piratemike
HARRRRRLite™
Isn't anyone worried that the only places he's winning are states that will never elect a Democrat?
doesn't matter...Obama and Edwards did what the national party wanted them to, yet Hillary can not only crow about those "victories" but then actually count the delegates? Bull####I'll never vote for a Democrat as long as I live if that crap ends up deciding the nomination.But was that not the point of the 'undecided' votes in Michigan that those votes could go to Obama?Like I said earlier...if they count those delegates, I will start burning #### down.If it ends up that close, then we're going to be hearing alot about those Florida and Michigan delegates in the coming weeks.
It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
No, because in the general those Hillary supporters will come right over to Obamaland. Not so sure about the Obama supporters automatically moving to Hillarville...I know I won't.Isn't anyone worried that the only places he's winning are states that will never elect a Democrat?
why these people voting for Hillary don't get that is beyond me...Obama vs. McCain is a landslide.Ari Fleischer: "Hillary Clinton is the great equalizer... give me Hillary Clinton and the Republicans keep the White House."
And I am pretty sure it is that attitude that will keep them from counting. You aren't the only one saying that.doesn't matter...Obama and Edwards did what the national party wanted them to, yet Hillary can not only crow about those "victories" but then actually count the delegates? Bull####I'll never vote for a Democrat as long as I live if that crap ends up deciding the nomination.But was that not the point of the 'undecided' votes in Michigan that those votes could go to Obama?Like I said earlier...if they count those delegates, I will start burning #### down.If it ends up that close, then we're going to be hearing alot about those Florida and Michigan delegates in the coming weeks.
Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
If McCain wasn't so f'ing war mongering I would consider him over Hillary as well.No, because in the general those Hillary supporters will come right over to Obamaland. Not so sure about the Obama supporters automatically moving to Hillarville...I know I won't.Isn't anyone worried that the only places he's winning are states that will never elect a Democrat?
Any democrat is going to have to steal a couple of those red states back to win. Which would mean if Hillary gets the nomination, there should be significant concern that Obama won the states that she needs to steal from the republicans. As bad as the republicans have been, I don't see any blue states going over to the republicans, so who really cares which democrat they prefer?Isn't anyone worried that the only places he's winning are states that will never elect a Democrat?
Are you sure you just don't want to burn something down regardless?Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
I'll bring the gasoline.Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
His foreign policy is even worse than hers.If McCain wasn't so f'ing war mongering I would consider him over Hillary as well.No, because in the general those Hillary supporters will come right over to Obamaland. Not so sure about the Obama supporters automatically moving to Hillarville...I know I won't.Isn't anyone worried that the only places he's winning are states that will never elect a Democrat?
Am I coming across as an angry firebug just looking for an excuse?Are you sure you just don't want to burn something down regardless?Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
Could be.Am I coming across as an angry firebug just looking for an excuse?Are you sure you just don't want to burn something down regardless?Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
This is going on every one of my posts until this thing is decided. I hope the Clinton supporters on this board and around the country think about what they are fighting for.why these people voting for Hillary don't get that is beyond me...Obama vs. McCain is a landslide.Ari Fleischer: "Hillary Clinton is the great equalizer... give me Hillary Clinton and the Republicans keep the White House."
Enough talk, let's start burningCould be.Am I coming across as an angry firebug just looking for an excuse?Are you sure you just don't want to burn something down regardless?Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
They do think. They just don't think strategically. McCain will get nominated because he's strategically the best shot for the Republicans to win, and not because he matches the position of most conservatives (because he's not).This is going on every one of my posts until this thing is decided. I hope the Clinton supporters on this board and around the country think about what they are fighting for.why these people voting for Hillary don't get that is beyond me...Obama vs. McCain is a landslide.Ari Fleischer: "Hillary Clinton is the great equalizer... give me Hillary Clinton and the Republicans keep the White House."
The word is that the more Obama speaks, the more voters like his message. In other words, he is still a bit unknown (after all, most voters do not pay attention until september) and has upside. On the other hand, he is very inexperienced and could say something very stupid in the heat of an election that sinks him. Hillary probably won't shoot herself in the foot.Isn't anyone worried that the only places he's winning are states that will never elect a Democrat?
Well it looks like its being spun as a Hillary win because of CA, NY, and MA. However, if you had told Obama he'd win 13 (maybe 14 states with NM pending), and more importantly probably more overall delegates b/c of blowouts in a number of those states, he would have taken it in a second. This may turn into a pyrrhic victory for her especially if he wins all contests over the next week.So was yesterday a good day for Obama?That's the question.
I'll admit, I had to google that word.Well it looks like its being spun as a Hillary win because of CA, NY, and MA. However, if you had told Obama he'd win 13 (maybe 14 states with NM pending), and more importantly probably more overall delegates b/c of blowouts in a number of those states, he would have taken it in a second. This may turn into a pyrrhic victory for her especially if he wins all contests over the next week.So was yesterday a good day for Obama?
That's the question.
Homer, I excitedly clicked the link with a finger poised on the print button.Then I saw all those big words. No way a woman understands 10% of that.For those of you with wives/GF's that are into Hillary because of the chick-thing, here's a pretty decent article on Huffingtonpost...pass it on.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kimberle-cre...t-_b_85165.html
Or an amped up fire fighter in a slow house...Am I coming across as an angry firebug just looking for an excuse?Are you sure you just don't want to burn something down regardless?Oh yeah, I'll burn #### down in that case as well.It actually could be more about the BS "super delegate" vote. Ridiculous.If Obama fails to win the nomination it will because he failed to get the Hispanic vote.
