For the record, these are not my rankings, i used 7 sites/experts to compile the numbers/rankings.Most of it is pretty self explanatory. The first set of numbers is the players combine/proday numbers. The first "Avg" is the average of a few sites grades of players attributes. The 2nd "Avg" is the average of where the 7 sites rank each player. The last column is the average of where a few of the sites project the player going in the draft. A 2.5 just means a 2nd/3rd round projection. An 8 means to player is expected to go undrafted. I did that so i can accurately sort by that column.For anyone interested in a link to my rookie RB/WR rankings spreadsheet, send me a PM.
Go Deep,Always love your stuff. When do you anticipate updating your rankings post-draft? I'm very interested in seeing where you place Ingram, Thomas, Williams, and others.For the record, these are not my rankings, i used 7 sites/experts to compile the numbers/rankings.Most of it is pretty self explanatory. The first set of numbers is the players combine/proday numbers. The first "Avg" is the average of a few sites grades of players attributes. The 2nd "Avg" is the average of where the 7 sites rank each player. The last column is the average of where a few of the sites project the player going in the draft. A 2.5 just means a 2nd/3rd round projection. An 8 means to player is expected to go undrafted. I did that so i can accurately sort by that column.For anyone interested in a link to my rookie RB/WR rankings spreadsheet, send me a PM.
Funny you post this. I just came here to look for this thread to say i will have a full post draft update done in the next couple/few days. Thanks for the bump. Looks like my having Locker as the #2 QB wasnt that crazy after all, and its nice to see Belichick agreed with me about Vereen. While im updating, if anyone has a strong argument to make about any of the incoming rookies, i would love to hear it.Go Deep,Always love your stuff. When do you anticipate updating your rankings post-draft? I'm very interested in seeing where you place Ingram, Thomas, Williams, and others.For the record, these are not my rankings, i used 7 sites/experts to compile the numbers/rankings.Most of it is pretty self explanatory. The first set of numbers is the players combine/proday numbers. The first "Avg" is the average of a few sites grades of players attributes. The 2nd "Avg" is the average of where the 7 sites rank each player. The last column is the average of where a few of the sites project the player going in the draft. A 2.5 just means a 2nd/3rd round projection. An 8 means to player is expected to go undrafted. I did that so i can accurately sort by that column.For anyone interested in a link to my rookie RB/WR rankings spreadsheet, send me a PM.
Im done done with my post draft updates yet, and there will be some changes, but things wont change too much. Quickly though, my thoughts on Foster have been discussed here quite a bit, but basically I like him in 2011, i just dont trust his long term value because im not a big believer in hs talent. Ive never been impressed with Mendenhall, although he might be in for a small boost with the Steeers not gettting a big play back in the draft, like i thought they were going to. Ingram and Mathews are two guys il ike alot, and think they are in for 5 years of top 10 RB seasons. I have actually already knocked Best down a few points because of Leshoure, but im confident that Best will still be the #1 with Leshoure being the shortyardge/COP back. The Giants not drafting a RB(other than Scott) means they will be keeping Bradshaw. He is still just 24 and one of the most talented backs in the league. My only real issues with him is his durability and fumbling. The fumbling thing can be easily fixed, and im not all that concerened about the durability issues.Moreno is a guy i just dont know where to put. I thought the Broncos were going to bring in another RB in the draft which would have made it easier to rank him. For now though he is still the bell cow in Denevr and looked pretty good last year when healthy, and Fox being there now can only help.I like Forte, but these are non-ppr rankings so i think his ranking is pretty fair.Go Deep, Why is it that guys like Mendenhall, Arian Foster, Forte ranked so low? Moreno, Best, Bradshaw, Ingram, Mathews ranked ahead of them ?
