What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Fanduel/DraftKings Week 3 (1 Viewer)

So much for fading Thursday. I really thought about going with Ryan and Julio but talked myself out of it. :doh:

Now with the Falcons D going off as well I feel like I already lost in my GPP and I haven't even played yet.

Might have to enter my two lineups into a Sunday GPP to have a shot with them.

Good news is the four 10 man leagues I'm in...only one person had Falcons D and only one person had the Ryan/Julio stack.
Out of the 70+ games I'm in this week I only had those two matched up in 3, which was a last second addition to my GPP plays for the week.

Looks like it's likely the most stacked combo of the week from what I'm seeing, so you're probably better off bucking the trend.

Just too bad I didn't have it widely used in cash games. It would have likely locked in a decent week, barring any major disaster.

 
So much for fading Thursday. I really thought about going with Ryan and Julio but talked myself out of it. :doh:

Now with the Falcons D going off as well I feel like I already lost in my GPP and I haven't even played yet.

Might have to enter my two lineups into a Sunday GPP to have a shot with them.

Good news is the four 10 man leagues I'm in...only one person had Falcons D and only one person had the Ryan/Julio stack.
Out of the 70+ games I'm in this week I only had those two matched up in 3, which was a last second addition to my GPP plays for the week.

Looks like it's likely the most stacked combo of the week from what I'm seeing, so you're probably better off bucking the trend.

Just too bad I didn't have it widely used in cash games. It would have likely locked in a decent week, barring any major disaster.
Yeah I think having Ryan and Julio combo would defintely lock in a good week in cash games unless the rest of the lineup flopped.

As for bucking the trend in GPP, whether I'm better off depends on whether my two combos can come close.

River/Allen...maybe? Cousins/Garcon...probably not

 
So we are officially giving up on the fade Thursday guideline?
I will still tend to fade Thursday unless there is someone I really think is a great value which this week was Rainey(who did OK) and Julio(who was awesome should of played him more than I did which was about 40%) Next week I could see Morris or Jennings a possible Thursday play depending on price.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we are officially giving up on the fade Thursday guideline?
I don't like it. I think it makes more sense to look at the same as every other game. Look at the matchup and the players and decide what to do. I think last week was a perfect game to fade, not because it was Thursday night, just because it was the Steelers and Ravens and I don't think a lot of people were expecting a lot of points. 1st game of the week, you were happy if you started Russell Wilson or Lynch but disappointed in Green Bay...but Green Bay was going up against a Seattle D that was ready to play, I don't think that had anything to do with Thursday night. Last night...Tampa is awful...my gut was telling me and a lot of people to go with Ryan/Julio and it paid off for those that did. I'm going to treat it like anything else from here on out. I think the key is to not start players on Thursday just to have action in the game, which I think a lot of people on FanDuel do. Just start them if after looking at everything, it looks like a good play. But that's just my opinion and how I am doing it from here on out.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we are officially giving up on the fade Thursday guideline?
I don't like it. I think it makes more sense to look at the same as every other game. Look at the matchup and the players and decide what to do. I think last week was a perfect game to fade, not because it was Thursday night, just because it was the Steelers and Ravens and I don't think a lot of people were expecting a lot of points. 1st game of the week, you were happy if you started Russell Wilson or Lynch but disappointed in Green Bay...but Green Bay was going up against a Seattle D that was ready to play, I don't think that had anything to do with Thursday night. Last night...Tampa is awful...my gut was telling me and a lot of people to go with Ryan/Julio and it paid off for those that did. I'm going to treat it like anything else from here on out. I think the key is to not start players on Thursday just to have action in the game, which I think a lot of people on FanDuel do. Just start them if after looking at everything, it looks like a good play. But that's just my opinion and how I am doing it from here on out.
I'm pretty new to daily, but love it so far - even though I'm down for the year :shrug: . I agree whole-heartedly with this post. Studs are going to go off regardless. The reason I didn't stack Julio/Ryan is I like Brees/Graham and Stafford/Calvin better. All at home indoors. I think you'll see similar output of of one or both of those this week, and maybe Rodgers/Jordy too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think a complete dismissal of the fade is in order after one unfavorable game, but I do think it puts things into perspective a little. If you've got a matchup you like, don't ignore it just because it's part of a Thursday game. If nothing else, take 10% off of your projections for the game. So if you had Julio going for 8-100-1, that's 20 points on FD. 10% off that is 18... still a pretty good play IMO.

