So you're prepared for a serving of crow when he blows up?Big numbers = 5 int's and 3 fumblesJake Delhomme is a joke.The only big number he SHOULD have is his number of handoffs to DWill and JStew.
I saw the barn give up on the route.
:blackhelicopter:Jambi said:Why is every post in this thread edited?
Jambi said:Why is every post in this thread edited?
not sureJambi said:Why is every post in this thread edited?
The defense is a pretty small part of the problems the 'skins are having. I wuoldn't put it out of the realm of possibilities that he has a very average game, but I wouldn't look for any kind of breakout, slumpbuster, make people forget all about the INT's type of game. Plus Blache realized last week that it might be a good idea to try and put pressure on the QB by actually blitzing, so who knows what he's going to do this week. If he goes back to the way he was playcalling before the Bucs game, Delhomme might have a solid game.Ripleys said:ummm, Panthers are playing the Skins this weekend. Its very possible Delhomme could have a good game.
Why do u ask? Do you suspect they spelled a word wrong and corrected it? Maybe used improper English and corrected it?That would be f***up! and you would definitely have owned us.Jambi said:Why is every post in this thread edited?
That's a good point. Why does it even have to tell you that a post has been edited? Who cares?Why do u ask? Do you suspect they spelled a word wrong and corrected it? Maybe used improper English and corrected it?That would be f***up! and you would definitely have owned us.Jambi said:Why is every post in this thread edited?
Why do u ask? Do you suspect they spelled a word wrong and corrected it? Maybe used improper English and corrected it?That would be f***up! and you would definitely have owned us.Why is every post in this thread edited?
You would probably find a lot more 'believers' if you actually included anything resembling the reasons you think this week will be different. The board is full of posters that want to have their called shot. So give me a reason to believeJambi said:Any believers?
Pretty sure it's in the cards this week. I'm not worried about called shots. I'm just passing along the sneaky play of the week. Now I wouldn't go starting him over Manning or anything but he will finish with top 10 numbers this week. Possibly top 5.Delhomme + Big Numbers = +You would probably find a lot more 'believers' if you actually included anything resembling the reasons you think this week will be different. The board is full of posters that want to have their called shot. So give me a reason to believeJambi said:Any believers?
I reluctantly admit I'm leaning to starting Delhomme this week. Our flex can be a QB and I'm weak there beyond Brees, who is off. I'm probably playing Delhomme over Josh Johnson, which is saying very little.Pretty sure it's in the cards this week. I'm not worried about called shots. I'm just passing along the sneaky play of the week. Now I wouldn't go starting him over Manning or anything but he will finish with top 10 numbers this week. Possibly top 5.Delhomme + Big Numbers = +You would probably find a lot more 'believers' if you actually included anything resembling the reasons you think this week will be different. The board is full of posters that want to have their called shot. So give me a reason to believeJambi said:Any believers?
I've seen all the Carolina games this year, and other than game 1, Delhomme has not looked bad. He threw one interception in the Atlanta game, and that was near the end of the game when they were in a hurry to try to catch up. The defense let them down in that game. In the Cowboys game, Delhomme threw 2 interceptions, one was not his fault and he looked great on the two minute drill before halftime. Delhomme has always been a gunslinger, and he said this week that they are not going to stop throwing long ones down the field, and the reason he threw two long ones to Muhammad in the Cowboys game (one was a TD called back from Muhammad pushing off), is because Smith has been double and tripled teamed.Watching the games: Something's up; he's not the same. he never used to make mistakes like this, he was a smart QB who played largely mistake free ball. Not anymore on the last part.
Question:What are Delhomme's stats - compl. %, TD's, sacks, INT's, fumbles lost - in the last 4 games, including the last playoff game?Anyone?I've seen all the Carolina games this year, and other than game 1, Delhomme has not looked bad. He threw one interception in the Atlanta game, and that was near the end of the game when they were in a hurry to try to catch up. The defense let them down in that game. In the Cowboys game, Delhomme threw 2 interceptions, one was not his fault and he looked great on the two minute drill before halftime. Delhomme has always been a gunslinger, and he said this week that they are not going to stop throwing long ones down the field, and the reason he threw two long ones to Muhammad in the Cowboys game (one was a TD called back from Muhammad pushing off), is because Smith has been double and tripled teamed.Watching the games: Something's up; he's not the same. he never used to make mistakes like this, he was a smart QB who played largely mistake free ball. Not anymore on the last part.
Nope, he be bottom five this weekJambi said:Any believers?
I've been a fan of Delhomme's but he hasn't had more than 2 TDs in a game in two years and he has yet to throw more than 1 TD in a game this season. I'm not sure he's going to drop 300/4 on the Redskins or any team this season. The only way I can see Delhomme being started this season is in a Start-2 QB league. And even there, it's best to lower your expectations for him. I think if he can get you 200/1, he'll have done well. Anything beyond that is a bonus. The problem is there's a very real chance he won't even reach that pedestrian total.No guts no glory. If you need a bye week filler this is the week to run Jake Delhomme. Your leaguemates will laugh at u when you add him and plug him into the starting line up but when he drops 300 yards and 4TD's everybody is going to think you're a friggin genious and it will be so worth it. This is the week my friends.
Update?Might be putting him instead of T. Edwards.
stay tuned....
Don't put too much stock in defensive rankings when they've played such offensive powerhouses like STL, TB, and DET. Week 1 the NYG didn't need to do much on offense because their defense was dominating them.+ The Skins have the 3rd best pass defense (right?) and 5th best scoring defense (right?). So even though the Skins stink they still haven't been allowing a lot of points, even if it is against their weak schedule. And the Skins need this game also.
Thats the theory... I got him in a couple and also teaming him up w/ MushSo he's due? And I have no better choice this week.Check.ETA-
Well, I agree with that, but:- Performance is performance, WAS for all the criticism about them has been good on defense. Can't ignore it either. Denver's D supposedly had faced an overly weak schedule too going into last week.- Carolina's no powerhouse themselves these days: 25th in off. ypg; 23rd pass ypg; 29th in off. ppg. 2 TD's passing, 29th or tied 2nd to last.You know what really got me in that Carolina / Dallas game? Near the goalline Jake going for Rosario twice. Not DeAng, not Stew, not SSmith. The Carolina fan above (different post) may disagree but I've seen him play and have been a fan since he was a Saint and Delhomme really hasn't looked the same; maybe he turns that around or maybe I'm wrong, I don't know, but that's my take.Don't put too much stock in defensive rankings when they've played such offensive powerhouses like STL, TB, and DET. Week 1 the NYG didn't need to do much on offense because their defense was dominating them.+ The Skins have the 3rd best pass defense (right?) and 5th best scoring defense (right?). So even though the Skins stink they still haven't been allowing a lot of points, even if it is against their weak schedule. And the Skins need this game also.
It's now official.Update?Might be putting him instead of T. Edwards.
stay tuned....
Can you give us a reason or two to believe that he's a good play this week?Any believers?