even weirder. i only looked at the targets for this year, but they don't seem to fluctuate that much, he just does a lot more with them on the road. maybe he just likes grass better?Julio Jones home/road splits last year were insane too:Home:2-29-01-16-02-9-00-0-05-85-14-76-2Road:5-71-06-115-011-127-03-131-24-68-03-104-28-128-1This year:Home:4-14-01-30-04-63-0Road:6-108-25-67-110-94-15-123-1
You'd think someone with Jones' speed and big-play ability would thrive in the dome.even weirder. i only looked at the targets for this year, but they don't seem to fluctuate that much, he just does a lot more with them on the road. maybe he just likes grass better?
NO DEAL!Well everyone sit Julio this weekend and let's see what happens
I would jizz.'steveski said:How about 7/130/2 this week to debunk this myth? Please?
I don't know that I'd call a year and half worth of splits a myth - especially splits that are that pronounced. Certainly, it could change.'steveski said:How about 7/130/2 this week to debunk this myth? Please?
While he's certainly performed better on the road, Julio did have a couple nice games at home last year...Week 15 (Home vs. Jacksonville) - 6/85/1Week 17 (Home vs. Tampa Bay) - 5/76/2I don't know that I'd call a year and half worth of splits a myth - especially splits that are that pronounced. Certainly, it could change.'steveski said:How about 7/130/2 this week to debunk this myth? Please?
Week 17 was for only a quarter since Falcons benched starters after 1st quarter (5th seed wrapped up).While he's certainly performed better on the road, Julio did have a couple nice games at home last year...Week 15 (Home vs. Jacksonville) - 6/85/1Week 17 (Home vs. Tampa Bay) - 5/76/2I don't know that I'd call a year and half worth of splits a myth - especially splits that are that pronounced. Certainly, it could change.'steveski said:How about 7/130/2 this week to debunk this myth? Please?
It is a myth to think it is done on purpose. Whether Julio just plays better away, well that is a different question.I don't know that I'd call a year and half worth of splits a myth - especially splits that are that pronounced. Certainly, it could change.'steveski said:How about 7/130/2 this week to debunk this myth? Please?
I'm trying to be positive since I own Julio and I'm going against Roddy this week.I don't know that I'd call a year and half worth of splits a myth - especially splits that are that pronounced. Certainly, it could change.'steveski said:How about 7/130/2 this week to debunk this myth? Please?
Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
But it isn't voodoo. There's a year and a half worth of stats to back it up.Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
The problem with the data is that there is no answer to the big question - Why?. Why would Julio do better away than at home - and that answer would need to be confirmed by someone who knew. Does he freak out in the dome? Is he afraid to put his body to the test on turf? Does he suffer from stadium claustrophobia? I would need an answer akin to that before I started thinking this was not voodoo.But it isn't voodoo. There's a year and a half worth of stats to back it up.Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
The problem with the data is that there is no answer to the big question - Why?. Why would Julio do better away than at home - and that answer would need to be confirmed by someone who knew. Does he freak out in the dome? Is he afraid to put his body to the test on turf? Does he suffer from stadium claustrophobia? I would need an answer akin to that before I started thinking this was not voodoo.But it isn't voodoo. There's a year and a half worth of stats to back it up.Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
Saw that one Double. We need someone who knows how to evaluate to answer that one.The problem with the data is that there is no answer to the big question - Why?. Why would Julio do better away than at home - and that answer would need to be confirmed by someone who knew. Does he freak out in the dome? Is he afraid to put his body to the test on turf? Does he suffer from stadium claustrophobia? I would need an answer akin to that before I started thinking this was not voodoo.But it isn't voodoo. There's a year and a half worth of stats to back it up.Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.I threw out a thought in post 15 as to why it might be - no one commented. The Falcons claim it's simply how they have been defended. If that is truly the case, it could change.
How could you ignore these stats? We've literally been given a blueprint as to how Julio performs home and away. This is essentially the inverse of Lance Moore's situation, which I use in determining whether or not I start him as well. I have an embarrassment of riches at my WR position in the league I own Julio (Julio, Nicks, Cobb, Maclin, Young). I'm not saying I'm going to sit him, but after analyzing each of my WR's match ups this week I won't rule it out either. I will admit I'm utterly confused as to why this is happening as well.
