Should I start with It's A Small World, or Pirates of the Caribbean?noWait, so Mr. Ham really = timsochet?
That notebook will someday be in the Smithsonian.Great moments in FFA plagiarism history
ThomasA lifts his entry from another source in the Smack Off Tournament. Shamed, he abruptly leaves the board and is never heard from again.
bueno engages yours truly in a political argument and manages to lift a few paragraphs from Ann Coulter. Called out by an unlikely source, he lacks contrition and suggests that Ann's ideas weren't that original anyway.
Konotay (aka golddigger), engaged in a debate bloodbath regarding evolution, feels overwhelmed and resorts to posting some drivel by a guy at the Discovery Institute as his own ideas. In a manner eerily similar to bueno, he lashes out at his accusers and proclaims that he got too lazy to type up something similar himself. This of course coming in the wake of claiming that he never even cites the Discovery Institute much less steals their stuff. Konotay decides that MasterOfOrion is his least sullied alias and rolls with that from then on. He also makes wild accusations about various posters being a "Pickles alias."
timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
We go about once every couple months with the kids, and sometimes we skip Small World altogether. But I have never been there in my life without going on Pirates. Not once.'Good said:Should I start with It's A Small World, or Pirates of the Caribbean?'timschochet said:no'Otis said:Wait, so Mr. Ham really = timsochet?
Here's what I think.Content scraping is a phenomenon of copying and pasting material from Internet websites, affecting both established sites[59] and blogs.[60]Free online tools are becoming available to help identify plagiarism,[61][62]
<br /><br /><br />'Mr. Pickles said:<br /><a href='http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=592154&view=findpost&p=13161566' class='bbc_url' title=''>scathing example</a><br />
Why don't you come back when you're sober.<br /><br /><br />'Mr. Pickles said:<br /><a href='http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=592154&view=findpost&p=13161566' class='bbc_url' title=''>scathing example</a><br />
You think that's plagaism? It's that inability to remain unbiased that will keep you from ever becoming FFA Ombudsman.
I'm not trying to publish anything, Mr. Kim Chee.As an author, I'm offended by content aggregators like Mr. Schochet.
Why don't you come back when you're sober.<br /><br /><br />'Mr. Pickles said:<br /><a href='http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=592154&view=findpost&p=13161566' class='bbc_url' title=''>scathing example</a><br />
You think that's plagaism? It's that inability to remain unbiased that will keep you from ever becoming FFA Ombudsman.
Great list, but you need to add Jackstraw too. He was plagiarizing all over the place in this thread starting here: Link. Worst kind too....the "personal", heart-wrenching anecdote.'Mr. Pickles said:Great moments in FFA plagiarism history
ThomasA lifts his entry from another source in the Smack Off Tournament. Shamed, he abruptly leaves the board and is never heard from again.
bueno engages yours truly in a political argument and manages to lift a few paragraphs from Ann Coulter. Called out by an unlikely source, he lacks contrition and suggests that Ann's ideas weren't that original anyway.
Konotay (aka golddigger), engaged in a debate bloodbath regarding evolution, feels overwhelmed and resorts to posting some drivel by a guy at the Discovery Institute as his own ideas. In a manner eerily similar to bueno, he lashes out at his accusers and proclaims that he got too lazy to type up something similar himself. This of course coming in the wake of claiming that he never even cites the Discovery Institute much less steals their stuff. Konotay decides that MasterOfOrion is his least sullied alias and rolls with that from then on. He also makes wild accusations about various posters being a "Pickles alias."
timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
That example isn't as clear to me. I'm not sure if he was meaning to represent those stories as his own. Mr. Schochet was moved by those posts and din't have a clue they might have been from somewhere else. Maybe that's part of the problem.From a little later in that thread:Great list, but you need to add Jackstraw too. He was plagiarizing all over the place in this thread starting here: Link. Worst kind too....the "personal", heart-wrenching anecdote.'Mr. Pickles said:Great moments in FFA plagiarism history
ThomasA lifts his entry from another source in the Smack Off Tournament. Shamed, he abruptly leaves the board and is never heard from again.
bueno engages yours truly in a political argument and manages to lift a few paragraphs from Ann Coulter. Called out by an unlikely source, he lacks contrition and suggests that Ann's ideas weren't that original anyway.
