Sammy B
Footballguy
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 2h
MT @MMehtaNYDN: Although Jets have let other FAs visit & leave without a deal, I would be very surprised if #NYJ doesn't sign Chris Johnson.
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 2h
MT @MMehtaNYDN: Although Jets have let other FAs visit & leave without a deal, I would be very surprised if #NYJ doesn't sign Chris Johnson.
This would be a fantastic signing as long as it doesn't lock them in long term - and with all the cap space available this year I don't even care if they "overpay" in 2014.NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 2h
MT @MMehtaNYDN: Although Jets have let other FAs visit & leave without a deal, I would be very surprised if #NYJ doesn't sign Chris Johnson.
I saw a Brees game live back in '06(?)/('07?) and you've never, ever seen a quarterback look worse. They were playing the Raiders in SD, and he just looked...lost. Seen few things like it. And, I mean, the Raiders stunk that year. Just stunk. It's one of the weirdest sports transformations, Brees from Purdue stud, to utter dog#### with SD, to hero with NO within ten years. Unreal.I wouldn't say that. Brees got benched in his 3rd season for a 40 yo QB and look how he turned out.Vick is past his prime and not that good anymore. This isn't a Tebow situation where a bunch of lunatics/media will be calling for him to play for non-football reasons.
If Geno gets benched, it will be because the staff has no doubt that Vick can save the season. And if Geno plays that bad, he wasn't ever gonna be the guy anyway.
Considering the other options, I'm cool with this move now.
Agreed. Would love to see this signing happen.This would be a fantastic signing as long as it doesn't lock them in long term - and with all the cap space available this year I don't even care if they "overpay" in 2014.NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 2h
MT @MMehtaNYDN: Although Jets have let other FAs visit & leave without a deal, I would be very surprised if #NYJ doesn't sign Chris Johnson.
The Jets desperately need playmakers on offense and Johnson still has enough speed to break long runs and make defenses gamplan for him. The drastic difference in running styles between Ivory and Johnson will give opposing defenses much more to think about and Ivory punishing them for the first three quarters will soften them up for some big plays from Johnson late in the game. Both players will stay fresh splitting touches which is another added bonus.
Johnson would also be a nice weapon in the passing game.
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 14m
Report: Jets And RB Chris Johnson Reach Two-Year Deal http://tinyurl.com/obmm6fo
Rotoworld seems to think it's the other way around....This have to be considered a huge upgrade at RB for the Jets. CJ/Ivory is a great 1/2 punch.
The Jets are a team that wants to run the ball 25+ times a game. Ivory is going to get his 10-15 carries a game, but CJ should be involved a lot in the passing game - something which Ivory will not. For the Jets, ideally both would get 10-15 carries. CJ could end up with only 200 carries but 50 catches. It's tough to count on many TD's but I expect mid-to-high RB2 numbers.Rotoworld seems to think it's the other way around....Jets signed RB Chris Johnson, formerly of the Titans, to a two-year contract.This have to be considered a huge upgrade at RB for the Jets. CJ/Ivory is a great 1/2 punch.
The Jets get their man. Gang Green was the only team really showing legitimate interest in the 28-year-old six-time 1,000-yard rusher. Johnson visited with the Jets all day on Tuesday and said he had more visits to make. Either the Jets wooed him with more money to keep him from leaving town or Johnson simply didn't have any other clubs interested in him. In our opinion, Chris Ivory should remain the early-down back in New York with Johnson mixing in to see 8-12 touches per game. Johnson's fantasy value clearly takes a hit, if so.
Well, there is a reason most people think Rotoworld's opinion is worthless...Rotoworld seems to think it's the other way around....Jets signed RB Chris Johnson, formerly of the Titans, to a two-year contract.This have to be considered a huge upgrade at RB for the Jets. CJ/Ivory is a great 1/2 punch.
The Jets get their man. Gang Green was the only team really showing legitimate interest in the 28-year-old six-time 1,000-yard rusher. Johnson visited with the Jets all day on Tuesday and said he had more visits to make. Either the Jets wooed him with more money to keep him from leaving town or Johnson simply didn't have any other clubs interested in him. In our opinion, Chris Ivory should remain the early-down back in New York with Johnson mixing in to see 8-12 touches per game. Johnson's fantasy value clearly takes a hit, if so.
