That he does, he does as much in the passing game alone as Allen and Williams and makes a pittance of what they make.Eckler deserves to get paid
That he does, he does as much in the passing game alone as Allen and Williams and makes a pittance of what they make.Eckler deserves to get paid
is there really a huge glut though? Jacobs is off the board, there's some decent guys like Montgomery, Damien Harris, Sanders, etc. And then the draft has one stud, one smallish top tier back and then some other late 2nd or 3rd round guys with potential but who knows if they'll work out.And the absolute glut of FA & rookie RB coming.Mama’s don’t let your babies grow up to be RBs.
Eckler deserves to get paid but won’t because of age and lack of longevity for RBs. Sucks for him.
Chabonet, Tucker, Evans, and several other rookie RB could come in and take the between the tackles role while Kelley could take over the receiving roleis there really a huge glut though? Jacobs is off the board, there's some decent guys like Montgomery, Damien Harris, Sanders, etc. And then the draft has one stud, one smallish top tier back and then some other late 2nd or 3rd round guys with potential but who knows if they'll work out.And the absolute glut of FA & rookie RB coming.Mama’s don’t let your babies grow up to be RBs.
Eckler deserves to get paid but won’t because of age and lack of longevity for RBs. Sucks for him.
Well i guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the value of those guys you mentioned. think they're all decent but not close to replacements for Ekeler.Chabonet, Tucker, Evans, and several other rookie RB could come in and take the between the tackles role while Kelley could take over the receiving roleis there really a huge glut though? Jacobs is off the board, there's some decent guys like Montgomery, Damien Harris, Sanders, etc. And then the draft has one stud, one smallish top tier back and then some other late 2nd or 3rd round guys with potential but who knows if they'll work out.And the absolute glut of FA & rookie RB coming.Mama’s don’t let your babies grow up to be RBs.
Eckler deserves to get paid but won’t because of age and lack of longevity for RBs. Sucks for him.
There’s also Mattison, who would be a fantastic fit in the Chargers offense. Monty is a very good back, and Sanders is the most like Eke of the bunch.
So yes - there is a glut. At least enough of one to negate most of Eke’s leverage. Likely why he’s asking to be traded since he knows the Chargers are unlikely to pay him. I’m betting his trade market is fairly soft as well.
You want to talk about a potential homerun spot for Bijan.
I’m not saying they are replacement level talent. I neither agreed nor disagreed with that statement.Well i guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the value of those guys you mentioned. think they're all decent but not close to replacements for Ekeler.
If Eke is gone it’s an absolute jackpot landing spot - not only do they throw to the RB & use them extensively in the RZ, the entire offense is build around that role.You want to talk about a potential homerun spot for Bijan.
It would be a home run landing spot even if Ekeler is still there. Not ideal for year 1 but still very good, then great after this year
I agree and already had plans if they drafted Bijan or Gibbs to quickly shoot over offers in hopes people in position to draft them don't see the big picture.You want to talk about a potential homerun spot for Bijan.
It would be a home run landing spot even if Ekeler is still there. Not ideal for year 1 but still very good, then great after this year
i guess i wasn't arguing against it taking away his leverage but more that this year is not a huge glut of talent that significantly impacts his value more than any other yearI’m not saying they are replacement level talent. I neither agreed nor disagreed with that statement.Well i guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the value of those guys you mentioned. think they're all decent but not close to replacements for Ekeler.
I’m saying their availability takes away Ekeler’s leverage.
That’s an entirely different statement. You’re welcome to agree to disagree with that one though.
Fair to question - I believe there’s a larger number of talented backs available than years past. We came up with a pretty good combined list.i guess i wasn't arguing against it taking away his leverage but more that this year is not a huge glut of talent that significantly impacts his value more than any other yearI’m not saying they are replacement level talent. I neither agreed nor disagreed with that statement.Well i guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the value of those guys you mentioned. think they're all decent but not close to replacements for Ekeler.
I’m saying their availability takes away Ekeler’s leverage.
That’s an entirely different statement. You’re welcome to agree to disagree with that one though.
Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
Ekeler does other things great......right?Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
Catches passes at .5 ypc less than Kelley.Ekeler does other things great......right?Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
Sure, if you want to be average everywhere, you can pay a lot less at every position.Catches passes at .5 ypc less than Kelley.Ekeler does other things great......right?Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
To be fair Ek has a much higher catch percentage. I’m not arguing Kelley is better, just that the drop off from a $10 million a year rb to $1 million is much less than that drop at other positions
I'm not sure how we could actually really prove this one way or the other, so I'll drop it after your response, but ypc in such a small sample size is irrelevant, and the rushing stats are only a small part of it anyway. Ekeler's a far bigger threat in the passing game.Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
I agree with this. I just don’t see how he has the leverage to pry any more money out of the chargers, and I don’t really see any other team overpaying for him in a trade at his age.I am guessing the most likely outcome is Ekeler plays his deal out on the Chargers, And this is a big nothingburger.
Unless a team actually offers a 2nd or whatever, then he's probably gone.
Sample size is getting up there rushing wise. Agreed Ekeler is a far bigger passing threat. I was surprised how many Carries Kelley had last year. Eke wasn’t treated like a bell cow. Likely the Chargers system more so than Eke’s ability, but here we are.I'm not sure how we could actually really prove this one way or the other, so I'll drop it after your response, but ypc in such a small sample size is irrelevant, and the rushing stats are only a small part of it anyway. Ekeler's a far bigger threat in the passing game.Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
Catches passes at .5 ypc less than Kelley.Ekeler does other things great......right?Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
To be fair Ek has a much higher catch percentage. I’m not arguing Kelley is better, just that the drop off from a $10 million a year rb to $1 million is much less than that drop at other positions
Catches passes at .5 ypc less than Kelley.Ekeler does other things great......right?Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
To be fair Ek has a much higher catch percentage. I’m not arguing Kelley is better, just that the drop off from a $10 million a year rb to $1 million is much less than that drop at other positions
Come on, man. "Not much of a drop off to Kelley" is a really bad take. You are not looking at the right metrics or considering the right context. Is this a schtick response?
