I voted "No" and "yes". It's pretty clear that A.J. Smith let his ego get in the way on the VJax situation and he acted in a manner that was not in the best interest of the San Diego Chargers. With that said... would I fire him? No. Who would you replace him with? It's not like there are all these top-10 GMs sitting on the street right now waiting for work.
Isn't that because he refused to sign his tender?
No. Vincent Jackson signed a 5 year contract as a rookie, then played 5 years for the San Diego Chargers. He fulfilled all of the terms of his contract. A.J. Smith then offered him his RFA tender, which was essentially a 1-year contract, but Vincent Jackson thought that the contract was insultingly low and not worth the risk of injury, so VJax refused to sign it.
A 2nd is not enough. Brandon Marshall brought two 2nds.
Santana Moss brought a 5th. Your point?At the end of the day, what's "enough" for Vincent Jackson is whatever you can get for Vincent Jackson. A.J. Smith either had a choice of letting VJax go for a 2nd and a conditional pick, or of letting him go for whatever compensatory pick he gets in return (best case scenario: the last pick of the 3rd round). If the 2nd+ wasn't "enough" for Vincent Jackson, then the compensatory pick DEFINITELY wasn't enough. Especially because there's no guarantee the NFL will keep compensatory picks in the next CBA.
Compensation picks aren't based entirely on base salary, so I doubt those hijinks work.
Some guy ran a regression of past compensatory draft picks and was able to reverse-engineer the formula. He's been predicting compensatory picks for the past 3 or 4 years (possibly longer) and has a near-perfect success rate. According to him, conditional picks are based almost entirely on base salary.His name eludes me, but I'm sure someone knows who I'm talking about. Every March people around here create a thread with his projected compensatory picks.