Well I tried this and it was a no-go.I just traded away CJ for Forte in one of my 12 team PPR dynasty leagues. I can afford to have Forte sit until he gets healthy which is why I made the offer. Feel kind of relieved since I own CJ and several leagues and wanted to diversify.
I was fortunate to have Spiller as my Rb2 and Bush in my flex to win. This guy is now a flex option at best for me. I will start him at home vs the Lions where Gore just got his first Td but he is not an every week starter, he's not playing like it and we have to adjust.I realize it's a different sport but this guys just like jimmy Rollins. Gets paid and then doesn't play hard and blames everyone around him. Sell if you can. Don't ride him out and hope he turns it around because he'll have a good game here and there but disappoint you in the end.
Well even if he disappoints, he still has value. He probably won't be top 5 RB so he'll be a bust in those terms but he can still have a decent year. As someone previously mentioned, the guy is just about impossible to trade b/c the difference in value between owners and potential trade partners is too big. Even if he isn't top 5, do you honestly think he isn't top 24 back and perhaps top 12-15? But is anyone going to trade Gore, S Jax, or even BJGE for him? I'd probably still have him ahead of M. Bush assuming Forte doesn't miss more than a week or two. Just wait til he plays the Jags and Colts 4 times. SD gave up 32 yards to DMC and 45 yards in total to the Raiders. And NE wasn't terrible giving up 3.2 ypc to Cards and only 2.375 ypc to Beanie/Ryan Williams. I know they aren't exactly great RBs either but I'd be more worried if they lit up the Pats.I realize it's a different sport but this guys just like jimmy Rollins. Gets paid and then doesn't play hard and blames everyone around him. Sell if you can. Don't ride him out and hope he turns it around because he'll have a good game here and there but disappoint you in the end.
You might be able to trade him for that junk if the guy is that upset after 2 years of CJ. Perhaps I'm more patient than most but last year he was 16th highest back on ESPN with a not much better start. I'd have to get top 24 back in return. Yahoo just had one of their guys trade him for BJGE which is about where I'm at. Guy said he took lower ceiling for higher floor. Richardson and Bush are probably off the table with their breakout games but I'd say someone like Ridley. But see this is the problem, his value is much closer to Ridley than Ryan Williams but nobody will offer Ridley b/c most people don't actually sell high or buy low. Sure, after one week its easy to see a return to the mean but after two weeks, then you are actually buying low. Ridley will probably be around top 20-24 the rest of the year but doesn't nearly provide the potential upside of CJ but most look at the past 2 weeks and want security.http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fantasy-roto-arcade/monday-brunch-selling-low-chris-johnson-192945908--fantasy.htmlSo what becomes a good trade offer for him with such bad value? I'm in a 12 team standard scoring league and the guy who owns CJ got burned by him last year as well. I'm almost prepared to offer crap for crap at this point and see if he will bite on Ryan Williams from Arizona and maybe throw in a low grade WR.
I guess that is the biggest issue, you know what he cost you to draft him and what he should be worth but no one is willing to offer that amount in the hopes that he bounces back. If you can get him low you don't mind sticking him on the bench waiting for him to get his mojo back, but most people are only going to offer so much for what has become just "potential" gains.You might be able to trade him for that junk if the guy is that upset after 2 years of CJ. Perhaps I'm more patient than most but last year he was 16th highest back on ESPN with a not much better start. I'd have to get top 24 back in return. Yahoo just had one of their guys trade him for BJGE which is about where I'm at. Guy said he took lower ceiling for higher floor. Richardson and Bush are probably off the table with their breakout games but I'd say someone like Ridley. But see this is the problem, his value is much closer to Ridley than Ryan Williams but nobody will offer Ridley b/c most people don't actually sell high or buy low. Sure, after one week its easy to see a return to the mean but after two weeks, then you are actually buying low. Ridley will probably be around top 20-24 the rest of the year but doesn't nearly provide the potential upside of CJ but most look at the past 2 weeks and want security.http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fantasy-roto-arcade/monday-brunch-selling-low-chris-johnson-192945908--fantasy.htmlSo what becomes a good trade offer for him with such bad value? I'm in a 12 team standard scoring league and the guy who owns CJ got burned by him last year as well. I'm almost prepared to offer crap for crap at this point and see if he will bite on Ryan Williams from Arizona and maybe throw in a low grade WR.
