What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Meltdown in Japan's Reactors (2 Viewers)

Nothing to see here, ball washing water...

http://nodisinfo.com/Home/holy-fukushima-radiation-from-japan-is-already-killing-north-americans/

Radiation From Japan Is Already Killing North Americans

UPDATED: though this article is not written by nodisinfo.com it has been hotly contested by posters. Yet, the premise is held, here, as correct, which is that the radionuclides disseminated as a result of the Fukushima disaster are deadly and that toxicity from these substances is leading to an increase in disease and mortality.

This can be substantiated even with the modest amount of science available after the disaster. Furthermore, the Chernobyl catastrophe proves that radionuclides emitted as a result of the detonation of a nuclear power plant do cause an increase in morbidity and mortality: to deny this is ludicrous, as this is fully substantiated from previous cases, including Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, now Fukushima.

Mangano has shown an increase in disease (thyroid disorders) and infantile mortality in the first six months after the contamination of the American air, soil, and water systems from the Fukushima detonation.
This is complete and utter bull####. Increases in radiation levels in North America shortly after the event were barely detectable with our most sensitive instruments, and any increases in radiation dose to Americans would have been about a million times lower than our normal background radiation exposure.

 
Nothing to see here, ball washing water...

http://nodisinfo.com/Home/holy-fukushima-radiation-from-japan-is-already-killing-north-americans/

Radiation From Japan Is Already Killing North Americans

UPDATED: though this article is not written by nodisinfo.com it has been hotly contested by posters. Yet, the premise is held, here, as correct, which is that the radionuclides disseminated as a result of the Fukushima disaster are deadly and that toxicity from these substances is leading to an increase in disease and mortality.

This can be substantiated even with the modest amount of science available after the disaster. Furthermore, the Chernobyl catastrophe proves that radionuclides emitted as a result of the detonation of a nuclear power plant do cause an increase in morbidity and mortality: to deny this is ludicrous, as this is fully substantiated from previous cases, including Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, now Fukushima.

Mangano has shown an increase in disease (thyroid disorders) and infantile mortality in the first six months after the contamination of the American air, soil, and water systems from the Fukushima detonation.
This is complete and utter bull####. Increases in radiation levels in North America shortly after the event were barely detectable with our most sensitive instruments, and any increases in radiation dose to Americans would have been about a million times lower than our normal background radiation exposure.
:goodposting:

sig.jpg


 
Nothing to see here, ball washing water...

http://nodisinfo.com/Home/holy-fukushima-radiation-from-japan-is-already-killing-north-americans/

Radiation From Japan Is Already Killing North Americans

UPDATED: though this article is not written by nodisinfo.com it has been hotly contested by posters. Yet, the premise is held, here, as correct, which is that the radionuclides disseminated as a result of the Fukushima disaster are deadly and that toxicity from these substances is leading to an increase in disease and mortality.

This can be substantiated even with the modest amount of science available after the disaster. Furthermore, the Chernobyl catastrophe proves that radionuclides emitted as a result of the detonation of a nuclear power plant do cause an increase in morbidity and mortality: to deny this is ludicrous, as this is fully substantiated from previous cases, including Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, now Fukushima.

Mangano has shown an increase in disease (thyroid disorders) and infantile mortality in the first six months after the contamination of the American air, soil, and water systems from the Fukushima detonation.
This is complete and utter bull####. Increases in radiation levels in North America shortly after the event were barely detectable with our most sensitive instruments, and any increases in radiation dose to Americans would have been about a million times lower than our normal background radiation exposure.
:goodposting:
sig.jpg
 
Problems at the plant seemed to take a sharp turn for the worse in July with the discovery of leaks of contaminated water into the Pacific Ocean. Two weeks ago, Tepco announced that 300 tons of water laced with radioactive strontium, a particle that can be absorbed into human bones, had drained from a faulty tank into the sea.

Contaminated water, used to cool fuel in the plant’s three damaged reactors to prevent them from overheating, will continue to be produced in huge quantities until the flow of groundwater into the buildings can be stopped — a prospect that is months or even years away.
 
link

TEPCO risks all at Fukushima
By Victor Kotsev

On Monday, by far the most dangerous nuclear operation attempted in human history was set to begin in the crippled Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan, the removal of more than 1,300 spent fuel rods and some 200 unused rods from a reservoir on top of Unit 4.

While the undertaking is necessary, the worst-case scenario would pale in comparison the triple meltdowns of 2011 and necessitate the evacuation of the capital Tokyo.

Experts are unanimous that the engineering challenges are on a scale unseen to date, given that the fuel pool was damaged in a fire caused by a cooling failure and a subsequent explosion during the meltdowns. If the fuel rods, some of which may be damaged, come too close to each other, there is a chance that the nuclear chain reaction would resume, which would be catastrophic in the presence of so much fissile material, as well as extremely difficult to stop.

