tools to succeed at the next level, but he needs plenty of work.

Source: Rookie Scouting Portfolio
 
Rotoworld:

The Vikings sent a contingent of GM Rick Spielman, coach Mike Zimmer and offensive coordinator Norv Turner to Alabama's Pro Day.
Turner figures to be most interested in QB A.J. McCarron, a possible mid- to late-round target of the Purple if they bypass a QB in Rd. 1. Minnesota is sure to come out of the draft with a signal-caller to add to its uninspiring duo of Matt Cassel and Christian Ponder.

Source: Chris Tomasson on Twitter
 
Rotoworld:

Alabama WR Kevin Norwood, who entered last season rated as an undrafted prospect, "could slip into 2nd day," according to draft insider Tony Pauline.
The Carolina Panthers will work out Norwood on Wednesday, Pauline passes along. Scouts Inc.'s Kevin Weidl is one analyst who has sung the former Crimson Tide's praises this offseason, writing in January that he was a "strong route runner" with "natural hands," concluding: "there's a place for him at the next level." Norwood has been overshadowed by Amari Cooper, but his skill set translates to the next level.

Source: Tony Pauline on Twitter
 
Rotoworld:

Colorado State TE Crockett Gilmore is moving up draft boards, writes draft insider Tony Pauline.
Gilmore collected a solid 4.78 in the forty during Colorado State's pro day, but he didn't have a chance to build on that performance because he pulled his hamstring and was forced to sit out the rest of the day. Gilmore (6-foot-6, 255 pounds) "projects as a third tight end at the next level and some feel he will eventually grow into an offensive tackle," writes Pauline. The former defensive end caught 107 passes for 1,264 yards and eight touchdowns over three seasons with the Rams.

Source: Walter Football
 
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler believes Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell would be mocked int he first-round if he was clean off the field.

"I hope he doesn't waste his talent in the NFL," Brugler writes. We share that sentiment. Rotoworld's Josh Norris ranks Crowell as his No. 3 running back in the class and notes he could be this year's Christine Michael. Crowell is very decisive and displays a physical style to break contact. He was dismissed from Georgia following two felony weapons charges.

Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
Weren't his shuttle and cone times bad at his pro day? I thought I saw he ran those indoors b/c of weather.
 
Rotoworld:

Tampa Bay Buccaneers tight ends coach Jon Embree was on hand to scout Bowling Green TE Alex Bayer at the school's pro day.
Bayer ran 4.77 and 4.78 second forties, posted a 31 1/2-inch vertical jump and a 9-foot-3 broad jump, ran a 4.42 second 20-yard short shuttle, did the three-cone drill in 7.26 seconds, and hefted 20 reps on the bench press. Bayer, who caught 37 passes for 593 yards and four touchdowns in 2013, has a personal visit with the Bucs lined up for Thursday.

Source: NFL.com
 
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Dane Brugler believes Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell would be mocked int he first-round if he was clean off the field.

"I hope he doesn't waste his talent in the NFL," Brugler writes. We share that sentiment. Rotoworld's Josh Norris ranks Crowell as his No. 3 running back in the class and notes he could be this year's Christine Michael. Crowell is very decisive and displays a physical style to break contact. He was dismissed from Georgia following two felony weapons charges.

Source: Dane Brugler on Twitter
Weren't his shuttle and cone times bad at his pro day? I thought I saw he ran those indoors b/c of weather.
Rotoworld:

Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell projects as a sixth- or seventh-round draft pick, writes Gil Brandt of NFL.com.

Crowell strangely lost more than half an inch in measurement from the combine to Alabama State's pro day, going from 5-foot-11 to 5-foot-10 3/8. He decided to keep his 4.57 forty time from the Scouting Combine, but collected a 4.51 short shuttle and a 7.25 cone drill. The former five-star Georgia recruit is interesting because he's a boom-or-bust prospect that will come at a minimal cost. Were it not for off-the-field issues, Crowell might have been a second- or even a first-rounder in May. It should be noted that Crowell earned praise from those around him at the Alabama State program.

Mar 9 - 10:34 PM

Source: NFL.com
Alabama State RB Isaiah Crowell will be "difficult to coach," according to NFL Media draft analyst Nolan Nawrocki.

"Beats to the tune of his own drummer," wrote Nawrocki. "Extremely immature and has a history of off-field issues." The former Georgia Bulldog put up huge numbers against inferior competition this past season. Evaluators will get Crowell under sizzling interview lights and ask him some tough questions about a weapons charge that was later dismissed. To his credit, Crowell earned praise from people around the Alabama State program.