As it stands right now, I think a deeper dive into the numbers is in order. I just feel uncomfortable following "the numbers say fantasy production is lower by 10% on Thursdays". There are likely lots of underlying factors at play here. What if, in general, weaker offensive teams play on Thursdays? Then it would not make sense at all to fade the game when a stronger offensive team (like Atlanta) plays.

Long story short... I think there needs to be more research on the issue. Or at least a more careful study of the research that's already been done.

 
The fade is still alive for a few reasons:

-the short week hurts, and it hurts more as we get into the middle of the season

-for whatever reason, people in the Thursday games LOVE to start all kinds of Thursday players just to watch them in action

The absolute fade is still a good move when two bad or two defensive teams are playing (e.g. week 2). Week 1 doesn't really count as it wasn't a short week.

In any case, even if you support the principle of avoiding Thursday players but playing in Thursday games, it doesn't hurt to "hedge" - In week 1, I had 1/3rd of my lineups with a Lynch/Wilson stack. In week 2, I went with Bell who mildly disappointed. Week 3 I had 1/4 of lineups with Ryan, 1/4 with Jones (none together unfortunately).

So in general, continue to fade, especially when the matchups stink as they often do. Studs can be an exception, and some portion of your lineups can hedge with them. But jumping on the Rainey Trainey just because Martin was ruled out, going into a road game, coming off a short week... I think that was a bit of a risk.

Fade + Hedge is IMO still a winning strategy

 
Seems silly to have any "rule" on fading Thursday games. Every game/week is unique. Giving your opponent 2 extra teams worth of players just because can't improve your odds. It's not like Julio sans White wasn't a pretty obvious strong play just because the game was Thursday night. He's probably a stud on Tues, Wed, Fri, and Sat too. I'm not saying that depressing projections somewhat isn't smart. I'm just saying that ignoring 2 teams of players can't be smart.

 
The fade is still alive for a few reasons:

-the short week hurts, and it hurts more as we get into the middle of the season

-for whatever reason, people in the Thursday games LOVE to start all kinds of Thursday players just to watch them in action

The absolute fade is still a good move when two bad or two defensive teams are playing (e.g. week 2). Week 1 doesn't really count as it wasn't a short week.

In any case, even if you support the principle of avoiding Thursday players but playing in Thursday games, it doesn't hurt to "hedge" - In week 1, I had 1/3rd of my lineups with a Lynch/Wilson stack. In week 2, I went with Bell who mildly disappointed. Week 3 I had 1/4 of lineups with Ryan, 1/4 with Jones (none together unfortunately).

So in general, continue to fade, especially when the matchups stink as they often do. Studs can be an exception, and some portion of your lineups can hedge with them. But jumping on the Rainey Trainey just because Martin was ruled out, going into a road game, coming off a short week... I think that was a bit of a risk.

Fade + Hedge is IMO still a winning strategy
I've been thinking about how to hedge the Th night game. I think I'm going with trying it with the Mon-Th matchups .I played the Mon-Th this week and did well in 3 -10 man tourneys and 50/50. I cashed 2.5 times my risk. Even if Julio/Ryan beat me some this week, Julio will have helped me already. Plus I have a little more bankroll to put in play Sunday now.

Mon is Bears/Jets and Th is Giants/Redskins.

 
So much for fading Thursday. I really thought about going with Ryan and Julio but talked myself out of it. :doh:

Now with the Falcons D going off as well I feel like I already lost in my GPP and I haven't even played yet.

Might have to enter my two lineups into a Sunday GPP to have a shot with them.

Good news is the four 10 man leagues I'm in...only one person had Falcons D and only one person had the Ryan/Julio stack.
Out of the 70+ games I'm in this week I only had those two matched up in 3, which was a last second addition to my GPP plays for the week.

Looks like it's likely the most stacked combo of the week from what I'm seeing, so you're probably better off bucking the trend.

Just too bad I didn't have it widely used in cash games. It would have likely locked in a decent week, barring any major disaster.
Yeah I think having Ryan and Julio combo would defintely lock in a good week in cash games unless the rest of the lineup flopped.

As for bucking the trend in GPP, whether I'm better off depends on whether my two combos can come close.

River/Allen...maybe? Cousins/Garcon...probably not
I like my earlier combo of Cassel/Patterson against a woeful Saints secondary in agame the Vikings will likely throw the football 55-60 times playing catch-up.