If, on the other hand, a fuel rod breaks or is exposed to air and ignites, this would release into the atmosphere a massive amount of radiation, likely necessitating the evacuation of the plant. The total amount of radiation present in the pool is estimated at 14,000 times that released by the atomic bomb dropped at Hiroshima, or about the same as in the combined cores of the three reactors that melted down.

"[F]ull release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date," states The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013, compiled by two independent nuclear energy consultants. [1]

In several recent interviews with different media, Arnie Gundersen, a former nuclear industry executive and chief engineer of the Fairewinds Energy Education non-profit, cautioned that there was no system to stop a nuclear chain reaction, if one should occur, at the pool, and recommended that the operators "throw all sorts of boron into the water" (boron captures neutrons and slows down chain reactions) before they start pulling the rods out.

"I ran a division that built fuel racks, and these high density fuel racks like they have at Fuksuhima are very close to going critical anyway. ... Normally its 0.95, and it can get as high as 0.99; that means there’s a 1% margin before a self-sustaining chain reaction can occur." [2]

Gundersen said in a separate interview with Radio Ecoshock, expressing his opinion that the Japanese government rather than Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the plant’s operator, should take charge of the operation: "I suspect come November-December-January we are going to hear that the building has been evacuated, they broke a fuel rod, the fuel rod is off-gassing, we have to wait a couple of days and then go back in." [3]

But even the most vocal critics of TEPCO’s and Japan’s response to the crisis so far acknowledge that the fuel has to be removed because the danger of doing nothing far outweighs the dangers of doing something wrong.

"If there is another earthquake and building four collapses ... I am going to evacuate my family from Boston," Dr Helen Caldicott, an influential Australian anti-nuclear advocate, said during a recent conference.

While the other exploded buildings hold less nuclear material than Unit 4, moreover, the challenge of removing molten and spent fuel from them is far greater. At least some of the reactor cores are believed to have melted through the containment vessels, and possibly into the ground, contaminating groundwater with unprecedented levels of hot particles.

Some of the buildings are off limits to workers due to the deadly levels of radiation inside, and TEPCO does not even plan to start working there until a few years to a decade from now. Engineers say the present undertaking will be a learning experience and a practice test for that work.

The effort to secure and decontaminate the site has run into numerous snags recently, with critics claiming mismanagement (a story about how the Japanese mafia runs many of the low-paid workers at the plant recently made headlines [4]) and attempts to cover-up the real severity of the situation. Over the summer, it emerged that the Pacific Ocean was being continuously contaminated with highly radioactive groundwater and that some of the hundreds of make-shift water tanks on site were leaking.

Workers are pumping out some 400 tons of water a day from the reactor basements and the ground nearby, to a total of almost 500,000 tons at present stored at the plant, while another 300 tons a day are running into the ocean. The three molten cores require constant cooling with water, most of which escapes the breached reactor vessels. To make matters worse, Fukushima Daiichi is near an ancient river bed at the base of a hill at the ocean shore, and it is constantly being flooded with groundwater.

To stem the water flow, TEPCO has announced that it will attempt to freeze the ground near the plant for up to 100 years in a project worth hundreds of millions of dollars, but critics say that this will take years to implement and may not be as reliable as expected. Efforts to filter the radioactive water in the tanks have also stalled. [5]

There has been a lot of speculation and few hard facts recently about ocean contamination, with one of the more esoteric dangers identified by scientists being that "buckyballs" of uranium fuel could drift all the way to North America in the next year or so. [6] But though simulations suggest that radiation from Fukushima would spread across the entire Pacific in the next few years, scientists also say that it will be so diluted that no panic is warranted.

Still, there is little ground for optimism either. Even in the best-case scenario, a major nuclear catastrophe would be averted, but Fukushima Daiichi would continue to create problems and to pose deadly threats for decades.

 
link

TEPCO risks all at Fukushima

By Victor Kotsev

On Monday, by far the most dangerous nuclear operation attempted in human history was set to begin in the crippled Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan, the removal of more than 1,300 spent fuel rods and some 200 unused rods from a reservoir on top of Unit 4.

While the undertaking is necessary, the worst-case scenario would pale in comparison the triple meltdowns of 2011 and necessitate the evacuation of the capital Tokyo.

Experts are unanimous that the engineering challenges are on a scale unseen to date, given that the fuel pool was damaged in a fire caused by a cooling failure and a subsequent explosion during the meltdowns. If the fuel rods, some of which may be damaged, come too close to each other, there is a chance that the nuclear chain reaction would resume, which would be catastrophic in the presence of so much fissile material, as well as extremely difficult to stop.