This is silly. "A year and a half worth of stats" = 23 games. Hardly a large enough sample size. And, as mentioned in another thread, Julio was injured in a few HOME games last year, and was sat after the 1st quarter in week 17.But it isn't voodoo. There's a year and a half worth of stats to back it up.Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
Its like saying saying in baseball because you can't explain why someone slumps in July each year or hits better in Milwaukee compared to Kansas City you think its voodoo. Its a fact about the split and the only thing you can say is, will it continue? People overact to so much on other things, but this is very straight forward and you need to decide if his off week is better than what you can get elsewhere, if it is you keep him in, if its not then you sit him.I can't say it will continue but its somethign I would consider when looking at trades and long term value now, I think it goes to question if you have a chance at AJ or Julio you maybe lean towards AJ based on a week to week consistancy...?The problem with the data is that there is no answer to the big question - Why?. Why would Julio do better away than at home - and that answer would need to be confirmed by someone who knew. Does he freak out in the dome? Is he afraid to put his body to the test on turf? Does he suffer from stadium claustrophobia? I would need an answer akin to that before I started thinking this was not voodoo.But it isn't voodoo. There's a year and a half worth of stats to back it up.Exactlyif I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
Moore has had 7-67-0 and 9-121-0 games on the road this season. If you're using home/road as the deciding factor about whether to start Moore you missed out on two very good games, including one terrific game. The same applies to Jones, who's obviously much more talented. Sit him at home and you run the risk of him having a huge game and delivering as the high-upside WR1 he was projected to be this season. If you're comfortable doing that, that's fine. This Jones owner is not. There's no way Julio Jones ever sits for me as long as he has a pulse and the game has meaning for the Falcons. He's far too talented to sit given the upside he has and has clearly demonstrated numerous times since entering the league.How could you ignore these stats? We've literally been given a blueprint as to how Julio performs home and away. This is essentially the inverse of Lance Moore's situation, which I use in determining whether or not I start him as well.
You and I have been chilling in that Lance Moore thread a bit this year. When it comes to predicting Moore's stats, it's the TDs that come at home on turf as opposed to away on grass. The disparity between his receptions and yards on both surfaces is not large enough to really take note of. In his career he has 5 TDs in 27 games on grass as opposed to 27 TDs in 48 games on turf. Both of Moore's TDs this year have come on turf. The reason Moore put up a 9-121-0 stat vs. TB was because Graham was sidelined. I know me some Moore.I'm sorry but I can't ignore the fact that Julio has 26 catches for 392 yards and 5 TDs in four games away, outdoors on grass this year and 9 catches for 107 yards and 0 TDs in three games at home, indoors on turf. Coupled with the fact that ATL is playing a DAL secondary allowing the 3rd least points to WRs this year and it'd be asinine to not at least question starting him if you have other legitimate options this week. In no way is this thread silly.Moore has had 7-67-0 and 9-121-0 games on the road this season. If you're using home/road as the deciding factor about whether to start Moore you missed out on two very good games, including one terrific game. The same applies to Jones, who's obviously much more talented. Sit him at home and you run the risk of him having a huge game and delivering as the high-upside WR1 he was projected to be this season. If you're comfortable doing that, that's fine. This Jones owner is not. There's no way Julio Jones ever sits for me as long as he has a pulse and the game has meaning for the Falcons. He's far too talented to sit given the upside he has and has clearly demonstrated numerous times since entering the league.How could you ignore these stats? We've literally been given a blueprint as to how Julio performs home and away. This is essentially the inverse of Lance Moore's situation, which I use in determining whether or not I start him as well.
Some of us don't want to wait until the end of a players career before we start trying to project what he's going to do next.This is silly. "A year and a half worth of stats" = 23 games. Hardly a large enough sample size.
Some of you may want to use better stats than home-away receiving splits.Some of us don't want to wait until the end of a players career before we start trying to project what he's going to do next.This is silly. "A year and a half worth of stats" = 23 games. Hardly a large enough sample size.
