What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Report: Norwood took most of 1st team snaps and is up to 210 (1 Viewer)

KellysHeroes

Footballguy
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports Norwood took most of the first-team reps during minicamp and that he has bulked up to 210 pounds.

It was post on my league's chat by a reliable guy... can anyone else comfirm this

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Falcons' runners' roles uncertain

Norwood learns new system; Dunn eager for more catches

By STEVE WYCHE

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Published on: 05/14/07

Flowery Branch — With questions of age and durability now added to his lack of stature, Falcons tailback Warrick Dunn either has a big hill to climb entering his 11th NFL season or additional chips to place on his surgically repaired shoulder.

Seemingly always on borrowed time, the Falcons' starter for most of the past five seasons said he might as well add a new coach that owes him no favors to the mix, too.

"I have to go out and prove what I can do," said the 32-year-old, 180-pound Dunn. "It's a new coaching staff and every year you have to prove yourself. I have to prove my worth."

Dunn has been as valuable as any player to Atlanta's offense in each of the past three seasons, in which he's rushed for more than 1,000 yards and the Falcons led the NFL in rushing.

Now, though, there is a new system based on a power-running scheme. Jerious Norwood is bigger (210 pounds) and more seasoned to the NFL game after a standout rookie season (633 yards, 6.4 yards per carry). He's also a very good receiver, something mandatory in coach Bobby Petrino's system.

So what will Dunn's and Norwood's roles be? Nobody knows right now because Dunn has been limited in offseason workouts, including the two mini-camps after having tissue from his right rotator cuff surgically reattached to the bone.

"It's a little early for that," Petrino said. "It would be great to see [Dunn] back doing everything. We could get a little better idea. It's still a process of getting to know each other and getting to know what they do best and getting them in the best situations to use their talents."

Norwood, thicker through the shoulders and chest, took most of the repetitions at mini-camp and dazzled coaches with his speed and hands.

"The great thing about Jerious is every time he touches it, he can go the distance," Petrino said. "Hopefully I won't have to call so many plays because he can make big plays. A lot of games are won with turnovers and big plays. He's a very good receiver. He can run routes just like receivers, so that's an exciting part of it."

For Norwood, learning Petrino's offense has been a radical change, especially pass protection, but he made strides during mini-camp, Petrino said.

"At first it was tough on me," Norwood said. In college I ran the West Coast offense. Last year, under coach [Jim] Mora, we ran something similar to the West Coast. This year is totally different for me. It was tough, but I'm catching on."

However Dunn and Norwood are used — in terms of starter, finisher, short-yardage specialist — Petrino said he has faith that each can do what's asked. One thing that's certain, each will be catching the ball, something Dunn has longed for.

He averaged nearly 52 catches a season in five years with Tampa Bay and had 50 catches in his first season with the Falcons in 2002. He never caught more than 29 passes in each of the past three seasons with a career-low 22 last season. Norwood caught 12 passes last season.

"I should catch more balls than 29," Dunn said, smiling. "If I can get back up to 40 or 50, I'm good."

As for that big tailback Petrino desired but didn't get in free agency and the draft, Dunn and Norwood have changed his thinking. So has massive fullback Ovie Mughelli, who not only can run for the tough yards, but can clear a path.

"When you talk about power running you're talking about running down hill, lead plays," Petrino said.

"The running backs we have can do that."

LINK

 
So what will Dunn's and Norwood's roles be? Nobody knows right now because Dunn has been limited in offseason workouts, including the two mini-camps after having tissue from his right rotator cuff surgically reattached to the bone.
Although it sounds like Norwood has looked good in camp, this is probably the reason he has taken the majority of 1st team snaps. I doubt we'll know much about either player's role until training camp.
 
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
With a deeper running back class next year I think regardless of how it turns out this year Atlanta will still be a RBBC with them grabing a bruiser in 08.

 
Duckett was pre-Petrino.

