What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

***Official 2011 Philadelphia Eagles Thread*** (1 Viewer)

scratcher

Footballguy
Disappointing loss but a lot to build on for next year.

Will Kolb be traded?

How do we address the defense?

Is Sean McDermott back?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We'll sign Vick to a monster contract. Kolb will get traded. Vick will blow out his knee in preseason. Kolb will be All-Pro somewhere in the league. Mike Kafka is your 2011 starting Eagles QB. Can't wait. :bag:

 
BTW, today's game aside, Sean McDermott needs to go. His ideas are too complicated and the players can't figure it out. Need some fresh perspective on defense next year.

 
We'll sign Vick to a monster contract. Kolb will get traded. Vick will blow out his knee in preseason. Kolb will be All-Pro somewhere in the league. Mike Kafka is your 2011 starting Eagles QB. Can't wait. :goodposting:
I'm not an Eagles fan but most teams would kill to have a guy like Vick and a coach like Andy Reid. You guys have bright years ahead, imo.
 
Not too bad for a "rebuilding" year.

Dissapointed, but not upset.

Offseason priorities:

1. O-Line

2. Secondary depth

3. LB

Really....not that far away!

 
Calling it now - we will see the first ever "sign and trade" in the NFL as Vick is signed and then dealt away for a king's ransom.

Eagles will draft heavily along O-line (as they should) and also get DBs (needed) and a quarterback (yes, a QB).

QB depth chart will read Kolb, Kafka and rookie for 2011.

Linebackers will be addressed via free agency plus the youth movement (as all the younger guys develop).

 
Calling it now - we will see the first ever "sign and trade" in the NFL as Vick is signed and then dealt away for a king's ransom.Eagles will draft heavily along O-line (as they should) and also get DBs (needed) and a quarterback (yes, a QB).QB depth chart will read Kolb, Kafka and rookie for 2011.Linebackers will be addressed via free agency plus the youth movement (as all the younger guys develop).
Would Vick be a part of this sign and trade deal, or would the Eagles have to keep a lid on this? I'm not following the Eagles, so I don't know this, but is he an RFA? What exactly is his FA status?
 
Is Kolb still a hot commodity? Would he fetch that much in a trade?
Read that the Eagles are asking for two first rounders. I just can't see a team doing that. I think Kolb is still highly regarded and think he would be a perfect fit in San Francisco. He should fetch a 1st rounder. I just can't see 2.
 
Is Kolb still a hot commodity? Would he fetch that much in a trade?
Read that the Eagles are asking for two first rounders. I just can't see a team doing that. I think Kolb is still highly regarded and think he would be a perfect fit in San Francisco. He should fetch a 1st rounder. I just can't see 2.
A 2011 #1 and a 2012 #3 from a team in need? Absolutely.
 
Is Kolb still a hot commodity? Would he fetch that much in a trade?
Read that the Eagles are asking for two first rounders. I just can't see a team doing that. I think Kolb is still highly regarded and think he would be a perfect fit in San Francisco. He should fetch a 1st rounder. I just can't see 2.
A 2011 #1 and a 2012 #3 from a team in need? Absolutely.
I think that is very fair. And if I were a team like the 49ers or Vikings in need of a qb, I would definitely make that deal.
 
Is Kolb still a hot commodity? Would he fetch that much in a trade?
Read that the Eagles are asking for two first rounders. I just can't see a team doing that. I think Kolb is still highly regarded and think he would be a perfect fit in San Francisco. He should fetch a 1st rounder. I just can't see 2.
A 2011 #1 and a 2012 #3 from a team in need? Absolutely.
Would any of the first group below seriously give up a #1 and a #3 for Kolb? Seriously? Would the Niners or Titans really give up the 7th or 8th pick? Vikings at 12? Dolphins at 15?I don't see it. Seems like a lot of wishful thinking and over-valuing your own player.
1. Panthers 2. Broncos 3. Bills 4. Bengals 5. Cardinals 6. Browns 7. 49ers 8. Titans 9. Cowboys 10. Redskins 11. Texans 12. Vikings 13. Lions 14. Rams 15. Dolphins 16. Jaguars 17. Patriots (from Raiders) 18. Chargers 19. Giants 20. Buccaneers
 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).