 
Last week in this thread, some of you requested an early, Vegas-based analysis of the games for the week; I obliged that request and you can find it here:

http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/article.php?article=14johnlee_TnP_Week3_VegasValue

This should help DFS players to focus on games with the highest scoring potential, as well as negating those with little value; the key is to build a core of players around which you will build rosters later in the week. Of course, it is still early in the week, so things are subject to change, but this is how I start every week. If you have questions, LMK.
Thanks, that was very helpful. No longer have to create that manually anymore.

 
Appears Charles is going to force me to change up my lineups. With it looking like he will be a game time decision and being its a late start I will likely have to move off of K Davis.

 
Anyone else considering rolling out Carrier at TE as a very cheap option. Not looking at him so much for the 1 PM start contest but the later starting contests where the options at TE are more limited.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What time do people think is best to look for overlays? Last Sunday I found several from about 12:30 on. Tried a 1/2 hour out on Thursday and everything filled within 5 minutes. Even 5 minutes to kickoff, stuff filled. Maybe I just got lucky last week?

 
What time do people think is best to look for overlays? Last Sunday I found several from about 12:30 on. Tried a 1/2 hour out on Thursday and everything filled within 5 minutes. Even 5 minutes to kickoff, stuff filled. Maybe I just got lucky last week?
I think the only reason last week worked was because of the site issues. They seem to have it down to a science now.

 
Not knowing the Jamaal Charles/ Knile Davis situation is a pain in the butt this week. I love Davis if Charles sits, but there is no "one for one" swap I like if I have to change him out last minute. I had to go in and change several players in each Thursday lineup individually after Charles practiced.

Anybody like pairing Cousins with Alfred Morris for 50/50s and H2H?

 
What is everyone thinking about the 3 cheap backs on fanduel. Will they be in your cash lineups?

Jeremy hill 4900-got 15 carries last week and made the best out of them should be getting mop up duty again this week

Khiry 4700-risky play for cash games cause you never know what the saints have planned in the back field. If he gets closer duties he should be great.

Bradshaw 5200-Jacksonville d is terrible. Should get carries. Biggest worry is he has scored the majority of his points of receiving. If the Colts are winning by a ton he might not get very many receptions.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is everyone thinking about the 3 cheap backs on fanduel. Will they be in your cash lineups?

Jeremy hill 4900-got 15 carries last week and made the best out of them should be getting mop up duty again this week

Khiry 4700-risky play for cash games cause you never know what the saints have planned in the back field. If he gets closer duties he should be great.

Bradshaw 5200-Jacksonville d is terrible. Should get carries. Biggest worry is he has scored the majority of his points of receiving. If the Colts are winning by a ton he might not get very many receptions.
I'm all over Khiry and Bradshaw. Don't trust Hill IMO
 
Hate to hijack thread, but where can I find that $11 50/50 Football guys contest? I entered first 2 weeks, can't seem to find it this week.

 
Hate to hijack thread, but where can I find that $11 50/50 Football guys contest? I entered first 2 weeks, can't seem to find it this week.
If you're a subscriber, the link is at the top of the daily emails. If not, I think the original link to week 1 points to the current week.

 
What is everyone thinking about the 3 cheap backs on fanduel. Will they be in your cash lineups?

Jeremy hill 4900-got 15 carries last week and made the best out of them should be getting mop up duty again this week

Khiry 4700-risky play for cash games cause you never know what the saints have planned in the back field. If he gets closer duties he should be great.

Bradshaw 5200-Jacksonville d is terrible. Should get carries. Biggest worry is he has scored the majority of his points of receiving. If the Colts are winning by a ton he might not get very many receptions.
I am all over Bradshaw. He's the better back there. I think Indy eviscerates Jax after their tough start.

So that means you might want to steer clear.

 
With all of the injuries last week, I went a little over the top diversifying in every way possible this week. Playing in a good mix of 1pm, Sunday, and regular games with:

Stafford

Rodgers

Wilson

Brees

Manning

Brees

Khiry

Gio

Sproles

PThomas

Jennings

Murray

Bradshaw

Ridley

Vereen

McCoy

Jordy

Calvin

Wallace

Tate

Andre

Harvin

Hawk

Maclin

Hilton

Cooks

Donnell

Ertz

Graham

Paul

Right now divided up H2H = 30%, 50/50 and Doubles = 25%, Triples and 3-player = 25%, GPP = 20%, but will probably try to shift that a bit more to H2H and 50/50. Going to have the whole bankroll in play this week!