What is that in reference to?fantasycurse42 said:
265/742/3
Trent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?fantasycurse42 said:
265/742/3
CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?fantasycurse42 said:
265/742/3
You would be easy to compete against in a fantasy league.CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?fantasycurse42 said:
265/742/3
Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
Agree with this -- people seem to be forgetting that Johnson played with a torn meniscus all last year. Not that I expect 2009 Johnson to show back up, but the 2012 version is plenty good enough to put Ivory on the bench.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
I'm not sure which back is "better" because they are both so different - which is why I love the combo. Opposing defenses will need to prepare for two very different styles and with Ivory punding them and wearing them out, it will make better opportunities for CJ to break some big plays.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
Without disagreeing with your assessment on the two players, the fact the Jets paid Johnson well doesn't mean as much as you think. They desperatly needed playmakers and also needed RB depth - they have $32MM in cap space available so "overpaying" Johnson by a bit (based on the current landscape) was a luxury they could afford in order to ensure getting him to sign.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
They need each other. Ivory hasn't yet in 4 years proven he can withstand the pounding of the NFL season so how can the Jets realistically count on him to do so? He's the battering ram (Lendale White) and Johnson can slash the defense when tired out. Also, with Vick back there it's another threat that the defense has to account for (similar to VY years back).I'm not sure which back is "better" because they are both so different - which is why I love the combo. Opposing defenses will need to prepare for two very different styles and with Ivory punding them and wearing them out, it will make better opportunities for CJ to break some big plays.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
Those that constantly bring up how Ivory couldn't break away from Powell to take the feature role, are only looking at year end stats. Ivory missed most of training camp so Powell was the early season feture back but around mid-season Ivory took over the lead role and played pretty well.
I think Johnson is probably the better overall talent (a few years ago there'd be no question), but I do think this will be a pretty even timeshare based on the two very different skill sets.
Why are you assuming the 2012 version is going to show up again either? He apparently has arthritis in his knee, and the Jets are talking as if they want them to split.Agree with this -- people seem to be forgetting that Johnson played with a torn meniscus all last year. Not that I expect 2009 Johnson to show back up, but the 2012 version is plenty good enough to put Ivory on the bench.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
do you have a link to anything from the team? I've read a lot of unfounded speculation from fantasy sights but nothing from the team....Why are you assuming the 2012 version is going to show up again either? He apparently has arthritis in his knee, and the Jets are talking as if they want them to split.Agree with this -- people seem to be forgetting that Johnson played with a torn meniscus all last year. Not that I expect 2009 Johnson to show back up, but the 2012 version is plenty good enough to put Ivory on the bench.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
Not from the team directly, but from beat writers covering the team. None of it is super reliable anyway, the Jets were talking up Ivory's "natural hands" and touting him as a top 10 RB last offseason. The arthritis stuff came from Schefter.do you have a link to anything from the team? I've read a lot of unfounded speculation from fantasy sights but nothing from the team....Why are you assuming the 2012 version is going to show up again either? He apparently has arthritis in his knee, and the Jets are talking as if they want them to split.Agree with this -- people seem to be forgetting that Johnson played with a torn meniscus all last year. Not that I expect 2009 Johnson to show back up, but the 2012 version is plenty good enough to put Ivory on the bench.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
I think it's open to interpretation as to which player got the best contract. Gerhart got $4.5M in guaranteed money, while Johnson is essentially on a 1-year, $4M deal. Donald Brown is also getting $4M guaranteed this year (like Johnson), and gets a base salary of "only" $3M next year, so there's a good chance he gets all $7M. The Jets would have to pay Johnson $3.5M in salary in 2015 and a $500K roster bonus, which means he'll have to do more to convince the Jets to keep him than Brown will have to do to convince San Diego. So while CJ2K might have more upside than say, Gerhart or Brown, he has less security in this deal than I think either player.Ivory is OK. I don't think he's better than CJ just yet and I don't think the Jets believe he is either. Otherwise, CJ wouldn't have gotten the best FA RB contract of anyone to come play for them.I don't have a problem with this deal. Even though CJ is a 29 year old speed back, I think he'll be effective in small doses. But I also think Ivory is a better back at this point, and he should get the majority of the carries.
We'll revisit this at the end of the seasonYou would be easy to compete against in a fantasy league.CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?
265/742/3
The idea that he would have that many carries and so few yards is patently moronic.We'll revisit this at the end of the seasonYou would be easy to compete against in a fantasy league.CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?
265/742/3
I think a lot of people are underrating Ivory. Last year he finished tied for 9th in the NFL at 4.6 YPC. That's very good, especially considering defenses consistently loaded up the box against the run. I think adding CJ should only help things, but I expect Ivory to continue to thrive in his role.