I liked Ingram before the draft, i love him after going to the Saints. He should see 250+ carries, and better than that he should easily score double digit TD's. I would not be at all surprised if he led the leagiue in rushing TD's either. With that said, i think Mcfadden is the way to go. He is one of the most talented RB"s in the league and is in a pretty good situation in Oakland. He was a top 3 RB in PPG last season, and is a good bet to finish as a top 5 RB if he stays healthy this season. Its close in non-ppr, but if you play in a PPR, Mcfadden is the easy choice.Go Deep,Thanks for updating your rankings. I'm in a 12-team standard lineup/scoring format that is a 2-Keeper league. I've been told a 2-Keeper league is still more similar to a redraft format than a Dynasty format, but I would like to get your advise...Surprisingly Run-DMC wasn't kept by his owner last season so I will have the choice between DMC or Ingram with my first pick (I'm retaining QB Rogers and Jamaal Charles from last season). I think Ingram will have the better career but am I being too overly optimistic regarding his 2011 stats (I'm assuming he will be a top 15 back at the end of 2011, and projecting him to be a top 5 heading into 2012? My gut says Ingram but I can't tell if my judgment is being clouded by the post-draft high from this past weekend?
White shouldnt lose any value in non-pprs. He will lose some targets and receptions but should do more with the ones he gets with the extra room he should get from Julio being on the other side,I was a big fan of Beanie until they drafted Williams. Im not giving up on Beanie, but im confused with the drafting of Williams considering the needs the Cardinals had at other positions. He is just 23, and had plenty of good reason to have a bad year last year, so i still think there is hope for Wells.I was never a fan of Tulloch, but he looked better than i thought last year. Alot of that was due to situation, but he definitely had someting to do with it. Im still scared he is replaceable there and might consider trading him while his value is this high.Thank you so much for all of your work with these rankings. I use them almost exclusively when deciding on a trade in my 10 team dynasty league. Absolutely no rush to update the rankings, but what do you do now with these 3 guys on my roster....Roddy White - what does Jones on the other side really mean for him?Beanie - the more I look, the more I see that Arizona got Williams as he was the BPA at that time for them, even though they didn't really need him. That's still not great news for Beanie, but is Williams really the RB to have there? Will this end up very similar to the 1-2 punch in Detroit with Best and Leshoure (young QB, dynamite #1 WR, 2 young RBs with similar skill sets)?LB Tulloch - wasn't a great draft for his stock, and where does he go now?
You also have to consider the freed up roster spot, which I think he "values" at 16 if I'm not mistaken. Personally, I think these values are better for 1 for 1 trades, when you start to get into 2 for 1 and 3 for 1 trades it gets a bit complicated and really depends on how badly you need to free up rosters space.Also, I'm in a 10 team league, so that adjusts things a bit as there are more QBs and such to go around with only 10 teams than there would be in a 14 or so team league.Are the point values meant to assist in trade values? Because if so, your top players are underrated and low players overrated. There's no way Denarius Moore and Alex Green (total 50) would be worth more than Julio Jones (48).
Yes they are, but there is a formula for trades that involve an uneven amount of players. It is explained in the OP.'mikel2014 said:Are the point values meant to assist in trade values? Because if so, your top players are underrated and low players overrated. There's no way Denarius Moore and Alex Green (total 50) would be worth more than Julio Jones (48).
Matt, you would start at 16 for 10 team leagues, but 14 for 12 teams. It is a bit complicated, but once you get the hang of it, its pretty accurate.'matttyl said:You also have to consider the freed up roster spot, which I think he "values" at 16 if I'm not mistaken. Personally, I think these values are better for 1 for 1 trades, when you start to get into 2 for 1 and 3 for 1 trades it gets a bit complicated and really depends on how badly you need to free up rosters space.'mikel2014 said:Are the point values meant to assist in trade values? Because if so, your top players are underrated and low players overrated. There's no way Denarius Moore and Alex Green (total 50) would be worth more than Julio Jones (48).
Also, I'm in a 10 team league, so that adjusts things a bit as there are more QBs and such to go around with only 10 teams than there would be in a 14 or so team league.
not with allen bradford in townseems that legarrette blount is candidate for a bump UP
He will move up, not sure how high yet.Go Deep,Speculating here, but if Kolb lands in Arizona does Larry move up to the #2 spot behind Calvin?