It is a bit what you paid for him but it also is his actual worth. Still finishes in the top 24. I'd think about dumping him off for someone like Ridley, probably do it for someone like Martin but no Martin owner probably offers that. If you dump CJ for someone like Ryan Williams, you might as well just quit on your season. If you have someone else you can play like Ridley then by all means bench CJ, but shipping him off for anything less than something like BJGE would be stupid. If you have nothing better than CJ, you might as well keep him and play him over Ryan Williams and if you can bench him, who is more of a sleeper, Ryan Williams or CJ?I guess that is the biggest issue, you know what he cost you to draft him and what he should be worth but no one is willing to offer that amount in the hopes that he bounces back. If you can get him low you don't mind sticking him on the bench waiting for him to get his mojo back, but most people are only going to offer so much for what has become just "potential" gains.You might be able to trade him for that junk if the guy is that upset after 2 years of CJ. Perhaps I'm more patient than most but last year he was 16th highest back on ESPN with a not much better start. I'd have to get top 24 back in return. Yahoo just had one of their guys trade him for BJGE which is about where I'm at. Guy said he took lower ceiling for higher floor. Richardson and Bush are probably off the table with their breakout games but I'd say someone like Ridley. But see this is the problem, his value is much closer to Ridley than Ryan Williams but nobody will offer Ridley b/c most people don't actually sell high or buy low. Sure, after one week its easy to see a return to the mean but after two weeks, then you are actually buying low. Ridley will probably be around top 20-24 the rest of the year but doesn't nearly provide the potential upside of CJ but most look at the past 2 weeks and want security.http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/fantasy-roto-arcade/monday-brunch-selling-low-chris-johnson-192945908--fantasy.htmlSo what becomes a good trade offer for him with such bad value? I'm in a 12 team standard scoring league and the guy who owns CJ got burned by him last year as well. I'm almost prepared to offer crap for crap at this point and see if he will bite on Ryan Williams from Arizona and maybe throw in a low grade WR.
That is tough, both are buy lows. I like Colston going forward. Only so many options in NO, they look to be behind a lot, and he has had some bad luck. I would definitely think about it. This probably comes into a case by case basis. If you need wins now to make the playoffs and you have someone on your bench who you can start I'd take it. If you have a deeper playoff system, WRs and no RBs, I'd hold onto him. CJ probably has higher ceiling at a scarcer position but it'd be tough to continue to start him if you have other options.So would you trade him for Colston straight up?
i'd trade him for a beerSo would you trade him for Colston straight up?
Again, he was the 16th ranked back last year. 8 games under 10 points. Games of 2, 3 and 5 points. 2 games of 4 and 6 points. Yet still finished with 157 points. You can name 24 running backs at this point who you'd rather start over him. Yes, against bad match ups if you have an RB going against the Jags I'd bench him but he still has value. People are just judging him based on where he was drafted. If you put him in a category with Greene, Stewart, McGahee, etc. you still don't want him?The upside being spoken of is no longer there. It vanished 2 years ago. The range you're dealing with is bad to mediocre. Basically a match up play
I disagree. Why hold something that still carries some value only because of where he was picked versus sending him for something even barely more consistent.the lure to start him is going to be there every game you own him. Be it because of his 1st rd. draft position, his potential or memories of two years ago.With someone more consistent, you can plug them with confidence that you will get the 5-15 points per week while the other person plays him. Will they get the 20+ points the week or two that he goes off? Yea. Will you have more wins as they started him weekly and got 0-3 pts. Yea.lol de ja vu... is this the same CJ thread from last year? hahaha .... you people need to take a few deep breaths. Its week 2. Look where he finished last year after missing camp and holding out ... this year he's been in a camp and reportedly in tip top shape. STAY PATIENT. If you have other options I'd say use them until he shows life but I wouldn't cut him or trade him because you won't get full value. Theres only a couple things I dont like about CJ and thats his oline and his schedule. He schedule appears to be brutal... other than that.. KEEP CJ2K
Definitely. Colston always seems to start slow and then finishes strong, especially during FF playoff time.So would you trade him for Colston straight up?