Konotay (aka golddigger), engaged in a debate bloodbath regarding evolution, feels overwhelmed and resorts to posting some drivel by a guy at the Discovery Institute as his own ideas. In a manner eerily similar to bueno, he lashes out at his accusers and proclaims that he got too lazy to type up something similar himself. This of course coming in the wake of claiming that he never even cites the Discovery Institute much less steals their stuff. Konotay decides that MasterOfOrion is his least sullied alias and rolls with that from then on. He also makes wild accusations about various posters being a "Pickles alias."
timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
Right. I'm pro-choice but anti-timschochet.
Why don't you come back when you're sober.<br /><br /><br />'Mr. Pickles said:<br /><a href='http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=592154&view=findpost&p=13161566' class='bbc_url' title=''>scathing example</a><br />
You think that's plagaism? It's that inability to remain unbiased that will keep you from ever becoming FFA Ombudsman.
Great moments in FFA plagiarism history
ThomasA lifts his entry from another source in the Smack Off Tournament. Shamed, he abruptly leaves the board and is never heard from again.
bueno engages yours truly in a political argument and manages to lift a few paragraphs from Ann Coulter. Called out by an unlikely source, he lacks contrition and suggests that Ann's ideas weren't that original anyway.
Konotay (aka golddigger), engaged in a debate bloodbath regarding evolution, feels overwhelmed and resorts to posting some drivel by a guy at the Discovery Institute as his own ideas. In a manner eerily similar to bueno, he lashes out at his accusers and proclaims that he got too lazy to type up something similar himself. This of course coming in the wake of claiming that he never even cites the Discovery Institute much less steals their stuff. Konotay decides that MasterOfOrion is his least sullied alias and rolls with that from then on. He also makes wild accusations about various posters being a "Pickles alias."
timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
He is.Why don't you come back when you're sober.<br /><br /><br />'Mr. Pickles said:<br /><a href='http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=592154&view=findpost&p=13161566' class='bbc_url' title=''>scathing example</a><br />
You think that's plagaism? It's that inability to remain unbiased that will keep you from ever becoming FFA Ombudsman.
Was this the "Let's talk chemical* engineering!" thing?*or something.'Mr. Pickles said:Konotay (aka golddigger), engaged in a debate bloodbath regarding evolution, feels overwhelmed and resorts to posting some drivel by a guy at the Discovery Institute as his own ideas. In a manner eerily similar to bueno, he lashes out at his accusers and proclaims that he got too lazy to type up something similar himself. This of course coming in the wake of claiming that he never even cites the Discovery Institute much less steals their stuff. Konotay decides that MasterOfOrion is his least sullied alias and rolls with that from then on. He also makes wild accusations about various posters being a "Pickles alias."
It isn't easy to make so many diligent and comprehensive posts on so many complex and significant topics without having a little bit of plagiarism creep in (I voted 1-19%). Tim's motives are more altruistic than selfish. I'm not sure anyone could direct his threads any better.I'm not trying to publish anything, Mr. Kim Chee.As an author, I'm offended by content aggregators like Mr. Schochet.
Yes.Was this the "Let's talk chemical* engineering!" thing?*or something.'Mr. Pickles said:Konotay (aka golddigger), engaged in a debate bloodbath regarding evolution, feels overwhelmed and resorts to posting some drivel by a guy at the Discovery Institute as his own ideas. In a manner eerily similar to bueno, he lashes out at his accusers and proclaims that he got too lazy to type up something similar himself. This of course coming in the wake of claiming that he never even cites the Discovery Institute much less steals their stuff. Konotay decides that MasterOfOrion is his least sullied alias and rolls with that from then on. He also makes wild accusations about various posters being a "Pickles alias."
Permaban seems appropriate. I think Pickles may have found a way to free us from the era of Tim and put this whole ugly thing behind us.16. Posting links to copyrighted materialMembers need to employ "fair use" quoting with proper credit and attribution from pieces ("fair use" guidelines are available for free at this link), and/or the inclusion of links to the full texts of articles. Both are meaningful and appropriate ways to give readers access to material. Most sites are fine with quoting pieces (quotes) of articles, but copying and pasting entire articles is rarely acceptable.
I'm sure just about anyone could, but most would have the sense not to start them.It isn't easy to make so many diligent and comprehensive posts on so many complex and significant topics without having a little bit of plagiarism creep in (I voted 1-19%). Tim's motives are more altruistic than selfish. I'm not sure anyone could direct his threads any better.I'm not trying to publish anything, Mr. Kim Chee.As an author, I'm offended by content aggregators like Mr. Schochet.