Feb 17 - 9:13 PM

Source: NFL.com
 
Rotoworld:

Michigan State WR Bennie Fowler "lit the place up today" in both the running and position drills at MSU's pro day, according to NFL.com.
Fowler (6-foot-1 1/8, 216 pounds) ran the forty in 4.39 and 4.44 seconds and collected a 6.91-second three-cone. Fowler led the Spartans with 622 receiving yards and six touchdown receptions in 2013.

Source: NFL.com
 
So if people are suddenly shocked by that and it's causing them to radically adjust their rankings, I think it's an indictment of their specific ability to assess tape rather than the practice of assessing tape in general.
I get what you're saying and just wrote something up about the things you need film to see, but literally no one had Carey outside the top three or four guys going into the combine. And he might not get drafted in the first ten RBs despite an exceptionally weak year at the position.

But even if that's not right (and Carey gets drafted early) there are other examples. What use is "the tape" if the best guys out there can't separate a high-end starter prospect from a third day guy before the combine?

And what does it say that former pro scouts and former GMs are all over the place on all but the best and worst prospects after watching the same film? If it could be done reliably the professionals would be in agreement. But it can't be done consistently. The tape lies.
I had Carey ranked #7 just before the combine, and my reasons at the time are pretty similar to why I don't like him now: not particularly big or athletic (he turned out to be even less athletic than expected), and showed pretty good elusiveness on tape (rather than looking spectacular).

 
Rotoworld:

Scout Inc.'s Todd McSay said UFC's Blake Bortles and Louisville's Teddy Bridgewater are better prospects than any QB in the 2013 class.
"I feel strongly that Bridgewater and Bortles are better than anything we had at the quarterback position a year ago," he said. McShay added that this class "wasn't close" to the 2012 class. The uninspiring '13 QB class, you'll recall, was led by EJ Manuel and also included Geno Smith, Mike Glennon, Ryan Nassib, Tyler Wilson and Landry Jones.

Source: ESPN's First Draft
Scout Inc.'s Todd McShay grimaced when asked if LSU QB Zach Mettenberger could be an early second-round pick on ESPN's First Draft podcast.
McShay made a guttural noise and said, "No. I think no." McShay handed Mettenberger a fourth-round grade. "It's not really about the durability, though that doesn't necessarily help him," McShay said. "He doesn't move well." The analyst believes that on many plays last season, ball placement was determined by the coaching staff, not the quarterback. With so many elite offensive weapons, it's not an outlandish theory. McShay loves Mettenberger's arm and character, but he didn't seem enamored by anything else.

Source: ESPN's First Draft
ESPN's Mel Kiper chose Ohio State QB Kenny Guiton when asked what quarterback would surprise by getting drafted in May.
The analyst thinks Guiton could intrigue teams looking to develop an athletic backup. Guiton ran 4.78 and 4.76 second forties at Ohio State's Pro Day, and added a short shuttle of 4.31, a 31-inch vertical and a 9-9 broad jump. NFL.com's Gil Brandt said he "looked good" at the event.

Source: ESPN's First Draft
ESPN's Mel Kiper insisted on the First Draft podcast that Eastern Illinois QB Jimmy Garoppolo is going in the second round.
"He seems to be the hot property right now that people are talking about even more than the big three quarterbacks," Kiper said. Garoppolo needs a lot of work -- his pocket presence is questionable at best, he doesn't have experience dropping back and he's easily flustered -- but he definitely has NFL tools. The 6-foot-2, 219-pound Garoppolo makes quick decisions, gets the ball out quickly, employs sound footwork and works through his projections.

Source: First Draft podcast
 
Here's my first stab at post-combine rankings (these are pretty rushed, since I've been busy with work). (My last pre-combine RB rankings were here)

RBs (* means that I don't have as much info on that player as I'd like to, either tape-watching or stats or both):Lache Seastrunk

Carlos Hyde

Tre Mason

Charles Sims

Jeremy Hill

Henry Josey *

Devonta Freeman *

Bishop Sankey

Isaiah Crowell *

Andre Williams

Tim Flanders *

David Fluellen

Stephen Houston *

George Atkinson III *

James White

Tim Cornett *

Terrance West *

Ka'Deem Carey

Antonio Andrews

Marion Grice

Tyler Gaffney *

James Wilder, Jr.

Storm Johnson *

Rajion Neal *

Kapri Bibbs *

Silas Redd *

Maybe in a Sproles or Harvin type role, if they're good enough receivers:

Dri Archer

Robert Godhigh

De'Anthony Thomas

Not enough info / want to see more of:

LaDarius Perkins

Damien WIlliams

Jerick McKinnon
Updating these rankings, Jerick McKinnon belongs on tier 2 - I'd put him between Freeman & Sankey. Excellent athleticism, and everything else is hard to evaluate.