The real question is why Petrino didn't grab Mike Bush... Doesn't sound good for Bush's injury, IMO.

 
Duckett was pre-Petrino.The real question is why Petrino didn't grab Mike Bush... Doesn't sound good for Bush's injury, IMO.
They woud have, but he was taken at 4.01. Atlanta had 3 4th round picks, and I'm sure they were hoping he'd fall to 4.10.Story of their draft, Brown/Landry would have been perfect, both got taken. I fully expected them to grab Bush in the 4th (because of the extra picks) but the Raiders jumped him.
 
Duckett was pre-Petrino.The real question is why Petrino didn't grab Mike Bush... Doesn't sound good for Bush's injury, IMO.
They woud have, but he was taken at 4.01. Atlanta had 3 4th round picks, and I'm sure they were hoping he'd fall to 4.10.Story of their draft, Brown/Landry would have been perfect, both got taken. I fully expected them to grab Bush in the 4th (because of the extra picks) but the Raiders jumped him.
Seems to me Atlanta must not have wanted him all that much because he was projected to go in the 2nd or 3rd round. If they wanted him they pretty much knew that had to take him with that 3.10.
 
Duckett was pre-Petrino.The real question is why Petrino didn't grab Mike Bush... Doesn't sound good for Bush's injury, IMO.
They woud have, but he was taken at 4.01. Atlanta had 3 4th round picks, and I'm sure they were hoping he'd fall to 4.10.Story of their draft, Brown/Landry would have been perfect, both got taken. I fully expected them to grab Bush in the 4th (because of the extra picks) but the Raiders jumped him.
I don't know, with 3 4th round picks, nothing was stopping them from trading up.
 
Duckett was pre-Petrino.The real question is why Petrino didn't grab Mike Bush... Doesn't sound good for Bush's injury, IMO.
They woud have, but he was taken at 4.01. Atlanta had 3 4th round picks, and I'm sure they were hoping he'd fall to 4.10.Story of their draft, Brown/Landry would have been perfect, both got taken. I fully expected them to grab Bush in the 4th (because of the extra picks) but the Raiders jumped him.
Seems to me Atlanta must not have wanted him all that much because he was projected to go in the 2nd or 3rd round. If they wanted him they pretty much knew that had to take him with that 3.10.
The writing is on the wall: JWood = StudThe nasayers just don't get it.
 
Duckett was pre-Petrino.The real question is why Petrino didn't grab Mike Bush... Doesn't sound good for Bush's injury, IMO.
They woud have, but he was taken at 4.01. Atlanta had 3 4th round picks, and I'm sure they were hoping he'd fall to 4.10.Story of their draft, Brown/Landry would have been perfect, both got taken. I fully expected them to grab Bush in the 4th (because of the extra picks) but the Raiders jumped him.
Seems to me Atlanta must not have wanted him all that much because he was projected to go in the 2nd or 3rd round. If they wanted him they pretty much knew that had to take him with that 3.10.
The writing is on the wall: JWood = StudThe nasayers just don't get it.
I would agree with this.Excuses are being made why he cannot be the starter in due time or this year- Iam just not sure if they are valid.I like Norwood and think in Petrino's offense - he could be a top ten or twenty fantasy back - especially without Warrick Dunn.
 
#1 Petrino wan't makin the picks for Atlanta, the owner was as I understand it. This is why Atlanta really had no interested in M BUsh or another RB during the 1st day.

#2 There will be some more competition next either though an FA or or draft. If Norwood proves himslef this yr I believe that they'll just get an washed away FA like the Steelers did.