I wont feel good about bumping Blount up until I see more from him.seems that legarrette blount is candidate for a bump UP
No, from what I have seen so far I have no reason to think he will be starting in TB for very long. I don't think that will change, but I'm open to it if he looks better in 2011 than he did last year. I also found it interesting the Bucs drafted a back with a similar skill set to Blount instead of a 3rd down back.you need to see him play more? are you studying video or something?
I'm curious, what exactly did you see last year that you didn't like? Seems odd that you need him to "look better" after he put up over 1,000 yards with 6 TDs in 13 games. I'd say he looked pretty damn good last year. I'm not going to anoint him as a Top 12 dynasty back, but I don't see why his starting job would be in jeopardy.No, from what I have seen so far I have no reason to think he will be starting in TB for very long. I don't think that will change, but I'm open to it if he looks better in 2011 than he did last year. I also found it interesting the Bucs drafted a back with a similar skill set to Blount instead of a 3rd down back.you need to see him play more? are you studying video or something?
Blounts numbers were good, but i think any decent back would have put up similar/better numbers. He has little burst or break away speed. He is a decent North/South runner with good balance but has no wiggle/elusiveness, cant catch and is not an effecient short yardage back.I'm curious, what exactly did you see last year that you didn't like? Seems odd that you need him to "look better" after he put up over 1,000 yards with 6 TDs in 13 games. I'd say he looked pretty damn good last year. I'm not going to anoint him as a Top 12 dynasty back, but I don't see why his starting job would be in jeopardy.No, from what I have seen so far I have no reason to think he will be starting in TB for very long. I don't think that will change, but I'm open to it if he looks better in 2011 than he did last year. I also found it interesting the Bucs drafted a back with a similar skill set to Blount instead of a 3rd down back.you need to see him play more? are you studying video or something?
Look at Moreno's stats in the games Tebow started.I've been thinking about Cam newton's effect on JStew. My first thought was now not only will JStew not be catching the ball but Cam will steal all his TDs. But, look at what Vick did for McCoy. Hmmm...
Its factored in, but its only a couple point difference. He is a talented player, but he has been severly overhyped on these boards. What have you seen from him that makes you think i am way off by having him ranked 16? What kind of numbers do you expect from him this season?Deep,Question regarding Dez Bryants ranking. Is he ranked lower based on the knucklehead factor. I think you are way off on him otherwise.
I think it helps to have a play making QB under center. He might lose a coupleTD's around the goalline, but Newton will likely help them get to the goalline more so it all evens out. Look at Chris Johnsons numbers with Vince Young at QB.I've been thinking about Cam newton's effect on JStew. My first thought was now not only will JStew not be catching the ball but Cam will steal all his TDs. But, look at what Vick did for McCoy. Hmmm...
Didn't you have him ranked top 10 prior to the mall incident?Its factored in, but its only a couple point difference. He is a talented player, but he has been severly overhyped on these boards. What have you seen from him that makes you think i am way off by having him ranked 16? What kind of numbers do you expect from him this season?Deep,Question regarding Dez Bryants ranking. Is he ranked lower based on the knucklehead factor. I think you are way off on him otherwise.
Just outside, but it had little to do with his fall. I actually only dropped him 3 points since then, i just felt like i had him ranked that high because i got caught up in the hype.Didn't you have him ranked top 10 prior to the mall incident?Its factored in, but its only a couple point difference. He is a talented player, but he has been severly overhyped on these boards. What have you seen from him that makes you think i am way off by having him ranked 16? What kind of numbers do you expect from him this season?Deep,Question regarding Dez Bryants ranking. Is he ranked lower based on the knucklehead factor. I think you are way off on him otherwise.