 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).
Sure, Kolb is more plug-and-play than any rookie, but so is Kerry Collins.
 
Not too bad for a "rebuilding" year.Dissapointed, but not upset.Offseason priorities:1. O-Line2. Secondary depth3. LBReally....not that far away!
What did they rebuild this year?
:lmao: Fantastic question.
Defensive youth / depth. Their defense is way too young and inexperienced to be asked to win games at this point - but they held GB to 21 points even with Nate Allen and their starting MLB and CB out for this year. (Bradley, Hobbs)Not saying that they were stellar, but they added decent young options in the draft.Riley Cooper was also a good depth WR addition. O-line and LB play was their biggest downfall.Oh yeah, they also rebuilt QB value with Vick.
 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).
Sure, Kolb is more plug-and-play than any rookie, but so is Kerry Collins.
Collins' ceiling is lower and his age is a negative. Come on now.
 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).
Sure, Kolb is more plug-and-play than any rookie, but so is Kerry Collins.
Collins' ceiling is lower and his age is a negative. Come on now.
Thank you. The same could be said of Kolb's ceiling compared to prospective QBs in the 1st round. Come on now.
 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).
Sure, Kolb is more plug-and-play than any rookie, but so is Kerry Collins.
Collins' ceiling is lower and his age is a negative. Come on now.
Thank you. The same could be said of Kolb's ceiling compared to prospective QBs in the 1st round. Come on now.
Kolb's NFL comparison is akin to Matt Schaub in Atlanta. He's been through several NFL seasons and - if he gets protection - he is NFL ready to play and start. None of that can be said about rookies. As for age being a factor, no other position (aside from kicker) affords veterans to play well into their 30s. Kolb and a rookie are both likely to outlast a 4-6 year deal.
 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).
Sure, Kolb is more plug-and-play than any rookie, but so is Kerry Collins.
Collins' ceiling is lower and his age is a negative. Come on now.
Thank you. The same could be said of Kolb's ceiling compared to prospective QBs in the 1st round. Come on now.
Kolb's NFL comparison is akin to Matt Schaub in Atlanta. He's been through several NFL seasons and - if he gets protection - he is NFL ready to play and start. None of that can be said about rookies. As for age being a factor, no other position (aside from kicker) affords veterans to play well into their 30s. Kolb and a rookie are both likely to outlast a 4-6 year deal.
So, are you on record as saying that you think Kolb is a high first round pick (i.e., 1-15)?
 
We'll sign Vick to a monster contract. Kolb will get traded. Vick will blow out his knee in preseason. Kolb will be All-Pro somewhere in the league. Mike Kafka is your 2011 starting Eagles QB. Can't wait. :unsure:
favre will need somewhere to play. :shrug:
 
Calling it now - we will see the first ever "sign and trade" in the NFL as Vick is signed and then dealt away for a king's ransom.Eagles will draft heavily along O-line (as they should) and also get DBs (needed) and a quarterback (yes, a QB).QB depth chart will read Kolb, Kafka and rookie for 2011.Linebackers will be addressed via free agency plus the youth movement (as all the younger guys develop).
I also happen to think that Vick will get traded. But my question is, what kind of return could be expected from Vick and any thoughts on where he might go?
 
Let me be the first in here to hope we sign Vick long term , just cause he was human in the last 2 games does not mean we should be willing to move him for any ransom .

Woould be scary if he had a line that protected him longer then 2 seconds

 
Calling it now - we will see the first ever "sign and trade" in the NFL as Vick is signed and then dealt away for a king's ransom.Eagles will draft heavily along O-line (as they should) and also get DBs (needed) and a quarterback (yes, a QB).QB depth chart will read Kolb, Kafka and rookie for 2011.Linebackers will be addressed via free agency plus the youth movement (as all the younger guys develop).
I also happen to think that Vick will get traded. But my question is, what kind of return could be expected from Vick and any thoughts on where he might go?
Pure speculation, but I could see Minnesota as one of many interested clubs.Odds are that the Eagles would prefer to ship him to the AFC, so that would mean a club like OAK, MIA or TEN.
 
