Lott said:
Not every fantasy RB need be handcuffed... in fact, most shouldn't be. Waste of a roster spot, except in very deep leagues.
Agreed. Sure, in some cases there is a good handcuff who could presumably step in and play well for the injured starter, but in most cases when the starter goes down it becomes rbbc.In the rare cases where there is a decent handcuff they don't usually produce as well as the injured starter, so the benefits of rostering said handcuff are outweiged by the lack of usuable lineup options, trade-able commodities, and depth throughout the season.
In certain situations a quality handcuff can be considered a bonus when drafting the starter, but I would never consider the lack of a quality handcuff as a negative factor when assessing/drafting starting RBs. In most cases, the downside of drafting handcuffs outweighs the upside.