Catches passes at .5 ypc less than Kelley.Ekeler does other things great......right?Ypc pretty close on 1/3 of the carries. 1/3 is getting pretty significant.Ummmm....not much of a drop off to Kelley
To be fair Ek has a much higher catch percentage. I’m not arguing Kelley is better, just that the drop off from a $10 million a year rb to $1 million is much less than that drop at other positions
Come on, man. "Not much of a drop off to Kelley" is a really bad take. You are not looking at the right metrics or considering the right context. Is this a schtick response?
Why did the Chargers give Kelley 25% of the carries (and he missed 4 games) when pretty much every game mattered? That split for the Raiders was about 6% to Bolden. Please why a team would settle for such a big drop off one of every four plays?
Now if you do come up with an explanation, please also explain why said team would re-negotiate a contract of that player.
With Bijan on the board why would that be dumb? They might get a need position for him & they’d save a bunch of money.It would be dumb for the Chargers to trade him this year and draft a rookie RB. Better
With Bijan on the board why would that be dumb? They might get a need position for him & they’d save a bunch of money.It would be dumb for the Chargers to trade him this year and draft a rookie RB. Better
I'm with you brother.Call me crazy, and I'm an owner, he's awesome in fantasy but he's not that great of a rb. That system and the tds absolutely make him and he's going to hit the downside of his career pretty fast here...
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Chargers granted Austin Ekeler permission to seek a trade.
Ekeler's trade request comes after he and the Chargers failed to reach an agreement on an extension. The soon-to-be 28-year-old will now look to find a suitor willing to fork over top dollar. Teams in immediate need of slashing running back help include the Bears and Dolphins, as well as the Bills and Chiefs. The Broncos could also be a consideration, as Javonte Williams' knee injury sounds like one that could sideline him longer than expected. Cincinnati could emerge if it cuts Joe Mixon.
SOURCE: Adam Schefter on Twitter
Mar 14, 2023 at 1:20 PM ET
ESPN's Adam Schefter reports the Chargers granted Austin Ekeler permission to seek a trade.
Ekeler's trade request comes after he and the Chargers failed to reach an agreement on an extension. The soon-to-be 28-year-old will now look to find a suitor willing to fork over top dollar. Teams in immediate need of slashing running back help include the Bears and Dolphins, as well as the Bills and Chiefs. The Broncos could also be a consideration, as Javonte Williams' knee injury sounds like one that could sideline him longer than expected. Cincinnati could emerge if it cuts Joe Mixon.
SOURCE: Adam Schefter on Twitter
Mar 14, 2023 at 1:20 PM ET
He won’t like cold weather.As much as I would like him to remain a Charger, I'm thinking he ends up in Chicago. He'd fit well there methinks.
He grew up and played college football in northern ColoradoHe won’t like cold weather.As much as I would like him to remain a Charger, I'm thinking he ends up in Chicago. He'd fit well there methinks.
he did play high school ball in northern CO....in the town I live in (Eaton)....no real weather issues as the high school football season is over by late November....but he played college ball in Gunnison which is indeed one of the coldest places in the state....the town sits in a bowl and the temps are bone chilling...dude is pretty good friends with my kids....long snapper for the Raiders is also from our town...He grew up and played college football in northern ColoradoHe won’t like cold weather.As much as I would like him to remain a Charger, I'm thinking he ends up in Chicago. He'd fit well there methinks.
I think he'll be okay
Can we throw Spiller in the trash?Chabonet, Tucker, Evans, and several other rookie RB could come in and take the between the tackles role while Kelley could take over the receiving roleis there really a huge glut though? Jacobs is off the board, there's some decent guys like Montgomery, Damien Harris, Sanders, etc. And then the draft has one stud, one smallish top tier back and then some other late 2nd or 3rd round guys with potential but who knows if they'll work out.And the absolute glut of FA & rookie RB coming.Mama’s don’t let your babies grow up to be RBs.
Eckler deserves to get paid but won’t because of age and lack of longevity for RBs. Sucks for him.
There’s also Mattison, who would be a fantastic fit in the Chargers offense. Monty is a very good back, and Sanders is the most like Eke of the bunch.
So yes - there is a glut. At least enough of one to negate most of Eke’s leverage. Likely why he’s asking to be traded since he knows the Chargers are unlikely to pay him. I’m betting his trade market is fairly soft as well.
Seems like a safe bet since he was beat out by Kelley pretty soundly.Can we throw Spiller in the trash?
Arian Foster comes to mind as another undrafted RB who was pretty great for a short period but yes, Ekeler has to be on that list.is Ekeler the biggest draft miss by nfl teams ever? I'm sure there are some other undrafted greats, but he's been top 5 at his position for years now
So does Priest HolmesArian Foster comes to mind as another undrafted RB who was pretty great for a short period but yes, Ekeler has to be on that list.is Ekeler the biggest draft miss by nfl teams ever? I'm sure there are some other undrafted greats, but he's been top 5 at his position for years now
is Ekeler the biggest draft miss by nfl teams ever? I'm sure there are some other undrafted greats, but he's been top 5 at his position for years now
Seems like a safe bet since he was beat out by Kelley pretty soundly.Can we throw Spiller in the trash?
Deep bench probably a hold. Ya never know.
is Ekeler the biggest draft miss by nfl teams ever? I'm sure there are some other undrafted greats, but he's been top 5 at his position for years now