Fariq,The idea that he would have that many carries and so few yards is patently moronic.We'll revisit this at the end of the seasonYou would be easy to compete against in a fantasy league.CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?
265/742/3
Maybe when Vick is on the field his YPC will be in the 4 range, but when Geno is the signal caller (& in his mid 30's I anticipate Vick being injured quite often) a YPC in the low 3's will not surprise one bit. His numbers will be ugly and having his first sub 1000 yard season will not surprise me one bit. I have no doubt he won't live up to his ADP.Fariq said:The idea that he would have that many carries and so few yards is patently moronic.fantasycurse42 said:We'll revisit this at the end of the seasonYou would be easy to compete against in a fantasy league.CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?
265/742/3
Me neither - not sure why people are assuming that Vick is coming in to start.I don't think Vick will be the starter.
I agree that Geno will prob start, however I think he struggles & Vick comes in. He isn't their future IMO, just not a franchise QB. Vick obviously will get hurt and Geno comes back. It'll be musical chairs.Me neither - not sure why people are assuming that Vick is coming in to start.I don't think Vick will be the starter.
It's still think Geno's job to lose until he shows otherwise or gets hurt.
You can tell that after a rookie season with arguably the worst group of receivers in the league?I agree that Geno will prob start, however I think he struggles & Vick comes in. He isn't their future IMO, just not a franchise QB. Vick obviously will get hurt and Geno comes back. It'll be musical chairs.Me neither - not sure why people are assuming that Vick is coming in to start.I don't think Vick will be the starter.
It's still think Geno's job to lose until he shows otherwise or gets hurt.
I don't like how he looked out there. Obviously he was surrounded by garbage so not completely his fault.You can tell that after a rookie season with arguably the worst group of receivers in the league?I agree that Geno will prob start, however I think he struggles & Vick comes in. He isn't their future IMO, just not a franchise QB. Vick obviously will get hurt and Geno comes back. It'll be musical chairs.Me neither - not sure why people are assuming that Vick is coming in to start.I don't think Vick will be the starter.
It's still think Geno's job to lose until he shows otherwise or gets hurt.
I agree with you there but I also think he was asked to do too much because of WVU's pathetic defense.Also hated how the second half of his WVU season played out and he had amazing talent around him there.
First of all, 265 carries seems way too high. I think he will get 150-200 carries. Considering the rushing stats put up last year with a rookie QB and bad receiving corps, I can't envision the running attack being worse in 2014.Maybe when Vick is on the field his YPC will be in the 4 range, but when Geno is the signal caller (& in his mid 30's I anticipate Vick being injured quite often) a YPC in the low 3's will not surprise one bit. His numbers will be ugly and having his first sub 1000 yard season will not surprise me one bit. I have no doubt he won't live up to his ADP.Fariq said:The idea that he would have that many carries and so few yards is patently moronic.fantasycurse42 said:We'll revisit this at the end of the seasonYou would be easy to compete against in a fantasy league.CJ0k 2014 campaignTrent Richardson's numbers?What is that in reference to?
265/742/3
So why did he even bother with a visit?NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 4m
RT @BrocknDanny: Sidney Rice told us the #Jets offered him more money than the deal he signed to return to the #Seahawks, @710ESPNSeattle.
Probably to get Seattle to either bite, or raise what they were offering him (i.e. meet him halfway). He would have been nice to have, but honestly, if the Jets were to pick up a Miles Austin (for example), it would have been practically the same thing (though Rice is a good deal younger).So why did he even bother with a visit?NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 4m
RT @BrocknDanny: Sidney Rice told us the #Jets offered him more money than the deal he signed to return to the #Seahawks, @710ESPNSeattle.
The Key is (as always) STAY HEALTHY.....Week Date Opp
1 9/7 vs. Oak W
2 9/14 @ GB L
3 9/22 vs. Chi W
4 9/28 vs. Det W
5 10/5 @ SD W
6 10/12 vs. Den L
7 10/16 @ NE L
8 10/26 vs. Buf W
9 11/2 @ KC L
10 11/9 vs. Pit L
11 Bye Week
12 11/23 @ Buf W
13 12/1 vs. Mia W
14 12/7 @ Min W
15 12/14 @ Ten W
16 12/21 vs. NE W
17 12/28 @ Mia L
It's obviously way too early to do this exercise, but it's fun to speculate even this early. I'm going with 10-6 for now. That may be overly optomistc considering a sweep of Buffalo is no gimme, and a loss to one of those NFC North teams at home is a real possibility - but I'll go with it for now.