BTW, today's game aside, Sean McDermott needs to go. His ideas are too complicated and the players can't figure it out. Need some fresh perspective on defense next year.
He could have had the best ideas on the planet and it wouldnt matter with what he has to work with.
 
Vick worries me going forward. I trust that he'll do enough to get us 10 wins but him and Reid together just look too much like McNabb and Reid. This type of QB just will not work in the playoffs with this playcalling.

If/ when FA hits they need to address almost everything. We havent had a pass rushing DT in years and we need another DE for when Cole decides to vanish come playoff time. The LBers actually make me ill but I think there may be something to see in Chaney.

 
Let me be the first in here to hope we sign Vick long term , just cause he was human in the last 2 games does not mean we should be willing to move him for any ransom . Woould be scary if he had a line that protected him longer then 2 seconds
Would be even scarier if he knew how to read a blitz.
 
Not too bad for a "rebuilding" year.Dissapointed, but not upset.Offseason priorities:1. O-Line2. Secondary depth3. LBReally....not that far away!
It looks simple but the OL needs a couple starters and Herramans injures and age are starting to catch up to him. At LBer you could easily make a case for 3 starters and we need another starting CB, I'm hoping that's Nnambi, hoping anyway.
 
Need the same thing we needed last year except more because those "plugs" they used for this year are leaky.

OT: Peters is fine. Justice...how often do you see a starting RT get BENCHED during a playoff game? Depth is Dunlap? Could we possibly be needing a new RT?

OG: Todd has been up and down with his play. He isn't that "underrated LG" anymore. Injuries are taking a toll. I think its time to look for a future LG. I don't see anyone on this team that can fill that role..kinda. RG is a must need. MJG & Cole are ...gotta go. Cole plays two positions but below average. MJG plays one position but as feet like dump trucks. Def need to look in the draft 1st day for a starting RG.

C: This is tricky. Jackson wasnt game ready ( rushed back ) when he got injured again. McGlynn has been doing OK but face it, this was his first year ever playing center. I would be more comfortable with McGlynn @ G...be it competing for either G spots or serving as a legit back up. I think they should look for a LEGIT C in FA if possible. ( should have drafted Pouncey last season $#@$@# )



So starting RG, possible starting RT & Center. Legit depth @ OT & G.

DT: Bunkley Patterson Dixon Laws. I don't like Patterson, people say Bunkley was the weak link but I feel its the opposite. I could see Bunkley & Dixon starting. Laws & Patt coming in the rotation. Wouldn't mind this but could see them possibly moving in FA if a decent DT becomes available.

DE: Cole Parker Tapp Teo....who else is here? Oh yea, bad draft pick in Graham. Cole isn't going anywhere, Parker proved he can played but limited time. Graham won't see the field until late in the season at best & you have to worry about him losing a step already because of the injury. Tapp will get time next season, Teo? Who knows, another wasted pick that could have been used for a need in the drafft. Either way knowing the Eagles, it wouldn't surprise me if they go DE in the first 3 to 4 picks. ***note when I say bad draft pick with Graham, its not a knock on him as a player, its a knock at the Eagles for taking a DE when they had other pressing needs, the injury just makes it look even worse ***

So a possible starting DT ( FA ) if available to replace Patterson..if none available, no move made. Looking at another DE or two to replace Graham ( injury ) & Teo ( ineffective ) and also to limit Parkers snaps.

LB: What can you say? I wish I would have been eating crow with the Sims trade but I was right. He is not good. Gaither Fokou Jordan Chaney could be outright released and no one would blink and eye IMHO. It won't happen, but just saying. Honestly I think each spot SHOULD be open for competition but competition via the draft & FA. When I mean draft, I don't mean those 5th 6th 7th and UDFA either. We seen how that worked out. Bradley stays, move him outside if a MLB is taken high in the draft. Fokou could possibly stay as a starter. A legit big MLB is needed. Bradley is the best LB they have and honestly, he is average/above average at best. Some could stay on as ST players.

