Hammer of Goodell
Footballguy
NO !!!!!!!!!
TDorBust...are you an attorney for the NFL?Congrats for winning the dumbest analogy in the history of the universe award.Whats the point of the NFL even giving out suspensions any more? NFLPA can just go crying to the courts and get it overturned for some reason or another.
It like telling your parents they can decide if you get to eat cake if they give you a $10 allowance but when they say you can't eat cake for the next 4 weeks because of X reason you go to social services to say its a crime and that you never did X.
Seems awfully odd to me too.Have to wonder if dragging it out till from January till the week before the season starts was intentional.LOL at the NFL being "losers" in all this. They will probably break the ratings record for TNF. And just for the record I predicted at the time of the suspension that he would be playing week 1.
What kind of ridiculous questions will be asked if he ends up doing well this season ?He's already had epic seasons and in my opinion would have played with more of a chip on his shoulder if the ban would not have been lifted. If anything, it now motivates other teams, opens the door for ridiculous questions all season long by media if he does end up doing well.Brady's going to have an epic season.
This whole thing has been such a joke, even more so than the pass call by Seattle at the goaline.
Why is it when something big happens that some people's first reaction is to say look at me, look at me. This isn't about you, talk about the news and how it relates to the NFL or fantasy football.I look like a genius right about now.
Were the balls deflated a little and that's why you did so well?What kind of ridiculous questions will be asked if he ends up doing well this season ?He's already had epic seasons and in my opinion would have played with more of a chip on his shoulder if the ban would not have been lifted. If anything, it now motivates other teams, opens the door for ridiculous questions all season long by media if he does end up doing well.This whole thing has been such a joke, even more so than the pass call by Seattle at the goaline.Brady's going to have an epic season.
I'm assuming you're talking about the NFL punishing brady when the rules said he wasn't allowed to, their refusal to share their evidence or allow the attorney who edited the Wells report to testify, and the court refusing to find them in contempt when overturning their ruling.So you can break your company's rules that you agreed by contract to follow, can destroy evidence that shows you intentionally violated those rules and your contract, and you can expect no punishment due to protection from the courts?
What could possibly go wrong?
That you are fined $1 million (the most in NFL history) and have draft picks taken away.So you can break your company's rules that you agreed by contract to follow, can destroy evidence that shows you intentionally violated those rules and your contract, and you can expect no punishment due to protection from the courts?
What could possibly go wrong?
This really calls spygate into question, where Goodell again ruled and then destroyed the evidence used to make the ruling. Pretty much exonerated the pats of ever having cheated now that we know the shameful depths the nfl front office went to to unfairly attack them.Wow, surprised it as totally nullified, but probably the right call.
Unfortunate that it had to be overturned on a team that is a proven cheat while this idiot self absorbed commish destroyed a franchise for a couple years in bountygate, but nice to see Goodell get his a little, finally.
I didn't know Brady had draft picksThat you are fined $1 million (the most in NFL history) and have draft picks taken away.So you can break your company's rules that you agreed by contract to follow, can destroy evidence that shows you intentionally violated those rules and your contract, and you can expect no punishment due to protection from the courts?
What could possibly go wrong?
Wow. What a surprising take from you.I'm assuming you're talking about the NFL punishing brady when the rules said he wasn't allowed to, their refusal to share their evidence or allow the attorney who edited the Wells report to testify, and the court refusing to find them in contempt when overturning their ruling.So you can break your company's rules that you agreed by contract to follow, can destroy evidence that shows you intentionally violated those rules and your contract, and you can expect no punishment due to protection from the courts?
What could possibly go wrong?
Saw on twitter that the NFL has had decisions on Bountygate, Rice, Peterson, and now Brady overturned. Nice track record.Wow, surprised it as totally nullified, but probably the right call.
Unfortunate that it had to be overturned on a team that is a proven cheat while this idiot self absorbed commish destroyed a franchise for a couple years in bountygate, but nice to see Goodell get his a little, finally.
He's been playing well for 14 years.Iwannabeacowboybaby! said:Were the balls deflated a little and that's why you did so well?Casting Couch said:What kind of ridiculous questions will be asked if he ends up doing well this season ?Iwannabeacowboybaby! said:He's already had epic seasons and in my opinion would have played with more of a chip on his shoulder if the ban would not have been lifted. If anything, it now motivates other teams, opens the door for ridiculous questions all season long by media if he does end up doing well.This whole thing has been such a joke, even more so than the pass call by Seattle at the goaline.ponchsox said:Brady's going to have an epic season.
The only thing delicious about this whole thing is your profile pic.These tears are so delicious
Works for Hillary but in Brady's case, it is actually just speculation and not a lot of information that legitimately casts doubt on the plaintiff's side.Bronco Billy said:So you can break your company's rules that you agreed by contract to follow, can destroy evidence that shows you intentionally violated those rules and your contract, and you can expect no punishment due to protection from the courts?