I'm with you man. Around here Tim and the attackers could all be the same person. A little rivalry with the guy is one thing, but the vitriol smells fishy.I always question the motives of the attackers in these character assassination attempts.
By not listing your sources at the end of each post, the bolded is pretty well what you are doing. By not sourcing each post you're leaving the perception to all the people who didn't read the first post that all of your writing is completely your own work.To be frank, I really don't see why you have such a problem with sourcing each of your posts; doing so doesn't even threaten any of your goals of creating a fun and informative platform for discussion.'timschochet said:In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.'Mr. Pickles said:timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
It's because I hardly ever even do it. For instance, for the rest of the rock and roll thread, I'm going to be using ONE source. Am I supposed to start every post with "From the book, Rock of Ages"?? How absurd! And it's not even accurate, because as I already pointed out, I often add my own thoughts from time to time. I'm amazed that anyone thinks this is a big deal anyhow. The purpose of those narrative threads is not to show how smart I am, it's to discuss topics which interest me and which I hope interest others. Most of the people ripping me here are the same ones who seem to always want to criticize me for starting those threads. Now they're criticizing me for the material I choose to put in those threads. If they find the threads as dull as they claim, why are they bothering to read them?By not listing your sources at the end of each post, the bolded is pretty well what you are doing. By not sourcing each post you're leaving the perception to all the people who didn't read the first post that all of your writing is completely your own work.To be frank, I really don't see why you have such a problem with sourcing each of your posts; doing so doesn't even threaten any of your goals of creating a fun and informative platform for discussion.'timschochet said:In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.'Mr. Pickles said:timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
Why not add your own thoughts ALL the time?... I often add my own thoughts from time to time.
Pretty sure this one's mine, guy.the era of Tim
How about you take a time out and think about what you just said.Why not add your own thoughts ALL the time?... I often add my own thoughts from time to time.
I wouldn't be able to do the narrative threads. I don't know enough.Why not add your own thoughts ALL the time?... I often add my own thoughts from time to time.
with full attribution to shuke:It's because I hardly ever even do it. For instance, for the rest of the rock and roll thread, I'm going to be using ONE source. Am I supposed to start every post with "From the book, Rock of Ages"?? How absurd! And it's not even accurate, because as I already pointed out, I often add my own thoughts from time to time. I'm amazed that anyone thinks this is a big deal anyhow. The purpose of those narrative threads is not to show how smart I am, it's to discuss topics which interest me and which I hope interest others. Most of the people ripping me here are the same ones who seem to always want to criticize me for starting those threads. Now they're criticizing me for the material I choose to put in those threads. If they find the threads as dull as they claim, why are they bothering to read them?By not listing your sources at the end of each post, the bolded is pretty well what you are doing. By not sourcing each post you're leaving the perception to all the people who didn't read the first post that all of your writing is completely your own work.To be frank, I really don't see why you have such a problem with sourcing each of your posts; doing so doesn't even threaten any of your goals of creating a fun and informative platform for discussion.'timschochet said:In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.'Mr. Pickles said:timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
Was it the word "add" you didn't like? I've been drinking so I don't get it.How about you take a time out and think about what you just said.Why not add your own thoughts ALL the time?... I often add my own thoughts from time to time.
If I'm Mr. Ham, then I'm also schizophrenic.with full attribution to shuke:It's because I hardly ever even do it. For instance, for the rest of the rock and roll thread, I'm going to be using ONE source. Am I supposed to start every post with "From the book, Rock of Ages"?? How absurd! And it's not even accurate, because as I already pointed out, I often add my own thoughts from time to time. I'm amazed that anyone thinks this is a big deal anyhow. The purpose of those narrative threads is not to show how smart I am, it's to discuss topics which interest me and which I hope interest others. Most of the people ripping me here are the same ones who seem to always want to criticize me for starting those threads. Now they're criticizing me for the material I choose to put in those threads. If they find the threads as dull as they claim, why are they bothering to read them?By not listing your sources at the end of each post, the bolded is pretty well what you are doing. By not sourcing each post you're leaving the perception to all the people who didn't read the first post that all of your writing is completely your own work.To be frank, I really don't see why you have such a problem with sourcing each of your posts; doing so doesn't even threaten any of your goals of creating a fun and informative platform for discussion.'timschochet said:In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.'Mr. Pickles said:timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
OH, BULL####!!!
you're the second biggest narcissist on this board (or, if Pickles is to be believed, you're both of them).