If, on the other hand, a fuel rod breaks or is exposed to air and ignites, this would release into the atmosphere a massive amount of radiation, likely necessitating the evacuation of the plant. The total amount of radiation present in the pool is estimated at 14,000 times that released by the atomic bomb dropped at Hiroshima, or about the same as in the combined cores of the three reactors that melted down.

"[F]ull release from the Unit-4 spent fuel pool, without any containment or control, could cause by far the most serious radiological disaster to date," states The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2013, compiled by two independent nuclear energy consultants. [1]

In several recent interviews with different media, Arnie Gundersen, a former nuclear industry executive and chief engineer of the Fairewinds Energy Education non-profit, cautioned that there was no system to stop a nuclear chain reaction, if one should occur, at the pool, and recommended that the operators "throw all sorts of boron into the water" (boron captures neutrons and slows down chain reactions) before they start pulling the rods out.

"I ran a division that built fuel racks, and these high density fuel racks like they have at Fuksuhima are very close to going critical anyway. ... Normally its 0.95, and it can get as high as 0.99; that means there’s a 1% margin before a self-sustaining chain reaction can occur." [2]

Gundersen said in a separate interview with Radio Ecoshock, expressing his opinion that the Japanese government rather than Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the plant’s operator, should take charge of the operation: "I suspect come November-December-January we are going to hear that the building has been evacuated, they broke a fuel rod, the fuel rod is off-gassing, we have to wait a couple of days and then go back in." [3]

But even the most vocal critics of TEPCO’s and Japan’s response to the crisis so far acknowledge that the fuel has to be removed because the danger of doing nothing far outweighs the dangers of doing something wrong.

"If there is another earthquake and building four collapses ... I am going to evacuate my family from Boston," Dr Helen Caldicott, an influential Australian anti-nuclear advocate, said during a recent conference.

While the other exploded buildings hold less nuclear material than Unit 4, moreover, the challenge of removing molten and spent fuel from them is far greater. At least some of the reactor cores are believed to have melted through the containment vessels, and possibly into the ground, contaminating groundwater with unprecedented levels of hot particles.

Some of the buildings are off limits to workers due to the deadly levels of radiation inside, and TEPCO does not even plan to start working there until a few years to a decade from now. Engineers say the present undertaking will be a learning experience and a practice test for that work.

The effort to secure and decontaminate the site has run into numerous snags recently, with critics claiming mismanagement (a story about how the Japanese mafia runs many of the low-paid workers at the plant recently made headlines [4]) and attempts to cover-up the real severity of the situation. Over the summer, it emerged that the Pacific Ocean was being continuously contaminated with highly radioactive groundwater and that some of the hundreds of make-shift water tanks on site were leaking.

Workers are pumping out some 400 tons of water a day from the reactor basements and the ground nearby, to a total of almost 500,000 tons at present stored at the plant, while another 300 tons a day are running into the ocean. The three molten cores require constant cooling with water, most of which escapes the breached reactor vessels. To make matters worse, Fukushima Daiichi is near an ancient river bed at the base of a hill at the ocean shore, and it is constantly being flooded with groundwater.

To stem the water flow, TEPCO has announced that it will attempt to freeze the ground near the plant for up to 100 years in a project worth hundreds of millions of dollars, but critics say that this will take years to implement and may not be as reliable as expected. Efforts to filter the radioactive water in the tanks have also stalled. [5]

There has been a lot of speculation and few hard facts recently about ocean contamination, with one of the more esoteric dangers identified by scientists being that "buckyballs" of uranium fuel could drift all the way to North America in the next year or so. [6] But though simulations suggest that radiation from Fukushima would spread across the entire Pacific in the next few years, scientists also say that it will be so diluted that no panic is warranted.

Still, there is little ground for optimism either. Even in the best-case scenario, a major nuclear catastrophe would be averted, but Fukushima Daiichi would continue to create problems and to pose deadly threats for decades.
Did anyone else read this as Radio Shack? :oldunsure:

 
"If there is another earthquake and building four collapses ... I am going to evacuate my family from Boston," Dr Helen Caldicott, an influential Australian anti-nuclear advocate, said during a recent conference.

What does this mean? Unless you move them to Western Europe isn't Boston far enough away? Or is this just a joke about the magnitude of what would happen?

 
Tepco Successfully Removes First Nuclear Fuel Rods at Fukushima

By Jacob Adelman & Masumi Suga - Nov 18, 2013 1:28 AM PT

Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501) successfully removed the first nuclear fuel rods today from a cooling pool at the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant, an early milestone in decommissioning the facility amid doubts about whether the rods had been damaged and posed a radiation risk.

