I've been in the same league for 20 years and it features some pretty antiquated rules, but one that I've always liked is that we start 2 QB's. I've joined other leagues over the years that feature the much more typical 1 qb/2 rb/3 wr set-up and they leave a lot to be desired for me. It just doesn't make sense that QB is the most important position on the field, yet they're significantly less valuable than RB's and WR's in fantasy football. Not only does starting 2 qb's add a lot more strategy to drafts and make them far less predictable, but it insures that almost every NFL starting QB has some value, as it should be.
Is the 1 QB rule something people believe in because there's only 1 QB in a real NFL game? I just don't buy that line of reasoning. We're playing fantasy football, after all. I think we're all capable of making the necessary leaps.
Would love to hear the arguments here. It's just never made sense to me and after trying both, I find a 2 QB much more challenging and interesting.
I started a thread on this a long time ago but it never got off the ground. Hoping to hear more responses given that it's the off-season.
Is the 1 QB rule something people believe in because there's only 1 QB in a real NFL game? I just don't buy that line of reasoning. We're playing fantasy football, after all. I think we're all capable of making the necessary leaps.
Would love to hear the arguments here. It's just never made sense to me and after trying both, I find a 2 QB much more challenging and interesting.
I started a thread on this a long time ago but it never got off the ground. Hoping to hear more responses given that it's the off-season.