What could possibly go wrong?
One was child abuse, confirmed and the other was hearsay. Big difference.Adrian Peterson sits an entire season for spanking his kids.
Tom Brady gets off scot-free for cheating in a championship game.
Fail.
Why would it be surprising? He just paraphrased what the judge who decided the case said and ruled on.Bronco Billy said:Wow. What a surprising take from you.bostonfred said:I'm assuming you're talking about the NFL punishing brady when the rules said he wasn't allowed to, their refusal to share their evidence or allow the attorney who edited the Wells report to testify, and the court refusing to find them in contempt when overturning their ruling.Bronco Billy said:So you can break your company's rules that you agreed by contract to follow, can destroy evidence that shows you intentionally violated those rules and your contract, and you can expect no punishment due to protection from the courts?
What could possibly go wrong?
Lots of butt hurt ensuingAdrian Peterson sits an entire season for spanking his kids.
Tom Brady gets off scot-free for cheating in a championship game.
Fail.
Yes because making a four year olds #### bleed is not nearly as reprensible as allegedly violating a rule less impactful than a chop block.Adrian Peterson sits an entire season for spanking his kids.
Tom Brady gets off scot-free for cheating in a championship game.
Fail.
Give out suspensions based on your own documented policies, and nothing gets overturned. Make s%!t up and get slapped down for basic due process and fairness. Pretty simple, really.TDorBust said:Whats the point of the NFL even giving out suspensions any more? NFLPA can just go crying to the courts and get it overturned for some reason or another.
It like telling your parents they can decide if you get to eat cake if they give you a $10 allowance but when they say you can't eat cake for the next 4 weeks because of X reason you go to social services to say its a crime and that you never did X.
Is it the color where courts of law ought to be ruling on crimes, and the NFL ought to be ruling on football stuff?Yes because making a four year olds #### bleed is not nearly as reprensible as allegedly violating a rule less impactful than a chop block.Adrian Peterson sits an entire season for spanking his kids.
Tom Brady gets off scot-free for cheating in a championship game.
Fail.
What color is the sky in your world?
That's a very poor comparison and I'm assuming you're not a parent. Peterson beat his child with a stick and caused bleeding. That is SO MUCH worse than spanking. If he just spanked him it would have been a non issue.Adrian Peterson sits an entire season for spanking his kids.
Tom Brady gets off scot-free for cheating in a championship game.
Fail.
The league is not asking for an injunction to prevent Brady from playing. He should be all systems go for the entire season, as the appeal most likely won't be heard until 2016.Goodell says he's going to appeal the ruling. Does this mean that Brady still plays week 1?
From Week 5 on last year he was QB2. In his last 16 games played including the SB, he put up 4400/40. With almost the same cast of characters.Brady finished QB8 in my league last year. He's got Gronk to throw to and then a whole lot of good but not elite players. Some (Edelman, LaFell) who are now injured.
He's great value if you got him in a late round pick, but I don't see how instantly he goes into the top 5 QB conversation. I'd still rather have Romo, Ben, Brees, or Manning.
Been doing this all summerFantasysports1 said:Looks like the late QB strategy is really good this year. Get either Bradford, Brady or both. Getting one of the those late can give you an advantage if you load up on RB/WR.
This depends on who you're drafting but I've enjoyed waiting longer and getting Tannehill. I think Tannehill finishes the season ahead of Brady.Been doing this all summerFantasysports1 said:Looks like the late QB strategy is really good this year. Get either Bradford, Brady or both. Getting one of the those late can give you an advantage if you load up on RB/WR.
He might, but I've been getting Brady and Bradford consistently in the round 8-10 area, and fully expect one or both to finish in the QB6-7 area. Took them both just a couple of days ago in an MFL 50 at 8.10/9.03, and they were generally available much later just a couple of weeks ago.This depends on who you're drafting but I've enjoyed waiting longer and getting Tannehill. I think Tannehill finishes the season ahead of Brady.Been doing this all summerFantasysports1 said:Looks like the late QB strategy is really good this year. Get either Bradford, Brady or both. Getting one of the those late can give you an advantage if you load up on RB/WR.
I'm guessing you won't be happy when they end the season 16-0 instead.Hope the Patriots go 0-4.
I hadn't thought about that. If they have great success and win it again or if a team they play in the first four weeks misses the playoffs by one game, we will hear nothing but "THey shouldn't have missed th eplayoffs because Brady shouldn't have been playing and we would have won that game".I'm guessing you won't be happy when they end the season 16-0 instead.Hope the Patriots go 0-4.
Because that obviously would get them another championship. Right? RIGHT?I'm guessing you won't be happy when they end the season 16-0 instead.Hope the Patriots go 0-4.