I would project 70 for 1000 and 9 TD's for the season. His leaping ability, moves, speed and hands are all plus skills. He is the next TO. My eyes don't lie. Physical freak. Hype has nothing to do with it.Its factored in, but its only a couple point difference. He is a talented player, but he has been severly overhyped on these boards. What have you seen from him that makes you think i am way off by having him ranked 16? What kind of numbers do you expect from him this season?Deep,Question regarding Dez Bryants ranking. Is he ranked lower based on the knucklehead factor. I think you are way off on him otherwise.
My eyes dont lie either, they are wrong sometimes, but they never lie. Bryant is talented, but he is being valued at his upside right now.I would project 70 for 1000 and 9 TD's for the season. His leaping ability, moves, speed and hands are all plus skills. He is the next TO. My eyes don't lie. Physical freak. Hype has nothing to do with it.Its factored in, but its only a couple point difference. He is a talented player, but he has been severly overhyped on these boards. What have you seen from him that makes you think i am way off by having him ranked 16? What kind of numbers do you expect from him this season?Deep,Question regarding Dez Bryants ranking. Is he ranked lower based on the knucklehead factor. I think you are way off on him otherwise.
Darel Scott.....7th rd? Pretty sure giants drafted himAmhad Bradshaw - Another guy who goes up for doing nothing but his team not drafting another RB.
Youre right, I meant a RB that would make the team.Darel Scott.....7th rd? Pretty sure giants drafted himAmhad Bradshaw - Another guy who goes up for doing nothing but his team not drafting another RB.
Even if he's already getting FWP hype... Scott's not taking over for anyone anytime soon, but too soon to say he won't even make the team.Youre right, I meant a RB that would make the team.Darel Scott.....7th rd? Pretty sure giants drafted himAmhad Bradshaw - Another guy who goes up for doing nothing but his team not drafting another RB.
Yeah, that hurts.'thriftyrocker said:Look at Moreno's stats in the games Tebow started.'mrip541 said:I've been thinking about Cam newton's effect on JStew. My first thought was now not only will JStew not be catching the ball but Cam will steal all his TDs. But, look at what Vick did for McCoy. Hmmm...
Too small of a sample size to draw any conclusions. Especially since they were getting blown out early in two of the 3 games so they pretty much abandoned the running game. Plus with Fox in town now, im sure the running game is going to become more of a priority.Yeah, that hurts.'thriftyrocker said:Look at Moreno's stats in the games Tebow started.'mrip541 said:I've been thinking about Cam newton's effect on JStew. My first thought was now not only will JStew not be catching the ball but Cam will steal all his TDs. But, look at what Vick did for McCoy. Hmmm...
Whoa. It reminded me of that clip from Inside the NFL when Denver gets close to the goal and Tebow starts yelling to the coaches that no one but him is touching the ball on the next play and he runs it in for a TD.'thriftyrocker said:Look at Moreno's stats in the games Tebow started.'mrip541 said:I've been thinking about Cam newton's effect on JStew. My first thought was now not only will JStew not be catching the ball but Cam will steal all his TDs. But, look at what Vick did for McCoy. Hmmm...
Vick at 16 ? Freeman at 17 ?Wait you said Vick where ???????????I don't understand these rankings at all. Why are Vick and Freeman at 16 and 17? And how can you have Best at 11 when he was average last year and will now be splitting carries? Jon Baldwin ahead of Brandon Lloyd? Torrey Smith ahead of Boldin?
Im going to expalin this one more time since its my fault i never put it in the OP(which i have now done)These rankings are not your typical rankings. A players DS(dynasty score) is what you should be looking at. Vick may be 16th, but he has a dynasty score of 37, which is 1 point from being in the top 10 and 5 points from being 6th. Obviously alot of people will still thinks thats too low, but i have explained in here multiple times why i dont trust Vicks long term value. Same thing applies to Freeman who has a similar score to a bunch of other QB's, i just prefer those others QB by a small margin, but they are basically all in the same tier.Best was not average last year, he was playing on turf toe, two of them, after week 2. Yes, Brandon Lloyd is 30 years old, and has had exactly one good season. That was with Josh Mcdaniels, who was more responsible for the Broncos passing numbers last year than anyone else. Plus that was with Orton at QB, and it looks like Tebw will be starting, and with Jon Fox there, i think the Bronocs wil focus on the run more. So yes, i would rather take my chances on a young talented first round pick at WR. Did you watch Boldin last year? I know he is only 30 but he looked liked he was 40. Im a big fan on Smith, and would rather have the guy who is on his way up than the one who is on his way down.I don't understand these rankings at all. Why are Vick and Freeman at 16 and 17? And how can you have Best at 11 when he was average last year and will now be splitting carries? Jon Baldwin ahead of Brandon Lloyd? Torrey Smith ahead of Boldin?