Not that they would go strictly to Obama. The Obama people said that if you supported him you were to vote uncommitted. That will be the logic in their argument that the convention should seat them. Obama should have campaigned or left his name on the ballot(like Hillary did) in Michigan if he wanted those votes. Popular vote in Michigan went to Hillary.But was that not the point of the 'undecided' votes in Michigan that those votes could go to Obama?Like I said earlier...if they count those delegates, I will start burning #### down.If it ends up that close, then we're going to be hearing alot about those Florida and Michigan delegates in the coming weeks.
Someone explain super delegates to me like I'm Woz and the subject is women.Superdelegates and their families are a ####!
Just listened to an explanation on CNN. The guys said, and I'm paraphrasing, "superdelegates are party big wigs and elected officials that vote for sections/blocks of their constituency to make the voting process more efficient." In other words, the superdelegates will go to Clinton.Someone explain super delegates to me like I'm Woz and the subject is women.Superdelegates and their families are a ####!
Someone explain super delegates to me like I'm Woz and the subject is women.Superdelegates and their families are a ####!
linkSuperdelegates are delegates to a presidential nominating convention in the United States who are not bound by the decisions of party primaries or caucuses. Superdelegates are elected officeholders and party officials. They are sometimes referred to as "unpledged delegates," but some unpledged delegates are not superdelegates.
Superdelegates were first appointed in the 1970s, after control of the nomination process in the Democratic Party effectively moved out of the hands of party officials into the primary and caucus process. The aim was to grant some say in the process to people who had been playing roles in the party before the election year.
The Republican Party has 123 similarly automatically appointed delegates, members of the Republican National Committee. Including these appointees, the Republican Party has 463 unpledged delegates out of a total of 2,380 delegates.[1]
In the Democratic primary phase of the 2004 U.S. Presidential election, Howard Dean acquired an early lead in delegate counts by obtaining the support of a number of superdelegates before even the first primaries were held.
The Democratic Party is often criticized during election cycles for conducting primary elections in a non-democratic fashion, since superdelegates are appointed by the party and are not obligated to support the candidate chosen by the voters. There have been repeated calls to eliminate the superdelegates from the primaries to more accurately reflect the popular vote.
Not neccesarily. Obama already has some and all of them can vote how they want at the convention.Just listened to an explanation on CNN. The guys said, and I'm paraphrasing, "superdelegates are party big wigs and elected officials that vote for sections/blocks of their constituency to make the voting process more efficient." In other words, the superdelegates will go to Clinton.Someone explain super delegates to me like I'm Woz and the subject is women.Superdelegates and their families are a ####!
yeah...plus he should end up cleaning up red state super delegate. I have a feeling it'll be a big non-issue in the end. If Obama has the pledged delegate edge in the end and is polling better than Clinton against McCain, the party bigwigs will end up backing him.Not neccesarily. Obama already has some and all of them can vote how they want at the convention.Just listened to an explanation on CNN. The guys said, and I'm paraphrasing, "superdelegates are party big wigs and elected officials that vote for sections/blocks of their constituency to make the voting process more efficient." In other words, the superdelegates will go to Clinton.Someone explain super delegates to me like I'm Woz and the subject is women.Superdelegates and their families are a ####!
I think Obama has a good chance in PA. He should get endorsed by the Mayor of Philadelphia (recently elected African American who was not the democratic party's choice in the primary either).great night for obama. the only thing that kept it being a total disaster for hillary was California. that state saved her campaign. she's got to target PA, OH and TX. I think Obama picks up VA, NC, MD, LA and WI. Up for grabs will be WA and OR.
ND is important as once again it shows that Obama has a play with a white consituency. I was listening to Paul Harvey this morning and he made the claim that Hillary won the traditional democratic vote while Obama won the black vote. That is very shortsighted viewpoint in my mind.The number of states won is completely misleading. Unless you are one to consider North Dakota as important as CA, MA, etc.
I understood the article just fine, hook. Why wouldn't other women understand it?Homer, I excitedly clicked the link with a finger poised on the print button.Then I saw all those big words. No way a woman understands 10% of that.For those of you with wives/GF's that are into Hillary because of the chick-thing, here's a pretty decent article on Huffingtonpost...pass it on.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kimberle-cre...t-_b_85165.html
True, but where it counts (# of delegates and surpassing expectations/winning the media "narrative"), you have to admit this was a win for Obama.The number of states won is completely misleading. Unless you are one to consider North Dakota as important as CA, MA, etc.
I could get onboard a Clinton-Obama ticket, I suppose.But why even talk about that? It is at least even money at this point as to whether Obama will win the nomination. I'll cross that bridge when I come to it. I see the Clinton campaign subtly pushing the story that a Clinton-Obama ticket would be unstoppable, and suggesting that Obama wouldn't pick Clinton (true), but Clinton would pick Obama.I'm surprised all these Obama supporters refuse to vote Hillary. Is that even if he is VP? How big of a supporter are you if you wouldn't support him for VP?
Doubtful.I'm now hearing that once the dust settles, Obama might end up with more delegates last night -- is this true?