Yeah, a couple of the Chris Johnson owners in my leagues said that they are not trading him until his value is back up. I guess that makes some sense with all things considered, but if I owned him I would seriously consider something like BJGE and a wr3 for sure.Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
Yeah, the difference in value between owners and potential trade partners is ridiculous. I own him and I'll probably hold onto him but I would think about BJGE or Ridley. Probably try to get another upside RB or WR out of you. That said, another CJ owner just offered me him for Ryan Matthews. Like sure, I held Matthews on my bench for two weeks to just sell him when I get to see him at work. He'll probably be top 24 when all is said and done and provides more week to week potential than most other backs in that area but not the consistency. Many owners are in love with CJ's breakout ability rather than BJGE's consistently mediocre performances.Yeah, a couple of the Chris Johnson owners in my leagues said that they are not trading him until his value is back up. I guess that makes some sense with all things considered, but if I owned him I would seriously consider something like BJGE and a wr3 for sure.Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
Yeah, the difference in value between owners and potential trade partners is ridiculous. I own him and I'll probably hold onto him but I would think about BJGE or Ridley. Probably try to get another upside RB or WR out of you. That said, another CJ owner just offered me him for Ryan Matthews. Like sure, I held Matthews on my bench for two weeks to just sell him when I get to see him at work. He'll probably be top 24 when all is said and done and provides more week to week potential than most other backs in that area but not the consistency. Many owners are in love with CJ's breakout ability rather than BJGE's consistently mediocre performances.Yeah, a couple of the Chris Johnson owners in my leagues said that they are not trading him until his value is back up. I guess that makes some sense with all things considered, but if I owned him I would seriously consider something like BJGE and a wr3 for sure.Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.
Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.
Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
I'm not saying another top 24 guy. I'd say something like BJGE and Sydney Rice or Titus Young type player. Nothing too special but a little more. I'd gladly ship him off for Doug Martin at this point but prob have to kick something in for him.'12punch said:'sporthenry said:Yeah, the difference in value between owners and potential trade partners is ridiculous. I own him and I'll probably hold onto him but I would think about BJGE or Ridley. Probably try to get another upside RB or WR out of you. That said, another CJ owner just offered me him for Ryan Matthews. Like sure, I held Matthews on my bench for two weeks to just sell him when I get to see him at work. He'll probably be top 24 when all is said and done and provides more week to week potential than most other backs in that area but not the consistency. Many owners are in love with CJ's breakout ability rather than BJGE's consistently mediocre performances.'Nucker101 said:Yeah, a couple of the Chris Johnson owners in my leagues said that they are not trading him until his value is back up. I guess that makes some sense with all things considered, but if I owned him I would seriously consider something like BJGE and a wr3 for sure.'Mario Kart said:Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.
Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.
Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
The fact that neither of those trades were excepted is mind boggling. I'm honestly not sure I would have even made those offers.'Mario Kart said:Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
All I know is that Reynaud sports the famous WR/RB tag, that alone had my staring at his name for several minutes.'Nucker101 said:Anyone know much about Harper or Reynaud, they might get some touches if Chris Johnson continues to struggle. There's probably not much upside though with an o-line that looks atrocious and no threat of a passing game yet. Reynaud seems sort of intriguing to me, looked like their best back during the pre-season and has very good speed and some decent moves as a kick returner as well. Might be worth an add in deep leagues.