Does anyone have strong aversions to any of these listed players?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
With all of the injuries last week, I went a little over the top diversifying in every way possible this week. Playing in a good mix of 1pm, Sunday, and regular games with:

Stafford - strong play, especially at home

Rodgers - strong play, the Lions are under rated by people against the run

Wilson - Strong play IMO, I think the Bronco's keep it close and try to away the run

Brees - strong play, but scares me a little because of the blow out factor. The Saints are upset so they may run it up

Manning - I don't like this play, even if Denver wins there are better options that save you money. No way is he the top qb this week.

Brees - listed twice

Khiry - I like the play for GPP

Gio - strong play love him this week, I think Green will be more of a decoy

Sproles - not a bad play, but I feel like a lot of people are on him chasing points.

PThomas - I like this play too, I think he could have the Sproles game this week

Jennings - safe play good for h2h and 5050

Murray - love the play, he could be the number 1 back this week

Bradshaw - like him this week, but I hope he gets his early because he won't be out there late in a blowout

Ridley - like him more now that Vereen is hurting a bit

Vereen - opposite of above

McCoy - I like him this week, but would rather have Murray or Gio for cheaper

Jordy - love him this week, but it does feel like we are chasing points

Calvin - love him

Wallace - like him this week

Tate - I like him this week too

Andre - don't like him this week, just a gut feeling

Harvin - boom or bust for me, I think the Broncos focus on Lynch, but he is the next guy they try to take out of the game

Hawk - good for h2h or 5050

Maclin - gut feeling to avoid him, I could see Ertz, McCoy doing a lot of the scoring this week

Hilton - This one feels like a boom or bust. They could hit him on a deep score early, but the longer the game goes the less likely he is to get his. I see Indy running a lot at the end

Cooks - Boom or bust

Donnell - Safe play imo

Ertz - love him this week, I think he could get in the endzone more than once

Graham - How can you not love him, if you are talking about Jimmy

Paul - my only fear is that Cousins locked onto him too much last week and the Eagles will try to take it away

Right now divided up H2H = 30%, 50/50 and Doubles = 25%, Triples and 3-player = 25%, GPP = 20%, but will probably try to shift that a bit more to H2H and 50/50. Going to have the whole bankroll in play this week!

Does anyone have strong aversions to any of these listed players?
Just my advice, take it with a grain of salt I am not world beater

 
With all of the injuries last week, I went a little over the top diversifying in every way possible this week. Playing in a good mix of 1pm, Sunday, and regular games with:

Stafford - strong play, especially at home

Rodgers - strong play, the Lions are under rated by people against the run

Wilson - Strong play IMO, I think the Bronco's keep it close and try to away the run

Brees - strong play, but scares me a little because of the blow out factor. The Saints are upset so they may run it up

Manning - I don't like this play, even if Denver wins there are better options that save you money. No way is he the top qb this week.

Brees - listed twice

Khiry - I like the play for GPP

Gio - strong play love him this week, I think Green will be more of a decoy

Sproles - not a bad play, but I feel like a lot of people are on him chasing points.

PThomas - I like this play too, I think he could have the Sproles game this week

Jennings - safe play good for h2h and 5050

Murray - love the play, he could be the number 1 back this week

Bradshaw - like him this week, but I hope he gets his early because he won't be out there late in a blowout

Ridley - like him more now that Vereen is hurting a bit

Vereen - opposite of above

McCoy - I like him this week, but would rather have Murray or Gio for cheaper

Jordy - love him this week, but it does feel like we are chasing points

Calvin - love him

Wallace - like him this week

Tate - I like him this week too

Andre - don't like him this week, just a gut feeling

Harvin - boom or bust for me, I think the Broncos focus on Lynch, but he is the next guy they try to take out of the game

Hawk - good for h2h or 5050

Maclin - gut feeling to avoid him, I could see Ertz, McCoy doing a lot of the scoring this week

Hilton - This one feels like a boom or bust. They could hit him on a deep score early, but the longer the game goes the less likely he is to get his. I see Indy running a lot at the end

Cooks - Boom or bust

Donnell - Safe play imo

Ertz - love him this week, I think he could get in the endzone more than once

Graham - How can you not love him, if you are talking about Jimmy

Paul - my only fear is that Cousins locked onto him too much last week and the Eagles will try to take it away

Right now divided up H2H = 30%, 50/50 and Doubles = 25%, Triples and 3-player = 25%, GPP = 20%, but will probably try to shift that a bit more to H2H and 50/50. Going to have the whole bankroll in play this week!