Cluster####...simple as that. I can see them going MLB high in the draft while looking to replace well everyone else sans Bradley & maybe Fokou.

CB: Samuels &....thats it. Lindley is a project...which in baseball or hockey works...not in the NFL when the project is probably better then the current crop of people ahead of him. Hanson will probably stay on but only as the nickel. I would like to see him replaced though. Patterson...he started hot then fizzled...alot. Yet Hanson can't even beat him out so you know CB is a top 3 priority on the 1st day. Lindley aruond to compete @ nickel & depth. I can see them picking up a FA CB for depth...right move would be looking into Asomugha to play opposite Samuels.



So starting CB. Possible nickel to compete/replace Hanson. Depth at CB for injury purposes ( able to start a few games ). Samuel Lindley stay...Patterson Hanson possible released. Lindley need to bulk up a bit

S: Hope Allen recovers. Showed alot of promise this season. Coleman is...JAG ( just another guy ). Depth at best really, ST type player like most the draft last season. Mikel is getting older & I think next year is his last year... Had a good season but also had alot of bad plays. I can see them taking a flyer on a mid talent guy to look to groom behind Mikel since he has one year left.



Future starting SS. FS Depth since I can't rely on Coleman in case Mikel or Allen go down again.

K/P: Akers is fine. Bring in competition for possibly kick offs to save his leg? I dunno. Rocca had a great year I think. Again competition can't hurt.

Overall I would like to see them go after players & not after "value" picks, out of position players or injured players ala last season.

I think they SHOULD trade Kolb. I can def see them getting multi picks for him...would they all be this year? Who knows but some teams will go after him. If they don't trade him & resign Vick, I can seriously see Kolb holding out. The guy wants to play. He was handed the franchise QB moniker and well yea. I wouldn't be surprised if he held out if he isn't moved prior to the draft.

If Vick didn't play the way he did this season & Kolb absolutely bombed, I think Reid would have been fired. Vick saved him his job imho. Kolb would have exposed how bad the Oline really was. If Marty leaves, which I think he will. I hope whatever OC they bring in shys away from Reids gameplanning. Say what you want, Marty was nothing more then Mr.Hat to Reid's Mr Garrison. The playcalling, year in and out is putting up numbers but at the same time holding the team back. More balanced....CONSISTENT attack would help this team & the players out tremendously.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I personally would like to see both QBs back and actually compete for the job. If we recall, when Andy opted to go with Vick early in the season in spite of the old adage that you can't lose your job to injury, he just kept saying that Vick was playing at too high a level to put on the bench. And most agreed. But Vick's play declined materially as the year wore on and certainly didn't exit the year at a level that makes him above competing with Kolb for snaps.

 
Just read a report that if he isn't the starter this year Kolb wants traded. Pure speculation at this point but I have a feeling it's Kolb being moved and not Vick.

 
First question is where does Kolb rank against the incoming QB's? He probably lost value this season but is still more plug and play ready than an unknown rookie. I could see a mid 1st from a needy team but not much more. Philly could continue to keep both but the cost is not filling other needs like like Dallas ignored OL to pick up Felix, Dez, and whatever that abortion of a 2009 draft was (special teams players).
Sure, Kolb is more plug-and-play than any rookie, but so is Kerry Collins.
Collins' ceiling is lower and his age is a negative. Come on now.
Thank you. The same could be said of Kolb's ceiling compared to prospective QBs in the 1st round. Come on now.
:rolleyes: WHile we can disagree on exactly how high Kolb's ceiling really is, virtually everyone grades that ceiling as no lower than a true, bonafide NFL starter. Meanwhile, his FLOOR is....a lower level, but still legit NFL starter. HMMMmmmmmm......even if his ceiling is (in your opinion) lower than most 1st round rookie QB's (I disagree), his floor is much MUCH higher than those same rookies.He's worth a low-mid first plus, or one higher first (8-13 range) alone.
 