#$%$%#@!!!!!! I just spent 15 minutes writing up a long response to this and when i hit "add relpy" i found out i lost my internet connection and lost everything i just typed. Im not retyping it, but basically these rankings are based on 12 team leagues that start 1 QB, 6RB/WR, 1 TE, 1K, 7-10 IDP's. League size doesnt matter as much as starting requirements. In a 10 team league that starts 1 QB and only 4 RB/WR's the top QB's would be worth alot more because there are more RB and WR's to go around. If you are in a 14 team league thats starts 1 QB and 7 RB/WR's then QB's would be worth alot less because is such a huge need for RB's and WR's. Players value should absolutely not change base on how much depth you have at the position. Someone out there values that player at that score, and as long as that is true, that player has that value.'matttyl said:You may have answered this before, but I'll ask again....what size league are your rankings based on? Meaning, how many teams (I saw the starting requirements for each team)? Would these rankings change at all for a league with more or less teams than you are basing them on? For smaller leagues, I would think the RB and WRs would be worth more. In bigger leagues, I would think that QBs and TEs would hold more value, as the drop off in those positions seem to be greater after 15 or so.Next, and this may get a bit more complicated, but would your rankings change depending on what's already on your team?Example - I'm in a 10 team league (we only start 1 QB each) and I'm lucky enough to have Aaron Rodgers as my #1 QB. As such, would Romo still be worth "48" if he's never going to be starting for me? I would think that if you have that kind of player, and that position already on "lockdown", then all the other players at that position would be worth much less, right?Example 2 - I'm also lucky enough to have Finley in the same league (yeah, Packers fan). We again only start 1 at this position. Since I've already got him, shouldn't the "value" of other TEs be less to me?
Just for a little clarification, I'll add a quote from another thread re: Moreno and his games with Tebow:Whoa. It reminded me of that clip from Inside the NFL when Denver gets close to the goal and Tebow starts yelling to the coaches that no one but him is touching the ball on the next play and he runs it in for a TD.Look at Moreno's stats in the games Tebow started.I've been thinking about Cam newton's effect on JStew. My first thought was now not only will JStew not be catching the ball but Cam will steal all his TDs. But, look at what Vick did for McCoy. Hmmm...
'ZWK said:Moreno was injured during the 3 Tebow weeks. Apparently it's been forgotten, but he missed half the game (or more) against Oakland and Houston. You can't judge him by the stats for those games
Week 15 against Oakland, Moreno injured his ribs in the first quarter and was out for the rest of the game. Here's how Rotoworld put it: "Considering the way the injury was handled, it's possible Moreno cracked a rib. He left in the first quarter and simply watched from the sideline the rest of the way." You can see from the play-by-play that his last touch came with 8:22 left in the 1st quarter.
Week 16 against Houston, Moreno started, reinjured his ribs, and left the game at halftime. Rotoworld: "Moreno, battling either cracked or severely bruised ribs entering the game, took an early-game body shot that seemed to affect his performance before he spent all of the final two quarters on the sideline with helmet in hand." The play-by-play shows his last touch coming with 5:03 left in the 2nd quarter.
Week 17 against San Diego, Moreno played the whole game, but was listed as questionable with his rib injury and used sparingly as part of a rotation. Moreno had 6 of the team's 15 RB carries and 1 of their 6 RB receptions, with Buckhalter & Lance Ball getting the rest.