Does anyone have strong aversions to any of these listed players?
Just my advice, take it with a grain of salt I am not world beater
Thanks for the comments.

Andre - I am on the fence with him, he's about 12th on the value chart, and seems like a safe high floor PPR play, like a bigger version of Edelman. Giants are so lousy overall and Hopkins has been the recipient the last two weeks of a kinda fluky TD. Evan SIlva's matchup column is pretty lukewarm about him tho. DRC isn't a shut down corner but can be pretty good.

Like him more as a Cash game, but if he gets a TD he'd be solid either way. I would like to reduce my allocation on him, but don't see a clear option. Keenan Allen has a solid matchup and could be 'due' but he's been really lousy the last two weeks and has a groin issue. There's Edelman with a high floor, and Fitz who is just a riskier play than Andre. Will probably offload some to Edelman and Fitz, since I am a little bit heavy on him from from Thursday and now 28% for Sunday.

Vereen - I much prefer Ridley but can't trust a patriots RB so its just a hedge. I'm about 20% on Ridley and 10% on Vereen. The matchup is solid and kind of a guessing game as to which RB will put up numbers (who knows, Bolden or White?)

Hilton - I don't really like this pick either except in GPP, and will probably offload that to Wallace, who is getting a ton of targets.

Sproles - agreed it feels like chasing points, but his price is still 6000 since they played the late game last week. Based on his game it should be 7000+. I like the Eagles to score a lot of points against Redskins.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a scale of 1 to Dodds, where does "I'm thinking of starting Derek Carr this week" rank? Seems like the Raiders could be throwing for 40 minutes.

Have liked him all week, and now Dodds has him as a top value pick so am seriously thinking about it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
On a scale of 1 to Dodds, where does "I'm thinking of starting Derek Carr this week" rank? Seems like the Raiders could be throwing for 40 minutes.

Have liked him all week, and now Dodds has him as a top value pick so am seriously thinking about it.
Maybe for a one-off tourney, but I'm not feeling it. Cassell last week (at home) - 36 pass attempts, 10 points. Now in Foxboro.... Carr would not cover his 6000 price at 10 points. I don't see how Carr hits his 15 point projection without multiple TDs, and that seems unlikely. There are so many stud QBs with solid matchups (Brees, Luck, Staford, Rodgers) this week.

 
A lot of Megatron, Stafford, Paul, Murray, and Sproles in my lineups this week. One or both of the GB/DET matchup has to yield good QB numbers, so I am gambling on Stafford at home.

Also, Nate Freese, who has been awful, seems like a good play at 4500, based on the Vegas O/U lines.

 
With all of the injuries last week, I went a little over the top diversifying in every way possible this week. Playing in a good mix of 1pm, Sunday, and regular games with:

Stafford

Rodgers

Wilson

Brees

Manning

Brees

Khiry

Gio

Sproles

PThomas

Jennings

Murray

Bradshaw

Ridley

Vereen

McCoy

Jordy

Calvin

Wallace

Tate

Andre

Harvin

Hawk

Maclin

Hilton

Cooks

Donnell

Ertz

Graham

Paul

Right now divided up H2H = 30%, 50/50 and Doubles = 25%, Triples and 3-player = 25%, GPP = 20%, but will probably try to shift that a bit more to H2H and 50/50. Going to have the whole bankroll in play this week!

Does anyone have strong aversions to any of these listed players?
Do you often put all your bank in play? I only put 25-33% in play. Honestly don't like this week as much as last but put about 33% in both weeks. Besides the QB you listed I like Cutler as well, will use him Brees and Wilson this week. I also like Kelce at TE this week as well as Thomas. Im avoiding the NE RBs except in GPP just don't trust how they will use them. Also sticking to GPP with Sproles mainly.
 
For those who might not have seen it....DraftKings is offering 25% reload bonus on up to $1000 until TOMORROW at 1 PM.

http://bit.ly/1v0MXw6

Keep in mind that the bonus is not immediately credited--it trickles at 4% (or something like that).

Best of luck to you all this weekend.