If I'm not mistaken, 20 of those 23 games we're discussing are not only home/away splits - they are turf/grass splits. Playing surface would possibly be more of an actual factor than location.Some of you may want to use better stats than home-away receiving splits.Some of us don't want to wait until the end of a players career before we start trying to project what he's going to do next.This is silly. "A year and a half worth of stats" = 23 games. Hardly a large enough sample size.
maybe you oughta give this some more thought...the difference is that lance moore is not the guy you took early in the draft, and is most likely one of several flex dudes on your team.if I sit julio because of this voodoo and he goes off for 8/150/2 I am going to kill myself.
5-85-X or 4-76-X is your argument for success? TDs are highly variable. No offense, but 5-85 or 4-76 out of your WR1 is hardly anything to help your confidence. The interesting thing about Julio's stats (and the reason they might be considered worth looking into) is they are almost the perfect opposite of Roddy's. It's not like in certain games the Falcons weren't passing the ball, or the offense was struggling. The home games (which are all on turf) compared to the road games (all of which, save for 3 are on grass) seems to indicate that the Falcons tend to favor one of their two outside receivers based at least in some way on playing surface (not light bulb wattage or anything as arbitrary as home/away). Could that be due to how opposing teams defense them based on surface? Sure - and that could change.I just feel like there is not enough information yet or manipulation here to make your decision based on home and road splits. First of all, he was a rookie who was injured for half of a season in an entirely different offense. Secondly, 2 out of maybe 4-5 games last year at home where he was healthy he had 5-85-1 and 4-76-2.
Need to factor in that 4-76 was for only one quarter.As for surface, 131 yards (2TD) was on Field Turf (Colts), 128 yards (1TD) was also on Field Turf (Saints). Field Turf is also used at the Georgia Dome.5-85-X or 4-76-X is your argument for success? TDs are highly variable. No offense, but 5-85 or 4-76 out of your WR1 is hardly anything to help your confidence. The interesting thing about Julio's stats (and the reason they might be considered worth looking into) is they are almost the perfect opposite of Roddy's. It's not like in certain games the Falcons weren't passing the ball, or the offense was struggling. The home games (which are all on turf) compared to the road games (all of which, save for 3 are on grass) seems to indicate that the Falcons tend to favor one of their two outside receivers based at least in some way on playing surface (not light bulb wattage or anything as arbitrary as home/away). Could that be due to how opposing teams defense them based on surface? Sure - and that could change.I just feel like there is not enough information yet or manipulation here to make your decision based on home and road splits. First of all, he was a rookie who was injured for half of a season in an entirely different offense. Secondly, 2 out of maybe 4-5 games last year at home where he was healthy he had 5-85-1 and 4-76-2.
But it is also possible that it is somehow related to how each player performs relative to opponents on said surfaces that is a factor. If that is indeed the case, it is possible (again, "possible" does not mean "all the time" nor does it even mean "very likely") that such a trend will continue.
The two questions you need to ask to determine on whether or not you want this "stat" to effect decision making (or whether you think it will effect each players stat-line) are:
1) Do you think the reason for the seemingly strong correlation between playing surface and performance is a causal/relational one or simply a coincidnetal one?
2) If you beleive there exsists a legitimate relationship, is the root of the cause the Falcons (or the players themselves) or the opposing team that is creating the difference?
The reason for question #2 is that if it is the defense or Falcon play calling, then the relationship may not continue moving forward as teams adjust their defenses. If you think it is a relational correlation and you beleive it is a result of the way the two players perform, there is a reason to presume that the relationship between the surface and which WR has a good performance, will continue to exsist - at least on some level.
I believe Alabama uses Field Turf - no?Need to factor in that 4-76 was for only one quarter.As for surface, 131 yards (2TD) was on Field Turf (Colts), 128 yards (1TD) was also on Field Turf (Saints). Field Turf is also used at the Georgia Dome.5-85-X or 4-76-X is your argument for success? TDs are highly variable. No offense, but 5-85 or 4-76 out of your WR1 is hardly anything to help your confidence. The interesting thing about Julio's stats (and the reason they might be considered worth looking into) is they are almost the perfect opposite of Roddy's. It's not like in certain games the Falcons weren't passing the ball, or the offense was struggling. The home games (which are all on turf) compared to the road games (all of which, save for 3 are on grass) seems to indicate that the Falcons tend to favor one of their two outside receivers based at least in some way on playing surface (not light bulb wattage or anything as arbitrary as home/away). Could that be due to how opposing teams defense them based on surface? Sure - and that could change.I just feel like there is not enough information yet or manipulation here to make your decision based on home and road splits. First of all, he was a rookie who was injured for half of a season in an entirely different offense. Secondly, 2 out of maybe 4-5 games last year at home where he was healthy he had 5-85-1 and 4-76-2.
