Run It Up said:
The difference is I can produce actual quotes of NFL employees at the highest levels. Can you produce any actual proof the Pats have cheated outside of spygate. Or perhaps you could even quantify the impact of spygate itself.
Its been said in this thread over the last three days that the Pats have such a sorted history of cheating, with all these transgressions that were so much more serious than anyone else. Yet no one will name them.
I was a little surprised to see Bayhawks shift from the #always rhetoric to the Koya dilaudid rhetoric.
It's interesting that its ok for one side of the discussion to theorize that deflategate is a proxy for punishment of undocumented sins, at the same time dis-allowing the possibility that deflategate is a proxy for the "sin" of operating on the razor's edge of the rulebook and embarrassing the dimwitted.
The league could use more brilliant coaches like Joe Gibbs, who said of the beatdown that the Patriots put on his Redskins I have no problem with what they did; if we don't want that to happen, we have to play better and coach better.
A digression regarding the ankle-nipping surrounding the point of emphasis regarding DB contact with receivers. History documents that the point of emphasis was brought about via the competition committee lead by Jeff Fisher and Bill Polian. After the point of emphasis was put in place, 5 head won the only superbowl he ever won and will ever win thanks to the successful manipulation of the rules by Polian. Belichick's response? Randy Moss, 23 TDs and 18-0.
Later on, Belichick innovates again with dual move TEs, and the league follows suit. Again and again, innovation and a near beligerent perspective on limitations of the NFL rulebook deserving exploitation (hello Jim Harbaugh!), and the epic stewardship of the greatest coach in the history of the national football league rolls on.
Personally, I'm on to Cincinnati.