TnP

 
jandyt said:
Do you often put all your bank in play? I only put 25-33% in play. Honestly don't like this week as much as last but put about 33% in both weeks. Besides the QB you listed I like Cutler as well, will use him Brees and Wilson this week. I also like Kelce at TE this week as well as Thomas. Im avoiding the NE RBs except in GPP just don't trust how they will use them. Also sticking to GPP with Sproles mainly.
No, I was about 50% for week 1 and 2,

 
Figured out how to issue my own head-to-head challenges in DraftKings.

You volume veterans may scoff at that but I feel a sense of accomplishment in working that out.

Had one veteran ringer accept along with two beatable guys.

Actually happy about that... the ringer never seems to lose so I'll learn something from the lineup he beats me with. The education alone will be worth the $2.

Juggling separate lineups between my Thursday contests that have Julio & Rainey already locked in and my Sunday contests (where I went Lions-heavy).

Really pleased with my Thursday roster - it's extremely value-focused (nobody with a salary higher than Wilson at $6,800) but still seems to boast all-around home run potential.

Wilson at home, Olsen with the depleted Panther receiving options (likely no Cotchery or Avant), hedging on both Saints RBs (Thomas & Robinson) with the likely blowout against Minnesota, Wallace against a depleted Chiefs secondary, D. Thomas as a contrarian play against the Seahawks (a little leery but can't argue value getting that weapon at $6,600) and the Colts D against the Jags offensive line who can't seem to protect Henne.

May tinker a bit in the morning based on injury news if either Pierce or Vereen are ruled out which would make Forsett and Ridley very attractive.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
if the Detroit Green Bay game turns into a low scoring stinker, all my entries this week are pretty shot, lol.

 
if the Detroit Green Bay game turns into a low scoring stinker, all my entries this week are pretty shot, lol.
I think Calvin is pretty safe, unless he gets hurt. His last 4 games against the packers go like this. 6-10 101 1 TD. 10-13 118. 5-11 143 1 TD. 11-17 244 1 TD. Not a bad average.

And Jordy should be safe with the amount of targets he is receiving.

Im going with Rodgers in most lineups, who is only 6-7% owned surprisingly, they should have Bulaga back on the O-line which will make an incredible difference compared to having Sherrod. When he gets in its a nightmare.

Im a packers fan and another guy I fear is Joique Bell, Packers cannot tackle...I mean they had a bad D last year(and the year before) but their D is believe it or not looking worse this year. THERE WILL BE LOTS OF POINTS! Joique will be most consistent but you can take a flier on Bush for a possible big game in GPP.

Packers should win a shootout.

Also Eddie Lacy, who has not looked himself this year, may break out, I still wouldn't recommend using him in multiple entries but do try in at least one lineup

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My Shoot to get lucky Freeroll Team

Brees

McFadden

Chris Johnson

Watkins

Patterson

Cooks

Graham

Groskowski

Packers D

 
If Foster is out like the news is reporting then Blue at min. cost looks like real value which could open up expensive options at Wr/TE.

 
If Foster is out like the news is reporting then Blue at min. cost looks like real value which could open up expensive options at Wr/TE.
Yes, and keep in mind that everyone and their brother will be on Khiry Robinson at $4700. This is especially important in larger tournaments.

 
If Foster is out like the news is reporting then Blue at min. cost looks like real value which could open up expensive options at Wr/TE.
Also wondering if that might boost Andre Johnson's production a bit against a depleted Giant's secondary?

Considering Cook at TE vs Dallas, who may not have McClain go at Middle Linebacker. Walker put on a good show last week against them, but does the Rams QB vastly limit this possibility?

 
I'm hearing Keenan Allen is likely out today.

Have Foster and Allen in some of my Thursday lineups and I don't think either were even on the injury report when I plugged them in. :cry:

 
I'm hearing Keenan Allen is likely out today.

Have Foster and Allen in some of my Thursday lineups and I don't think either were even on the injury report when I plugged them in. :cry:
I loaded up on Rainey and Foster. Looking like a genius right about now :shrug:

 
All in on Cousins. Just added some Alfred Blue into the mix. Got Calvin Johnson and Jimmy Graham in 90%. My GPPs aren't much different than my cash games this week.

 
What happened to the Beta lineup on 'Upcoming games'?

Wow, them taking that away this morning hurts! It was so much easier to make changes if I had multiple LU's.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top