The first of the fuel-rod assemblies at the plant’s No. 4 reactor building was transferred from an underwater rack on the fifth floor to a portable cask just before 4 p.m., the utility known as Tepco said in an e-mailed statement.

Enlarge image Tepco's Fukushima Plant

A member of the media wearing a protective suit and a mask walks in front of a fuel handling machine on the spent fuel pool inside the building housing the No. 4 reactor at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s (Tepco) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan on Nov. 7, 2013. Photographer: Tomohiro Ohsumi/Bloomberg

Tepco planned to remove 22 assemblies from the pool, which contains 1,331 spent fuel assemblies and 202 unused assemblies, by the end of tomorrow, the company said. Crews are beginning with the unused assemblies because they are less fragile, spokesman Yusuke Kunikage said by phone.

The operation is the most significant test to date of Tepco’s ability to contain the threat stemming from the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Were the rods to break or overheat, it could prompt a self-sustained nuclear chain reaction similar to the meltdowns at three Fukushima reactors following the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

“Although moving spent fuel into long-term storage is a routine task that Tepco has taken more than 1,200 times over the years, the circumstances at Fukushima Dai-Ichi require special care,” Tepco president Naomi Hirose said in a video message on the company’s website. “The success of the extraction process therefore represents the beginning of a new and important chapter in our work.”

Workers’ Experience

Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority assigned an inspector to oversee the removals, in addition to its existing staff at the plant, and is using video monitoring of the removal, the agency said in a statement Friday.

An uncontrolled nuclear reaction due to structural failures or mishandled fuel is highly unlikely because of safeguards and workers’ experience with the procedure, Akira Ono, the Dai-Ichi plant’s chief supervisor, said at a Nov. 7 news conference at the power station.

Removing the rods, bunched in assemblies, will take place from a large shoebox-shaped structure cantilevered atop the reactor building, which was damaged in an explosion after the earthquake and tsunami. The assemblies, each holding about 80 rods, will be moved to a more secure pool on the ground.

Tepco said that it plans to complete the removal of all the fuel in the pool by the end of 2014.
 
AAABatteries said:
"If there is another earthquake and building four collapses ... I am going to evacuate my family from Boston," Dr Helen Caldicott, an influential Australian anti-nuclear advocate, said during a recent conference.

What does this mean? Unless you move them to Western Europe isn't Boston far enough away? Or is this just a joke about the magnitude of what would happen?
-34.678631,135.854645

 
AAABatteries said:
"If there is another earthquake and building four collapses ... I am going to evacuate my family from Boston," Dr Helen Caldicott, an influential Australian anti-nuclear advocate, said during a recent conference.

What does this mean? Unless you move them to Western Europe isn't Boston far enough away? Or is this just a joke about the magnitude of what would happen?
I don't know but the fact that there isn't worldwide panic about this is troubling. :oldunsure:

 
With Chernobyl we basically just poured a #### ton of concrete over it and let it just smolder. What is preventing that type of approach here?

 
With Chernobyl we basically just poured a #### ton of concrete over it and let it just smolder. What is preventing that type of approach here?
Godzilla won't let anyone near the plant.They have been trying to recruit Mothra to fight Godzilla, but there have been scheduling conflicts.

 
With Chernobyl we basically just poured a #### ton of concrete over it and let it just smolder. What is preventing that type of approach here?
I think the issue is it's leaking from underneath and concrete wouldn't help that.

 
If they're not careful with this whole Fukushima radiation mess over there, all they're going to have left is a bunch of diminutive, militant, kinky porn freaks with a love of nanotechnology and sea monsters.

 
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:

 
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:
Was his name Shirley?

 
This is crazy. I live in Japan and this isn't headline news here.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Parrothead said:
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:
Extinction level event for the world, or for Japan?

 
Parrothead said:
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:
Safety guys are their own breed.

 
T Bell said:
If they're not careful with this whole Fukushima radiation mess over there, all they're going to have left is a bunch of diminutive, militant, kinky porn freaks with a love of nanotechnology and sea monsters.
This hits a little close to home.

 
Parrothead said:
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:
Extinction level event for the world, or for Japan?
the world of course.. according to our instructor

 
Parrothead said:
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:
Safety guys are their own breed.
yep.. the instructor was telling us how he has been in nuclear plants all across the world and this has the potential to be the worst accident ever.. drama queen

 
Parrothead said:
was at an OSHA training class a few weeks back and our instructor went on a rant about this and how he used to work for nuclear plants blah blah blah and that this has the potential to be an extinction level event..

and he was dead serious :scared:
Extinction level event for the world, or for Japan?
the world of course.. according to our instructor
Does this mean I can stop paying my bills?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top