Norwoods draft stock increases heavily w/ this news

 
I would agree with this.Excuses are being made why he cannot be the starter in due time or this year- Iam just not sure if they are valid.I like Norwood and think in Petrino's offense - he could be a top ten or twenty fantasy back - especially without Warrick Dunn.
OK, I'll bite. What happens to Dunn? I understand that it's not entirely out of the question that they would cut him altogether, but if Dunn is around does he just not play?Say what you want about Dunn's size or his age, but over the past 3 seasons he ranks:- 9th in rushing attempts- 7th in rushing yards- 6th in ypc (minimum 600 rushing attempts)- Has not missed a game the past 3 seasons- Had a career high in carries last year- Had a career high in rushing yards the season beforeI'm not saying Norwood is not talented and does not deserve more opportunities, but why the sudden urge to completely ditch Dunn? Sometimes I wonder if people confuse what they want to happen in fantasy football with the way things generally operate in the NFL. I would find it strange if the Falcons were to simply bench Dunn and go full throttle with Norwood unless Dunn has a major injury that keeps him off the field (see Holmes or Martin as examples) or if his performace really tanked (like a 3.0 ypc) over an extended period.Also, Dunn is a huge humanitarian and won the Walter Payton Man of the Year Award for community service. He's done a ton of stuff in the community and I'm not sure the fan base would be all that keen on kicking him to the curb. I know the new regime has no loyalty to any of the existing players, but I don't see Norwood as a clear starter this year (barring injury) and at this point I would still consider Dunn the starter (although it certainly is not a very clear situation right now). Maybe they go with more of a split workload, but I don't see Norwood with the workload right now to be a fantsy force this season.
 
weren't there talks of them just cutting him
Talk? Maybe. Rumors? Yes. But that was in the pre-draft timeframe when all the focus was on the Falcons taking a RB early in the draft and they since took no one (and did not sign anyone either). IMO, if they feel that Dunn is getting too much money, they can always ask him to renegotiate and I've not heard a peep about them even asking him to do that. He carries a $3.25 million salary for this season, which to me is not excessive. FWIW, the President and GM of the team said a few months ago that Dunn would be back with the team this year. Also, I have not heard much from the team on the situation and most of the info I've seen has been supposition by the media. I generally believe what coaches and GMs say over what writers think should happen . . . not that either is a lock to be true.
 
But Dave.. you have to agree, they can't be thinkin about another 280+ carries season for Dunn.

They have to cut him down to less than 200

 
I half-expect a near 50/50 ratio this year. I know Dunn is 32 years old, but his knees haven't been carrying around the other 35 pounds that most other backs have. 31 is almost the absolute cut-off for a RB, but Dunn is one who I believe can make it another year or two. He's also the toughest, pound-for-pound football player I have ever seen. He is at the proverbial brick wall, but I'm sure he's brought his sledge hammer to meet it.

I expect him to hold all 3rd down duties, as he is already entrenched as the solid-blocking veteran who has shown that he is good cathcing the ball out of the backfield. Norwood is definately the home-run threat that Dunn is not, but the qualities that are built over a long career can not be so quickly dismissed.

 
But Dave.. you have to agree, they can't be thinkin about another 280+ carries season for Dunn.They have to cut him down to less than 200
I won't dispute that Norwood did exceptionally well last year when given the chance, but it's not like Dunn was not productive. I agree that the two guys will probably share the workload this year. Both should see more receptions out of the backfield. If I were to guess, myabe a 60/40 split for Dunn with Norwood seeing more later in the year once he learns schemes/pass protection and Dunn rides off into the sunset. So maybe 200-225 for Dunn and 150-175 for Norwood if both are healthy or one does leaps and bounds better than the other. Norwood certainly is primed to be in a good position if he were to become a clear starter, but IMO we are not at a stage where Atlanta starting RB = Jerious Norwood . . . at least not as I see it. My concern is that come fantasy draft day someone will want to grab Norwood about 3 rounds sooner than I would even think about looking at him so I doubt I'll have him on my teams. However, others may ignore Dunn and he could freefall into a decent backup fantasy RB for pretty cheap. As discussed in other threads, Norwood has a sweet last month of the season schedule wise, so he may be someone to try to acquire for later in the season, especially if Week One Dunn gets 20 carries and Norwood gets 6. Depending upon how things shape up and what draft slot people may have, trying to get a Dunn?Norwood tandem might be doable and then you may end up with a decent guy early in the year and a decent guy late in the year. Just food for thought . . .
 