But it is also possible that it is somehow related to how each player performs relative to opponents on said surfaces that is a factor. If that is indeed the case, it is possible (again, "possible" does not mean "all the time" nor does it even mean "very likely") that such a trend will continue.
The two questions you need to ask to determine on whether or not you want this "stat" to effect decision making (or whether you think it will effect each players stat-line) are:
1) Do you think the reason for the seemingly strong correlation between playing surface and performance is a causal/relational one or simply a coincidnetal one?
2) If you beleive there exsists a legitimate relationship, is the root of the cause the Falcons (or the players themselves) or the opposing team that is creating the difference?
The reason for question #2 is that if it is the defense or Falcon play calling, then the relationship may not continue moving forward as teams adjust their defenses. If you think it is a relational correlation and you beleive it is a result of the way the two players perform, there is a reason to presume that the relationship between the surface and which WR has a good performance, will continue to exsist - at least on some level.
I don't see it here: http://www.fieldturf.com/football-turf/ and Alabama doesn't have a dome.I believe Alabama uses Field Turf - no?Need to factor in that 4-76 was for only one quarter.As for surface, 131 yards (2TD) was on Field Turf (Colts), 128 yards (1TD) was also on Field Turf (Saints). Field Turf is also used at the Georgia Dome.5-85-X or 4-76-X is your argument for success? TDs are highly variable. No offense, but 5-85 or 4-76 out of your WR1 is hardly anything to help your confidence. The interesting thing about Julio's stats (and the reason they might be considered worth looking into) is they are almost the perfect opposite of Roddy's. It's not like in certain games the Falcons weren't passing the ball, or the offense was struggling. The home games (which are all on turf) compared to the road games (all of which, save for 3 are on grass) seems to indicate that the Falcons tend to favor one of their two outside receivers based at least in some way on playing surface (not light bulb wattage or anything as arbitrary as home/away). Could that be due to how opposing teams defense them based on surface? Sure - and that could change.I just feel like there is not enough information yet or manipulation here to make your decision based on home and road splits. First of all, he was a rookie who was injured for half of a season in an entirely different offense. Secondly, 2 out of maybe 4-5 games last year at home where he was healthy he had 5-85-1 and 4-76-2.
But it is also possible that it is somehow related to how each player performs relative to opponents on said surfaces that is a factor. If that is indeed the case, it is possible (again, "possible" does not mean "all the time" nor does it even mean "very likely") that such a trend will continue.
The two questions you need to ask to determine on whether or not you want this "stat" to effect decision making (or whether you think it will effect each players stat-line) are:
1) Do you think the reason for the seemingly strong correlation between playing surface and performance is a causal/relational one or simply a coincidnetal one?
2) If you beleive there exsists a legitimate relationship, is the root of the cause the Falcons (or the players themselves) or the opposing team that is creating the difference?
The reason for question #2 is that if it is the defense or Falcon play calling, then the relationship may not continue moving forward as teams adjust their defenses. If you think it is a relational correlation and you beleive it is a result of the way the two players perform, there is a reason to presume that the relationship between the surface and which WR has a good performance, will continue to exsist - at least on some level.
I've got to fill 3 WR slots with Wayne, Decker, Julio and Moore. Giving strong consideration to benching Julio for Indoor Moore. Don't think it's crazy.Anyone benching Julio this week? Just thinking of his poor splits, and playing the Cowboys who are pretty tough against the pass. If you have a good array of WRs is it crazy?
Hmmmm... I've got 3 WRs to start and have Wayne, Colston, Steve Smith and Julio. I'd hate to miss a huge game from Julio but he could have a quiet game too....I've got to fill 3 WR slots with Wayne, Decker, Julio and Moore. Giving strong consideration to benching Julio for Indoor Moore. Don't think it's crazy.Anyone benching Julio this week? Just thinking of his poor splits, and playing the Cowboys who are pretty tough against the pass. If you have a good array of WRs is it crazy?