Damien Williams I'd stick right below James White in tier 3. Like White, he has an unfortunate tendency to run right into defenders and go down rather than using some shiftiness to pick up extra yards, and unlike White he struggles with this in space as well as in traffic. His big plays are almost all about pure speed, rather than shiftiness.

I still haven't been able to watch any of Perkins.

Tim Flanders should be down in tier 4 instead of at the top of tier 3 - he was misranked because of a data entry error (I'd failed to include his combine numbers in my spreadsheet).

It's not clear exactly where to put the tier break near Andre Williams; there is sort of a mini tier break before Sankey, a mini break after Andre Williams, and another mini break after Atkinson.

A couple new sources of information (including Peshek releasing his first set of full-season RB elusiveness numbers and Xue sharing his 40 times) have caused me to reshuffle a bit within tiers. Mason has slipped behind Sims & Hill. I'm betting that when the updated nfldraftscout 40 times are released, Seastrunk's time (now 4.51) will be faster than Sankey's (now 4.49) or Mason's (now 4.50).

With Sproles probably heading out of town, there is room on the Saints for a new receiving back to have major fantasy relevance. If they draft Archer, Godhigh, D. Thomas, Josey, or Freeman that'll be good news for that RB.

 
Rotoworld:

ESPN's Mel Kiper said he would not be surprised if Virginia Tech QB Logan Thomas is a TE by the 2016 season.
"If he doesn't get it done at quarterback, then you could have a potential tight end on your hands," Kiper said on a conference call. Thomas will almost certainly be drafted as a quarterback, but his development has been slow over the past two seasons. Thomas' workout numbers were outrageous and compared to Jimmy Graham and Rob Gronkowski from a size and movement standpoint. The biggest question, however, is if he can win at the catch point.

Source: Dan Kadar on Twitter
Michigan senior WR Jeremy Gallon could be a "steal" in later rounds, according to CBS Sports' Rob Rang.
"He's a proven playmaker who recorded a career-high 80 receptions for 1,284 yards and nine scores as a senior and could prove a steal if still on the board in the late rounds," Rang wrote on Wednesday. Gallon had an impressive showing at Michigan's Pro Day recording a 10-10" broad jump and a 39.5" vertical. The 5-foot-7 Gallon also ran a 4.49 forty at the combine. This year's draft class is deep with talent, but if a team is looking for a playmaking slot receiver Gallon could be that guy. Gallon displays a similar skill set to Golden Tate, minus some explosion and burst after the catch.

Source: CBS Sports
 
Rotoworld:

CBS Sports' Rob Rang believes teams could have an issue with Oklahoma WR Jalen Saunders' "shockingly slow" shuttle times.
Rang writes it raises "questions about how much Oklahoma's spread attack exaggerated his overall athleticism." Saunders' pro day short shuttle was 4.42 seconds, which would have been good for 37th of 39 receivers at the Combine. "Similarly slow times came in the long shuttle (11.56) and 3-cone (7.29), results which also would have ranked among the slowest at the Combine among wide receivers." Saunders is an absolutely joystick with the ball in his hands, so the times are a bit puzzling.

Source: CBS Sports
 
Rotoworld:

USC WR Marqise Lee met privately with high-level Jets personnel before and after his Pro Day Wednesday.
It's a sign the Jets are interested in Lee at No. 16 overall, or could even try to snag him in the second round. The 2012 Biletnikoff Award winner measured in at just 5-foot-11 3/4 and ran a disappointing 4.52 at the Combine. GM John Idzik is not done at wide receiver after signing Eric Decker Wednesday.

Related: Jets

Source: New York Daily News
 
Rotoworld:

Former Oregon TE Colt Lyerla was forced to work out at Protland State's pro day.
Per Gil Brandt, he was not welcome on Oregon's campus, which makes sense given the way Lyerla left the team. "Good player, lots of problems. Could go undrafted," Brandt added. From the outside looking in, Lyerla would fit perfectly with Chip Kelly in Philadelphia, but we do not know the details of their relationship.

Source: Gil Brandt on Twitter
 
Rotoworld:

Wyoming QB Brett Smith measured in a 6-foot-1 and 3/4 of an inch at the school's pro day.
Smith also had 10 inch hands, recorded an "official" 4.51 forty, and a broad jump of 10-foot-8. The Wyoming passer will draw comparisons to Johnny Manziel, although his movements are a bit more robotic than Manziel's improvisational style. Smith was notoriously known as a great athlete while in school and he should have been invited to the Combine.

Source: Ben Allbright on Twitter
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top