Saw a trade proposals on the internet yesterday.
To SF: 2024 #5 pick, 2024 #181 pick
To LAC: Aiyuk, 2024 #31 pick, 2024 #94 pick
Thought it was fair. SF can get a WR to replace Aiyuk at a controlled cost.
I don't see why the Chargers would trade Allen due to high cap hit and then give up valuable draft capital to trade for another WR who will require a high cap hit contract.
If you only look at the money portion, you probably won't see why. If you look at the entire context of the players, it may become more clear. Keenan Allen is going to be 32 years old and has been injured quite a bit the past few years. Aiyuk is entering his prime years and has been healthy. Plus, in the above trade scenario, you're getting 3 players for 2.
I will agree to disagree with you about this trade being a viable scenario. As for Allen, what I have posted about him here is in alignment with:
- What Chargers GM Hortiz has said publicly
- What Chargers beat reporters have reported
- What Allen and his representation have said publicly
The Chargers offered Allen a contract extension. They wanted to keep him, but only at their price. Allen refused. IMO that was more about their approach to cap management than age. It is reasonable to believe that if you ranked all of the NFL teams in order of willingness to pay a premium WR salary, the Chargers (GM Hortiz, HC Harbaugh, OC Roman) would be at or near the bottom of that list.
If the Chargers want a high quality WR badly enough that they would consider trading the #5 pick for one, they will just use that pick on the best WR available instead and enjoy 5 years of cap savings.