#1 Petrino wan't makin the picks for Atlanta, the owner was as I understand it.
Actually Blank stays out of the way. It's McKay who makes the picks with input from the Coach & Scouting Dept.
Great posts and I really wish more people would realize this. Petrino is not making personnel decisions in Atlanta. McKay is. Norwood is McKay's guy and he, Norwood, will get a chance to shine before another draft pick is spent on a RB. The Falcons really pound the SEC area in terms of scouting and, while Norwood might be a new name to many in FF, McKay knew who he was drafting. My understanding is that McKay and the scouting department make the picks and Petrino coaches football. I'd say Petrino has his hands full right as a new coach. Throw in the Vick situation and, well, Petrino is probably dealing with much more than he had expected. He has very limited NFL experience. Conversely, McKay has a lifetime of NFL player personnel knowledge. Blank is a very smart business man. Seriously, why would Blank or McKay let Petrino make choices on draft picks? For recent examples of college coaches not knowing what they do not know see the Browns, Dolphins and Redskins. McKay is damn good at what he does and both he and Blank know better. As far as Dunn getting cut, Blank is smarter than that. Dunn is everything right about a professional athlete or being a man. He is what Vick is not. Right now that means a great deal to that team. Cutting Dunn would be a HUGE PR fiasco.
 
KellysHeroes said:
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports Norwood took most of the first-team reps during minicamp and that he has bulked up to 210 pounds.It was post on my league's chat by a reliable guy... can anyone else comfirm this
I would want to know why someone would share this with the rest of their league.
 
KellysHeroes said:
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports Norwood took most of the first-team reps during minicamp and that he has bulked up to 210 pounds.It was post on my league's chat by a reliable guy... can anyone else comfirm this
I would want to know why someone would share this with the rest of their league.
Our draft is over and our league is really cool
 
I have Dunn as my RB3 this year in Dynasty and I'm perfectly happy to have him in that role. He should get enough reps in the running and passing game to be a great flex player when needed. Having guys like Dunn on your team providing depth in key positions like RB are how fantasy championship teams are built. :thumbdown:

 
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
 
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag. I like Norwood but he has no punch up the middle, dunn will be gone soon and Norwood will continue spot duties. I think it is a reasonable to at least expect Norwood to be the Willie Parker of the NFC with Snelling used as the Bettes type back. Same problem for Parker, super fast but his feet stop at the line. :hot:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag. I like Norwood but he has no punch up the middle, dunn will be gone soon and Norwood will continue spot duties. I think it is a reasonable to at least expect Norwood to be the Willie Parker of the NFC with snelling Binda used as the Bettes type back.
from the articileSo has massive fullback Ovie Mughelli, who not only can run for the tough yards, but can clear a path

I highly doubt Snelling see much of the field

 
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
 
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.

 
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:goodposting: Never realized Westy timed so slow.
 
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:goodposting: 4.56 certainly won't gain him the "FJS" monicker, but it's not slow either. It's certainly fast enough for an inside the tackles runner.

 
KellysHeroes said:
RD1967 said:
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag. I like Norwood but he has no punch up the middle, dunn will be gone soon and Norwood will continue spot duties. I think it is a reasonable to at least expect Norwood to be the Willie Parker of the NFC with snelling Binda used as the Bettes type back.
from the articileSo has massive fullback Ovie Mughelli, who not only can run for the tough yards, but can clear a path

I highly doubt Snelling see much of the field
You mean the guy with 12 career rushing attempts in four seasons? That Ovie Mughelli?BTW, he's had 24 career receptions to go along with his 12 rushes, and he also has 2 fumbles. I'm not seeing a profile on a guy who I'd want carrying the ball a whole lot.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:bag: Never realized Westy timed so slow.
that's why measurables and a .1 difference in the 40 is irrelevant IMO. Give me a guy that can play football over a track star anyday.
 