I'm betting it's the "all the time" part. Bostonfred figures I post too much already.Was it the word "add" you didn't like? I've been drinking so I don't get it.How about you take a time out and think about what you just said.Why not add your own thoughts ALL the time?... I often add my own thoughts from time to time.
this wouldn't be a surprise to anyone.If I'm Mr. Ham, then I'm also schizophrenic.with full attribution to shuke:It's because I hardly ever even do it. For instance, for the rest of the rock and roll thread, I'm going to be using ONE source. Am I supposed to start every post with "From the book, Rock of Ages"?? How absurd! And it's not even accurate, because as I already pointed out, I often add my own thoughts from time to time. I'm amazed that anyone thinks this is a big deal anyhow. The purpose of those narrative threads is not to show how smart I am, it's to discuss topics which interest me and which I hope interest others. Most of the people ripping me here are the same ones who seem to always want to criticize me for starting those threads. Now they're criticizing me for the material I choose to put in those threads. If they find the threads as dull as they claim, why are they bothering to read them?By not listing your sources at the end of each post, the bolded is pretty well what you are doing. By not sourcing each post you're leaving the perception to all the people who didn't read the first post that all of your writing is completely your own work.To be frank, I really don't see why you have such a problem with sourcing each of your posts; doing so doesn't even threaten any of your goals of creating a fun and informative platform for discussion.'timschochet said:In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.'Mr. Pickles said:timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll
OH, BULL####!!!
you're the second biggest narcissist on this board (or, if Pickles is to be believed, you're both of them).
Yep. I was bitter at the time. But I've come to love the FFA and all of you (with 1 or 2 exceptions) so I could never leave now.
This has never stopped you from giving your long winded opinion.I wouldn't be able to do the narrative threads. I don't know enough.Why not add your own thoughts ALL the time?... I often add my own thoughts from time to time.
To be fair, timschochet is actually Aramaic for cut and paste.
First of all, adding your own thoughts to the posts doesn't give you the right to not have to cite sources you use; I didn't think that would be need to be explained to you. Secondly, the number of sources you use is irrelevant, the issue is that people aren't going to know you are sourcing material unless they read one certain post in a thread that'll have hundreds of posts. As for the bolded, I don't see how that is absurd at all. Although you don't have to go about it as if you're writing scripture. Just ending each post with a footnote: "Source: Rock of Ages" would do the job. If it's not a big deal like you claim, why are you so against doing it? You're writing out hundreds of words with each post, I don't see how adding 5-10 words at the end of each one is such a chore.It's because I hardly ever even do it. For instance, for the rest of the rock and roll thread, I'm going to be using ONE source. Am I supposed to start every post with "From the book, Rock of Ages"?? How absurd! And it's not even accurate, because as I already pointed out, I often add my own thoughts from time to time. I'm amazed that anyone thinks this is a big deal anyhow. The purpose of those narrative threads is not to show how smart I am, it's to discuss topics which interest me and which I hope interest others. Most of the people ripping me here are the same ones who seem to always want to criticize me for starting those threads. Now they're criticizing me for the material I choose to put in those threads. If they find the threads as dull as they claim, why are they bothering to read them?By not listing your sources at the end of each post, the bolded is pretty well what you are doing. By not sourcing each post you're leaving the perception to all the people who didn't read the first post that all of your writing is completely your own work.To be frank, I really don't see why you have such a problem with sourcing each of your posts; doing so doesn't even threaten any of your goals of creating a fun and informative platform for discussion.'timschochet said:In both the World War II and and Civil War threads, the sources I used can be found in the opening post. With very few exceptions, I transcribed directly out of books which I noted, and sometimes added my own commentary. I wrote of my intention to do it up front, and very rarely have I ever used internet sources. The only reason that I used internet sources on the rock and roll thread is because my source book hadn't arrived yet. Now that it has, I don't expect to use the internet again. If I do I will note it.But the narrative threads are meant to be fun, informative and platforms for discussion, nothing more. I have never tried to represent this stuff as my own, and I never will.'Mr. Pickles said:timschochet (aka Mr. Ham) retypes a majority of his material in his Civil War thread without proper attribution. When challenged, he says he mentioned this up front, but people have a difficult time finding any of his original thoughts in his posts. Similar transgressions appear in his threads about WWII and the History of Rock and Roll