Calling it now - we will see the first ever "sign and trade" in the NFL as Vick is signed and then dealt away for a king's ransom.Eagles will draft heavily along O-line (as they should) and also get DBs (needed) and a quarterback (yes, a QB).QB depth chart will read Kolb, Kafka and rookie for 2011.Linebackers will be addressed via free agency plus the youth movement (as all the younger guys develop).
I really hope this happens. Not that I have anything against Vick. Its just that his style of play will get him injured. Plus he doesn't seem to audible ever. We ripped Donovan for half the things Vick did this year. I just have a bad feeling if we keep Vick. Sign him to a reasonable long term deal then trade him to teams in need for a 1st and a 3rd.
 
I'm not an Eagles fan but most teams would kill to have a guy like Vick and a coach like Andy Reid. You guys have bright years ahead, imo.
It drives me nuts too think how poorly that game was called but we'll still have people talking about how Andy Reid is an "elite", "top 5", etc coach. I'm not going to go as far to say that he's got to go but will he EVER learn?
 
Guess that was only a matter of time. But hey, maybe we can deal him and draft another Teo, I'm excited.

All kidding and pissedoffness aside they have to keep him. He'll be more valuable when Vick goes down then a 2nd round pick would be.
Exactly. We owe him less than $1.4mm next year. OF COURSE he wants to start or be traded, but that has absolutely no bearing on whether we will.
 
Guess that was only a matter of time. But hey, maybe we can deal him and draft another Teo, I'm excited.

All kidding and pissedoffness aside they have to keep him. He'll be more valuable when Vick goes down then a 2nd round pick would be.
Exactly. We owe him less than $1.4mm next year. OF COURSE he wants to start or be traded, but that has absolutely no bearing on whether we will.
Curious on your opinion here Jason - what would you think of tagging Vick (assuming that's OK in next CBA) and trading him for a king's ransom (Oakland, anyone?)I say Oakland as Davis loves a guy like Vick and he'd way overpay.

Also, how was the stadium at the game (I assume you went)?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Guess that was only a matter of time. But hey, maybe we can deal him and draft another Teo, I'm excited.

All kidding and pissedoffness aside they have to keep him. He'll be more valuable when Vick goes down then a 2nd round pick would be.
Exactly. We owe him less than $1.4mm next year. OF COURSE he wants to start or be traded, but that has absolutely no bearing on whether we will.
Curious on your opinion here Jason - what would you think of tagging Vick (assuming that's OK in next CBA) and trading him for a king's ransom (Oakland, anyone?)I say Oakland as Davis loves a guy like Vick and he'd way overpay.

Also, how was the stadium at the game (I assume you went)?
I'd be apprehensive to trade Vick but if we could dramatically upgrade the offensive line and help out the secondary with the compensation I wouldn't mind giving it a shot. Like some one posted earlier, Vick is probably going to get himself banged up anyways with his style of play. As electrifying as he is, he just isn't that great of a pocket passing QB.
 
Guess that was only a matter of time. But hey, maybe we can deal him and draft another Teo, I'm excited.

All kidding and pissedoffness aside they have to keep him. He'll be more valuable when Vick goes down then a 2nd round pick would be.
Exactly. We owe him less than $1.4mm next year. OF COURSE he wants to start or be traded, but that has absolutely no bearing on whether we will.
Curious on your opinion here Jason - what would you think of tagging Vick (assuming that's OK in next CBA) and trading him for a king's ransom (Oakland, anyone?)I say Oakland as Davis loves a guy like Vick and he'd way overpay.

Also, how was the stadium at the game (I assume you went)?
Hey Jeff,Yes, I was at the stadium. It was COLD but rocking. I was proud of the way we kept the noise up and seemed to be the most energized I'd seen the stadium all year.

As to your question, I like the way you're thinking. I guess like all things it comes down to what we would define as king's ransom. To hand over what I think most perceive as an elite QB, we would need a monster return. And it seems that teams never give you what you want in that regard in today's era.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top