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:bag: 4.56 certainly won't gain him the "FJS" monicker, but it's not slow either. It's certainly fast enough for an inside the tackles runner.
Yep, guess I need to rethink the "just might be too slow for the NFL". Some pretty good RB's right there & if Petrino wants a banger, he could certainly fill that role.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
KellysHeroes said:
RD1967 said:
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag. I like Norwood but he has no punch up the middle, dunn will be gone soon and Norwood will continue spot duties. I think it is a reasonable to at least expect Norwood to be the Willie Parker of the NFC with snelling Binda used as the Bettes type back.
from the articileSo has massive fullback Ovie Mughelli, who not only can run for the tough yards, but can clear a path

I highly doubt Snelling see much of the field
You mean the guy with 12 career rushing attempts in four seasons? That Ovie Mughelli?BTW, he's had 24 career receptions to go along with his 12 rushes, and he also has 2 fumbles. I'm not seeing a profile on a guy who I'd want carrying the ball a whole lot.
Just quotin the above statement made by the coach of the team Bud
 
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:thumbup: 4.56 certainly won't gain him the "FJS" monicker, but it's not slow either. It's certainly fast enough for an inside the tackles runner.
Yep, guess I need to rethink the "just might be too slow for the NFL". Some pretty good RB's right there & if Petrino wants a banger, he could certainly fill that role.
where did you guys get 4.56 from? Everything I have says he ran a 4.79 :confused:
 
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:thumbup: 4.56 certainly won't gain him the "FJS" monicker, but it's not slow either. It's certainly fast enough for an inside the tackles runner.
Yep, guess I need to rethink the "just might be too slow for the NFL". Some pretty good RB's right there & if Petrino wants a banger, he could certainly fill that role.
where did you guys get 4.56 from? Everything I have says he ran a 4.79 :confused:
Its in the link you quoted. I just quoted it too.but, here it is anyway:

http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2007/snelling_jason

 
DocT said:
Big Score said:
RD1967 said:
redman said:
jwb said:
Before the draft, I traded for him in two of my dynasty leagues, thinking he'd make a nice flex play. He may end up being something more than that, especially since they didn't draft a back. He'll at least get the chance.
Incorrect. Jason Snelling was drafted in the 7th round and has the attributes that Petrino likes in his RB's (large and a good receiver).
Wow I was hoping that all of the Norwood is the next stud RB hopfuls would overlook the fact that they drafted Snelling to come in and be the Power back, cats out of the bag.
He's got a chance & certainly did well in College, but I think he just might be too slow for the NFL - 4.56 in the 40-yard dash
Not that I think the guy will be successful but his 40 time is hardly bad enough to discount him.Frank Gore -- 4.66

DeAngelo Williams -- 4.55

Brian Westbrook -- 4.57

from nfl.com prospect profiles.
:thumbup: 4.56 certainly won't gain him the "FJS" monicker, but it's not slow either. It's certainly fast enough for an inside the tackles runner.
Yep, guess I need to rethink the "just might be too slow for the NFL". Some pretty good RB's right there & if Petrino wants a banger, he could certainly fill that role.
where did you guys get 4.56 from? Everything I have says he ran a 4.79 :confused:
Its in the link you quoted. I just quoted it too.but, here it is anyway:

http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2007/snelling_jason
Okay its a campus time, because i know i watched the combine and saw him run a 4.79. He's also a fullback right?
 
Same problem for Parker, super fast but his feet stop at the line. :cry:
Parker scored 16 TDs last year. What are you talking about?
I have drafted Parker the last two years and think he is stud, however inside running is not where he gets it done. He runs to the outside and makes great cuts, most of his scoring came from running to the perimeter. As long as he stays fast Willie I will look to draft him each year. Pit needs a goal line back. I'm not knoking the guy just pointing out he aint no power runner. He wont come close to scoring 16 this year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top