As a CJ owner, I'd trade you for Doug Martin. If you are that secure at RB than it makes sense. Most CJ owners being 0-2 aren't worried about the playoffs and stretch run. Additionally, CJ faces a pretty nice schedule in the playoffs so if you can stash him on your bench for most of the next 5-10 weeks, you could easily get some nice value.I'm not sure if this is the right place for me, since most of the people in here hate CJ, but I'm considering trading Doug Martin for him. Johnson's done nothing, Martin is what he is, and will probably wear down this season at some point with a full NFL load, and frankly, my team is somewhat stacked and the RB2 slot sounds better with a home run swing like CJ than a safe and steady Doug Martin.Bought CJ last year about week 10, and it helped for a couple games down the stretch (and sucked for some too.)
'sporthenry said:Yeah, the difference in value between owners and potential trade partners is ridiculous. I own him and I'll probably hold onto him but I would think about BJGE or Ridley. Probably try to get another upside RB or WR out of you. That said, another CJ owner just offered me him for Ryan Matthews. Like sure, I held Matthews on my bench for two weeks to just sell him when I get to see him at work. He'll probably be top 24 when all is said and done and provides more week to week potential than most other backs in that area but not the consistency. Many owners are in love with CJ's breakout ability rather than BJGE's consistently mediocre performances.
this thread is making me lol for real.I am really starting to regret taking CJ at 10th overall in a 12 team, 6pt ALL TD, PPR league. I wasn't expecting another 2000 yard season out of him but thought he could get me around 1300 yards rushing and another 40 rec / 400 yards. Does not look like that is going to happen.
I haven't had a chance to watch either Titans' game so I can only go on what I've read. Has their offensive line and offense in general been that terrible???
I'm going try and salvage some value out of him instead of watching him circle the drain completely. I just offered him straight up for Ryan Matthews. I highly doubt the Matthews owner goes for it but its worth a shot IMO. Maybe the CJ2K hype is still in his mind...
Good job next week that will be a stretch!!Traded him straight up for Steven Jackson, without hesitation.
I made my offers and cannot add more. No idea what they might want butThe fact that neither of those trades were excepted is mind boggling. I'm honestly not sure I would have even made those offers.'Mario Kart said:Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
Check out this article. It's relevant to your interests.I made my offers and cannot add more. No idea what they might want butThe fact that neither of those trades were excepted is mind boggling. I'm honestly not sure I would have even made those offers.'Mario Kart said:Johnson, for all he is worth, is not a buy low. Nobody is selling even at mid range prices.
Offered Green-Ellis in two of my leagues and was rejected each time. No counter offer, no communication from either owner about moving Johnson.
Offered Ridley in two other leagues along with a 3rd round rookie pick. No go on either of those.
Not sure CJ feels so lucky to face Detroit. Sure, there D isn't what it was last year, but TEN might be the worst team in the league. DET is going to be up early and often in this matchup and will dare Locker to beat them in the air. So CJ will get the same amount of touches this week as he did vs SD last week. Not looking promising, CJ owners.Lucky, CJ gets the Det defense this week. If he can't produce this week, it's time to cut bait on this guy IMO.
The Detroit D isn't that bad, and this looks to be another game where Tenn falls behind and has to play catch up. The team is really, really bad right now.Lucky, CJ gets the Det defense this week. If he can't produce this week, it's time to cut bait on this guy IMO.
I never understood this combative approach especially for running backs. He along with many other RB's are grossly underpaid on their rookie contracts and they are the ones who I can't fault for holding out since they have short shelf lives. I'd look at it more that you are paying him now for some past production as is the case with many RBs. And they can release him after this year if they want so it isn't like the Titans have their hands tied behind their backs.benching him would be the best thing for this team, but it's pretty hard to justify that kind of money on the bench.I wonder if he'll take a pay cut for underproducing his contract.